barbult's Discursion Thread

1202122232426»

Comments

  • cosmosmcosmosm Posts: 93

    WendyLuvsCatz said:

    ... but given the size of the one in the original render, I am now worried who's skin that was surprise

     

    Maybe someone dismantled a stuffed toy lion (or just didn't finish making one) 

  • WendyLuvsCatzWendyLuvsCatz Posts: 41,381

    cosmosm said:

    WendyLuvsCatz said:

    ... but given the size of the one in the original render, I am now worried who's skin that was surprise

     

    Maybe someone dismantled a stuffed toy lion (or just didn't finish making one) 

    sounds better than my thoughts cheeky no kitties harmed

  • barbultbarbult Posts: 27,342
    edited August 9
    cosmosm said:

    WendyLuvsCatz said:

    ... but given the size of the one in the original render, I am now worried who's skin that was surprise

     

    Maybe someone dismantled a stuffed toy lion (or just didn't finish making one) 

    That is a very plausible explanation. When my nieces were infants, I sewed them stuffed monkeys. The monkey was named Fred, for reasons I don't remember. When I had it sewn, but not stuffed yet, my husband saw it flat on my sewing table and called it a Fred skin rug.
    Post edited by barbult on
  • barbultbarbult Posts: 27,342
    edited 12:05AM

    Here is an old worn out Fred on the left and a new Fred, for the next kid, on the right.

    The pattern came from the Woman's Day magazine September 1, 1978.

    DSC00243 Fred the Monkey.JPG
    3648 x 2736 - 4M
    Post edited by barbult at
  • Richard HaseltineRichard Haseltine Posts: 111,101

    Much loved, evidently (or much experimented on, depending)

  • 3DIO3DIO Posts: 533

    WendyLuvsCatz said:

    sounds better than my thoughts cheeky no kitties harmed

     See, all that worry for nothing, when all along it was just Right Said Fred being too sexy for his skin as well as his shirt!

     

Sign In or Register to comment.