Loading...
> >

Is this Victoria?

XyetztXyetzt Posts: 27,527
in The Commons

I found this YouTube video with this goth girl?  She reminds me of a Victoria or Genesis figure.  But not sure which one.  The hair seems to be rendered in DS.

IMG_4129.jpeg
1623 x 886 - 302K

Comments

  • 3DIO3DIO Posts: 449

    She looks typical AI to me, and I feel like I've seen that same face a million times now.
    But fear not, cause the real life Barbie Girl looks more like a real life Goth Girl anyway!

    The arm tattoo in the video doesn't look very "Barbie" IMHO:

     

    LN.jpg
    474 x 316 - 18K
  • WendyLuvsCatzWendyLuvsCatz Posts: 41,214

    without you linking the actual video, one cannot really tell but I strongly suspect it's AI as watched many similar ones that are

  • XyetztXyetzt Posts: 27,527

    I think this is it.

  • crosswindcrosswind Posts: 9,962
    edited July 14

    Definitely an AI generated image + post work... but it does remind me of some V4 / G2F chars from Jessaii, if you review their stores: 

    https://www.daz3d.com/jessaii
    https://www.renderosity.com/marketplace/vendors/Jessaii

    Post edited by crosswind on
  • WendyLuvsCatzWendyLuvsCatz Posts: 41,214
    edited July 14

    ah I thought it would be animated because it reminded me of the style of Noturnal Records AI music videos 

    https://youtube.com/@nocturnalrecords-1?si=KiuSmfxKl6_V025R

    Post edited by WendyLuvsCatz on
  • 3DIO3DIO Posts: 449
    edited July 15

    I must admit, I still don't understand how something like that AI "Barbie Girl" track can escape the fact that the AI must have used (in this case Aqua's) intellectual property in order to render the audio with the same words and melody.  If not, then how the Hell would it even know how the track goes?

    If I were to program my own arrangement of Barbie Girl into my DAW, and publish it, then that would be an infringement of Aqua's intellectual property, unless I'd been licensed to do that.  In musical terms, the AI track posted here would be considered a different 'arrangement' of Aqua's Barbie Girl.

    So I fail to see how (just because it's a different arrangement), it somehow escapes the blatantly obvious fact that the title of the track, the lyrics of the track, and the melody of the track all belong to Aqua.  Crazy (and legally dangerous) stuff IMHO, fun as it must be to play around with!

    Not trying to be a gate-crashing a-hole by the way, I'm just being a realist, because I doubt the appalling audio quality that AI systems tend to render out, would be enough to save a person from legal issues if an intellectual property holder took issue.  Now obviously, I very much doubt that Aqua would take issue (in fact I doubt most artists would take any issue to hearing AI renditions of their work), but you have to wonder where this is all going, and the potential consequences of it all.

     

    Post edited by 3DIO on
  • WendyLuvsCatzWendyLuvsCatz Posts: 41,214

    the band I linked uses AI to enhance their own original music. they play their instruments and sing but run it through Suno to flesh it out. They use AI video with their clips as well as footage of themselves 

Sign In or Register to comment.