You've been heard. Response re: 4.9 and Encryption

1121315171861

Comments

  • TheKDTheKD Posts: 2,711

    Also will never use connect, as I am a dinosaur that likes to manually organize my content :D
    I do a lot of kitbashing, so I need to know where everything is, and I have created a system for that.

    You can still organize your content manually using Connect. There have been a number of posts explaining how to do it by dragging-and-dropping shortcuts into the Content Library and arranging them there. I'm reinstalling all of my content using Connect and I'm able to put shortcuts and custom folders wherever I want. 

    Great that it works for you. That does not work with my system unfortunately. I manually download each product, unzip it, reorganize it, most of the time I have to make better icons and tooltip icons, then rezip it for my personal backup archive. If I need to update it, i know what to allow to override, and what not to. I customise prettymuch everything before it even makes it to my library. If I use connect or even DIM it will mess stuff up everytime it does an update. 

  • larsmidnattlarsmidnatt Posts: 4,511

    You've been heard. 

    Doesn't seem to be the case.

     

  • Also will never use connect, as I am a dinosaur that likes to manually organize my content :D
    I do a lot of kitbashing, so I need to know where everything is, and I have created a system for that.

    You can still organize your content manually using Connect. There have been a number of posts explaining how to do it by dragging-and-dropping shortcuts into the Content Library and arranging them there. I'm reinstalling all of my content using Connect and I'm able to put shortcuts and custom folders wherever I want. 

    Shortcuts are not manually organizing content. They are shortcuts which are only as good as the originating files. Our manual files can be used on any version of DS (mostly) and are safe from future updates that could/will probably (if history has shown us anything) break the originating files or locations. All We have to worry about is hard drive crashes and most of us have numerous back-ups so that really isn't a concern.

  • fixmypcmikefixmypcmike Posts: 19,713

    You've been heard. 

    Doesn't seem to be the case.

    For those people who will not accept DRM under any circumstances on principle (which I can respect), there is nothing Daz can offer short of dropping DRM completely, which Daz is not willing to do without trying it.  For those who have problems with it but are willing to accept it under certain circumstances, Daz has tried to offer concessions which hopefully address their issues.  Saying that Daz has not heard because they haven't abandoned DRM completely is not a fair assessment, any more than saying those who will not accept DRM under any circumstances as a matter of principle are not listening because they won't give it a try and see how it works.

  • kyoto kidkyoto kid Posts: 42,216
    edited February 2016
    atticanne said:
    Petercat said:

    One way to mitigate credit card fraud would be to require any prospective new customer to download the free DazStudio and post a unique scene render to the gallery before they can make their first purchase. That wouldn't stop all fraud, of course, but it would (probably? Maybe?) cut it down a bit.

     

    Thank you, petercat, for the best laugh I've had in months.  I remember when I first got Studio.  No idea how to use it, didn't even know forums existed.  I found free items in the store and immediately went searching for more through Google.  My first scene I envisioned 2 men, casually chatting.  One was seated on a rock, the other standing.  In a wooded area with a bear approaching behind them.  No instructions, no manual.  First I loaded  M4 and proceeded to dress him.  I picked out pants, shirt, then underwear.  Shocker--the underwear appeared on top of his pants and his shirt wasn't tucked in.  No idea how to fix it, so I just let it go.  Loaded another M4 and did the same thing.  I managed to use a photo a friend hade sent me for the background, added a bear and a big rock.  All set.  Now to position the bear.  Okay, now for the M4s.  I worked for several hours before giving up.  They just wouldn't go where I wanted them and I knew nothing about possing or positioning.  Saved and called my daughter to see my masterpiece.  She took one look and when she quit laughing, she demanded I remove it from my computer.  She has 2 sons and said it was an extremely pornographic picture the way I had the men positioned and she did not want her sons seeing it.  I couldn't have put it in the Gallery because I didn't even know there was one.

    Maybe DAZ should adopt your idea.  It could be a special area of the Gallery, Comedy of Errors.

     

    ..+1. 

    ..yeah been there too. Aiko 3 in the Mech Girl costume in getting out of the AM Limo to face off with the Mil Dragon that was chasing her.down the streets of Dystopia.

    Crikey my lighting was terrible in that one and I knew nothing about the difference between Poser and Daz materials so all the windows looked all wrong . Fortunately it is now on a dead HDD.

    Post edited by kyoto kid on
  • nicsttnicstt Posts: 11,715
    edited February 2016

    You've been heard. 

    Doesn't seem to be the case.

    For those people who will not accept DRM under any circumstances on principle (which I can respect), there is nothing Daz can offer short of dropping DRM completely, which Daz is not willing to do without trying it.  For those who have problems with it but are willing to accept it under certain circumstances, Daz has tried to offer concessions which hopefully address their issues.  Saying that Daz has not heard because they haven't abandoned DRM completely is not a fair assessment, any more than saying those who will not accept DRM under any circumstances as a matter of principle are not listening because they won't give it a try and see how it works.

    They've tried to addess some issues; I have no problem with admitting that.

    Some of those that dislike DRM do because of personal experience (how many I've not idea - obviously.); Daz has only done one thing to address the various issues, and it appears to be a decent attempt at compromise. Unfortuneately EULA can be amended and hypethetical future owners could take steps. The other issues Daz can't just stop DRM withoug evidence it will cost more than pre 4.9; the expedicture and commitment can't allow that. So it has to be tried, and who knows, it might on balance be an improvement for them.

    DRM is a feature that offers nothing tangible in the way of benefit to me the customer, or indeed to any customer. Experience again suggests that any benefits that Daz experiences will not be shared with customers. Companies just don't do that unless it is part of some marketing strategy. So at best, any possible benefit, is in some undetermined future.

    So yes, there is nothing Daz can offer - except considerably cheaper prices for DRM products. As others have posted. When you (Daz) control the duration I can use the product for, and the circumstances under which I can use it, the products need to reflect that price.

    Would I personally pay for DRMed items? Not at any price you could rent and still make a profit, I am sure?

     

     

    Post edited by nicstt on
  • larsmidnattlarsmidnatt Posts: 4,511
    edited February 2016
    nicstt said:

    You've been heard. 

    Doesn't seem to be the case.

    For those people who will not accept DRM under any circumstances on principle (which I can respect), there is nothing Daz can offer short of dropping DRM completely, which Daz is not willing to do without trying it.  For those who have problems with it but are willing to accept it under certain circumstances, Daz has tried to offer concessions which hopefully address their issues.  Saying that Daz has not heard because they haven't abandoned DRM completely is not a fair assessment, any more than saying those who will not accept DRM under any circumstances as a matter of principle are not listening because they won't give it a try and see how it works.

     

    So yes, there is nothing Daz can offer - except considerably cheaper prices for DRM products.

    I once said I would get DRM items for 95% off, but I changed my mind last week after some hoopla or another. It still looks like support. I need my content to always work, anytime I want. I'm a artist, I don't have time for no stinking approvals devil

     Once they fix the content library I'll see what others have to say about it before I dive in to 4.9. Sticking with 4.8. 

    Post edited by larsmidnatt on
  • kyoto kidkyoto kid Posts: 42,216

    ...I still have not DL'd the encrypted freebies, as a matter of fact I have not even installed 4.9 yet.

  • You've been heard. 

    Doesn't seem to be the case.

    For those people who will not accept DRM under any circumstances on principle (which I can respect), there is nothing Daz can offer short of dropping DRM completely, which Daz is not willing to do without trying it.  For those who have problems with it but are willing to accept it under certain circumstances, Daz has tried to offer concessions which hopefully address their issues.  Saying that Daz has not heard because they haven't abandoned DRM completely is not a fair assessment, any more than saying those who will not accept DRM under any circumstances as a matter of principle are not listening because they won't give it a try and see how it works.

    Actually, I don't recall hearing that they'd be willing to drop it ever. I always got the sense that it was going to be imposed and the only thing being decided was to what degree. I'm not planning on ever purchasing DRMed content, but I was pretty much just hoping they'd at least relent enough to say that if the results are bad enough that they'd at least consider the possibility of giving up on it. (Admittedly, 'bad enough' is as hard to know from outside as what they would consider success with this but I would like to know if DRM is set in stone or not.)  I can understand and accept that it might not be now, it might not be the near future since it takes time to see how the impact on sales and piracy and all that really is. Doesn't change much for me, there's already whole sections of products I don't generally buy. I didn't even touch G3 stuff till the recent super discount on V7.

     

  • Oso3DOso3D Posts: 15,104

    I actually don't mind that they haven't done anything yet. I had no illusions they would.

    But this all lays the groundwork for, hopefully, explaining why things don't go well, and hopefully if/when things go badly, they will be willing to suck it up and just drop it. My big concern is groupthink, or that given the bad decisions leading up to doing this, more bad decisions will keep it.

     

     

  • kyoto kid said:

    ...I still have not DL'd the encrypted freebies, as a matter of fact I have not even installed 4.9 yet.

    what encrypted freebies? Or do you mean the pay so much and get these free items? I do think they should release a truly free item. While I understand there's some risk involved, it would at least let those with technical based objections see what they're dealing with. Hearing from others that things work fine doesn't tell people what they'd encounter on their own systems. 

  • nicsttnicstt Posts: 11,715

    You've been heard. 

    Doesn't seem to be the case.

    For those people who will not accept DRM under any circumstances on principle (which I can respect), there is nothing Daz can offer short of dropping DRM completely, which Daz is not willing to do without trying it.  For those who have problems with it but are willing to accept it under certain circumstances, Daz has tried to offer concessions which hopefully address their issues.  Saying that Daz has not heard because they haven't abandoned DRM completely is not a fair assessment, any more than saying those who will not accept DRM under any circumstances as a matter of principle are not listening because they won't give it a try and see how it works.

    Actually, I don't recall hearing that they'd be willing to drop it ever. I always got the sense that it was going to be imposed and the only thing being decided was to what degree. I'm not planning on ever purchasing DRMed content, but I was pretty much just hoping they'd at least relent enough to say that if the results are bad enough that they'd at least consider the possibility of giving up on it. (Admittedly, 'bad enough' is as hard to know from outside as what they would consider success with this but I would like to know if DRM is set in stone or not.)  I can understand and accept that it might not be now, it might not be the near future since it takes time to see how the impact on sales and piracy and all that really is. Doesn't change much for me, there's already whole sections of products I don't generally buy. I didn't even touch G3 stuff till the recent super discount on V7.

     

    Even if they would consider that, they couldn't say it; it would be irresponsible of them to state such a thing.

     

    nicstt said:

    You've been heard. 

    Doesn't seem to be the case.

    For those people who will not accept DRM under any circumstances on principle (which I can respect), there is nothing Daz can offer short of dropping DRM completely, which Daz is not willing to do without trying it.  For those who have problems with it but are willing to accept it under certain circumstances, Daz has tried to offer concessions which hopefully address their issues.  Saying that Daz has not heard because they haven't abandoned DRM completely is not a fair assessment, any more than saying those who will not accept DRM under any circumstances as a matter of principle are not listening because they won't give it a try and see how it works.

     

    So yes, there is nothing Daz can offer - except considerably cheaper prices for DRM products.

    I once said I would get DRM items for 95% off, but I changed my mind last week after some hoopla or another. It still looks like support. I need my content to always work, anytime I want. I'm a artist, I don't have time for no stinking approvals devil

     Once they fix the content library I'll see what others have to say about it before I dive in to 4.9. Sticking with 4.8. 

    I've tried 4.9 again; I didn't install the sql stuff, and have Daz blocked through the firewall.

  • FSMCDesignsFSMCDesigns Posts: 12,854

    Here is the solution, add a 10-20% price increase to every product, drop the DRM and use the added 10-20% to fund an anti piracy task force with 2 mandates, one is a group that singles out all illegal file sharing torrent sites and physically shuts them down and throws the owners in a deep dark hole forever. The second group would work with hackers to single out users online that seed the torrent sites and file sharing forums and also users that d/l from them and "compromise" their devices to stop any activity from these low lifes. There you go a win-win for both DAZ and the users, plus every other digital company that suffers from piracy will want DAZ to do the same for their content thus increasing DAZ revenue in the process

  • nicsttnicstt Posts: 11,715

    Here is the solution, add a 10-20% price increase to every product, drop the DRM and use the added 10-20% to fund an anti piracy task force with 2 mandates, one is a group that singles out all illegal file sharing torrent sites and physically shuts them down and throws the owners in a deep dark hole forever. The second group would work with hackers to single out users online that seed the torrent sites and file sharing forums and also users that d/l from them and "compromise" their devices to stop any activity from these low lifes. There you go a win-win for both DAZ and the users, plus every other digital company that suffers from piracy will want DAZ to do the same for their content thus increasing DAZ revenue in the process

    I'd consider that.

  • DAZ_Steve said:

    1. Encryption and DRM.

    ...

    Obviously this does not address some of the other issues...

    No, it doesn't.

    Such as the glaring (to me) reality that you retain ultimate control over any stuff that I might* pay good money to buy from you. Your out-of-business escape pod doesn't help me if you're still in business and busy changing the rules.

    * i.e. not

    That is another thing which bothers me a great deal: the "sudden" and unilateral imposition of this change at DAZ. Any change can be implemented at any time by DAZ, and I don't want to be a slave to a whim.

    I believe it is a matter of trust in their customers on the part of DAZ, but it is also a matter, a very serious matter, of the trust we customers place in DAZ, and that trust has been very greatly damaged. Would a legal argument look at the custom of trade between the seller and the customer, and reasonable expectations by the customer, based on past experience....... ? I hope it does not come to a real-life legal matter.

    It appears from what I have read that new items, and older items as time unfolds, will be encrypted.......  

    What about the content that so many of us use in Poser ????????????????????

    G2 items were supposed to be be used in Poser.... that is how it was presented to us as a real world option. This is no longer possible for encrypted DAZ products. 

    I have invested thousands of dollars in buying DAZ items because they could be also used in Poser.

    I cannot puruse the threads and topics here always, so I don't know if this has been addressed, but I have not read anything about it so far.

    Has anyone read any response to this issue? If not, will DAZ please answer this concern.

    I have bought some encrypted items here, before I read about the concerns. I will probably not return them. But because of the possibility that all DAZ items might someday be encrypted, I am going to be very careful about buying here from this point on.

     

     

     

  • Here is the solution, add a 10-20% price increase to every product, drop the DRM and use the added 10-20% to fund an anti piracy task force with 2 mandates, one is a group that singles out all illegal file sharing torrent sites and physically shuts them down and throws the owners in a deep dark hole forever. The second group would work with hackers to single out users online that seed the torrent sites and file sharing forums and also users that d/l from them and "compromise" their devices to stop any activity from these low lifes. There you go a win-win for both DAZ and the users, plus every other digital company that suffers from piracy will want DAZ to do the same for their content thus increasing DAZ revenue in the process

    Win-win ignoring the lengthy prison sentences likely to be handed down for Daz and its associates, anyway.

  • fixmypcmikefixmypcmike Posts: 19,713
    DAZ_Steve said:

    1. Encryption and DRM.

    ...

    Obviously this does not address some of the other issues...

    No, it doesn't.

    Such as the glaring (to me) reality that you retain ultimate control over any stuff that I might* pay good money to buy from you. Your out-of-business escape pod doesn't help me if you're still in business and busy changing the rules.

    * i.e. not

    That is another thing which bothers me a great deal: the "sudden" and unilateral imposition of this change at DAZ. Any change can be implemented at any time by DAZ, and I don't want to be a slave to a whim.

    I believe it is a matter of trust in their customers on the part of DAZ, but it is also a matter, a very serious matter, of the trust we customers place in DAZ, and that trust has been very greatly damaged. Would a legal argument look at the custom of trade between the seller and the customer, and reasonable expectations by the customer, based on past experience....... ? I hope it does not come to a real-life legal matter.

    It appears from what I have read that new items, and older items as time unfolds, will be encrypted.......  

    What about the content that so many of us use in Poser ????????????????????

    G2 items were supposed to be be used in Poser.... that is how it was presented to us as a real world option. This is no longer possible for encrypted DAZ products. 

    I have invested thousands of dollars in buying DAZ items because they could be also used in Poser.

    I cannot puruse the threads and topics here always, so I don't know if this has been addressed, but I have not read anything about it so far.

    Has anyone read any response to this issue? If not, will DAZ please answer this concern.

    I have bought some encrypted items here, before I read about the concerns. I will probably not return them. But because of the possibility that all DAZ items might someday be encrypted, I am going to be very careful about buying here from this point on.

    IANAL, but the solutions in the first post appear to me to protect the customer from Daz changing its policies on a whim and refusing to allow customers to use their content.  And no one has said anything about encrypting past items -- Daz has said items which are currently available unencrypted would not become encrypted (and there's no reason for doing so, since the unencrypted veersions are already out there).

     

  • TesseractSpaceTesseractSpace Posts: 1,583
    edited February 2016

    Here is the solution, add a 10-20% price increase to every product, drop the DRM and use the added 10-20% to fund an anti piracy task force with 2 mandates, one is a group that singles out all illegal file sharing torrent sites and physically shuts them down and throws the owners in a deep dark hole forever. The second group would work with hackers to single out users online that seed the torrent sites and file sharing forums and also users that d/l from them and "compromise" their devices to stop any activity from these low lifes. There you go a win-win for both DAZ and the users, plus every other digital company that suffers from piracy will want DAZ to do the same for their content thus increasing DAZ revenue in the process

    Win-win ignoring the lengthy prison sentences likely to be handed down for Daz and its associates, anyway.

     

    *Shrug* Pity delivering a Batmanesque beating to some of these people would get more action from the authorities in their countries than the much more massive illegal operations that they are running.  

     

    I had heard other industry groups had discussed putting up fake and harmful versions of software on sharing sites, but obviously then it becomes a question about the ethics of deliberately spreading malware even with good intentions. Though personally I'd regard the complaints of the victims like the story about the drug dealer who goes to the police to report that someone stole his illegal drugs. At least the old .exe installers meant anyone getting one off a pirate site ran a chance of getting a bad case of malware.

    Post edited by TesseractSpace on
  • Let's all drop the personal attacks, please.

    I always agree with that, Mike. You and many others here have been a great help to me and taught me a lot.

    R

  • Thing is, stores do let people walk out, sometimes even though they have good reason to suspect them of theft, because they don't want to lose business by accidently accusing an innocent person. Costco may check reciepts but they've consistently done so for as long as I've heard and they don't come to my house to check them again. You've added this after over a decade of the market not having DRM. And again, DRM is basically a statement that we're all guilty till your system proves us innocent.

    The door lock is a poor analogy, though I suppose if you wanted us to feel locked out I know I've been feeling that way since my database reset, so mission accomplished I guess.

    Again it's not me having a lock on the door, it's you putting a lock on there and giving me a balsawood key that I have to hope doesn't break when I try to use it. Right now I'm stuck crawling in through the window. 

    DAZ is not my neighbor, we are not peers. The business relationship enshrined in the EULA is not one of equals. My neighbors also have no license to use my property and I give them no reason to desire to do so. The presence of a lock on my front door defines a different social contract and is not the same as your DRM. I am not placing a lock on something my neighbor has paid for the right to use.

    I know it's not gaining you money, but I also know how little chance you have of slowing theft down more than briefly with this method. As well, I know how frequently the numbers involved in piracy are exaggerated in order to justify such measures. And no matter how much you promise we won't be locked out, the most you can promise is that we won't be permanently locked out, which is small comfort when you're stuck outside waiting on your locksmith.

    Edited to remove reference to removed post

    What you can always depend on is action and reacftion.

    The bad guys will break the code, and the stolen Daz item will be sold unencrypted on the bad-guys retail site. This might be even more harm in the long run.

     

    Oh..... and what about the Poser users?

  • ByrdieByrdie Posts: 1,783

    I dunno, lots of people have gotten bad cases of malware without being criminals. Remember when the Polipos virus was making the rounds? No pirated stuff on my machine, but I got it all the same and I'm sure I'm not the only one did while using p2p/torrent software only for perfectly legal things, such as indie films and music and other public domain stuff. Computer viruses, like biological ones, do not discriminate when it comes to spreading infections, with the result being that innocent parties are stricken along with the guilty. 

  • IceCrMnIceCrMn Posts: 2,332

    Thing is, stores do let people walk out, sometimes even though they have good reason to suspect them of theft, because they don't want to lose business by accidently accusing an innocent person. Costco may check reciepts but they've consistently done so for as long as I've heard and they don't come to my house to check them again. You've added this after over a decade of the market not having DRM. And again, DRM is basically a statement that we're all guilty till your system proves us innocent.

    The door lock is a poor analogy, though I suppose if you wanted us to feel locked out I know I've been feeling that way since my database reset, so mission accomplished I guess.

    Again it's not me having a lock on the door, it's you putting a lock on there and giving me a balsawood key that I have to hope doesn't break when I try to use it. Right now I'm stuck crawling in through the window. 

    DAZ is not my neighbor, we are not peers. The business relationship enshrined in the EULA is not one of equals. My neighbors also have no license to use my property and I give them no reason to desire to do so. The presence of a lock on my front door defines a different social contract and is not the same as your DRM. I am not placing a lock on something my neighbor has paid for the right to use.

    I know it's not gaining you money, but I also know how little chance you have of slowing theft down more than briefly with this method. As well, I know how frequently the numbers involved in piracy are exaggerated in order to justify such measures. And no matter how much you promise we won't be locked out, the most you can promise is that we won't be permanently locked out, which is small comfort when you're stuck outside waiting on your locksmith.

    Edited to remove reference to removed post

    What you can always depend on is action and reacftion.

    The bad guys will break the code, and the stolen Daz item will be sold unencrypted on the bad-guys retail site. This might be even more harm in the long run.

     

    Oh..... and what about the Poser users?

    Well,,,Poser belongs to Smithmicro. Daz really doesn't have much say in what happens to that program. Smithmicro could pull Poser off the shelf tomorrow and there would be nothing Daz could do about it.

  • FSMCDesignsFSMCDesigns Posts: 12,854
     

    *Shrug* Pity delivering a Batmanesque beating to some of these people would get more action from the authorities in their countries than the much more massive illegal operations that they are running.  

     

    I had heard other industry groups had discussed putting up fake and harmful versions of software on sharing sites, but obviously then it becomes a question about the ethics of deliberately spreading malware even with good intentions. Though personally I'd regard the complaints of the victims like the story about the drug dealer who goes to the police to report that someone stole his illegal drugs. At least the old .exe installers meant anyone getting one off a pirate site ran a chance of getting a bad case of malware.

    I remember a rumor for a game I develop commercial content for. Another payware company developed a massive commercial global mod for the game. After it was released, they then released an update with fixes. In the update was also a checker to make sure the copy of the mod was licensed to the user which bought the mod as was the case upon initial install of the mod. If the license did not match, the update erased all evidence of the mod in the game. The company never acknowledged or denied this publicly, but there were quite a forum forum users wondering why their mod dissapeared and it was sooooooooooooooooo gratifying to see other forums users give these users a very hard time since this singled them out as getting the mod from non legit means

  • HavosHavos Posts: 5,655
    DAZ_Steve said:

    1. Encryption and DRM.

    ...

    Obviously this does not address some of the other issues...

    No, it doesn't.

    Such as the glaring (to me) reality that you retain ultimate control over any stuff that I might* pay good money to buy from you. Your out-of-business escape pod doesn't help me if you're still in business and busy changing the rules.

    * i.e. not

    That is another thing which bothers me a great deal: the "sudden" and unilateral imposition of this change at DAZ. Any change can be implemented at any time by DAZ, and I don't want to be a slave to a whim.

    I believe it is a matter of trust in their customers on the part of DAZ, but it is also a matter, a very serious matter, of the trust we customers place in DAZ, and that trust has been very greatly damaged. Would a legal argument look at the custom of trade between the seller and the customer, and reasonable expectations by the customer, based on past experience....... ? I hope it does not come to a real-life legal matter.

    It appears from what I have read that new items, and older items as time unfolds, will be encrypted.......  

    What about the content that so many of us use in Poser ????????????????????

    G2 items were supposed to be be used in Poser.... that is how it was presented to us as a real world option. This is no longer possible for encrypted DAZ products. 

    I have invested thousands of dollars in buying DAZ items because they could be also used in Poser.

    I cannot puruse the threads and topics here always, so I don't know if this has been addressed, but I have not read anything about it so far.

    Has anyone read any response to this issue? If not, will DAZ please answer this concern.

    I have bought some encrypted items here, before I read about the concerns. I will probably not return them. But because of the possibility that all DAZ items might someday be encrypted, I am going to be very careful about buying here from this point on.

    IANAL, but the solutions in the first post appear to me to protect the customer from Daz changing its policies on a whim and refusing to allow customers to use their content.  And no one has said anything about encrypting past items -- Daz has said items which are currently available unencrypted would not become encrypted (and there's no reason for doing so, since the unencrypted veersions are already out there).

     

    They originally were going to encrypt everything (via DAZ Connect that is), and whilst they changed their mind on that, it is that original intent that makes some users uneasy as to what they would have really done if no one had complained.

  • Barbult, I recommend putting a ticket with just what was discussed here so it gets on their list to go over.  Even though Daz is actively monitoring, I would go that extra step just to be sure.  :)

    Petercat said:
    barbult said:
    Petercat said:
    Sorel said:

    To be fair, it is a vocal few >_>

    Of the population on this thread? Not so few.

    My objection was mostly to the part, "who want to have their feelings hurt."

    Adding "want to" was unneeded, childish, and gratuitously insulting.

    If Steve had said "who have their feelings hurt", I wouldn't have even mentioned it.

    But for this to come from the freakin' Director of Marketing??!! Un-freaking-believable.

    "who want to have their feelings hurt"???? Where did you read that? I think you may be misquoting.

     

    That was a direct cut-and-paste from Steve's comment. It appears to have been changed since then.

    Yeah, think he might have realized just how insulting and patronizing that turn of phrase was. Hoping that was just him being tired and/or out of sorts, I'd really hate to think that he really thinks that

    Considering how many times I've posted things and then as I reread them after posting, have gone and changed and reworded things up to a dozen times realizing I actually meant to say something another way, or decided it was better put another way or adding something I forgot.  Many people do that.  And thank goodness we have the ability to do that because some of us would be cherry-red with mistakes we made with posting and had no edit recourse.  I've made some whole-word -typos that made me think I had a multiple personality disorder and one of them was having fun with me when I was typing.  

    I've been a PA with Daz since 2001.  My first SKU was 370.  I was one of the first moderators when Daz began their forums.  I've had a lot of dealings with Daz and those working there and they are good people.  I have stayed with Daz because I've never seen a company that bends so far backwards for their customers. They have made errors and always tried to make things right when it comes to sales and other things that concern their customers.  It's far too easy to ascribe wrong doing, mal-intent, corporate-speak when you're dealing with a company and a handful of names.  I wish you guys had the ability to know these people as some of us, PAs and mods, do.  The information that was presented by Steve may not address everything, but it is certainly showing that they are listening and working on things.  It's only been a week and you already have gotten some official word.   

    People have a tendency to get into it and rile each other up.  Ok, that's good, you' make your opnions heard.  Don't let it become circular.  Circles just keep moving, but never go anywhere but around and around.  Decide what you're going to do or wait and listen to what's happening and reports from those that are working with Connect.  It's a work in progress.  Have respect for one another.  Step away when it gets to be too much.  Report to the mods when you feel someone is out of line instead of responding in the forums.  Help us help you.

    (Edited, and of course, the thing I typed wrong was the word "typos".  LOL!)

    Really good point.

    I think part of what is bothering me is that I have always been treated really decently and fairly by the good folks at DAZ.

    And then, out of the blue, this DRM thing lands on the house. Now, I think the DAZ folks are trying to help their vendors. There is no nefarious scheme to hurt customers.

    However, DRM just does not work, and will make things much more difficult for the customers.

    When I buy an item, I want to be left alone to work with it, in DS or Poser....... and I still have heard nothing about Poser users.

  • ByrdieByrdie Posts: 1,783

    :nods: Right about now somebody is probably going: "Poser users? We still have those around here?"  Yes, Daz, you do. What about us? We'd like to buy the things you have that would otherwise work for us, like new G2 goodies you might be releasing for instance. But no can do if they're gonna be encrypted and/or Connect only from now on.

  • Oso3DOso3D Posts: 15,104

    I keep imagining the original post as:

    'Good news, everyone! We listened to you, and are now doing exactly what we were doing before!'

    /Farnsworth

     

  • frogimusfrogimus Posts: 200
    Byrdie said:

    :nods: Right about now somebody is probably going: "Poser users? We still have those around here?"  Yes, Daz, you do. What about us? We'd like to buy the things you have that would otherwise work for us, like new G2 goodies you might be releasing for instance. But no can do if they're gonna be encrypted and/or Connect only from now on.

    I can't really remember which of the multitude of 20+ page topics it was in, but one of the DAZ_people stated that there weren't very many Poser users according to a poll they did.

  • ByrdieByrdie Posts: 1,783

    Heard that one before, guess they don't want my money. cheeky

  • frogimus said:
    Byrdie said:

    :nods: Right about now somebody is probably going: "Poser users? We still have those around here?"  Yes, Daz, you do. What about us? We'd like to buy the things you have that would otherwise work for us, like new G2 goodies you might be releasing for instance. But no can do if they're gonna be encrypted and/or Connect only from now on.

    I can't really remember which of the multitude of 20+ page topics it was in, but one of the DAZ_people stated that there weren't very many Poser users according to a poll they did.

    Poll or no poll Daz has been moving away from Poser support for a long time

     

This discussion has been closed.