3D Print
This discussion has been closed.
Adding to Cart…
Licensing Agreement | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | EULA
© 2026 Daz Productions Inc. All Rights Reserved.You currently have no notifications.
Licensing Agreement | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | EULA
© 2026 Daz Productions Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Comments
If they just opened up 3D printing without the need for any licence, DAZ would probably get a whole lot of brand-new users spending their money here.
Right now no profits are being made off of 3D printing.
DAZ could even offer a universal license, or one with a checklist:
For $10.00, you can use any 5 artists works, just check their names on a list before purchase.
For $17.00, you can have 10. Or add 5 more later for $7.00.
Etc.
This way any artist who didn't want to make any extra money could opt out and keep their names off the list.
(Sorry, forgot about the DAZ business model, make that $9.99, $16.99, and $6.99!)
Good to know (I misunderstood based on some of the previous posts, not planning on doing any 3d printing at the moment). The other part of this equation (Daz creating a licensing regime for this for anyone that wants to take their 3d printed design to the next level) still needs to be addressed. The competition is leaving Daz in the dust on this. I'm all about everyone getting reimbursed fairly, but there needs to be a regime for that.
The fair use question that is being debated here often comes down to who has the best, most competent, and/or the most well spoken lawyer, but again I"ll leave that to the pundits here. Fair use can be very broad or very narrow dwpending on what exactly you've done, and again there's the question as to if the EULA would supercede any instances of fair use in the first place.
This would also let DAZ pay the artists. $1.00 for every time your name appears on a purchased list.
Stonemason, Maclean, DZfire, etc. would make a fortune, quickly, with no extra work.
Let's not beat around the bush as it were... people are wanting to print and SELL figures based on DAZ/PA assets. Clearly you can not do that and no Fair Use does not let that happen either.
Now honestly I want to make minis for tabletop games but test prints are still crappy with $1k or less 3D printers.
I would be nice if each PA had a $1 or $3 or $5 or $10 license to 3D print any of their products. Or X items for $Y as has been suggested.
Also it has been stated if you were to have a really good fig and want it mass produced you would hand it off. Probably the finished 3D PRINTED model with any physical tweaks and design done to the PRINTED model and it would most likely be MOLDED not 3D printed anyway.
Myself, I just want make a figure and sell the 2D rendered scene/art and a 3D printed 25mm mini, but both the tech and licensing are not there yet. Prints are sadly not yet as good as the old 1 or 2 inch tall molded green army men of 40-50 years ago.
Nothing beyond the basic purchase of the content license - it was a 2D print (albeit wrapped around a 3d truncated cone) so the basic EULA covered it.
Actually, you do. If you use an external printing service you have to send them the mesh for it to be printed, so you need permission for that. And anyway, what you purchase from DAZ is not the actual content, it's a licence to use it for a certain purpose.
I'm looking to do exactly this. How do I get from DAZ to a .stl file?
You will need to export the mesh to a program that uses .STL format since DS doesn't . https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STL_(file_format)
for best results the mesh will need to be watertight also which means some modeling will be involved.
Okay, let me edit it so that what I said is more clear:
You don't need a license to print stuff yourself for your own use.
yes
I'm holding off on getting a 3D printer until the quality improves. Right now the technology is at 1970's dot matrix printer level. I'll wait at least until it gets to the 1990s inkjet printer level.
Had lots of people ask me if I'd sell figurines of my Lolo Hai chibi figure. I told I will as soon as 3D printers can make them look as good as the Iray renders.
You need a licence for that too, it's simply included in the standard EULA. If DAZ said in their EULA that they didn't allow 3D printing, then even if you printed them with your own printer and they never left your house then technically you would be violating the EULA.
Yes, the standard EULA allows commercial use of 2D images and videos you create with the content you purchased.
I mean, heck, they could have a EULA that said you aren't allowed to use Daz Studio on Thursdays. As long as it is legal for them to restrict something, they can.
Now, it's up to the market to decide whether restrictions are too much.
While I find the 3d print restrictions a little nonsensical and mildly frustrating (mildly since I have nearly 0 interest in 3d printing products to sell), it's not enough to make me go use something else. So, hey.
Yikes, not for me. A 3D printer should cost the same as a high-end inkjet paper printer. $350 or less. That is affordable.
I got a $400 one but it is more for practice and workflow. I am confident the EULA will be in place when the more capable printers take another couple of dips in price. Like I said I think just like the gaming licenses the PAs will offer 3D individually and/or possibly as an option for each product.
Honestly, with things like greebles and such, not needing to texture and shade things for 3D modelling, I am not far from just creating items/models directly. I mean for the most part a body is a body and if you slap on armor and helmets it gets covered anyway whether it is a thin small figure or a hulking brute.
I think DAZ was more worried/interested in the figures they offer larger 6" or larger with much more detail. I just don't see the gaming/collectable market going that way. The print on demand mini-figures IS quite huge though. I said before folks like my 2D renders and were asking about minifigs for tabletop RPG play. I would guess by about end of 2018 or maybe CES 2019 things will be where I thnk they need to be to make pro level today avaible to hobbyists of today.
Well if I go to Wal*Mart or similar store you only see 3D printed figures targeted at little boys and little girls but not anyone else.
However, I've saw in past internet searches that there is this 3D doll printout industry of 'famous' IP, eg 'The Terminator', that apparently enough collector type adults have interest in that there a a few people that regularly produce and sell, well, illegal 3D dolls of that IP, not that I think Paramount or whoever is worried about that tiny market. I was surprised.
Looks good, is that from an $800 printer or closer to the $5000 one?
-- Walt Sterdan
The local libraries have free 3d printers, which is awesome.
Except you have to make an appointment for a 2 hour block a month in advance, which is trickier, particularly since I'd probably spend several 2 hour blocks just learning how to make something print right.
But it's an amazing future!
From a year ago, a college student 3d printing his own braces:
http://money.cnn.com/2016/03/16/technology/homemade-invisalign/index.html
Libraries having 3D printers?! LOL, you city folk live in the lap of luxury.
That braces guy is cool. Imagine you can print out your own tooth eventually if you ever needed a replacement and take it to the dentist and save a bundle over what them manufacturers and dentists would charge.
I think it'll also be nice to see 3d printing take on glasses, which are BS priced. ;)
My son has broken so so so so so many. ugh
Well, this whole issue is ridiculous. 3D printing is a fast-growing market, and right now nobody is making any money off of it. DAZ should come up with a solution, because the most popular items at present would probably be figurines printed from works of artists who have created popular characters in webcomics and other art venues.
They won't print them to sell because of the EULA restrictions, and DAZ can't print them to sell because they are derivitave works, and thus, the copyright belongs to the end creator.
I wish someone at DAZ would come up with a licensing plan that would allow individual artists to profit from their work, because under the current rules, no one is.
Which is, as I said, ridiculous.
Will, what happened to your DA page? I can't find it. I'm always interested in what you're up to!