New DS Filament Render Engine

1151618202130

Comments

  • CerragCerrag Posts: 242

    After reading thru the forum, it seems most of us are trying to use Filament in the way we *wish it would work instead of maybe what it was intended for, as a fast preview renderer for scene setup or animations.  After playing with it and seeing it's limitations, that was my conclusion anyway.  I may still use it for a final render here and there when I know I can Photoshop it to death but I'm going to stop trying to make it do things that just aren't feasible to do. At least right now.  I *love it tho for quick scene composition;  absolutley love it for that so it's still a win for me!

  • dawnbladedawnblade Posts: 1,723

    @chrom if you're talking about the atmosphere, or the fire, you're probably only going to need a single prop. The atmosphere is one large grid that uses transparency maps for falloff. You just load an appropriate size into the scene and it just works. The fire is similar, just load a fire prop that you like and it's pre-lit.

    @KindredArts Any suggestions on getting Iray Distance Fog/Mist to work with Filament? I already have them.

  • I think one needs to be aware of and work around limitations like anything in real life

    expecting everything to work out of the box in doing creative stuff is quite absurd when you consider filmmakers and artists don't 

    they all cheat they have lighting rigs, reflective umbrellas, crop stuff out etc

    software is dumb the user has to make choices

  • gniiialgniiial Posts: 204
    edited November 2020

    It's not the efford we have to put in it... It's the workflow that breaks and breakes and breakes again and is way to complicated since day one i found DAZ and this was a few years ago. 
    You also should "say" what you are using and what you've maybe discovered to make it better. Because this is the way to give people the "power" to actually do something with this program. Else it is just showing off and nothing more. And this is my point. Daz could be more, could be faster, could be right from the start a "setup the scene and render crazy nice images..." But it still (after years) just isn't! 
    And without in depth tutorials, sharing and a steep learning curve, it's just trail and error and this is frustrating... Adding another render engine means just more of that frustrating learning by figuring it out in days or weeks.In comparison, I could also name Photoshop, as an example of how incredibly extremely important the user is. Especially the sharing of ideas, brushes, new filters, plugins and so on was exactly the same like with Blender, even it wasn't free.

    BTW, i don't want to make Daz a bad thing, i just want to point out where everything is going and what Daz maybe could improve "first" before adding more things that are half done...
    My Scene: Connor finds... (setup around 30-60 minutes)

    GM8 Standart...
    Skin/Character: Owen 8
    Eyebrows: Old SHB self created (Parameters: Render Line Tesslation Sides 4, Preview PR Hairs ON, Visible ON, Visible in Render ON, Visible in Viewport ON)
    *NOTE: Render Line Tesslation Sides NUMBER seems to thicken the hair, without changing it (you may try it for other hairs that look "thin"?!)
    Beard: Old SHB self created (Parameters: Render Line Tesslation Sides 2, Preview PR Hairs ON, Visible ON, Visible in Render ON, Visible in Viewport ON)
    *NOTE: Render Line Tesslation Sides NUMBER seems to thicken the hair 
    (don't work here, looks awful... the "old" shader seem to break if i change the RLTS down/up but it looks "right and nice" just when i load it without a change)
    Clothing: Alt Style Outfit
    Pose: Z CHA 12 Genesis 8 Male (Hands and Arms modified) 
    Scene Environment: Standart DAZ Alchemy Chasm
    Scene environment options Standart: Environment Intensity 0.0025 (night, dark mood / around 0.050 is midday i'd say, 0.025 evening/moonshine)
    Light #1: Distant Light in front, over his head, 5 meters away, slight rotated to the sky 
    - Ilumination: ON, Color: 255, 255, 226, Intensity: 25%, Photometric Mode: ON,  Luminous Flux (Lumen) 1500, Temperature 1500
    Light #2: SpotLight from behind right, in his neck, 5 meters away, straight
    - Ilumination: ON, Color: 255, 131, 93, Intensity: 125%, Photometric Mode: ON, Everything else standart.  Luminous Flux (Lumen) 25000, Temperature 1500

    4 Planes, with some quick and dirty shader settings and a marble texture on it. Placed one after the other, rotated to simulate some mist looking suroundings
    2 more lights at his feet, lighting the "mist" a little more up... (planes had metallicity around 0.70)

    Rendered with the Filament Viewport render on 16:9, 1920x1080

    Sceene without the character (because it's a payed one) ready to render to download... here
    Just load Alchemy Chasm, load a model with a proper skin and pose it on the spot... (..if you like it ^^)
    Textures are free textures from Polygon... therefor credits and my gratitute to Andrew Price wink
    (...who shows you also the power of blender with photorealistic evee btw)

    Oh... and my first 3 renders where not saved... another nice experience (...even when i did it the manual way...) Maaaannnn... you know?! frown
    And i just realized, the ball i made was more transparent and glowy, before saving the scene. So this means something is off... because after loading it, it was strangely looking like a ball and the nice effect it had was lost in the nirvana... 

    connor_finds_02.png
    1920 x 1080 - 2M
    connor_finds_01.png
    1920 x 1080 - 3M
    in_iray.png
    1920 x 1080 - 804K
    Post edited by gniiial on
  • plasma_ringplasma_ring Posts: 1,020
    edited November 2020

    Hey guys, i thought i'd just throw my 2c in on the conversation here. As i've mentioned elsewhere on the forums, i threw my support behind this endeavor because i coach and train a lot of budding artists and PA's from developing countries where the purchase of high-end Nvidia cards is almost impossible. I wanted broke students to be able to pick this up as a hobby, even if their only available pc is a 10-year-old laptop that's being held together by duct tape. Lowering the bar of entry is good for daz. As it stands right now, you can pick up daz, grab a load of freebies and get started with rendering in filament without spending a dime. If you're lucky enough to be dual-wielding titans and overclocked i9's, then there's still plenty of goodies lined up for you. It's not replacing iray it's just an addition.

    Thank you for this. Most of my art circles are made up of people who use offbeat tools to make weird and unique experimental stuff and transformative works. Daz would be fantastic for that except for the thing where I have to explain not only asset purchasing (which can be mitigated with free community resources) but that you need a pretty good computer to get started. If DS were to take off in that subculture there'd be more people sharing resources, making tutorials, and joining the community. I want DS to be a tool people can use to try animation for the first time, or to make experimental games to share on itch.io or just to get used to 3D. In a lot of ways the look of Filament would be more comfortable than Iray because it looks like a video game from 1995, and many of those artists create work that references games they grew up with. 

    This is something I feel strongly about because if I hadn't ended up in the job I have now, about 90% of the software and hardware I use to make art would have been completely out of my reach. 

    Post edited by plasma_ring on
  • marblemarble Posts: 7,449

    Hey guys, i thought i'd just throw my 2c in on the conversation here. As i've mentioned elsewhere on the forums, i threw my support behind this endeavor because i coach and train a lot of budding artists and PA's from developing countries where the purchase of high-end Nvidia cards is almost impossible. I wanted broke students to be able to pick this up as a hobby, even if their only available pc is a 10-year-old laptop that's being held together by duct tape. Lowering the bar of entry is good for daz. As it stands right now, you can pick up daz, grab a load of freebies and get started with rendering in filament without spending a dime. If you're lucky enough to be dual-wielding titans and overclocked i9's, then there's still plenty of goodies lined up for you. It's not replacing iray it's just an addition.

    I'm also seeing a lot of comparisons to eevee and UE4, which i don't think is a fair comparison. Eevee and UE4's renderers along with Filament *can* look great if you put forth the effort, but none of them are going to do it for you. Whenever you see awesome quality work in eevee or UE4, or any other engine, i guarantee you that there was a seasoned visual effects artist that created it. We have Iray for people with hardware capable of using effectively, we have filament for those who don't have that luxury. Both of them will look terrible if you don't put forth adequate effort. Both will look great if you do.

    Early in the port process when FIlament was still crashing regularly and had no documentation, i made these -

    They're certainly not avengers level CG obviously, but if i told people they were made in Iray, i'm pretty sure they'd believe me. 

    I'm not saying this to cause a flamewar, - i too am looking forward to more high-tier goodies being introduced into daz. The wishlists being presented in this thread are valid, and i'd like to see improvements in a lot of areas too. I'd just like to get my point across that many people will benefit from this, and i hope it will breed a lot of new daz artists who would not have been able to use the software previously. It's the Artist, not the brush, make something awesome.

     heart

    Your renders are amazing but they are not the kind of thing I render - ever. You seem to be a master of the "epic" scene - all atmospheric effects and action but my renders are more mundane and personal. Human beings in close-up in a room or a street with a few props. So in my few experiments so far I have not been able to get the hair to look like hair rather than semi-transparent plastic, the skin to look like skin rather than a plastic doll or cloth with any level of translucency to look like cloth rather than almost fully transparent plastic. Moreover, I can't figure out how to use Photometric lights. I use spotlights a lot in IRay but if I move a spotlight in Filament more than a couple of feet from the figure's face, the drop-off is almost total. I have not been able to get HDRi images to work at all.

    A quick video about how to handle those issues would be much appreciated.

  • grinch2901grinch2901 Posts: 1,246
    edited November 2020

    I think Filament has its place but the materials are so different than Iray that you really can't set up a scene and get good renders out of both Filament and Iray. All the surfaces need to change, sometimes drastically.  Plus lighting. So far the best I've been able to get resembles my early 3Delight renders from 10 years ago, before the AoA lights and some better shaders made those start to look a lot better --- okay, I'll admit it, a LITTLE better - my composition still was what it was unfortunately.  Anyway lighting and materials - all the difference.  Who'd have thunk it?.  

    Now I could undoubtedly work on a scent for a good bit and adjust the lights and materials to look better in Filament but then it's a Filament only scene, no longer suitable for Iray. That's  not necessarily a bad thing depending on your needs. The speed is unreal  compared to Iray and if you animate I could see it becoming essential once the learning curve starts ascending.  I ony do still renders and since nothing I've gotten so far out if it is even close to looking as good as Iray for simple things like transmaps with all the surface lookingl like their made out of molded plastic I'll personally wait and see where it goes from here.

    Post edited by grinch2901 on
  • I'm absolutely blown away by Filament because hey, new free stuff to play with and I'll never say no to that. It's another spanner in the toolbox, and one that lets me render a scene in under 5 seconds. That's incredible by any measure. And I can see the same scene in the viewport as the final output, should I decide to keep with Filament as the render engine - I have that choice. Filament is one more option, and it's one that is only going to improve over time. You don't have to use it or even like it, but it's there should you want to use it (however you want to use it), and it's cost you nothing. 

    Is it perfect for every render and every scene? Absolutely not, but then neither is 3Delight or iray either. This is another option, and I'm very glad it exists. Thank you, Daz.

    All of the images below were rendered using Filament. Each took less than 3 seconds to render, and I could make all of these (and more) in the time it would have taken to render just one of them in 3Delight or iray. Maybe they'd look "better" in iray but n my ancient laptop if the choice is between "good  enough" in 3 seconds or 4+ hours for "better", I'll take good enough for all but the most precious of renders thanks. For those, I'll render in Filament first, adjust the lights then leave the iray version chugging overnight. Choice is a wonderful thing, don't you think?

    elf charge.jpg
    1280 x 1600 - 1000K
    last battle.jpg
    1280 x 1600 - 915K
    noirette.jpg
    1280 x 1600 - 882K
    raider resting.jpg
    1280 x 1600 - 1021K
  • MazhMazh Posts: 476
    edited November 2020

    Sorry, don't want to read the whole thread, anybody else having a (Filament) Environment + Tonemapper node in the scene which can't be removed/ deleted ?

    Post edited by Mazh on
  • PaintboxPaintbox Posts: 1,633
    Mazh said:

    Sorry, don't want to read the whole thread, anybody else having a (Filament) Environment + Tonemapper node in the scene which can't be removed/ deleted ?

    Thats the new way of displaying those render options, I wouldn't mind them too much. These are the same fields you had in your tabs of Render Settings before.

  • GalaxyGalaxy Posts: 562
    edited November 2020

    People are expecting more from Filament because Eevee and Unreal set the bar of realtime rendering too high.

    After DS 4.14 upgrade, Iray stopped working. Only CPU rendering without denoising feature is currently possible with this PC. Filament is really need to improve. Specially I like to know how to render hair better.

    Post edited by Galaxy on
  • Imago said:

    So... I'm the only one having this issue?

    Nope, I had the same issue on shadows when did a test on a camera on distance being similar like a drone, a figure running in circles and the issue was present.

  • khorneV2khorneV2 Posts: 146

    Just found a thing, using a iray head lamp blocker seems to enhance HDR/IBL accuracy.

    Is that correct ?

  • Greywulf said:

    All of the images below were rendered using Filament. Each took less than 3 seconds to render, and I could make all of these (and more) in the time it would have taken to render just one of them in 3Delight or iray. Maybe they'd look "better" in iray but n my ancient laptop if the choice is between "good  enough" in 3 seconds or 4+ hours for "better", I'll take good enough for all but the most precious of renders thanks. For those, I'll render in Filament first, adjust the lights then leave the iray version chugging overnight. Choice is a wonderful thing, don't you think?

    Great renders on Filament, I haven't played with point lights in years!!

     

  • khorneV2khorneV2 Posts: 146

    Iray / Filament comparison

    Studio4.jpg
    1277 x 1000 - 513K
    tt_out.jpg
    1277 x 1000 - 458K
  • tsroemitsroemi Posts: 2,400

    Sorry if this has been asked before - from what I've been reading so far I gather that Filament gives a preview of the current HDRI positioning, is that correct? Much like what IBL Master does in Iray? I'd love that, it's really such a pain to rotate the dome blindly! So could someone please confirm? Thanks and cheers!

  • tsroemi said:

    Sorry if this has been asked before - from what I've been reading so far I gather that Filament gives a preview of the current HDRI positioning, is that correct? Much like what IBL Master does in Iray? I'd love that, it's really such a pain to rotate the dome blindly! So could someone please confirm? Thanks and cheers!

    yes it does. but HDR looks in low resolution.

  • kprkpr Posts: 59
    Greywulf said:

    I'm absolutely blown away by Filament because hey, new free stuff to play with and I'll never say no to that. It's another spanner in the toolbox, and one that lets me render a scene in under 5 seconds. That's incredible by any measure. And I can see the same scene in the viewport as the final output, should I decide to keep with Filament as the render engine - I have that choice. Filament is one more option, and it's one that is only going to improve over time. You don't have to use it or even like it, but it's there should you want to use it (however you want to use it), and it's cost you nothing. 

    Is it perfect for every render and every scene? Absolutely not, but then neither is 3Delight or iray either. This is another option, and I'm very glad it exists. Thank you, Daz.

    ...

    ^^^ This. All day long   80)

    I render on a potato. To get that level of quality in less than a minute means I can do animation. There was no way that was an option before.

    Versus iRAY (Issues?):

    From 5 minutes over over excited "testing" I found that DOF doesn't seem to work in Filament (anyone else??) - Have searched, couldn't find a specific comment?

    It seems way "brighter" than iRAY scenes? But all of the shaders I use are iRAY, so is it a combination of iRAY lighting rigs and iRAY shaders?

    Anyway ... This PP+ Member is a lil giddy with the new toy and is wondering what animation project to have a go at first ... As quoted above, Thanks Daz.

  • PaintboxPaintbox Posts: 1,633
    kpr said:
    Greywulf said:

    I'm absolutely blown away by Filament because hey, new free stuff to play with and I'll never say no to that. It's another spanner in the toolbox, and one that lets me render a scene in under 5 seconds. That's incredible by any measure. And I can see the same scene in the viewport as the final output, should I decide to keep with Filament as the render engine - I have that choice. Filament is one more option, and it's one that is only going to improve over time. You don't have to use it or even like it, but it's there should you want to use it (however you want to use it), and it's cost you nothing. 

    Is it perfect for every render and every scene? Absolutely not, but then neither is 3Delight or iray either. This is another option, and I'm very glad it exists. Thank you, Daz.

    ...

    ^^^ This. All day long   80)

    I render on a potato. To get that level of quality in less than a minute means I can do animation. There was no way that was an option before.

    Versus iRAY (Issues?):

    From 5 minutes over over excited "testing" I found that DOF doesn't seem to work in Filament (anyone else??) - Have searched, couldn't find a specific comment?

    It seems way "brighter" than iRAY scenes? But all of the shaders I use are iRAY, so is it a combination of iRAY lighting rigs and iRAY shaders?

    Anyway ... This PP+ Member is a lil giddy with the new toy and is wondering what animation project to have a go at first ... As quoted above, Thanks Daz.

    You use the shaders from Iray, but you can tweak them to fit Filament, yes.

    use tone mapping  to get the correct exposure for your scene. Use the nodes in the create menu,

  • tsroemitsroemi Posts: 2,400
    tsroemi said:

    Sorry if this has been asked before - from what I've been reading so far I gather that Filament gives a preview of the current HDRI positioning, is that correct? Much like what IBL Master does in Iray? I'd love that, it's really such a pain to rotate the dome blindly! So could someone please confirm? Thanks and cheers!

    yes it does. but HDR looks in low resolution.

    Thanks for the quick response! Low res is okay, I'd just like to be able to check the general position of the HDRI without having to wait for the Iray viewport to start up. I set up my scenes on the (graphic chip only) laptop mostly and only hook up the external GPU for final renders because it's such a hassle. So Iray always takes time. Filament sounds like a really useful addition to me!

  • plasma_ringplasma_ring Posts: 1,020
    kpr said:
    Greywulf said:

    I'm absolutely blown away by Filament because hey, new free stuff to play with and I'll never say no to that. It's another spanner in the toolbox, and one that lets me render a scene in under 5 seconds. That's incredible by any measure. And I can see the same scene in the viewport as the final output, should I decide to keep with Filament as the render engine - I have that choice. Filament is one more option, and it's one that is only going to improve over time. You don't have to use it or even like it, but it's there should you want to use it (however you want to use it), and it's cost you nothing. 

    Is it perfect for every render and every scene? Absolutely not, but then neither is 3Delight or iray either. This is another option, and I'm very glad it exists. Thank you, Daz.

    ...

    ^^^ This. All day long   80)

    I render on a potato. To get that level of quality in less than a minute means I can do animation. There was no way that was an option before.

    Versus iRAY (Issues?):

    From 5 minutes over over excited "testing" I found that DOF doesn't seem to work in Filament (anyone else??) - Have searched, couldn't find a specific comment?

    It seems way "brighter" than iRAY scenes? But all of the shaders I use are iRAY, so is it a combination of iRAY lighting rigs and iRAY shaders?

    Anyway ... This PP+ Member is a lil giddy with the new toy and is wondering what animation project to have a go at first ... As quoted above, Thanks Daz.

    From my limited experimentation it does seem that DOF doesn't work. 

    I don't mess with tonemapping much in Iray because I do so many adjustments in post, but in Filament it really helps with lighting control. 

  • GreywulfGreywulf Posts: 58
    edited November 2020
    kpr said:
    It seems way "brighter" than iRAY scenes? But all of the shaders I use are iRAY, so is it a combination of iRAY lighting rigs and iRAY shaders?

     

    The absolute first thing to do with a new scene when you're using Filament is go to Create->New Environment Options Node , select Environment Options in the scene, go to Parameters and set Environment Intensity to around about 0.3. Intensity 1.0 is much too high for Filament (at least, for this release of DAZ Studio). If you're going to add additional lights (such as Point Lights), set it as low as 0.15. Hope that helps.

     

     

    Post edited by Greywulf on
  • gniiialgniiial Posts: 204
    edited November 2020

    After recreating the new characters, endless waiting multiple times because some of the products i used seem to "fool" around with daz... Also while loading the scene again, after closing the program and reopening it. frown

    "Whispering Devil"

    Beard, hair and eyebrown of prince charming here is SHB selfmade. The hair seems to glow at the back of the head, but changing the thickness again makes it look odd like black painted whatever. The GM8 model is standart with the same pose i made before. The Skin is "upcycled" GM8, nothing fancy or special, but still better quality than the normal skin. The eyes are also remade. The glowing ball looks now more like it was before, but also not really like it was at the time i had created it at first. Seems verry strange to me that these changes happen.
    The GM3 Model (the devil) is a little morphed here and there, but pretty much the Damien Demon with his horns, eyes, skin, scaled up a little, with heath hair, helion pants, helion belt, a changed pose from Basix - G3M  - 16 and the face expression is Night Creatures - Night Creatures Expressions 05. .

    ..just realized that the right arm is a little off, but even a simple posing and i hit the minutes long "lagg" even with a new reloadet scene. 

    whispering_devil_01.png
    1920 x 1080 - 3M
    Post edited by gniiial on
  • N-RArtsN-RArts Posts: 1,445

    Is it better to use Iray or 3Delight textures/materials/shaders as a starting point?

    In my tests, on a close up, I can see G8F's mouth inside her head. Plus, some of my characters eyes are red (the sclera and iris).   

    I know I said that I wasn't going to bother... But I was interested in the rendering times, and what my own computer could do.

  • MojoManMojoMan Posts: 285
    edited November 2020

    First test render using Filament

    I watched the video by KindredArts and found it immensely helpful. The long and the short of it is, I LIKE Filament. A lot.

    BFGBladerunner-2-filament1.jpg
    1920 x 1080 - 1M
    Post edited by MojoMan on
  • marblemarble Posts: 7,449
    edited November 2020

    I have a default scene load which I have set up for IRay so that I don't need to go tweaking things before I start adding to the scene. I'd be very surprised if I'm alone in this so here's a question: 

    Has anyone created a default load scene for Filament and, if so, what are your environment, tonemapper and draw style settings?

     

    Post edited by marble on
  • algovincianalgovincian Posts: 2,577
    3Diva said:

    I rendered this animation with Filament in just under 14 minutes. It would have taken my machine over 2 hours to render it in Iray.

    https://player.vimeo.com/video/478310569

     

    Edit: Vimeo lowered the quality by a LOT. It rendered out much more clear and crisp. Here's one of the frames (and of course uploading the frame here also lowered the quality a bit lol /DOH!):

    Both the skin and the hair look great here, @3Diva!

    - Greg

  • marblemarble Posts: 7,449
    3Diva said:

     

    Both the skin and the hair look great here, @3Diva!

    - Greg

    I just can't get the hair to look right  - I can reduce the shine but not the transparency (at least not without deleting the transmaps altogether).

  • ZilvergrafixZilvergrafix Posts: 1,385
    edited November 2020

    I have come to the conclusion that what you save in rendering time you spend on configuring the shaders.

    time to render: almost 2 seconds!

    time to make shaders look right (or even trying to) : AN HOUR!

    my findings are:

    • Better use iRay shaders FOR tweaking!
    • And turn off SSS, simply does not work
    • Bump mapping is marvelous!
    • Get rid of Normal maps
    • Your best friend here is Glossy Anysotropy
    • Your other best friend is Metallicity
    • Refraction Weight fakes glass and fog
    • Skin...use another color for diffuse, except white
    Post edited by Zilvergrafix on
  • marblemarble Posts: 7,449
    1gecko said:

    Ok - please be gentle: Just went for my procedure today and still groggy from the anesthia..

    but am I reading this correctly?  We LOSE shadows and most hair, but get faster rendering?

    Well of COURSE it is faster, you just dropped the two biggest burdens on the rendering engine!

    ... I guess it will work for 1960s era 'near future' sci-fi where everyone is bald and everything is over-lit from all directions.

    Shadows work for certain light types, not for others, and there are limits on the number of lights. Hair has two issues - enabling dForce/Strand based hair (which is essentially the same as any other preview emthod) and the transparency mapped hair being overly transparent (which can be adderssed via surface settings, as discussed up-thread).

    I'm sorry but I've backtracked through the thread and can't find a post where the transparency issue is addressed. Any hints?

Sign In or Register to comment.