Daz 3D is part of 
Connect
DAZ Productions, Inc.
7533 S Center View Ct #4664
West Jordan, UT 84084
Licensing Agreement | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | EULA
© 2026 Daz Productions Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Comments
I remember one complaining offended about bare shoulders and dresses above the knee
If people are worried about getting into trouble for viewing mature images on the DAZ website while at work ( or even just having a 'mature image' Icon), then I would recommend they don't visit the DAZ website at all from work. An employer doesn't need cameras, they will likely log URL's visted and user's ID for any traffic to/from their network. If there is any suggestion of suspicious Internet usage they will check those logs and likely take a look at URL's they don't recognise as business related. Even looking at lingerie dressed 3D models from work might be difficult to explain once discovered.
what Cyberfox says is what I always thought in that Daz was origionaly aimed at those that wanted to do fantasy and pinup art if you look at the really old stuff Victoria/Michael 1-2-3 eras there was a lot of content clothing characters like we are getting now over time they did start to include more everyday type content as well but then they started to phase out the more creative revealing stuff with clothing being safe and kinda bland same all look then when Daz bought out few other stores and coaxed a lot of creators and their products from Rendo and other places we had an explosion of variety and creativity in clothing styles I was so happy and excited and then the more descriptive previews I went on so many spending sprees because of that
^ This. And even from yor own phone, you might not want to visit Daz et al while coworkers are around. Prying eyes, easily offended people, HR intervention, etc. It's a mountain of awfulness.
And yet somehow Otto has gotten away with flashing his "chocolate starfish" for years now. Perhaps the filthiest promo in the whole store.
It's worse than you think. An Octopus's mouth is between it's tentacles, so who knows why Otto has a second, but their male organ is on one of their tentacles, so he's been flashing everyone for all this time.
@FrankTheTank
Richard can be quite daring at times, too!
I do agree with you here, but there is a caveat. This presupposes that Daz never makes mistakes when loading/programming their storefront. I think that it's fairly obvious from the various threads of weird pricing issues and other glitches/problems that it's not exactly as simple as that. But I would say that if such a system was implemented that it would be the end user who would be the one to assume the risk in such instances if they're going to use, or misuse their companies resources in such a way and get caught. The same might apply should they go on social media and speak imprudently for instance, it's not as if free speach applies to the corporate environment. So it might be more of a use at your own risk sort of thing. It's not as if, I imagine, that they're using corporate resources to do the rendering after all, so except for the frequent (though incessant) flash sales it's not as if anybody will miss anything if they just wait until they get home to shop anyway.
As far as morphs go, I'd like to see a visual representation of what they actually do rather than just read the title of the morph in question - they rarely describe the movement in enough detail. For textures, I'm on your side, but while it's possible to show clothing with a hidden figure, the same isn't the case with textures so I have no plausible answer to offer you.
That's a very good point, but I'm really just laying-out the basic idea by suggesting a checkbox. In order to prevent (or at the very least minimise) the sort of error you speak of, what they could do instead is present vendors with two buttons whenever they upload an image. A big green one called "UPLOAD SAFE IMAGE", and a big red one called "UPLOAD NON-SAFE IMAGE".
The benefit of this design is two-fold. Because it means that it's just as easy and obvious for a vendor to click the SAFE button to upload a safe image, as it is to click the NON-SAFE button to upload a non-safe image. The second benefit is that the step requiring the checkbox is eliminated completely, because the button itself dictates what they are uploading in the first place, and any image uploaded using the red NON-SAFE button is automatically tagged by the system as non-safe.
Something Muon Quark wrote also got me thinking. Because I get the feeling that some people might not fully realise the benefit of taggin "per image" as opposed to tagging "per product". But to put it as simply as possible, vendors would not have to worry about any product being completely tagged as NON-SAFE. It is only certain images within their product promotion that would be tagged with NON-SAFE.
This means that vendors would not have to worry about lack of 'reach' due to tagging certain promotional images as NON-SAFE. All it means is that when someone vists the product page, they will see ALL promotional images if they have SHOW ALL IMAGES turned on in their account. If, however, they choose to "BLOCK NSFW IMAGES" then the product page itself will still show, but only the safe images demonstrating the product will show.
Basically, technical nudity and sexual images would fall under NON-SAFE, whereas everything else would fall under SAFE.
This also goes hand-in-hand with what ArtAngel and Richard mention, since there would be no blank images to click on to uncensor in the first place. The system simply would not show them, at all, not even those blank placeholders. Logged out , the system would not be able to load your settings, and therefore anyone casually visiting the Daz store would not see be able to see any NON-SAFE content, purely by design, and by default.
I'm doubtful if this would work. We know that some people like to push the boundaries of what is acceptable, I suspect you would find people uploading images as 'SAFE' which really were not. If someone is trying to sell a sexy outfit they will want it seen by as many people as possible ( so SAFE), and to appear as sexy as possible ( so borderline ).
Again, good point but that's something that could be remedied with a warning and confirmation. For example, they could have it so that at the point where a vendor hits the final "SUBMIT" button to upload their product to the Daz store, they are presented with a warning along the lines of ...
"I confirm that I fully understand Daz's policy on image categorisation, and have uploaded every product image using the correct image upload button. I understand that carelessness could lead to closure of my PA account, and loss of any sales royalties owed to me."
I reckon the PA's would take it all pretty damn seriously if it were done that way, and would lean more towards playing it safe than risking the consequences.
It kind of reminds me of the old policy on nudity, which if i recall correctly stated that all 'sensitive' areas had to be obscured, that led to people putting a variety of symbols in front of the areas concerned which drew attention, things like smiley faces with tongues hanging out, you get the picture. Technically following the rules, but done in such a way as to make the image stand out. btw I'm not against nudity, I like to see what I'm buying. Also I suspect threatening to withhold royalties might need a lawyer or a rewrite of the PA terms and conditions, I'm not a PA so I have no idea what conditions they agree to..
I don't see any issues with any of the stuff in your galleries, AngelReaper.
thanks well the only place I have left is Deviant Art everywhere else no longer can sometimes might get to on a forum thread here
Again this might get me into trouble but I feel I must clarify a little bit. I'm not opposed to the adult content. I just don't want to see it. I want to see regular clothes, dragons, elves, spaceships, plants, architecture, magic things, animals, (more toon generations), and lots of other different stuff so my imagination can make the renders that first drew me to DAZ in the first place. Just don't want DAZ to turn into an adult only store. Thanks.
well Linday found a way of sorts with their latest product dforse escape outfit with showing some reveal morphs by having on an armless/headless silver mannequin
https://www.daz3d.com/dforce-perfect-escape-outfit-for-genesis-9-8-and-81-female
That is perfectly fine. I wish I could show what I'm talking about but I don't want to link to any vendor and cause trouble.
Edited to add: There is a lot of suggestive underwear though.....
Found?
Linday has been doing that since the releases of products made for Genesis 3:
https://www.daz3d.com/boyfriend-t-shirt-wet-and-dry-for-genesis-3-female-s
https://www.daz3d.com/satine-detective-outfit-for-genesis-3-female-s
yes true but lately new releases have not been permitted to show previews like that it's recently changed rules
Apologies. I've edited this post out since it doesn't make sense without the link.
I was able to see the full skins again today, so I just wanted to thank Daz for putting the nude promos back.
I never understood why they got removed in the first place. It was baffling, but it's a relief to have 'em back!
Thanks, it's much appreciated and very much needed.
On a side note, Rendo just changed it's site preference settings to set your preferred viewing mode to one of three options: safe, mature, and adult. Seems like a much better solution than changing the rules back and forth. Of course, Rendo's website is actually built and operated by people who build commercial websites as a side-business as opposed to... whatever DAZ has.
@3DIO not sure what you're referring to, since all recent figures seem to be wearing shorts (male) and at least bra/panties (female) with no nudity visible anywhere. Likely doesn't matter, seems the decision is made here.
Their previous solution was better and it's too bad the new one doesn't simply offer a setting allowing to keep it instead of that slow and clunky system:
1. products are completly hidden if they are deemed not compatible with your settings (just compare how many products from Rhiannon will be listed on her Rendo store if you have the filter set to Safe compared to the filter set to Mature: they are even around 5 products deemed Adult content) and there is no information about products being hidden due to our filter settings.
2. some renders are deemed adult when all they are showing is a woman wearing a NON translucent swimsuit or underwear: check the Lizzy Shorts Set by Rhiannon with the filter set to mature and you'll see that the majority of the renders are hidden with the filter set to Mature and are only visible by switching to Adult (two clicks because they needs me to tell them that I'm an adult by checking a second checkbox each time
).
Rhiannon's clothes are usually on the sexy side of things, but most if not all of the products hidden on Renderosity would not be hidden here and many pictures who are deemed to be Adult content would also not be hidden by Daz mature filters: the Lizzy set is less revealing that the Frankie PJs sold here and none of Frankie PJs's renders are hidden by Daz mature filters.
@Torquinox
If you mean all those recent characters with the huge eyes, perhaps they left out the nudity due to them being toon-like?
Not sure to be honest. Personally I'm just pleased to be able to see a full frontal of (right now for example) Elena 9 and Lianna 9 because I was planning to buy one of them, but without being able to see the full skin, I would not have remembered which one had the lighter coloured areola, and therefore would not have been prepared to purchase either of them.
Thankfully, a full frontal is available for both characters. I can clearly see that it was in fact Lianna 9 that has the lighter areola, and I will indeed purchase her. That said, even after seeing her nude, she's not exactly ideal since she's a bit too tanned for what I had in mind. But using the Diffuse Overlay parameter in careful moderation would lighten her skin and make her areola lighter at the same time (which is what I want). Without the nudity, though, it would have been impossible to know and to come to an educated decision as to what I'm buying.
The sale therefore would have been lost.
@3DIO I don't care about the bug-eyed characters or the shape-only characters that use the base skins. You referenced Elena 9 and Lianna 9. Those are characters from Feb 2025 and June 2024, respectively. I'm talking about recent characters including https://www.daz3d.com/eric-for-genesis-9. https://www.daz3d.com/aro-9, https://www.daz3d.com/nadine-9, https://www.daz3d.com/sigrid-9 and many more. It seems showing everything was a phase and the phase is over.
You're right, it's not the news ones. I went back through the store based on Daz Originals, and the last character found showing their birthday suit, was Eduardo 9.
Whatever it is, I really hope they change it back. Since being in this hobby, I've only ever purchased my Daz content from Daz. But unless I can see the full texture of a character then I'm forced to shop elsewhere (at least for characters). It really bothers me, because apart from the obvious, it would be the end of an era for me, really. When I buy characters, it is sometimes for the whole character, sometimes just the morph, and sometimes just the skin texture. So for very obvious reasons, I'm not paying for skin textures that I cannot examine prior to purchase.
It took a while, but Daz did finally have it right prior to this. They had a family-friendly store that had a professional and sensible level of information on show.
Since I think it is unlikely that DAZ suddenly became all prudish, then, as others have suggested, it is quite likely the new policy is down to third party pressure. Could be a payment processor, or someone else. However it is odd that they stop any new nudity, even technical ones, but leave all the existing ones in the store. If this is really down to third party pressure, one would assume that would want the existing ones gone too.
Elena 9 is over a year old and Lianna 9 almost 2 yeasr old, so those promo images were made and released long before DAZ flipped the rules back. The question is whether all of the already published nude images will stay in the store or if there'll be a further purge.... some have posted that the images for older products won't be changed retroactively, though I've yet to see that posted by anyone who I'd judge to be in a position to say so with real authority.
Wow, thanks for pointing that out. I was still seeing the usual picture warning here and there so i thought the new 'site options' was to remove the warning of pictures. But it is indeed obscuring products. Rhiannon store went from 2 pages on safe to 5 on mature or adult.
While i would agree that people should have the option to opt out of certain products/vendors it should be done more carefully.