Adding to Cart…
Licensing Agreement | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | EULA
© 2026 Daz Productions Inc. All Rights Reserved.You currently have no notifications.
Licensing Agreement | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | EULA
© 2026 Daz Productions Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Comments
I think he was quite clear, Richard. It can't, and we just have to deal with that.
Blender 2.8.3 is the Long Term Support version. So unless you need bleeding edge you can get bug fixes and what not and not worry about anything breaking
albin apparently makes all their clothes in blender, which is remarkable. They are some of the best. you can buy them at various places.
evgeniya petrova has a project on artstation which is titled something like "... with bonus boot" which you can buy and analyse. i havent really looked into it.
i think most people just model over existing obj bases if they use MD at all for this.
The "hard surface" modeled items of Blender, eg badges, brooches, shoes, buttons, buckles and so on being brought into MD and then attached to the cloth sims and they cause the cloth sims to deform or stop deforming as the case may be, appropriately for the attached hard surface item.
I know that you mean that MD is not good at modeling hard surfaced items otherwise but they do need to be combined at some point and in a way that looks realistic unless your story is all hard exeskeltons and such.
Hello All,
Wow! Quite the discussion taking place here and it seems like the ball is bouncing back and forth between Blender and MD. Ok, I wasn't clear in what I wanted to do and for the most part I do static pictures and not animations...yet. I might do that in the future.
In terms of creating clothing, I do admit that I like the form flowing dForce outfits...when they work. I do find myself struggling with dForce issues still and sometimes I just prefer to use clothing presets. So from what I gathered here so far, is that outside of dForce, I should be able to make most clothing in Blender? Yet, the dForce (or dynamic) clothing is better to do in MD. So do I have that correct?
There was mention of armor and hard surfaces. Well, one of my pet peeves about the auto-fit on clothing is that items that are supposed to not conform to the body and move with it, such as jewelry, and solid armor plating seems to become bendable with the figure poses. That was something that always got to me. Many pairs of earrings I have look terrible because of the auto-fit. But that was another issue I posted in another topic elsewhere.
From what I seen of the renders above of that armor, that looks pretty darn good. I mean initially, I probably will make more form fitting clothes such as bodysuits, swimsuits, underwear...that sort of thing before I move on to the more free flowing stuff. I do eventually want to do animation, but I just feel I am a LONG way off on it.
As for Blender, I have not used any versions prior to 2.8 and that is what is currently on my machine now. I just have not used it yet simply because I do not know where to begin!
So hopefully that clears things up in regards to my intentions.
BTW, that Blender scene for Napoleon is amazing! But I am no stranger to what Blender can do. This entire short movie was done in blender (BTW, I warn you, the movie below is very sad):
Now THAT is impressive.
Thanks,
Geo
Can't what?
Well of course you can run cloth sims on characters wearing thick soled boots
etc, but you need to be able to model the thick/rigid stuff in proper 3Dmodelor
and you wont be able to do that if you only learn how to run cloth sims in Marvelous designer
That's the joke... @nicstt never completed their sentence.
@Wolf359 is right about everything he's said. Blender is completely capable of making good looking rigged clothes. If you don't simulate anything, you don't need MD. You're going to waste HOURS playing with the Cloth Brush, not even doing anything, just playing with it :) I suppose you could even animate with it, if the clothing is rigged, afterall. But even if you do only stills, simulating is a quick and easy way to greater realism. In my opinion:
I guess only you can decide what is best in your case. Why not start with Blender because, again as @Wolf359 said and I couldn't agree more, learning Blender is probably the best investment in yourself that you can make, for many reasons beyond just clothes. If it falls short in any way for clothing, not in some abstract way of guys talking in a forum but rather it is stopping you from producing what you want to produce, then consider something like MD.
And of course once you really Start deep diving Blender you may find it a
better environment for scene setup and rendering as Daz has been very generous
with their free export options
( unlike a certain company who's name rymes with "steelfusion")
I was speaking more of pinning a broach on a blouse and such things. Rigid buttons and buckles and such aren't exactly strong points on DAZ Studio products that I've purchased.
Hey @Wolf359, it'd be a little off-topic, but you should be more clear that that was *not* just you rotating an HDRI and changing the strength. For those people who are not familiar with that paricular plugin, they may have missed just how much awesomeness was going on :)
You can import hard surfaces as either 'avatar' or 'trim'.
'Avatar' will interact with your simulated cloth i.e., collide with it, but it wont follow your cloth. So you have to strategise around that limitation.
'Trim's will follow your cloth but will not interact with it*.
*Trims can be assigned a specific weight in grams, so they will pinch,pull, and drag down your garment accordingly. But they will have no physical geometry, they will just be a point weight.
@TheMysteryIsThePoint
indeed it is a true volumetric atmosphere the likes of
which, I have not seen, since the glory Days of Eon's vue infinite.
Now if Blender ever implements a general purpose MOBU/Iclone 3Dx styled
Character motion retargeter
My life will be complete.
That is what I was thinking. Blender seems to touch upon many areas of 3D Art. Even my sons use it to animate 5 Nights At Freddy's figures. Also Blender came up when I was looking into Z-Brush for sculpting, so it seems like the program does quite a bit and it is a serious contender. And one of the best parts is that it is free!
This is a pet peeve I have with many Daz Studio products...particularly earrings. Sometimes something that is supposed to be rigidly round and you know it to be round, ends up totally distorted. The same is true of rings and other pieces of clothing which might look fine in the static T or A pose, but just try and twist the body and the round ring becomes a parallogram! So creating a rigid item in Blender transfers over better to Daz Studio?
Ok, this I don't know anything about.
So in all, being that I am mostly dealing with static pictures, I would be best off to start with Blender? So say if I create a skirt, I could create manual morph sliders for parts of it so I could adjust it for say a seated position or walking? If so, I am good with that.
I have seen some products in Daz that just alter a garments position. So I am wondering if I would take a skirt that doesn't have many options, bring it over to Blender and then add some more morph dials so it could better fit a character? Is it also possible to fix the armpit and crotch stretching issues when trying to use Gen 2 and 3 clothing on Genesis 8?
Could I create a complete outfit from scratch?
If that is a Yes, then it does look like Blender would be the road I will be heading down.
Thanks,
Geo
Yes, autofit has problems that DAZ 3D should add a parameter or two to their models capabilities such as to keep rigit objects rigid. I'd really like DAZ Studio to get to the point that it can animate as easy and dForce as easy as Blender but if they don't then at least the products I've bought/licensed are exportable to SW that can. As my licensed models from DAZ are must easily storyboarded in DAZ it makes sense to use DAZ so I wait. I'm not in a hurry either way.
HowieFarkes has done wonders for making DAZ Studio more usuable for nice storyboards.
You and me both, brother.
You do realise there are rigid follow nodes in Daz. All hard body accessorys to clothing should be attached as rigid follow nodes. You can edit any existing Daz clothing you have which arent making use of the rigid follow node option, and you can make the buttons etc rigid follow nodes (as long as you can select the offending geometry in geometry editor.)
My understanding is that there is also the option to use the weight mapping brush in Daz to make different parts (at least bones) of the outfit follow the character rigging to different extents.
disclaimer: i have never made a daz product nor followed the full garment creation process for Daz studio.
All i was doing in my post was commenting on the capabilities of Marvelous Designer for interactng with hard body objects that you import. Cloth will not necessarily ever need to interact with rigid objects besides your figure, that is if you're just making simple cloth garments, but you might have accessories, overlayed armour, etc., which would need to interact with the cloth. I was just describing the potential of MD to do that.
I dont have much experience with Blender, but there are lots of sculpting tools there, so you would be able to fix any problematic clothing areas with them, i.e., create a joint controlled morph. For movement and fit morphs, you can do those in blender or theoretically in Daz itself (using mesh grabber).
Thank you all for the information, I guess it looks like I will be heading down the path of Blender and I will see what that can do. If it isn't for me in terms of clothing, then I certainly could use Blender for other things. I been meaning to start to use it anyway, so it seems like the logical way to go.