No encrypted for me.

1121315171841

Comments

  • wgdjohn said:
    DAZ_Steve said:
    Downloading of old products through Daz Connect will not force them to be encrypted.  If you look at the product pages for any product it now lists "Install types".  It will either list "Daz Connect" or "Encrypted Daz Connect".  if it doesn't say encrypted Daz Connect, then it isn't encrypted.  That means that your scripts will still work on everything that they used to, but you are correct in that they would not work against encrypted content. 

    This product now does not state any install type, no DC, DIM or Manual are listed. https://www.daz3d.com/victoria-7-attitude-bundle

    Bundles don't. Check the individual products.

  • fixmypcmikefixmypcmike Posts: 19,683
    lx said:
     Sure your DRM scheme is less restrictive than it could be, but that is another thing I have I seen that before from companies too.  Start small and it only gets worse as time goes on.  DRM ONLY gets worse not better.

     

    +1, as the youngsters type.

    At the moment it's presented as all about combating piracy. I'll bet money that within a couple of years some aspect of DAZ output will be subscription based, which is what this process enables. The most obvious candidate is a variation on the Platinum Club, where content is "free" so long as you continue to pay the annual subsciption.

    Sadly, rent seeking is a natural human behaviour.

    This has been mentioned several times, and every time it has been pointed out how little sense a subscription model would make for Daz, how PC+ is basically one anyway (if you buy products here at least once a month, you should probably be in it) and how insanely logistically difficult that would be to organise for a company that mainly operates via hundreds of vendors.

    Daz has been doing a lot of things that make little sense lately. As for logistics, it wouldn't be that different from the logistics of the Platinum Club. 

     

    wgdjohn said:
    DAZ_Steve said:
    Downloading of old products through Daz Connect will not force them to be encrypted.  If you look at the product pages for any product it now lists "Install types".  It will either list "Daz Connect" or "Encrypted Daz Connect".  if it doesn't say encrypted Daz Connect, then it isn't encrypted.  That means that your scripts will still work on everything that they used to, but you are correct in that they would not work against encrypted content. 

    This product now does not state anything. https://www.daz3d.com/victoria-7-attitude-bundle

    Bundles don't, only the individual products in the bundle do -- I'll ask Daz about it.

  • lx_2807502lx_2807502 Posts: 2,996
    lx said:
     Sure your DRM scheme is less restrictive than it could be, but that is another thing I have I seen that before from companies too.  Start small and it only gets worse as time goes on.  DRM ONLY gets worse not better.

     

    +1, as the youngsters type.

    At the moment it's presented as all about combating piracy. I'll bet money that within a couple of years some aspect of DAZ output will be subscription based, which is what this process enables. The most obvious candidate is a variation on the Platinum Club, where content is "free" so long as you continue to pay the annual subsciption.

    Sadly, rent seeking is a natural human behaviour.

    This has been mentioned several times, and every time it has been pointed out how little sense a subscription model would make for Daz, how PC+ is basically one anyway (if you buy products here at least once a month, you should probably be in it) and how insanely logistically difficult that would be to organise for a company that mainly operates via hundreds of vendors.

    Daz has been doing a lot of things that make little sense lately. As for logistics, it wouldn't be that different from the logistics of the Platinum Club. 

    They -could- do another dumb thing, but why? Every regular customer already wants to be in Platinum Club. Daz Studio used to be pay software (at least parts of it) but they shifted it to free and saw a huge sales boost. I can't think of a single argument on their side for doing it.

    Then again they let market research decide so many things these days (hello white website, I haven't forgotten about you) so they will probably implement it next week.

  • Some hacker is going to break the Connect framework and pirating will continue unabated.

    That leaves DAZ with their paying customers who DO value very much the work of DAZ and the fabulous vendors. Sometimes I will buy a product from a specific vendor that I know I'll never use just because I want to support that vendor for when they make that superb superb set I'll use a thousand different ways.

    When has a business tried to control customers and come out good in the long run?

    And Daz Studio being in eternal beta doesn't help with trying to push 4.9 down custoimers throats... is the thing even REALLY ready?

  • Tman300Tman300 Posts: 40

    I have to agree with all the folks out there that really dislike the Daz Connect mechanism for downloading some of the newer products. I for one won't be purchasing ANY and I repeat ANY products that don't allow for manual downloading. I prefer to download my purchases and store them locally until I wish to install them myself. I even refuse to use Install Manager as not everything I purchase will be used right away. Quite frankly, Daz doesn't have the right to control how and when purchased content is to be added to one's library. Furthermore, I am sure they can't guarantee 100% anytime access to purchased products as they don't control a users access to the web, nevermind the problems they have experienced in the not too distant past maintaining customer access to their own site. Very bad move Daz is all I can say.

  • lindelllindell Posts: 62
    To Daz, I will not purchase any content that is encrypted. If that is your only option going forward, you will lose me as a customer. There is no reason for this encryption, it is not a feature or an improvement and I'm not a fan of Daz Studio downloading my content or managing it for me. Don't bother reasoning with me about it.
  • i totally agree with the above.now daz connect might not be too bad (maybe) but the worst is that encrypted scheed you cant move it around as i have structured my huge runtime the way i want it .yep daz shoot itself in the foot so to speak.

  • KhoryKhory Posts: 3,854

    We all have different preferences. I like that I can not only install what ever I want when I want with connect but also uninstall at will when I need to save space. Getting it back is easy so I don't feel like I am going to be jumping any hoops to save space and get rid of stuff I don't use often. I also like that I can check for updates and get those as I need them for the product I am about to use rather than have to remember to check for updates. Overall it has been a huge time saver since the downloads take a minute at most and updates take seconds. I've set it up so that the connect files are where I want them to go currently, but am thinking I will move it all to an external pretty soon. Shouldn't be a problem as I have already moved them once with no issue. I'm not the least worried about connection since even if I took my computer off line there is an offline option and methods to get the files. As far as encryption.. I wouldn't know it was there unless someone told me. I don't often, ok never, go into product files which is really the only encrypted part. I can do anything I need to inside the program as far as adjustment and changes go. And of course my own work isn't encrypted when I am working on it so that is no issue.

  • Cris PalominoCris Palomino Posts: 12,448

    Merging with the main thread designated for comments and questions on Daz Connect issues.

  • wgdjohnwgdjohn Posts: 2,634
    DAZ_Steve said:
    Based on the number of downloads of 4.9 today, and the number of people connecting with Daz Connect, it appears that the enticement was un-needed.  We do however, have a few more encrypted only free items planned over the weekend.I will launch some products encrypted only in the coming weeks and see how they do.
    [cut]
    I will also use free items to entice people to adopt encryption.

    While I have had 4.9 Beta for some time and now the 4.9 release also count me out for encrypted products. I've no desire to tie up Studio to download content while this can be done via Manual or DIM. In a sense G3 could be called encrypted since "as is" it will not work in Carrara 8.5 Pro and other programs. Due to that alone I quit buying new 3D models when Olympia 7 came out. Now I have encryption to worry about also. I'm sure that a lot of users of DAZ products won't be slowed down by encryption.... but just wait until they eventually find out about what programs will not be able to read it without it being exported to .obj or .fbx and then not have full functionality.

    Still I continue to buy G3 and older content. If/When any form of manual and DIM, non encrypted, are no longer supported is when I can be counted out entirely. Been buying since V1 till today and since Carrara 4 Pro to 8.5 Pro. Been a fun ride... will have to see what the future brings... hope to be purchasing from DAZ for a long time.

    I did purchase enough the other night to get the 3 free products only to later discover they required 4.9 to download. I've opened a "return" ticket for 3 items I'd only added in order to get the "DAZ Connect" 3 "free" files which I did not download nor do I intend to ever install any encrypted content. I've asked for store credit rather than a refund. Note that one of the true meanings of Free means "provided without, or not subject to, a charge or payment". The 3 DAZ Connect files are not actually "free". At best they are "no additional charge" items. And yet when I see Free my eyes perk up.

  • nicsttnicstt Posts: 11,715
    edited January 2016
    lx said:
     Sure your DRM scheme is less restrictive than it could be, but that is another thing I have I seen that before from companies too.  Start small and it only gets worse as time goes on.  DRM ONLY gets worse not better.

     

    +1, as the youngsters type.

    At the moment it's presented as all about combating piracy. I'll bet money that within a couple of years some aspect of DAZ output will be subscription based, which is what this process enables. The most obvious candidate is a variation on the Platinum Club, where content is "free" so long as you continue to pay the annual subsciption.

    Sadly, rent seeking is a natural human behaviour.

    This has been mentioned several times, and every time it has been pointed out how little sense a subscription model would make for Daz, how PC+ is basically one anyway (if you buy products here at least once a month, you should probably be in it) and how insanely logistically difficult that would be to organise for a company that mainly operates via hundreds of vendors.

    Try finding references to those posts.

     

    Khory said:
    lx said:
     Sure your DRM scheme is less restrictive than it could be, but that is another thing I have I seen that before from companies too.  Start small and it only gets worse as time goes on.  DRM ONLY gets worse not better.

     

    +1, as the youngsters type.

    At the moment it's presented as all about combating piracy. I'll bet money that within a couple of years some aspect of DAZ output will be subscription based, which is what this process enables. The most obvious candidate is a variation on the Platinum Club, where content is "free" so long as you continue to pay the annual subsciption.

    Sadly, rent seeking is a natural human behaviour.

    This has been mentioned several times, and every time it has been pointed out how little sense a subscription model would make for Daz, how PC+ is basically one anyway (if you buy products here at least once a month, you should probably be in it) and how insanely logistically difficult that would be to organise for a company that mainly operates via hundreds of vendors.

    Daz has been doing a lot of things that make little sense lately. As for logistics, it wouldn't be that different from the logistics of the Platinum Club. 

    PC and Daz O's products are owned by Daz where as everything else in the store is owned by the original creator of the product. There are over 300 PA's who own those products and those products actually outnumber the products owned by Daz. The logistics would be totally different from Plat Club because it would involve getting over 300 people on board and figuring out how to compensate those 300 people when their products were used. It isn't like adobe saying Photoshop is going to be subscription it would be like adobe saying every paintbrush sold would be by subscription.


    Doesn't mean they both can't run concurrently.

    However this is pure speculation... Valid imo, but still speculation.

    Post edited by nicstt on
  • pearbearpearbear Posts: 227

    Relating my story as a DAZ customer - I used to spend money at DAZ like a kid in a candy store, but after the encryption plans were first put forth a few months ago it seriously cooled my enthusiasm for shopping at DAZ. DAZ has for a while been an integral part of my workflow for making art, and I enjoyed piling up a sizable library of content. But the idea of DAZ switching over to just selling encrypted content is a scary one - why would I spend money on encrypted content when I can buy unencrypted 3D models from every other 3D model store on the web? The major thing that currently keeps me working with DAZ instead of a different 3D software tool is that I like the integration of the posable figures, and I think the Genesis 3 line is quite good. But the idea that Genesis 4 and it's add-ons will probably be encrypted has already got me weaning myself off of DAZ in preparation, learning more about other software and techniques, and finding other content stores. 

    I'm still buying things from DAZ here and there, but only at a fraction of how much I was purchasing a year ago (I'm guessing that I currently spend about 10-25% as much at DAZ as I used to - heck, I didn't even make any purchases in December). I definitely have no plans to buy encrypted content, and slowing down in my DAZ purchases is the result of my migrating to other work methods and spending money at other stores, since it's very possible that in a year or two all new DAZ content will be encrypted and I won't be buying any of it.

    This isn't me just speculating that I might spend less if encryption becomes the norm - my drop off in DAZ purchases has already happened, and pretty dramatically, just based on the strong hunch that in the future it will all be encrypted. Ultimately, I'm sharing this because I really like DAZ and I will miss it if I have to switch to a different workflow. I'm hoping to contribute another voice that lets DAZ know they are really alienating many of their customers the further they push the encryption. I'm hoping content encryption goes quietly into the night like some other bold DAZ experiments (DAZ 3D printing service, cough cough) and everything can be as it was.

  • SuperdogSuperdog Posts: 765
    lx said:

    Adobe Suite is cheaper to subscribe than it was to buy out each new version. It was certainly never accessible to me until the new system (I still don't like subscription systems, but I appreciate them as an option to allow hobbyists to learn and get started.) You'd need to use a purchased copy for over 4 years with no upgrading before you started to save money.

    The Creative Suite Master 6 Collection in Australia costs $4,334. (hahahahaha) The same software carries a price of $2599 in the US, Gizmodo reported.

    (The Subscription version is $50 a month and offered substantial discounts for existing CS users.)

     

    I've never used a Windows ID to log onto my computer (7, 8, or 10.) 8 was a bit forceful on it if you wanted to use their little metro apps but why not just use real software instead? That said they have been consistently making their software (Office, Skype, Explorer) worse by taking away more and more options and make it sillier and brighter and wasting a ton of screen space and 

    A good reason not to use Office anymore is that there are several robust alternatives available for free. I also didn't buy Poser because Daz Studio was far nicer to use, and free.

    [end of random fact checking.]

    As I said I'm a long term user of the master suite, upgrading each time. The upgrade price offered me was cheaper than the subscription fee and I owned the software. It may have benefitted you. but it certainly did not benefit me.

    The upgrade price to CS6 was much cheaper than subscribing. All these sub discounts sound gret but when the sub expires try opening or editing CS projects.

  • fred9803fred9803 Posts: 1,565

    I suppose some of the resistance to 4.9 is based on the idea of not wanting to be a party to where this is apparently (or possibly) heading, ie. encrypted only products. Something of a Mexican standoff with disgruntaled users and Daz with guns pointed at each other's heads - who is going to blink first?

    As my partner purchases the products here, she's the one who will decide the outcome for me, and she's sitting on the fence at the moment with 4.9. She doesn't actually dislike the option of encription, but she doesn't want to be seen as going along with a policy where that choice is taken away from her in the future. And like many women she doesn't like to be dissapointed, oh no she doesn't.

  • Tman300 said:

    I have to agree with all the folks out there that really dislike the Daz Connect mechanism for downloading some of the newer products. I for one won't be purchasing ANY and I repeat ANY products that don't allow for manual downloading. I prefer to download my purchases and store them locally until I wish to install them myself. I even refuse to use Install Manager as not everything I purchase will be used right away. Quite frankly, Daz doesn't have the right to control how and when purchased content is to be added to one's library. Furthermore, I am sure they can't guarantee 100% anytime access to purchased products as they don't control a users access to the web, nevermind the problems they have experienced in the not too distant past maintaining customer access to their own site. Very bad move Daz is all I can say.

    DIM allows downloading and not isntalling, and you can download the Ofline Authorisation packages for Connect content which can be stored and used to install at any time (as long as DS 4.9+ on that the machine has at least once connected to your account). I intend to either grab the Offline Authorisations packages or possibly write a script to make a shadow copy of selected items (using sort by install, date/upload date) as I am on a capped data allowance and can't afford to regularly redownload (in that respect Connect is a great advance as updates are per file, there's no need tio download a full zip of mostly unchanged files).

  • pearbearpearbear Posts: 227

    I suppose some of the resistance to 4.9 is based on the idea of not wanting to be a party to where this is apparently (or possibly) heading, ie. encrypted only products.

    Exactly. When DAZ says (I'm paraphrasing here) - "We have no plans to release base characters with encryption in the near future" how I interpret that is that they do have plans to possibly release base characters with encryption by the time Genesis 4 is ready in a year or two. In light of the recent turn of events (DAZ releasing encrypted-only content after recently saying they had "no plans to do so"), it makes me feel that I have to interpret everything they say pedantically to the letter, rather than trusting that they will follow the spirit of what they are saying. And they might very well do the opposite of what they say anyway, as they just demonstrated.

  • fred9803fred9803 Posts: 1,565
    pearbear said:

    I suppose some of the resistance to 4.9 is based on the idea of not wanting to be a party to where this is apparently (or possibly) heading, ie. encrypted only products.

    Exactly. When DAZ says (I'm paraphrasing here) - "We have no plans to release base characters with encryption in the near future" how I interpret that is that they do have plans to possibly release base characters with encryption by the time Genesis 4 is ready in a year or two. In light of the recent turn of events (DAZ releasing encrypted-only content after recently saying they had "no plans to do so"), it makes me feel that I have to interpret everything they say pedantically to the letter, rather than trusting that they will follow the spirit of what they are saying. And they might very well do the opposite of what they say anyway, as they just demonstrated.

    And when you think about all the hundreds of suggestions about what DS users would like to see improved about the program and what they'd like to see in future releases, there are absolutely none suggesting they want encrypted content, soon to become encrypted only content. This issue of Connect is a glaring example of the disconnect between what users want and what they are being given.

  • pearbear said:

    I suppose some of the resistance to 4.9 is based on the idea of not wanting to be a party to where this is apparently (or possibly) heading, ie. encrypted only products.

    Exactly. When DAZ says (I'm paraphrasing here) - "We have no plans to release base characters with encryption in the near future" how I interpret that is that they do have plans to possibly release base characters with encryption by the time Genesis 4 is ready in a year or two. In light of the recent turn of events (DAZ releasing encrypted-only content after recently saying they had "no plans to do so"), it makes me feel that I have to interpret everything they say pedantically to the letter, rather than trusting that they will follow the spirit of what they are saying. And they might very well do the opposite of what they say anyway, as they just demonstrated.

    No, it just means what it says. As has also been said, encrypting the bases that are free with DS doesn't seem worthwhile anyway. Whether things like Victoria # will eventually be encrypted only I wouldn't care to guess.

  • lx_2807502lx_2807502 Posts: 2,996
    pearbear said:

    I suppose some of the resistance to 4.9 is based on the idea of not wanting to be a party to where this is apparently (or possibly) heading, ie. encrypted only products.

    Exactly. When DAZ says (I'm paraphrasing here) - "We have no plans to release base characters with encryption in the near future" how I interpret that is that they do have plans to possibly release base characters with encryption by the time Genesis 4 is ready in a year or two. In light of the recent turn of events (DAZ releasing encrypted-only content after recently saying they had "no plans to do so"), it makes me feel that I have to interpret everything they say pedantically to the letter, rather than trusting that they will follow the spirit of what they are saying. And they might very well do the opposite of what they say anyway, as they just demonstrated.

    No, it just means what it says. As has also been said, encrypting the bases that are free with DS doesn't seem worthwhile anyway. Whether things like Victoria # will eventually be encrypted only I wouldn't care to guess.

    Fun fact: there are pirated versions of Studio (4.9 with keys but also 4.8 etc. which had no reason to be pirated) as well as Essentials etc. Kinda makes my head hurt to try and work out what other people are thinking sometimes.

  • lindelllindell Posts: 62
    Time after time, company's that use encrypted products lose out in the end. Users want control of their runtime because Daz and it's PA do not sell a consistent, logical runtime and the users have to fix it in order to easily find what they bought.
  • SuperdogSuperdog Posts: 765
    pearbear said:

    I suppose some of the resistance to 4.9 is based on the idea of not wanting to be a party to where this is apparently (or possibly) heading, ie. encrypted only products.

    Exactly. When DAZ says (I'm paraphrasing here) - "We have no plans to release base characters with encryption in the near future" how I interpret that is that they do have plans to possibly release base characters with encryption by the time Genesis 4 is ready in a year or two. In light of the recent turn of events (DAZ releasing encrypted-only content after recently saying they had "no plans to do so"), it makes me feel that I have to interpret everything they say pedantically to the letter, rather than trusting that they will follow the spirit of what they are saying. And they might very well do the opposite of what they say anyway, as they just demonstrated.

    And when you think about all the hundreds of suggestions about what DS users would like to see improved about the program and what they'd like to see in future releases, there are absolutely none suggesting they want encrypted content, soon to become encrypted only content. This issue of Connect is a glaring example of the disconnect between what users want and what they are being given.

    I've been reqesting better animation features like the ability for figures to follow surfaces when walking. For example, I waste huge amounts of time painfully re-editing the floor contant of each figure after stringing a few aniblocks together. It seems that fundemental features that make creating work so much easier have been put on the shelf in favour of encryption.  There are a number of other other fundemental features relating to the natural movement of clothing and hair which would significantly improve animations yet this appears to have been sidelined. Some might claim that without encryption DAZ can't survive and offer new features in DS but how has it managed so far then? I had also really hoped that pipelines into Lightwave and other more advanced apps might arise to compensate for the lack of animation versatility in DS but this seems even more unlikely now that the walled-in encyption mentality has appeared. I think all that squandered potential is what disappoints me the most.

  • DaikatanaDaikatana Posts: 830
    edited January 2016

    I have been a customer and a PC+ club member since before the PlatinimClub became PC+.  Not too many people  -including myself- liked that change but a least it was rooted in common sense and was logical from an economic point of view.  So I stayed with the PC + and continued paying my subscription.

    The change to DAZ connect and the use of encryption for DRM is another matter entirely.  Far FAR more people are upset with this and in my opinion they are upset with good reason.  This time the mass exodus that the community seems to be leaning toward is a much greater possibility.

    DAZ Connect on its own is bad but not really deadly.  It's inconvenient to learn how to rearrange the directory system to get things close to where you had them before but, with patience,  you can sort something out.

    The requirement to of in at least once to "register" the sftware is not really a big deal the way it is currently implemented. Various software companies have done that for years.

    The offline install/authentification option is not truly that bad but it's starting to get into that "unnecessarily complicated" area that will make a good number of customers throw up their hands in disgust and start looking at other options.

    However the encryption thing is the deal breaker.  It  not only is fairly useless in its original stated intent ( to hamper/ reduce piracy) but it also limits the use of the content that we are purchasing the license to use.  sure you can export into other formats but when you do this you end up losing some of the functionality.  The encrypted content will only function fully in DAZ  Studio 4.9 and higher.  DAZ 3D is creating a walled garden and I am beginning to wonder if this is a prelude to making Studio not free anymore.  Basically you lock the customers in to needing the software to use their content they have invested in and then you force them to spend even more money to be able to continue to use the investment either by forcing a (probably large) initial purchase or by turning the use of Studio into a tiered subscription service.  Yes , perhaps someone from DAZ might see this and address the question by stating that there are "no plans to do this in the future" but they said that about encrypted connect only content and look what happened there.

    Customer dissatisfaction is high and customer trust is reaching an all time low.  When this happens at the same time customers go elsewhere.

    Post edited by Daikatana on
  • nicsttnicstt Posts: 11,715
    lx said:
    pearbear said:

    I suppose some of the resistance to 4.9 is based on the idea of not wanting to be a party to where this is apparently (or possibly) heading, ie. encrypted only products.

    Exactly. When DAZ says (I'm paraphrasing here) - "We have no plans to release base characters with encryption in the near future" how I interpret that is that they do have plans to possibly release base characters with encryption by the time Genesis 4 is ready in a year or two. In light of the recent turn of events (DAZ releasing encrypted-only content after recently saying they had "no plans to do so"), it makes me feel that I have to interpret everything they say pedantically to the letter, rather than trusting that they will follow the spirit of what they are saying. And they might very well do the opposite of what they say anyway, as they just demonstrated.

    No, it just means what it says. As has also been said, encrypting the bases that are free with DS doesn't seem worthwhile anyway. Whether things like Victoria # will eventually be encrypted only I wouldn't care to guess.

    Fun fact: there are pirated versions of Studio (4.9 with keys but also 4.8 etc. which had no reason to be pirated) as well as Essentials etc. Kinda makes my head hurt to try and work out what other people are thinking sometimes.

    Thinking: Why presume that is occuring?

     

  • fastbike1fastbike1 Posts: 4,078

    Just go into the Content Directory mapping tab and edit the location for the "Daz Connect Data" path. You can put this anywhere. Anyhting already loaded to your Documents location can be moved to the new location without issues. My Daz Connect data loads to the same location as the rest of my content, which is an external drive.

    The directory properties finally finished tallying...  So to be exact, my DAZ Library is 507 GB, 1,165,186 files in 177,093 directories. So that is why I was / am so mad at indescriminately picking my C drive.

     

  • pearbearpearbear Posts: 227
    pearbear said:

    I suppose some of the resistance to 4.9 is based on the idea of not wanting to be a party to where this is apparently (or possibly) heading, ie. encrypted only products.

    Exactly. When DAZ says (I'm paraphrasing here) - "We have no plans to release base characters with encryption in the near future" how I interpret that is that they do have plans to possibly release base characters with encryption by the time Genesis 4 is ready in a year or two. In light of the recent turn of events (DAZ releasing encrypted-only content after recently saying they had "no plans to do so"), it makes me feel that I have to interpret everything they say pedantically to the letter, rather than trusting that they will follow the spirit of what they are saying. And they might very well do the opposite of what they say anyway, as they just demonstrated.

    No, it just means what it says. As has also been said, encrypting the bases that are free with DS doesn't seem worthwhile anyway. Whether things like Victoria # will eventually be encrypted only I wouldn't care to guess.

    It is clear that if customers buy into the encrypted content enough and the upset doesn't hurt DAZ's bottom line, then eventually every new product will be encrypted. Otherwise why would DAZ bother with developing the whole encrypted content thing? They can't have the end goal of going through all this headache to encrypt only a few odd items here and there.

    This issue isn't something I take personally, and I understand that DAZ has good reason to want to take measures against pirates. But if those measures make their product more cumbersome, less accessable, less reliable (or possibly all three), or even just make me worry about that possibility, then I'll as a result be buying more often from their competitors instead. Again, it's not personal, it's just the psychology of a customer - I want to buy the thing that I can feel that I own and will never need to ask permission to use in the future.

  • KatteyKattey Posts: 2,899
    edited January 2016
    Encrypted content, online DRM (which is what Connect/Encryption is) and inability to customize Runtimes/Content Libraries via new method of installation makes DS 4.9 unusable for me and if DS 5 and future releases will go that route (which it probably will, seeing how eagerly they released Connect-only stuff), I will no longer use DAZ products at all. Me being treated as a criminal with those quite fruitless measures just because some people pirate stuff, adds to the heap of those problems and there are other markets and other applications with much more customer-friendlier disposition. There were precedents in the past when DAZ3D promised sugar mountains and delivered slate rock pancakes on those promises, and it seems that they already made another one with promises of 'no Connect-only content' so soon. It shows to me that DAZ3D probably wants to implement more locked content in the future and I vote with my wallet against it.
    Post edited by Kattey on
  • IceCrMnIceCrMn Posts: 2,319
    nicstt said:
    lx said:
    pearbear said:

    I suppose some of the resistance to 4.9 is based on the idea of not wanting to be a party to where this is apparently (or possibly) heading, ie. encrypted only products.

    Exactly. When DAZ says (I'm paraphrasing here) - "We have no plans to release base characters with encryption in the near future" how I interpret that is that they do have plans to possibly release base characters with encryption by the time Genesis 4 is ready in a year or two. In light of the recent turn of events (DAZ releasing encrypted-only content after recently saying they had "no plans to do so"), it makes me feel that I have to interpret everything they say pedantically to the letter, rather than trusting that they will follow the spirit of what they are saying. And they might very well do the opposite of what they say anyway, as they just demonstrated.

    No, it just means what it says. As has also been said, encrypting the bases that are free with DS doesn't seem worthwhile anyway. Whether things like Victoria # will eventually be encrypted only I wouldn't care to guess.

    Fun fact: there are pirated versions of Studio (4.9 with keys but also 4.8 etc. which had no reason to be pirated) as well as Essentials etc. Kinda makes my head hurt to try and work out what other people are thinking sometimes.

    Thinking: Why presume that is occuring?

     

    Jeezz, no wonder there is such a huge problem with credit card fraud here and at other 3D stores.
    I wonder if they got a firmware keylogger, or just a software keylogger that can be uninstalled?
    Either way, that's some industrial grade stupid right there.

    I'll never understand why people put so much trust and faith in random thieves on the internet.

    Do they honestly think those thieves wouldn't dare steal from them as well?

  • lx_2807502lx_2807502 Posts: 2,996
    icecrmn said:
    nicstt said:
    lx said:
    pearbear said:

    I suppose some of the resistance to 4.9 is based on the idea of not wanting to be a party to where this is apparently (or possibly) heading, ie. encrypted only products.

    Exactly. When DAZ says (I'm paraphrasing here) - "We have no plans to release base characters with encryption in the near future" how I interpret that is that they do have plans to possibly release base characters with encryption by the time Genesis 4 is ready in a year or two. In light of the recent turn of events (DAZ releasing encrypted-only content after recently saying they had "no plans to do so"), it makes me feel that I have to interpret everything they say pedantically to the letter, rather than trusting that they will follow the spirit of what they are saying. And they might very well do the opposite of what they say anyway, as they just demonstrated.

    No, it just means what it says. As has also been said, encrypting the bases that are free with DS doesn't seem worthwhile anyway. Whether things like Victoria # will eventually be encrypted only I wouldn't care to guess.

    Fun fact: there are pirated versions of Studio (4.9 with keys but also 4.8 etc. which had no reason to be pirated) as well as Essentials etc. Kinda makes my head hurt to try and work out what other people are thinking sometimes.

    Thinking: Why presume that is occuring?

     

    Jeezz, no wonder there is such a huge problem with credit card fraud here and at other 3D stores.
    I wonder if they got a firmware keylogger, or just a software keylogger that can be uninstalled?
    Either way, that's some industrial grade stupid right there.

    I'll never understand why people put so much trust and faith in random thieves on the internet.

    Do they honestly think those thieves wouldn't dare steal from them as well?

    I'm not seeing the connection. Why would someone who is a customer here download a pirated version of software that is already free here (that they would have on their account if they had an account to make purchases) ?

    As to why others would download a pirate version of a program that is free to legitamately download and use, yeahhh I don't get it. I should also note that I have no idea if encrypted content has been cracked already, which is what I was actually trying to find out while stumbling across the pirated version of the clients. 

  • cosmo71cosmo71 Posts: 3,609
    mrposer said:

    I "bought" the 3 free ones but I didn't download them and not sure about when/if I will be upgrading to 4.9. They should put the Iray and other bug fixes in a hotfix for 4.8 for those of us not convinced of the new version. I am mostly afraid it will try to build a new database of my glut of products and my machine will run out of space. I never used the content paradise tab in Poser. 

    yes, my opionion, they should fix DS 4.8

  • BarubaryBarubary Posts: 1,230
    nicstt said:
    Barubary said:

    I kind of think people are getting worked up over the wrong thing at this point in time.

     

    As Cypherfox recently argued, the whole DRM thing is probably just a side-effect of DAZ trying to force a more streamlined content management. Which sounds mean, but does make a lot of sense for a company. Finding and managing 3D content is hard. Especially for someone new to the hobby. And DAZ is trying to make their application as simple and easy to use as possible, so beginners don't get scared away. And to remove some pressure from their customer support. I mean we live in a day and age where Apple products matter because they look like fisher price toys and are about as hard to use, so they are accessible to everyone. The price for this simplicity is freedom.

     

    And while it makes sense for DAZ, and I understand their point of view, I am not at all happy about this. Because now the people how have proven again and again and again that they are not qualified to organize a content database (from my own personaly view, of course, because everyone has their own preferred way of working, I'm sure their content management all makes sense to them), DAZ and / or their PAs, are forcing their ways on everyone else.

    Well forcing is too strong a word. I know, we can still use categories. But really, going through a tedious task like content management, working from within a program not specifically designed for content management, is going to be a big NO for me. Organizing content in DS is slow, sluggish and inconvenient. I'll either work in a tiny tab as opposed to my full screen or keep resizing my 3D workspace which I hate. I cannot use the scripts I have and I'm not sure how many shortcuts work inside DAZ. Drag and drop, copy and paste, creating new folders or renaming old ones, none of that - in my experience - works quite a smoothly in DS as it does in the old, trusty Windows Explorer. And, yes, I'm sure there are still better alternatives that the Explorer.

    And if the software buggers up, it's all gone or something (we just need one upgrade that breaks compatibility). And yet, on the bottom level, it will still be the same old chaos. Maybe worse, when they think they don't have to keep any sort of order. What if DAZ goes away and is succeeded by some other 3D program. You may still wanna use your old content, but good luck finding anything in without your now useless categories.

    Installing content is a task that I dread already, but now DAZ wants me to do it with a big iron ball around my ankle? Just no.

     

    And all that still has nothing to say about the power DAZ theoretically gains over our content with a system like this. Power they swear they will never use (or rather 'don't currently have plans for...'), but I believe they still should not have. Because they will use it when it they feel they can make a dollar more. Just look at what DAZ and many PAs keep saying on the boards, when they feel they have to defend their decisions. In the end, it all comes down to what makes the most money. Moral questions or convenience for the customer are not the priority. DAZ is not our friend. It's a company. So I would be very careful where I put my trust.

    Streamlining the content management - which had serious issues - did not require DRM.

    The DRM is a seperate issue, and connect without DRM would be interesting and worth investigating.

    Otherwise your post seems spot on.

    You're right it is a separate issue. It is though, I would argue, for now a side-effect of streamlining content management. They just added it in, because it seemed conveniet, not because they actually think that this will be very effective in preventing piracy. It won't stop them, but maybe it will piss them off a little.

     

    That's of course, the nice way of reading it, where DAZ is still kind of naive.

    Personally, I think it's much more likely that they are building the framework for a walled garden. Not today, because that's not an idea they can sell us right now, but maybe in a year. Maybe two. I'm sure there will be a great many good reasons why everything will be much more comfortable for their users, if there's no outside content infecting their libraries.

    It's not pirates who should be afraid. It's other content providers and Poser.

    If users don't want to be locked in, or at least risk that happening, now is the time to prevent it.

    But past experience as well as...erm...looking at my own purchase patterns don't quite help my trust in DAZ' customer base :D

This discussion has been closed.