The "The Weather Changes More Often than the Thread Title" Complaint Thread

13233343537

Comments

  • TJohnTJohn Posts: 11,446

    My condolences, SilverGirl.

    I've lost 3 very close friends in the last 10 years or so, one to cancer, one to sepsis, and one to a heart attack.

    I miss them terribly, and think of them often, but I watched helplessly as my friend with cancer suffered through years of chemotherapy, wasting away until he was being fed through a tube at home by himself. I tried to help him as often as I could (and there were others that were helping him - he had many friends and a cousin that was cleaning and helping around the house), but I was still working full time and could only check in on him Friday nights and weekends. When he passed, it seemed merciful. No more suffering.

    Sadly, we are all mortal, and all we can do is love people while we still have them, mourn them when they're gone, and cherish the good memories of all the things that made us love them in the first place. 

    John

  • LeanaLeana Posts: 13,537

    SilverGirl said:

    complaint: Lost a friend to cancer this morning. She was one of the most amazing people I've ever met, one of those folks who is just the center of a Buttefly Effect of awesomeness. She's been battling stage 4 colon cancer for 8 years, and she never stopped fighting. All she wanted was more time to live and do amazing things and make a positive difference in more people's lives. 

    Death needs to stop taking the good people and start taking the jerks.

    non-complaint: Great sadness only grows where there is great love to nourish it... and I am so blessed to have known her. 

    Sorry for your loss. 

  • LeatherGryphonLeatherGryphon Posts: 12,499
    edited September 18

    NylonGirl said:

    LeatherGryphon said:

    Complaint:  Mini-adventure this morning was more than I expected. 

    I could handle the music and maybe even the conversation. But if that woman tried to walk off with my burrito, they would have to rebuild the part of the laundromat where the fight took place.

    I'd watched her in the Burger King for the last couple of years.  The men are always there regardless of which day I show up, and she would often show up too.  Sometimes there would be another woman, I believe the wife of one of the men, but not always.  Regardless, the intrusive woman was, despite her late '60s age, still rather attractive with obviously dyed long blond hair and attention paid to her makeup and nails, and trying too hard to get too close to the men's circle.  The men were all retired grizzled farmers, factory workers, and truck drivers, and looked "hard driven".  She had to be the center of attention but the men weren't biting.  Until eventually, with not enough fish in the sea, I became the fresh meat, despite my infrequent, sporadic appearances.  I had no idea who she was until she cornered me with the photos and I recognized her sister.  The men all treated her with respect but were obviously not interested in letting her too deep into their "club".  (I'm a people watcher.)  I was initially annoyed that she started cornering me, but listened politely for a few minutes until I recognized her sister, mentioned it, and was told bluntly, intimate perceived family details that I didn't want to hear about my friend.  Then the second time we interacted, she stole my burrito (clumsy attempt at humor) and SMIRKED.  Warning:  Do NOT smirk at me!!!!angry  It was immediately at that point that I knew I wanted to avoid this person at all costs.  Which unfortunately became more difficult, because now that she knew I lived next door to her 98 year old mother, our paths crossed a couple of more times, near my home.  But I was able to quickly disengage from those situation.  A few weeks later, when her desperation for attention had risen and she waltzes into BK blasting music, and later rattling the windows with it, I couldn't remain divorced from the situation.  The men would not have said anything, they're too entangled with her.  I was the "annoyed general public" (despite being the only other person in the dining area) and had the choice of complaining to the staff (who would never have confronted a customer from their desperate, failing business) or saying something.  I think my choice of simply pointing out where she wasn't was enough.  And the timid indications of agreement from the men said I was wasn't out of line.  I probably took the air out of her superiority balloon and did what others had been wishing they had the courage to do.

    For me it was the smirk that turned me against her on only the 2nd time dealing with her.  Do not smirk, it reveals so much about your inner being.enlightened 

    Post edited by LeatherGryphon on
  • SilverGirlSilverGirl Posts: 3,933

    Thanks for the condolances, all. They're appreciated.

  • NylonGirlNylonGirl Posts: 2,398

    I always find conversations about death of a loved one to be difficult. Because I feel like nothing I say can make the situation better. So that means I can only make it worse. I've had a friend or two who may have felt disappointed in me because I didn’t show up or didn’t say anything. But what can I say?

    The first time I experienced such a loss personally was when I lost my oldest aunt. And I wasn’t used to problems that cannot be fixed. It was unimaginable stress.

    The second time this happened to me was when we lost my uncle. And we didn’t want to lose him. But when we did, I felt like a great pressure was gone. Because we had spent all that time worrying about him dying. And now we were no longer worried about that. It felt horrible, but in a different way.

    I got a call from a man some hours ago. He had previously asked me if he was more like a father figure to me, or an older brother, or just a crazy old white man. I told him I don’t see why he can’t be all three. But we were talking about things related to the Christian faith. And he was talking about how it is sometimes troubling to experience the occasional feelings that death might be an end, with nothing after. I told him I was taught that this faith was necessary. And I concluded, if we were given some proof that there is a reward, we would find it difficut to do anything just because it’s right, because we could never separate what’s right from the reward. And there are often times when we try to be good and it seems like there is no reward. And he said to me, maybe that’s why people, who have passed on, don’t communicate with us. Because we’re better off not knowing.

    This is a good example of why I shouldn’t speak when somebody has lost a loved one.

  • LeatherGryphonLeatherGryphon Posts: 12,499
    edited September 19

    Who knew?:  There's a word for a gathering of old men in a restaurant, chillin'  They're called a "ROMEO Club"  Retired Old Men Eating Out.  It's apparently a phenomenon!  Wikipedia knows.surprise

     

    Major Event:  Today's the day!  60th high school runion.  Yay!  BFF from NYC is in town and will pick me up at 2:00 for the start of the day's happenings.  2:30 is a tour of our old high school by a member of our class who is now a member of the school board.  I've only seen the school from the outside since 1966, but it has grown to at least double its size when we were there!  I'm curious to see what's inside.  Do blackboards still exist?  Did they ever replace the hard wooden seats in the auditorium?  Enquiring people want to know.smiley  Then at 5:00 is cocktail hour, and at 6:00 is the dinner at a local upscale steak house.  We had about 150 in the class in '66, but I don't expect more than 50 for the dinner, and a long list of departed & otherwise absent.  I guess, for me, this must be more than a mini-adventure because I dug out my dress pants (though they are a little big for me), and a nice crisp ironed shirt.  Dress code is "casual" but I feel that jeans and polo shirt would be a bit under dressed.  But jacket & tie (despite owning them) would chafe my seasoned attitude toward formalism.devil  I warned my BFF that these days, he might have to pour me back into the car after both the cocktail hour and a dinner drink.  One drink a month is about all I can handle these days.frown  Which has done wonders for keeping dust from gathering under the spot in my pantry for the vodka bottle, and last bottle of champagne that I bought for a special occasion a few years ago.  Usually, when I go out I'll get a margarita if they have a decent one(Olive Gardenyes), or a vodka tonic, but two drinks in one day make an interesting evening, and miserable morning.sad  And good thing I'm not driving.smiley

    Post edited by LeatherGryphon on
  • Regarding condolences:  Some people are comforters, others are just awkward. I understand, but am among the awkward group.   Personally, I burned out my grief muscles during the year after my Max died.  I have little left to share.  Just know that awkwardness does not mean apathy.  Again, condolences.

  • SilverGirlSilverGirl Posts: 3,933

    Heh... well, for for anyone who feels awkward, rest assured that you cannot possibly get worse than the cashier at the grocery store who decided that the best thing she could say after my first kid didn't make it to the finish line was to assure me that "Babies don't die in the third trimester. We have science to prevent that."

    People can hate on self check-outs all they want, at least they don't make comments like that.

    (I'm pretty sure her brain just glitched that "oh your baby must be coming any day now!" didn't get the response she was expecting, and that was what fell out. So in retrospect I feel bad for her, and it makes for a "good" dark humor story... although at the moment I was not feeling particularly graceful about it. The poor guy behind me probably desparately wished he'd picked a different lane.)

  • TorquinoxTorquinox Posts: 4,921

    I use self-checkouts sometimes, but I'm not a store employee and don't want to be one. So, when I visit the checkout clerk, we exchange pleasantries, not opinions on any actual topic. Getting beyond-the-pale comments like that might change my mind, though. 

  • NylonGirlNylonGirl Posts: 2,398

    The I Shouldn’t Do Short Stories Complaint Thread

    Story Number 1: I was sitting with a friend as she had told me she lost her sister a few days earlier. And she told me it was her sister’s birthday. I automatically said, “Happy Birthday”.

    Story Number 2: My father was a minister at a Baptist church. At his funeral, my mother stood at the microphone in front of the people and said, “we never got married. I was his girlfriend. There is the child we had together”. And she pointed at me.

    I suppose I’d better get started mowing the lawn.

  • SilverGirlSilverGirl Posts: 3,933

    NylonGirl said:

    The I Shouldn’t Do Short Stories Complaint Thread

    Story Number 1: I was sitting with a friend as she had told me she lost her sister a few days earlier. And she told me it was her sister’s birthday. I automatically said, “Happy Birthday”.

    Story Number 2: My father was a minister at a Baptist church. At his funeral, my mother stood at the microphone in front of the people and said, “we never got married. I was his girlfriend. There is the child we had together”. And she pointed at me.

    I suppose I’d better get started mowing the lawn.

    I think the absolute best "I did an awkward" line I ran into was from a found-family member who had inadvertantly stuck her foot in it and recovered with "So, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play??"

    Something about her delivery... I laughed so hard I almost fell off my chair.

  • SilverGirlSilverGirl Posts: 3,933

    Torquinox said:

    I use self-checkouts sometimes, but I'm not a store employee and don't want to be one. So, when I visit the checkout clerk, we exchange pleasantries, not opinions on any actual topic. Getting beyond-the-pale comments like that might change my mind, though. 

    I don't know if maybe it's a Midwest thing and people in other places have more restraint... but around here cahsiers feel compelled to have a full conversation. The number of times I've gotten religion dumped on my head... or when Teen Kiddo was a kid, trying to guilt/shame them into cutting all their hair off and donating it to Locks of Love (the first time they cut it was a couple years ago, so for a good chunk of their life it was knee-length)... (I'd get it too, but not as often).

    And on top of it, the ones coughing right into their hand and then grabbing the next grocery without using any hand sanitizer in between...

    Just... no. 

    I do entirely agree with the point about providing free labor for the store, though. IMHO they should have a 10% discount for using the self-serve registers or something. Because I don't want to be a store employee either... I just want to deal with the store employees even less. 

  • NylonGirlNylonGirl Posts: 2,398

    The My Shoes Got There Before I Did Complaint Thread

    So I don’t know about shoes that teleport themselves or whatever. But on Star Trek, the teleportation mechanism seems to work by breaking the object down into its smallest possible pieces. Perhaps molecules or atoms. And those particles are transported to the new location where they are put back together. I don’t know why they think it’s better to split the object into a billion pieces and send them individually rather than send them all as one piece.

    Maybe their particular means of teleportation requires a tremendous amount of energy to transport even a very small thing. So it would be necessary to transport one piece at a time.

    Apparently, if something goes wrong with the teleportation, it is possible to store all of the pieces of the object in the computer system until it’s safe to resume teleportation. And this leaves the stored object in fine condition as long as the system has power, even if it’s a complex living organism. There was something like that on an old TV show called Captain Power and the Soldiers of the Future. The bad guys had machines that had a way of storing a human in some digital form inside the machine, which sometimes was the end of the human. And I’m pretty sure this was meant to be a show for children. I mean, they were selling toys that could respond to input from the TV show.

    Now people seem to have trouble reconciling consciousness with science. Like, you’re pretty sure it’s in there but you have no idea how it’s working or how to move it around or anything. So one would have to wonder what happens to that consciousness if you break down the entire structure containing it.

    Like, if you disintegrate the human for teleportation purposes, then have you killed the person? And when you put the person back together, does the consciousness return to the person? How does the out of body experience work if you move the body fairly far away? Or does a whole new consciousness enter that person, leaving the old consciousness lost? Like you've destroyed one life and created another very similar one. Or do we have a wacky scenario in which only one person is conscious and the rest of us are all complex automatons, which means the teleported automaton is just a machine that has been disassembled and put back together.

    I don’t care for the process personally. I’d get more use out of the holodeck.

    Now there also seems to be this theory about “wormholes”. Apparently, the belief is that time and space works kind of like a physical area… like, you can take the long road from one place to another but you can also take a shortcut or move backwards. And this is done by opening some kind of portal. I feel like the Star Trek transporter and the wormhole are both a bit much. I still want the holodeck. I’d settle for a good VR headset.

  • LeatherGryphonLeatherGryphon Posts: 12,499
    edited September 20

    60th High School Reunion Report:  Long story:  High school tour was very interesting.  Ugly parts of the building addition built in the late '50s in the ugly style of aluminum and glass panelling had been competely torn down and rebuilt larger in properly styled brick to sort of match the orginal building from the late '30s.  Nice tech labs, nice wood shop, sawdust free via built-in vacuum system on each piece of equipment, senior class size now half the size ours was (75 vs 142), building now houses grades 6 through 12 (used to be 7 through 12).  "Library" is now a "Media Room", they still have both orchesta and band, and a couple of chorus groups, auditorium refubrished and now has plush seats instead of hard wood fold-down seats, classrooms have whiteboards and digital boards, original '30s picturesque entrance stairs, long abandoned, has been rebuilt with a modern grand entrance with stairs and ramps.  Gym was the same but the climbing ropes and gymnastic equipment eliminated due to safety issues.  Football field and track is now artificial turf, and it's been named for the gym teacher from our era.  I approve of all except the removal of the gymnastics equipment (parallel bars, pommel horse, spring board, etc.) that was the only thing I actually liked about gym class.

    The reunion dinner was wonderful, fun and went without problems.  Out of 142 graduating, 44 had died, about 20 attended the school tour, and 36 people attended attended the dinner.  My steak was perfect, salad was perfect, dessert was meh.  Good conversations.  So many unrecognizable people though, age hits some harder than others.  I did run into the sister of my BK annoying person, I congratulated her on her mother's 98th birthday, and she said something that indicated that she had already heard about the incident in BK.  I said, "Oh, you know already?", and the conversation proceeded from there and I told the story in 4 part harmony, and everybody had a good time.  So, that's off my mind now.  It was a good day and night.

    Short story:  TLDR:  AOK!

    Post edited by LeatherGryphon on
  • kyoto kidkyoto kid Posts: 42,434
    edited September 20

    ...lots of catching up on the forums today. More boring RL and "concerned ctiizen stuff for the most part, with a few pleasant distractions here and there to help maintain a grip on sanity.

    ____________________ 

    First and foremost, @SilverGirl:  condolences and many for the loss of your freind yeah one of htose "awkwared" types here

    ____________________

    @LeatherGryphon

    enjoyed the story about the Burger King "ROMEO Club" and "restaurant pest".  Being retired myself (and member of our local "retired old men smoking cigars club" that meets twice a week) I only rarely encounter someone like that woman as it is too expensive these days dine out and I avoid fast food joints for dietary reasons,  When it does happen it's usually while riding the bus or tram and there I am stuck, a captive audience until my stop comes up.

    Hoping you have a good time at your 60th reunion.

    ____________________

    Teleportation is not without its risks as André Delambre discovered in the 1958 sci-fi classic The Fly

    As to the transporter in Star Trek, the concept was conceived primarily as a means to save production time and costs as it would have been more expensive to build additional sets/props and film shuttle landing and tale off scenes. Proves that necessity is the mother of invention as the transporter  (and replicator based off of it) has become an iconic element of the Star Trek universe.

    Post edited by kyoto kid on
  • Complaint: My MS flare or relapse or whatever got worse, so I can't walk without a walker now. My bedroom is upstairs, so it was a pain getting up here and I required help. I was a little better today, but I didn't feel like I could make it to the MRI clinic. I ended up canceling. I left a message asking to reschedule to a location closer to my house and in a hospital, so there will be nurses if I need assistance. The clinic just had technicians and can't assist you.

    Complaint: We have a dead tree in the backyard, and it's starting to drop limbs. So now I get to figure out how to pay to take that down. Because I needed another expense.

    Non-complaint: Being disabled and on a fixed income, I might qualify for emergency assistance to take down the tree. Maybe. Seems like I have a bunch of phone calls to make on Monday to try and find out.

  • TorquinoxTorquinox Posts: 4,921
    edited September 20

    NylonGirl said:

    The My Shoes Got There Before I Did Complaint Thread

    So I don’t know about shoes that teleport themselves or whatever. But on Star Trek, the teleportation mechanism seems to work by breaking the object down into its smallest possible pieces. Perhaps molecules or atoms. And those particles are transported to the new location where they are put back together. I don’t know why they think it’s better to split the object into a billion pieces and send them individually rather than send them all as one piece.

    Maybe their particular means of teleportation requires a tremendous amount of energy to transport even a very small thing. So it would be necessary to transport one piece at a time.

    Apparently, if something goes wrong with the teleportation, it is possible to store all of the pieces of the object in the computer system until it’s safe to resume teleportation. And this leaves the stored object in fine condition as long as the system has power, even if it’s a complex living organism. There was something like that on an old TV show called Captain Power and the Soldiers of the Future. The bad guys had machines that had a way of storing a human in some digital form inside the machine, which sometimes was the end of the human. And I’m pretty sure this was meant to be a show for children. I mean, they were selling toys that could respond to input from the TV show.

    Now people seem to have trouble reconciling consciousness with science. Like, you’re pretty sure it’s in there but you have no idea how it’s working or how to move it around or anything. So one would have to wonder what happens to that consciousness if you break down the entire structure containing it.

    Like, if you disintegrate the human for teleportation purposes, then have you killed the person? And when you put the person back together, does the consciousness return to the person? How does the out of body experience work if you move the body fairly far away? Or does a whole new consciousness enter that person, leaving the old consciousness lost? Like you've destroyed one life and created another very similar one. Or do we have a wacky scenario in which only one person is conscious and the rest of us are all complex automatons, which means the teleported automaton is just a machine that has been disassembled and put back together.

    I don’t care for the process personally. I’d get more use out of the holodeck.

    Now there also seems to be this theory about “wormholes”. Apparently, the belief is that time and space works kind of like a physical area… like, you can take the long road from one place to another but you can also take a shortcut or move backwards. And this is done by opening some kind of portal. I feel like the Star Trek transporter and the wormhole are both a bit much. I still want the holodeck. I’d settle for a good VR headset.

    Star Trek events indicate that the person is disintegrated, existing as matter particles and data in the transport buffer and a copy of the person appears on the other end. The original, apparently no longer exists. Faulty re-integration can leave the copy altered or dying/dead on arrival. There's the episode where Kirk & Co reintegrate as old people with accelerated aging. They go through the transporter again and get re-integrated using the data from before the mishap. Magically, they're fine after that.

     

    The transporter can sometimes produce multiple copies. There's the ToS episode where we get two Kirks (one lacks willpower the other lacks reason/empathy). They get re-integrated back into a single Kirk. TNG says there are actually two Will Rykers due to a transporter accident before TNG began. The second is discovered by the Enterprise (Small universe!) in a ship Ryker served on that was used for an illegal cloaking device experiment. The duplicate decides to be Thomas and then goes rogue in DS9.

     

    Consciousness is apparently unaffected by the process. IIRC in Wrath of Khan, Kirk & Co have a conversation while being transported. Movie magic! Being transported apparently feels weird, McCoy doesn't like having his molecules scrambled. I would guess breaking the body into particles encased in an energy beam solves acceleration problems and maybe the packet of matter moves through what is effectively a wormhole. IDK. There's a lot that's handwaved away because transporters in ST are a mcguffin to simplify going from place to place. They do use a lot of energy, as they don't work when the ship's power is reduced.. Ironically, the one ToS episode that features a shuttlecraft ends with Spock & Co being rescued from certain death using the transporter. Aside from demonstrating I probably watched too much Star Trek, I don't know if this helps at all.

    Post edited by Torquinox on
  • NylonGirlNylonGirl Posts: 2,398
    Well it doesn't hurt.
  • SilverGirlSilverGirl Posts: 3,933

    Going through my photos and thought I would share my bunny friend with you all.

    "...got apples?"

     

    (...forgive the haze; it was super humid out that day and the lens fogged up within seconds of wiping it off.)

    DSC_4198.JPG
    4608 x 3072 - 7M
    DSC_4199.JPG
    4608 x 3072 - 7M
    DSC_4200.JPG
    4608 x 3072 - 8M
  • TJohnTJohn Posts: 11,446

    On Star Trek and transporters:

    I seem to recall an episode with a transporter failure that was described by a character as something like, "What was transported didn't live very long."

    Another memory I have is a Next Generation episode where they found Scotty stored in a transporter buffer and successfully removed by Geordie who was a big fan. Until Scotty became painfully aware he was a man out of his own time, and obsolete as a engineer.

    And one in of the most recent series, the ships Dr. has his daughter stored in the buffer in the transporter in sickbay until he can find a cure for her fatal illness.

     

  • TorquinoxTorquinox Posts: 4,921
    edited September 20

    That's right! I forgot about Mr Scott being storeed that way! I never had the Paramount channel and haven't seen much of the recent series.

    Post edited by Torquinox on
  • TJohnTJohn Posts: 11,446

    @SilverGirl: Cute apple bunny.

    I had a wild bunny that came to greet me for several days when I got home from work, and would actually come surprisingly close when I spoke to him. No apples or anything. 

    I missed when he quit coming, wishing him well and getting back to normal bunny business. smiley

     

  • Damned eye infection angry That's a day of double bubble HGV driving money I'm down this week. Can't drive a 44t artic with one eye like a waterfall.....

  • memcneil70memcneil70 Posts: 6,126

    Love the bunny pictures @SilverGirl.

    LeatherGryphon so glad you had a wonderful day and a great meal.

    Life: Yesterday I stripped the bed, washed all the bed linens, sheets, blankets, quilt, and throws. This morning Charlie decided to pig out on his breakfast and after he was groomed, and I had just settled down at my computer, he started the infamous hacking up. He managed to nail a pillow case, four throws, cover sheet and quilt. He knows he totally messed up and has apologized and is now asleep against the rest of the pillows. Simon, who was asleep when all this went down, flashed out of the bedroom and hasn't returned.

    So, more laundry today. Joy. 

    One positive note, my iPad is finally charging. Thanks to the last iOS 26 update, it messed up the charging completely. Even upgrading to iOS27 which was waiting to go live didn't help. So I went and bought one of the Apple power adapters and a new cord. Had to reboot again but it is now stable and keeping a charge. (Knocks on wood.)

     

  • TorquinoxTorquinox Posts: 4,921

    garrett_3d said:

    Damned eye infection angry That's a day of double bubble HGV driving money I'm down this week. Can't drive a 44t artic with one eye like a waterfall.....

    Speedy recovery to you! 

  • kyoto kidkyoto kid Posts: 42,434

    TJohn said:

    On Star Trek and transporters:

    I seem to recall an episode with a transporter failure that was described by a character as something like, "What was transported didn't live very long."

    Another memory I have is a Next Generation episode where they found Scotty stored in a transporter buffer and successfully removed by Geordie who was a big fan. Until Scotty became painfully aware he was a man out of his own time, and obsolete as a engineer.

    And one in of the most recent series, the ships Dr. has his daughter stored in the buffer in the transporter in sickbay until he can find a cure for her fatal illness.

     

    ,,.the "didn't live long" scene was from the first theatrical film Star Trek - the motion Picture. Love Robert Wise as a director (he also directed the original The  Day the Earth Stood Still) but those jumpsuit uniforms reminded me of children's "onsies".  The best uniforms were the ones in The Wrath of Khan and subsequent films with the TOS crew.

    .The Scotty episode was titled "Relics"

  • It's been a long time since I watched any Star Trek TOS, but surely there were severeal episodes in which shuttles were seen on the ground if not in flight?

  • LeatherGryphonLeatherGryphon Posts: 12,499
    edited September 20

    Yes, there were a few.  The old, plywood, flying shoebox shuttles.  A particularly noteable episode was, I think, "The Gallelio II" where Spock and a few others were stranded on a planet of giants who threw boulders down on the grounded shuttle (sounds like a Lost In Space Episode).  The shuttle was geniously fixed and able to take off, but forced to use excess fuel and unable to attain orbit.  The radio was inoperative.  Everybody thought they were going to have to use up the rest of the fuel to land safely, but without fuel and radio, unable to contact the Enterprise and they'e all die by starvation or giants, but at the last moment Spock took a gamble (*shock*) and while still in sub-orbit, exhausted all the remaining fuel reasoning that the massive flare of energy would be noted by the Enterprise and they'd be found.  It was.  They were.  And they were rescued.  End of story.  Wheee...

    Galileo_II.jpg
    1024 x 768 - 111K
    Post edited by LeatherGryphon on
  • kyoto kidkyoto kid Posts: 42,434
    edited September 20

    ..,however, use of shuttles was no where as frequent for "planet side" episodes as the transporter was.

    ____________________

    I remember that Lost in Space episode where a giant Cyclops was throwing big rocks at the Space Family Robinson who were in the Chariot.rover.

    The name of that Star Trek episode with the shuttle was The Galileo 7.

    uh oh my geekness is showing again.

    Post edited by kyoto kid on
  • TorquinoxTorquinox Posts: 4,921
    edited September 20

    The only other TOS episode I remember with shuttles was "The Doomsday Machine." Commodore Decker committed suicide in one in an attempt to stop the machine, Kirk repeats the effort with intent to survive using what's left of the Constitution. In keeping with the local theme of transporter use, the Enterprise is having problems and only manages to beam Kirk out at the last second. Not sayin; there weren't others cheeky

    Post edited by Torquinox on
Sign In or Register to comment.