No encrypted for me.

1202123252641

Comments

  • kyoto kidkyoto kid Posts: 41,847

    ..yeah, haven't done much modelling as it is so frustrating when Hex just freezes up on me with no warning.  I have to kill the process in Task Manager when that happens.

  • There are still certain effects and materials that I need to render in Poser although I use DAZ Studio and Reality for other things. Nevertheless, not being able to import .duf files into Poser at all any more severly limits their value for me. I had still been buying some G3 content, hoping that eventually comatibility might be achieved again but that seems to be a lost cause by now. I should really cancel my subscription, or perhaps buy a few remaining older items before doing so. Bad feelings about this overall, and judging by the number of views and replies to this discussion, it is not exactly only a select few customers who are annoyed by this move.

  • lx_2807502lx_2807502 Posts: 2,996
    ghosty12 said:

    Even some of the other 3D content sites are starting to mock this DRM stance..  Recieved a email from one of them today promoting that their content is and will always be DRM free, and part of their promotion was giving a discount code to all their members..

     

    I can't speak for DAZ, but a lot of those points have answers:

    * Carrara, Bryce, and Hexagon appear to have pretty much become DAZ's backburner projects that they'll never really get around to concentrating on again. Most software companies do this though, so it's not unprecedented.

    * Adding KeyMate and GraphMate to Studio along with aniMate will give it very good animation tools.

    * I don't have a good reason why we don't have better dynamics in Studio yet, but I doubt it's just "DAZ doesn't want to do what we want".

    * Technical advancements made it too difficult to keep compatibility with Poser when developing new figures and content.

    They're still charging money for Bryce, Carrara and Hexagon. That carries an obligation for support which they have been very negligent with. Yeah Hexagon is only $20, but it's cheap price doesn't change the fact that every modern machine is running on a 64 bit operating system which they don't support. If they don't intend to support the software they should do the honourable thing and make it open source so the users can support it.

    Animate just lets you save your own aniblocks. Keymate and Graphmate add some additional useful animation features to the program (which should have been there to begin with) but Daz Studio is still way too weak when it comes to animation tools.

    At this point Daz not adding dynamics and physics to Studio does appear to be Daz not wanting to do what we want. There's no other way to explain it. It is almost universally wanted and yet Daz makes absolutely no movement on that front... oh but hey, have another Genesis figure nobody asked for.

    And as for technology moving on in other fronts. If Daz would just use the standards for FBX and DAE instead of using their own proprietary formats for those industry standards (and what's the point of a DAE/FBX export/import for Daz Studio that only works in Daz Studio) then getting Daz assets to work in other industry software would be less problematic. There is absolutely no excuse for Daz not to use the standardized DAE/FBX protocols other than they don't want people to use Daz assets in other applications. This is downright incompetence. Daz makes the majority of it's bucks selling assets and yet they do everything they can to make sure nobody can use those assets in anything other than one single program. And a program which the industry considers a joke.

    I am at a complete loss to figure out what the motives of the leadership of the company are because it certainly can't be to increase the userbase for the software nor increase the sales of their assets when everything they do runs counter to those goals.


    Has me wondering that was why their was that exodus of talented PA's and Staff from here to go and startup Hivewire maybe they saw the writing on the wall way back then..

    And totally agree on that matter of Daz's other software products and total lack of support for them..  I use Hexagon a lot would love a 64bit version but I don't see that happening, I would use Bryce and Carrara but since they won't work with encrypted content say goodbye to them..

    There are articles about why that happened over on that site. Very illuminating read on how the new Daz management works. But to be honest, I like Daz figures and sales a whole lot more than that site, so as long as good content is released unencrypted here, I'll keep buying it regardless of the politics.

  • RCTSpankyRCTSpanky Posts: 850
    edited January 2016

    Sorry for Oskarsson and Imaginary_House... great Trenchcord and Warehouse, which I immediately put in my cart (Bundle), until I saw that it is available only as "Encrypted Content". You've lost me as a customer. "Encrypted Content" means no deal for me.

    Apart from that, DAZ should mark "Encrypted Content Only" on their store pages, so i save the time to check each product or to buy it by mistake and must give it back.

    Post edited by RCTSpanky on
  • TaozTaoz Posts: 10,247

    .

    Morpheon said:
    icecrmn said:
     

    Daz is the only store I know of that will give you free fixes and updates to products, after you have bought them.

    Renderosity has done that for years. Have you never received an email from them telling you that an item you purchased has been updated and the new files are waiting for you to download?

    They also have an update flag for the products, in the download section - unfortunately the vendors sometimes forget to set it so you won't see the product has been updated. 

  • kyoto kidkyoto kid Posts: 41,847

    ...bugger, finally a decent trench coat (been looking for one for years) and it's encrypted.

  • DaikatanaDaikatana Posts: 830
    kyoto kid said:

    ...bugger, finally a decent trench coat (been looking for one for years) and it's encrypted.

    Luthbel made a nice trenchcoat with the Eldritch Seeker product for G2 male.  I use it often.

  • kyoto kidkyoto kid Posts: 41,847
    edited January 2016

    ...nice, but somewhat more period styled (30s Cthulu investigator) and a bit out of my budget. I just need a "generic" 60s styled trench coat like the one posted tonight, and at 1/3 the price, a lot easier on the old wallet.

    I sure hope this isn't going to become an ongoing trend with DO content, or staying with the PC will no longer be worth the membership price.

    Post edited by kyoto kid on
  • DaikatanaDaikatana Posts: 830
    kyoto kid said:

    ...nice, but somewhat more period styled (30s Cthulu investigator) and a bit out of my budget. I just need a "generic" trench coat

    I sure hope this isn't going to become an ongoing  trend with DO content, or staying  in the PC will no longer be worth the cost.

    Yeah.  This occurred to me while looking at the various options this morning .  There's still the PA content related coupon though.

    I used to do the bulk of my 3D shopping here at DAZ because they often DO have the best content but now with this encryption situation having evolved, it's starting to appear that I will spend more time -and more money elsewhere.

    I simply can't understand why a company will take a stance that alienates a good chunk of its long term customers as well as put itself in a vulnerable position as regards to its competitors and simply not care.  Are they TRYING to put themselves out of business?

     

  • Silas3DSilas3D Posts: 731
    edited January 2016

    Has DAZ clarified what the deal is with bundles that are a mixture of encrypted only and non-encrypted content (such as the newly released detective bundle)?

    • All items encrypted only?
    • All items unencrypted?
    • Items maintain their native encryption status?

    They really need to be more transparent about encryption only products. Store filter is a no-brainer and should have been there from day one. in addition, a straightforward way to do it would be to enforce a CSS logo/watermark in one corner of the promo's, perhaps a padlock symbol or something else that's universally acceptable as a restricted/locked symbol, and then update their brand guidelines for promos so that said corner cannot have any other text. Another alternative would be to update the official watermarks and make them mandatory for PA's to use.

    I also don't agree with the removal of the last few major versions. Can you imagine what it would be like if Microsoft had dropped support for IE9/IE10 as soon as IE11 was released? As a front end developer it would have made my life a hell of a lot easier, but there will always be customers that will need access to a couple of legacy versions. 3D software is no different, in some respects; I daresay a lot of people are still using XP or generally 5+ years old hardware that simply wouldn't be capable of running the latest and greatest.

    I shan't be upgrading to 4.9 because I won't support software that supports permanently encrypted only content, regardless of the other benefits it provides. I've worked in the ICT industry for over 10 years and as other people have already repeated, DRM is a bad idea, though I really do sympathise with PA's that lose revenue due to piracy. I would like to one day become a PA for DAZ3D myself, but it would only be on the condition I wasn't forced to provide products with encryption, so I'll be continuing to watch this thread intently.

    For info, I'm aware I've used DRM and encryption interchangeably - when files are permanently encrypted so that they can't be read/edited by someone, that's DRM in my opinion.

    Post edited by Silas3D on
  • tl155180tl155180 Posts: 994
    edited January 2016
    ghosty12 said:

    Even some of the other 3D content sites are starting to mock this DRM stance..  Recieved a email from one of them today promoting that their content is and will always be DRM free, and part of their promotion was giving a discount code to all their members..

    Yeah, I've had this email too this morning. It made me chuckle. Trying to cash in on what they obviously hope will be Daz's DRM-related demise. Very cheeky, but very funny.

    I must admit... also very tempting.

    Post edited by tl155180 on
  • nicsttnicstt Posts: 11,715
    Jan19 said:
    nicstt said:
    Jan19 said:

    I do not think the content encryption has much to do with making the pirates' lives harder. It probably does make a pirate life harder, but i think it just does not matter (at least for DAZ). Nowadays vendors had 10 years time or so to become accustomed to piracy and probably have adjusted their prices and expected sales with the existance of piracy taken into account anyway. So why start fighting piracy now? Do they suddenly feel the urge to make all their products cheaper? Sounds unlikely to me.

    To prevent piracy, all the DS application would need to do is to check if the content is legit, i.e. if it was previously bought be the user (provided that the Dson content is mainly used in DazStudio). If one wants to throw cryptography at that challenge, one would use a so called signature algorithm. Most signature algorithms do not require the data to be unreadable. Think of Https (e.g. like in the personal account area of this site): Https authenticates the daz account area to the user, so the user can be sure that the page really comes from daz. It does not make it unreadable. So a pirate could copy the webpage, but it cannot be used as a replacement for the daz-page, because of the 's' in 'Https'. The same mechanism could be used to authenticate content. But DazConnect does not use signatures; it uses encryption. So the question naturally is: what is this encryption trying to accomplish besides restricting illegal usage of content? At least if this encryption scheme was engineered intentionally.

    One possibility it might be used for is a way to implement vendor-lock-in. Or to be more exact, it will happen, but if it will be a blessing or a curse can not be foreseen today. But the effect is not so much to lock out non-users (ie pirates) of using the products, but to lock in existing users with the software (and the content), so that they continue use the products (that can be a good or a bad thing, but its usually good for the vendor, i.e. Daz in this case). Like DAZ_* wrote more than once, they have no plans for the near future to do this and that. Above all they probably have no plans for the more far future. For example if DS will be free of charge forever. Might not be the question today, but maybe in a year or two? It might also be out of DAZ's control. Perhaps one day the NVIDIA's revenue stream originating from DS users buying high end graphics cards might trickle, and NVIDIA might say: "Sorry Daz, the free iray doesn't cut it any more, from now on you have to pay $100 for every iray license". I could imagine a lot of users would not pay that and look for alternatives. Who knows, by the time that happens some competitors (like Poser or 3dsmax)  might have implemented the Dson format, and might actually be cheaper and/or better in every aspect. But even if 3dsmax would cost only $10 and had a perfect Dson format reader: if a user had built a considerable $1000-library of encrypted content which only DS can read, the user would likely swallow the pill and pay the price for the newest DS version, just to keep that content.

    An example where that worked out rather well in the 3d-world is 3dmax. Once i have a considerable library of .max files, i will buy (or rent) the 3dsmax software. It does not really matter to me if 3dsmax contains bugs, provides no innovations or is worth its money. I will buy it anyway because no other non-autodesk application can read those .max files. It could also be called customer-loyalty instead of vendor-lock-in. Does not sound so negative.

    Actually the best way to curb piracy is to use a watermark or a code stamp someplace in the content that won't be notice maybe in a code snippit embed into the product with individual serial# for each customer that bought it., its ls less intrusive to the customer and privacy & that way each product sold would have its own customer ID# with out exposing the custer to the public making it traceable and easier find the person responsible and to prosecute them. put a watermark or a code ID into the product  your piracy will stop almost over night and if there is pirated copies issue you will know who was the one who released it.   Many  web site developers are doing this now and it works  even Amazon & Kindle has adopted this policy for their e-books

    Thanks to those who are explaining encryption.  :-)  I know very little about it.

    As for the embedded watermark, I wondered if something like that was possible.  It'd zero in on who is doing what with the content -- using it in the wrong way, I mean.

     

     

    Dont confuse DRM for encryption; DRM uses encryption, but other tools on the internet also use encryption; you are likely aware of the https (indication a safe connection) which is used for passing private personal data, which is done by encryption. This is without any risk of the customer being tempoarily or permenantly locked out. That is often a result of issues with the company and its servers becoming unavailable or the company cancelling/stopping a service that uses DRM.

    Ok -- well, obviously I know less about DRM than I think. :-)  Thanks for the info.

     

     

    Encryption is good, for example: would you want to make a payment over the internet without your card details being encrypted. It's a tool, and like any tool, it's use can have positive and negative consequences no matter the intent.

     

     

    If I wish to relocate parts of a product to suit whatever setup I'm running, I can do so. Not so with encrypted products which must remain where they install to as I can't simply rewrite where they look for components.

    Not true.  Daz has already provided a capability to provide links to the Connect-installed files (encrypted or not) so you can move them around in your file browser.  As for components, why do you need to move around the components?  If you routinely like to move around files in Data or in Runtime:Textures, why?

    Why? Not important to anyone else, only the person doing it; there workflow is their own. This is like arguing with someone about how they hold their pen or brush. It works for them.

  • DaikatanaDaikatana Posts: 830

    Gah!!!  This is sooo tough.  The Gianni 7 pro bundle is non encrypted.  I can buy this without compromising my stance on DRM.  This is good.  But then DAZ tosses out that little detective mini -bundle (which is encrypted) go a 75% discount if I buy it with the Gianni bundle.  It's male content. There's never enough male content.  They are really trying to make this hard...

    Must. Hold. Firm.

  • nicsttnicstt Posts: 11,715
    Daikatana said:

    Gah!!!  This is sooo tough.  The Gianni 7 pro bundle is non encrypted.  I can buy this without compromising my stance on DRM.  This is good.  But then DAZ tosses out that little detective mini -bundle (which is encrypted) go a 75% discount if I buy it with the Gianni bundle.  It's male content. There's never enough male content.  They are really trying to make this hard...

    Must. Hold. Firm.

    Ultimately, people's buying habits, not their posts will tell them what they think of DRM.

  • nicstt said:
    Daikatana said:

    Gah!!!  This is sooo tough.  The Gianni 7 pro bundle is non encrypted.  I can buy this without compromising my stance on DRM.  This is good.  But then DAZ tosses out that little detective mini -bundle (which is encrypted) go a 75% discount if I buy it with the Gianni bundle.  It's male content. There's never enough male content.  They are really trying to make this hard...

    Must. Hold. Firm.

    Ultimately, people's buying habits, not their posts will tell them what they think of DRM.

    Certainly some clever frog boiling on DAZ's part.  First the it's free, then 75% off, it's not too hard to imagine it will just be the norm on new releases by the end of February.

  • Jason GalterioJason Galterio Posts: 2,562
    edited January 2016

    Okay, doing my best to remain calm and react reationally.

    Installed 4.9. Started it up. Right out of the gate I get the error message below. Exactly what I was afraid of getting.

    It came up right when I first launched. Is it normal for it to come up the first time? I don't recall it happening on my test machine.

    What constitutes a "system change" so that I can avoid it in the future?

    EDITED TO ADD:

    And it seems like this error comes up every time I start DAZ. I have not tried rebooting yet.

    DaZ Connect.jpg
    539 x 125 - 33K
    Post edited by Jason Galterio on
  • cherpenbeckcherpenbeck Posts: 1,416

    Buying habits don't always offer valid data. I "bought" the first "free" encrypted items, just because a) they were free and b) I wanted to see if this encrypted content is of any use in 4.8.

    It isn't. So I never downloaded the three items, as I stay with 4.8 . But sales department will say: She bought it, so she's interested in encrypted content.

  • LeanaLeana Posts: 12,740
    RCTSpanky said:

    Sorry for Oskarsson and Imaginary_House... great Trenchcord and Warehouse, which I immediately put in my cart (Bundle), until I saw that it is available only as "Encrypted Content". You've lost me as a customer. "Encrypted Content" means no deal for me.

    Once again: Those products are DAZ ORIGINALS, not PA Products. Oskarsson and Imaginary_House had nothing to do with the fact that those are distributed as encrypted content. DAZ lost a sale (well, make that 2 since I would probably have bought the trenchcoat too had it not been encrypted), not them.

    tigerste said:

    Has DAZ clarified what the deal is with bundles that are a mixture of encrypted only and non-encrypted content (such as the newly released detective bundle)?

    • All items encrypted only?
    • All items unencrypted?
    • Items maintain their native encryption status?

    Since bundles are not distributed as a single file but add each product of the bundle to your library then each product should maintain their native encryption status. 

  • nicsttnicstt Posts: 11,715
    nicstt said:
    Daikatana said:

    Gah!!!  This is sooo tough.  The Gianni 7 pro bundle is non encrypted.  I can buy this without compromising my stance on DRM.  This is good.  But then DAZ tosses out that little detective mini -bundle (which is encrypted) go a 75% discount if I buy it with the Gianni bundle.  It's male content. There's never enough male content.  They are really trying to make this hard...

    Must. Hold. Firm.

    Ultimately, people's buying habits, not their posts will tell them what they think of DRM.

    Certainly some clever frog boiling on DAZ's part.  First the it's free, then 75% off, it's not too hard to imagine it will just be the norm on new releases by the end of February.

    I'm voting with my wallet; I haven't taken advantage of any offers that include DRM; if I take advantage of an offer because its a good deal, despite the 'free' extras, I won't add them to my cart. I have nothing against DRM in principle, but principles get sacrificed for expediency by companies; I don't know what Daz's intentions are, and that is the problem; they can be all genuine today, but tomorrow be something else.

    I look on it that DRM enforces the T&Cs that states we are in affect - renting - the product. A lease without any way of knowing its duration, or when we will be forclosed on, is not to be trusted. Snake oil is not just sold by snake oil salesman.

  • LeanaLeana Posts: 12,740

    Okay, doing my best to remain calm and react reationally.

    Installed 4.9. Started it up. Right out of the gate I get the error message below. Exactly what I was afraid of getting.

    It came up right when I first launched. Is it normal for it to come up the first time? I don't recall it happening on my test machine.

    What constitutes a "system change" so that I can avoid it in the future?

    EDITED TO ADD:

    And it seems like this error comes up every time I start DAZ. I have not tried rebooting yet.

    If you never ever logged in it might be normal: I wouldn't be surprised if DS used the same error message to tell you that your key became invalid or that you simply don't have a key at all.

    The kind of system changes that would make a key invalid are probablyhardware changes and maybe some windows updates that change the system's signature.

  • Leana said:

    Okay, doing my best to remain calm and react reationally.

    Installed 4.9. Started it up. Right out of the gate I get the error message below. Exactly what I was afraid of getting.

    It came up right when I first launched. Is it normal for it to come up the first time? I don't recall it happening on my test machine.

    What constitutes a "system change" so that I can avoid it in the future?

    EDITED TO ADD:

    And it seems like this error comes up every time I start DAZ. I have not tried rebooting yet.

    If you never ever logged in it might be normal: I wouldn't be surprised if DS used the same error message to tell you that your key became invalid or that you simply don't have a key at all.

    The kind of system changes that would make a key invalid are probablyhardware changes and maybe some windows updates that change the system's signature.

    That's what I figured too...

    However, as far as I can remember, this message never came up on my test computer. Only now on my actual working laptop.

    And it continues to come up at every DS startup. Which is even more alarming.

  • argel1200argel1200 Posts: 760
    edited January 2016

    Buying habits don't always offer valid data. I "bought" the first "free" encrypted items, just because a) they were free and b) I wanted to see if this encrypted content is of any use in 4.8.

    It isn't. So I never downloaded the three items, as I stay with 4.8 . But sales department will say: She bought it, so she's interested in encrypted content.

    I picked up the free encytpted content as well, but I am very reluctant to encoruage this for paid content. I am also tempted to start boycotting PAs tied to encrypted content. Even if DAZ purchased the content, if PAs feel the burn they may stop selling to DAZ or only sell to DAZ under the condition that the content is not encrypted. If we do not take a stance on this now, encryption will be here to stay for sure. It's now or never.

    Edit1: Though it is tempting at 75% off. At least the poses are supposedly unencrypted - wonder if that was a mistake? Has anyone purchased them to see if they are actually available unencrypted?

    Edit2: Regarding 64-bit versions of Bryce and Hexagon, they were likely written with only 32-bit systems in mind are would likely be extermely diffiuclty to port to 64-bit, so I doubt we will ever see 64-bit versions of them. :(

    Post edited by argel1200 on
  • LeanaLeana Posts: 12,740
    Leana said:

    Okay, doing my best to remain calm and react reationally.

    Installed 4.9. Started it up. Right out of the gate I get the error message below. Exactly what I was afraid of getting.

    It came up right when I first launched. Is it normal for it to come up the first time? I don't recall it happening on my test machine.

    What constitutes a "system change" so that I can avoid it in the future?

    EDITED TO ADD:

    And it seems like this error comes up every time I start DAZ. I have not tried rebooting yet.

    If you never ever logged in it might be normal: I wouldn't be surprised if DS used the same error message to tell you that your key became invalid or that you simply don't have a key at all.

    The kind of system changes that would make a key invalid are probablyhardware changes and maybe some windows updates that change the system's signature.

    That's what I figured too...

    However, as far as I can remember, this message never came up on my test computer. Only now on my actual working laptop.

    And it continues to come up at every DS startup. Which is even more alarming.

    If it's a recent version of Windows, maybe try running it once as Administrator and connecting to DAZ during that session?

  • Leana said:
    Leana said:

    Okay, doing my best to remain calm and react reationally.

    Installed 4.9. Started it up. Right out of the gate I get the error message below. Exactly what I was afraid of getting.

    It came up right when I first launched. Is it normal for it to come up the first time? I don't recall it happening on my test machine.

    What constitutes a "system change" so that I can avoid it in the future?

    EDITED TO ADD:

    And it seems like this error comes up every time I start DAZ. I have not tried rebooting yet.

    If you never ever logged in it might be normal: I wouldn't be surprised if DS used the same error message to tell you that your key became invalid or that you simply don't have a key at all.

    The kind of system changes that would make a key invalid are probablyhardware changes and maybe some windows updates that change the system's signature.

    That's what I figured too...

    However, as far as I can remember, this message never came up on my test computer. Only now on my actual working laptop.

    And it continues to come up at every DS startup. Which is even more alarming.

    If it's a recent version of Windows, maybe try running it once as Administrator and connecting to DAZ during that session?

    No luck on that either. I always run DS as Administrator due to having to pick which GPU the software is going to default to.

  • nicsttnicstt Posts: 11,715
    argel1200 said:

    Buying habits don't always offer valid data. I "bought" the first "free" encrypted items, just because a) they were free and b) I wanted to see if this encrypted content is of any use in 4.8.

    It isn't. So I never downloaded the three items, as I stay with 4.8 . But sales department will say: She bought it, so she's interested in encrypted content.

    I picked up the free encytpted content as well, but I am very reluctant to encoruage this for paid content. I am also tempted to start boycotting PAs tied to encrypted content. Even if DAZ purchased the content, if PAs feel the burn they may stop selling to DAZ or only sell to DAZ under the condition that the content is not encrypted. If we do not take a stance on this now, encryption will be here to stay for sure. It's now or never.

    Indeed

  • Good news. Previous error message went away on the third entry.

    Bad news, now I get this error message...

    DaZ Connect 2.jpg
    527 x 145 - 51K
  • Excuse my paranoia over this whole DRM idea but I must look at things here realistically

    Don't be paranoid. Wait and see what happens. We go through this EVERY TIME DAZ does anything of note and yet we're all still here.

    Except that this is the best time to say something, while it's still new. Before the ones responsible (I doubt it's anyone we'd know. This sounds like the decision of someone who either doesn't know or doesn't care what the marketplace thinks of DRM) decide to ramp things up. The game industry started small with DRM. Password checks, on-install authentication... when that didn't get the results they thought it should, they went to stronger and more onerous methods such as having to always have the install disc, having to always be online, or flat out rootkit installations.  (The music industry on the other hand dove straight for the deep end.  One might remember when Sony decided to put a rootkit on some of their music cds as a DRM method to keep pirates from ripping the disc to mp3.) There's a lot of good reasons to not want this DRM, and the best time to stop it is now before too much is invested in it. Otherwise the money guys who are pushing for it will keep pushing. The problem is that DRM is a game of diminishing returns. It makes a short term dent in piracy and then stronger and stronger methods have to be used to get less and less of a result. In a way, DRM is the software industry's drug habit.

     

    And add Gianni 7 to things I will never purchase as it is being used to support the DRM.

  • nicsttnicstt Posts: 11,715
    edited January 2016

    Good news. Previous error message went away on the third entry.

    Bad news, now I get this error message...

    Make sure you have the postgreSQL installed (and the other SQL - valentina conversion) - DIM should show, if you have: uninstall, delete and redownload and then install. In the help section there is a FAQ about it if you have issues.

    It can be firewall issues I believe, or at least I seem to remember reading somewhere. The main 4.9 thread has some help getting it working.

    Post edited by nicstt on
  • nicstt said:

    Good news. Previous error message went away on the third entry.

    Bad news, now I get this error message...

    Make sure you have the postgreSQL installed (and the other SQL - valentina conversion) - DIM should show, if you have: uninstall, delete and redownload and then install. In the help section there is a FAQ about it if you have issues.

    It can be firewall issues I believe, or at least I seem to remember reading somewhere. The main 4.9 thread has some help getting it working.

    I don't think this is the issue; why would I get the error message sometimes but not all times? DS should not be flipping back and forth between each of these messages if it was a single, consistent issue (like a lack of Postgre or a firewall.)

    I did open a ticket, but I imagine it's going to be a while before I hear back.

  • larsmidnattlarsmidnatt Posts: 4,511
    edited January 2016

    Is this the "light-hearted" thread or the one adults can talk in? So confused. Maybe they should add tags to the top so I can discern the difference.(so the forums can be just as complicated as figuring out which products have which install methods, hah. Consistency. )

    Anyway, I don't visit here much anymore, never read the forums anymore. Only skimmed a few pages last week after 4.9 came out. but I see things are about the same as months ago when 4.9 was in beta.

    I'm not obligated to read each post in each thread, or anything like that. But I can have my own opinion. Which remains no DRM for me. I once said I could see getting it at 95% off, but after recent events not even then.

    As neato as Daz Studio is, I can think for myself. Sorry I don't linger around here more, kinda pointless these days. The defense force is out in numbers, using any means needed to justify moderation.

    And since all those other places are finally supporting the newer daz dollies, I can finally frequent them now :) Might even though out a few pennies to keep them funded.

    Post edited by larsmidnatt on
This discussion has been closed.