Breasts

13

Comments

  • cosmo71cosmo71 Posts: 3,609
    edited October 2015

    but it is not only on breasts. It is nearly impossible to create a "real" looking female body and the face well, a story for itself. A much to huge forehead speaks for itself.

    Post edited by cosmo71 on
  • cosmo71cosmo71 Posts: 3,609
    edited October 2015

    in my opinion the whole body shape concept is not a big deal but face and head are bad, with V4 one was able to create much better faces than with g3f and if it comes to v7 well, in someway this character looks like a drug addict and has absolutely nothing to do with victoria, sorry

    Post edited by cosmo71 on
  • Cris PalominoCris Palomino Posts: 12,604

    Certainly that is your opinion, but I have seen many great faces made from morphs in both Daz and PA packs.  V7 is not the base morph; she is a character made from the G3 female base.  The base is much closer to an average woman.  Do remember, however, that this thread is not an overall morph discussion.  So best we get back on topic, please.

  • cosmo71cosmo71 Posts: 3,609
    edited October 2015

    Certainly that is your opinion, but I have seen many great faces made from morphs in both Daz and PA packs.  V7 is not the base morph; she is a character made from the G3 female base.  The base is much closer to an average woman.  Do remember, however, that this thread is not an overall morph discussion.  So best we get back on topic, please.

    sure this is my opinion Chris, I allways have just my opinion wink Well I want an average woman, have a look at Dixie smiley I would say she is about 30-35 yrs. And that is the case. I do not think that G3F looks like an avarage woman and also not v7 and all the others.

    Post edited by cosmo71 on
  • cosmo71cosmo71 Posts: 3,609

    To oversized breasts, if you have measure metrics for G3F you have a good option to make the breasts smaller and let them look quite good.

  • jestmartjestmart Posts: 4,449

    Just one point on G3F's base shape, it is average in the sense of the artist ideal average which is what the base shape should be.  IMO the one thing that is lacking from the breast morphs is an HD nipple morph. 

  • marblemarble Posts: 7,500

    There's one issue I keep having and that's the under-breast where the breast meets the rib-cage (I'm talking G2F, I don't use G3F). I have many morphs including those from Zev0 but I can't get a natural fold there. I usually end up with a ridge, about half an inch out from the rib, on the underside of the breast. I try to smooth it out with the morphs but it never looks natural.

    V4 had the Natural Gravity morphs which, I seem to remember, did quite a good job.

  • So just a little humorous thing I noticed about this thread.

    68 comments

    1.3 K views

    Observation:  For all the admonishments about "skimpwear", it seems that 95% of us do like to look.

    wink

  • Zev0Zev0 Posts: 7,123
    edited October 2015

    I added more options in the G3 version to address this. The under breast smoothers on the g2F version also tackles this issue in combination with the breast move up\down pose control.

    Post edited by Zev0 on
  • cosmo71cosmo71 Posts: 3,609
    jestmart said:

    Just one point on G3F's base shape, it is average in the sense of the artist ideal average which is what the base shape should be.  IMO the one thing that is lacking from the breast morphs is an HD nipple morph. 

    correct, that is what I also miss, the nipples are to "unsharp"

  • nicsttnicstt Posts: 11,715

    So just a little humorous thing I noticed about this thread.

    68 comments

    1.3 K views

    Observation:  For all the admonishments about "skimpwear", it seems that 95% of us do like to look.

    wink

    I have commented on the plethora of skimpwear, but I certainly like to look. :)

  • Serene NightSerene Night Posts: 17,704

    I keep reading this thread and I don't know why...  

  • wizwiz Posts: 1,100

    I think the original Deanna troi on next generation was supposed to have multiple breasts. But they cut that from the show

    I never heard that one. 

    But I can tell you that the character was originally supposed to be bald.

    Deana Troi and Will Riker are modifications of Ilia (the "Deltan" empath) and Will Decker, two characters created for the series "Star Trek: Phase II", which later became "Star Trek: The Next Generation". The Phase II pilot got totally out of control and became "Star Trek: The Motion Picture" and Ilia and Decker were killed off at the end of the movie.

    Oh, and technically two is "multiple". ;)

  • Serene NightSerene Night Posts: 17,704

    It's in Deanna's wiki, but I think she was supposed to have 4. That might have made more of an interesting alien quality, but Gene's wife didn't like the idea. I preferred the original character concept.

    As it was Deanna was sort of underdeveloped eye-candy unitl they started working on the character later on in the series. The alien Hermaphrodite character would've stretched the boundaries which I like tht Star Trek does.

  • wiz said:
     

    Oh, and technically two is "multiple". ;)

    So they are also good for assisting us with mathematics.  So versatile!

  • XaatXuunXaatXuun Posts: 874

    I keep reading this thread and I don't know why...  

    I don't know why you do either cheeky  (couldn't help that,had to open with something for a first reply here)

    a couple hours before this topic was started, I was doing google searches on and about breast, I was curious on size and shapes, types of breast. I've never been satisfied and felt they were always too big to start with.  For my idea breast, though I do know they do get that big and bigger naturally. I did learn during my search , what I was calling C cups were really B cups.

    One thing that was mentioned at the different sites I was reading, women are more concern about breast size then men.

    but what I found interesting, was . . took a break on my reading and searching about Breast and this topic shows up. Strange condescendence . . I would had chimed in sooner but pretty much anything I would had said or mentioned already was, and I didn't want to do a bunch of quotes with just

    ^^^^^ that ^^^^^ or Ditto +10 or Totally agree, as my only reply

    I know I'll keep reading this topic, has some interesting trivial in it

  • starionwolfstarionwolf Posts: 3,670

    I thought the breasts on Genesis 2 female (without morphs) are too small??  I must be crazy. lol

  • j cadej cade Posts: 2,310
    The only reason to know bra sizes is to find a bra that fits. So there's absolutely no reason for a man to ever know bra sizes. Cup size doesn't actually tell you how big breasts are any way. For instance 34d and 32dd have the same breast volume. Now you say, but someone who has a 34d is fatter than someone with a 32dd so their breasts will look better... Nope, its more to do with ribcage size, which is influenced by weightweight, but has more to do with build. So someone can be skinnier and have larger breasts, but have a smaller cup size and larger band size than someone who is fatter and looks like they have smaller breasts. In conclusion anyone who claims they can look at a picture and tell someone's cup size is delusional.
  • IceDragonArtIceDragonArt Posts: 12,889

     

    j cade said:
    One word on that crotch gun: recoil.

    I just spit water all over my desk I was laughing so hard

  • XaatXuunXaatXuun Posts: 874
    j cade said:
    The only reason to know bra sizes is to find a bra that fits. So there's absolutely no reason for a man to ever know bra sizes. Cup size doesn't actually tell you how big breasts are any way. For instance 34d and 32dd have the same breast volume. Now you say, but someone who has a 34d is fatter than someone with a 32dd so their breasts will look better... Nope, its more to do with ribcage size, which is influenced by weightweight, but has more to do with build. So someone can be skinnier and have larger breasts, but have a smaller cup size and larger band size than someone who is fatter and looks like they have smaller breasts. In conclusion anyone who claims they can look at a picture and tell someone's cup size is delusional.

    hey that's good news, I was normal. 

     

  • DarkSpartanDarkSpartan Posts: 1,096
    j cade said:
    The only reason to know bra sizes is to find a bra that fits. So there's absolutely no reason for a man to ever know bra sizes. Cup size doesn't actually tell you how big breasts are any way. For instance 34d and 32dd have the same breast volume. Now you say, but someone who has a 34d is fatter than someone with a 32dd so their breasts will look better... Nope, its more to do with ribcage size, which is influenced by weightweight, but has more to do with build. So someone can be skinnier and have larger breasts, but have a smaller cup size and larger band size than someone who is fatter and looks like they have smaller breasts. In conclusion anyone who claims they can look at a picture and tell someone's cup size is delusional.

    I know what bra sizes are about, but then I've had to take people shopping for them from time to time. The general rule is one letter size for every inch that the breast mass at it's fullest point protrudes from the chest. I will agree that it's difficult to tell how big they are just by looking at a picture. The difference between C and D isn't as apparently obvious as it is between B and C. G3F's base form is about a B, give or take a little. G2F, about the same.

  • cosmo71cosmo71 Posts: 3,609

    would be cool to have more areola shapes not only perk and out and size

  • Are there any good breast morphs for when someone is hanging upside down?  Or falling, swiming, crawling, other odd angles?

  • Oso3DOso3D Posts: 15,090

    thistle: There's http://www.daz3d.com/breast-control-for-genesis-2-female-s

     

    There's also this pack of 200 or so free morphs from... sharecg, I think? That includes some lowering/raising/drooping and other stuff.

     

  • thistle: There's http://www.daz3d.com/breast-control-for-genesis-2-female-s

     

    There's also this pack of 200 or so free morphs from... sharecg, I think? That includes some lowering/raising/drooping and other stuff.

     

    That looks very promising - I should have asked at the BEGINING of the PA sale.

  • DarkSpartanDarkSpartan Posts: 1,096
    edited October 2015

    Well, maybe this looks better?

    NorikoBase.jpg
    960 x 1248 - 173K
    Post edited by Richard Haseltine on
  • TSasha SmithTSasha Smith Posts: 27,340
    edited October 2015
    Chohole said:

     On curvier plumper figures bigger makes more sense. But judging by the average figure model and what I see in the gallery big breasts are popular. 

    And then there is natural vs enhanced, LOL.Unless my image is for a specific reason/commision and the female needs to look dumpy/normal/homley, whatever the term, I, personally can't imagine rendering a figure that I find unattractive, probably why I never use canned character morphs, they are always to big.. My problem is that I have spent waaaaaaay to much time over the years around model/dancer type women where implants are the norm. I can't count how many doctor visits I have been to where they have wanted me along to help them decide, LOL.

    So to me, thin/athletic women with implants is "normal"........ and my preference, therein lies the beauty of morph packages, everyone wins. wink

    And then again you get some poor females who are well endowed naturally and end up having surgery in order to get rid of the large breasts because they are so tired of the permanent back ache of carrying them around. We have a young friend who is saving up for the money to pay for an op to reduce her boobs for just that reason.  This is something that some people don't appreciate. Natural large boobs are a strain on the person having them.

    how about poor women who are well endowed but cannot afford to have breast reduction because a) insuarance probably won't cover it. b) they cannot afford it because of c) they are addicted to shopping at Daz or d) refuse to have any body modification surgery even if it is to reduce the size of the breasts

    Post edited by TSasha Smith on
  • DarkSpartanDarkSpartan Posts: 1,096
    Chohole said:

     On curvier plumper figures bigger makes more sense. But judging by the average figure model and what I see in the gallery big breasts are popular. 

    And then there is natural vs enhanced, LOL.Unless my image is for a specific reason/commision and the female needs to look dumpy/normal/homley, whatever the term, I, personally can't imagine rendering a figure that I find unattractive, probably why I never use canned character morphs, they are always to big.. My problem is that I have spent waaaaaaay to much time over the years around model/dancer type women where implants are the norm. I can't count how many doctor visits I have been to where they have wanted me along to help them decide, LOL.

    So to me, thin/athletic women with implants is "normal"........ and my preference, therein lies the beauty of morph packages, everyone wins. wink

    And then again you get some poor females who are well endowed naturally and end up having surgery in order to get rid of the large breasts because they are so tired of the permanent back ache of carrying them around. We have a young friend who is saving up for the money to pay for an op to reduce her boobs for just that reason.  This is something that some people don't appreciate. Natural large boobs are a strain on the person having them.

    how about poor women who are well endowed but cannot afford to have breast reduction because a) insuarance probably won't cover it. b) they cannot afford it because of c) they are addicted to shopping at Daz or d) refuse to have any body modification surgery even if it is to reduce the size of the breasts

    Sounds like my wife, with the exception of being a DAZaholic.  When making characters, I ask her what's actually doable, and if she says "That would hurt," I back it off a bit.

  • McGyverMcGyver Posts: 7,085

    For two weeks this thread keeps catching my eye... I read it, I know what it's about... It's not something I felt the need to add to or comment on but every time I see the title my brain is like "Wha... What's that..."

    I don't have anything else to add other than to bring up the fact that my stupid brain is easily distracted by jiggly words.

    Thats all.

Sign In or Register to comment.