Adding to Cart…
Licensing Agreement | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | EULA
© 2026 Daz Productions Inc. All Rights Reserved.You currently have no notifications.
Licensing Agreement | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | EULA
© 2026 Daz Productions Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Comments
That might at least have been a distraction from her wooden-as-a-forest acting!
Didn't read entire thread, just the first few posts... This has been my complaint since my first day with poser 4. I always had to beat the figures with what I called the "reality stick". I actually had dialed in a normal male and normal female and built my characters off that. Most of my figures are just everyday normal people and some of what I would consider 'normal'. Sometimes, for characters where there was an element of topless (not in a erotic sort of way, more of a primitive sort of way), I did dial one breast a slightly smaller than the other.
All the figures I have in my library that I've assembled over the years have some sort of flaw by design (crooked teeth, yellowed teeth, big non-elf ears, deviated noses, one hand bigger than the other, etc). This was always fun creating the same race of figures in the gen2 days because nothing was compatible with each other. It was made easier in the Gen3 days where I could share textures and I never adopted anything newer than generation 3 as it would require retooling. I didn't have the budget or time for it so I stuck with the gen 3 figures, they satisfied my needs. I mostly used SP3 & David because they seemed more everyday than their supermodel pedigree neighbors Mike and Vicky.
Not to mention I find unnaturally large breasts an absolute turn-off.
here is what I mean
1) Here is what I see and it does not seem to be as much of a problem to me. http://prnt.sc/8rvctw
2) I did exactly the morphs you cited, but my breast appears a bit different, so perhaps you have other morphs as well.
What you do not seem to be able to understand is that while morphs are wonderful things, there is no way to account what happens once you start mixing them. Some morph combinations can create unwanted artifacts. That is not the fault of the morphs or the mesh. It is just an unhappy result. You're trying to use morphs that have been created to work best in isolation. Every attempt is to make them blend well with each other, and for the better part they do, but how can you test for every possible combination including when people add their own custom morphs or add bits of other characters etc.
In the modeling world, you would mix your morphs and if they don't mix well, you'd create a new morph or smooth the mesh or whatever you need in order to make it work. People would like this to be a turn key system, but it can't always be. The sooner you learn to go with the flow and find ways to fix the baubles, be it using a 3D modeler, DFormers, postwork, the better you can get on with the business of making your illustrations. That is my heartfelt recommendation. Things will continue to be striven to be made better. And, as always, if you really believe it's a bug, then do a bug report as that is the only sure way to bring it to the attention of Daz.
I agree with Cris, I've mixed and matched morphs to get believable shapes; has it been possible to obtain results like cosmo71? Sure, but I wasn't trying to make a point!
do you have a crack or not`?
there was a bit of v7 in it but that does not matter, I have the crack with and without 50% V7
Different examples of a small chest, both with V7 dialed all the way.
This is fun
@cosmo71 "do you have a crack or not`?"
Cris' example doesn't show the problem that yours has. Did you look at his link? J Cade's examples don't seem to have the issues either. FWIW, I haven't seen the drastic result that you show in your two examples.
It has been said elsewhere, where most of the problem comes from...baked in under breast creases in normal/bump/displacement maps. The fix has been given...use an image editor to remove those unwanted details or find maps that don't have them in the first place.
True, however it can be the result of conflicting morph dials.
Yup but it is possible to get a believable result for more typical sized and smaller breasts.
I said 'most'...yes, it can come from conflicting morphs, but it definitely compounded by the baked in underbreast crease in the maps. And to some degree, the maps are at fault, all by themselves...
No.
Cris <------ female. :)
Cosmo, as many of us have said, combining morphs can give you mixed results depending on what you use and what percentages.
Cosmo have you installed any freebie morphs? I ask because nobody else seems to be having the problems you are with G3F.
There's a thing I didn't know, actually. The first line, not the second. I didn't count the bit where you responded to his rather pointed and easily misconstrued question.
@Cosmo: Have you tried manipulating the mesh directly in a cheap-to-free modeling software? It's not that hard, and you can get whatever result you want with a little perserverance.
Also, check out a vendor known as Xameva on either of the other two sites. They have a standalone pack for both G2F and G3F that might suit your needs better than using the appropriate Vicki-pair. Better still, they're an MR, and thus so long as you follow the rules they laid out, you can do what you like with them.
@Cris Palomino
Apologies for the gender assumption. I try to be non-specific when unsure, but was in a bit of a hurry. Still no excuse however.
No problem, fast. :) Just clarifying as the majority of people I meet online, seem to think I'm male, often due to my name. :)
Don't you know? There are no girls on the internet! (Okay generally people don't believe that any more)
I've pretty much gotten into the habit of refering to everyone as "they" I can never go wrong that way. It was just stupid people in the 19th century who didn't like it anyway. Seriously a facinating wikipedia read
I switched to j.cade because sites where I used "jackcade" people assumed my name was Jack, and I am not, in fact, a 15th century revolutionary
Something hilarious from the citations. Oh for the halcyon days when comment sections were letters sent in to newspapers and then published because they were sick, sick, burns.
Yeah, I remember I made that assumption. ;)
Although, I admit, I find people who use opposite gender avatars totally confuse me. I tend to look at the avatar as a clue, but no more, heh.
I just use a shot of my own head. That bald pudgy guy? Yep, all Will, all the time.
Yes, I typically use they as well. Was just on a roll. Typically don't assume male in the 3D circles since so many PA's are wonderful women (been married 42 years, so I'm well trained, or broken in, or just broken) :))
The spelling on your name indicated you might be female. :) Of course, this being the internet, one always wants piccies to prove it, which isn't proof as who knows where they came from.
My understanding that when referring to someone we don't know, we refer to them as he if we are male, and as she if we are female. Politically Correctness has messed that up. /shrug But this is off topic and likely to get me/us shouted at.
The spelling is Spanish. Male or female would be Cris .Cristina, in my case, males could be Cristobal, but all would be Cr as Ch is always like Church. And yes, we've meandered, heh.
Some forums displays a male or female symbol on your post header (sider), based on your m/f profile setting. Should be a basic feature in all forums.
Not without a "rather not say" option, and I would question it even then. As anyone who follows the various storms in social media knows, women who are visible run a substantial risk of recieing abusive messages. I hope we have enough active women here that there's little (or even none) of that*, but people should still have a choice of how much they reveal of their identity.
* and as an aside, if the reader does receive any such messages please forward them to a mod.
It should of course be voluntary - but to me that also means that those who want to state their sexual identity should have the option for doing it. It doesn't reveal much about you anyway in itself, it's pretty useless in real life if you don't have any other information about the person. And words alone can't hurt anyone unless they choose to let them. Just use the "ignore" button (another thing any forum should have) if someone bothers you and that's the end of that.
There are symbols for that also.
Wrong, some has also send support tickets to DAZ