Loading...
> >

zilpha invades DAZ -

2»

Comments

  • Richard HaseltineRichard Haseltine Posts: 108,961

    commando991_70eecfd4fc said:

    Richard Haseltine said:

    If you need to show a nude figure please put the Viewport in Smooth Shaded mode.

    You need Edit>Figure>Zero>Zero Figure (or Zero Figure Shape)

    the figure was Default, and it was the Genesis 8 Basic Male figure with NO Genitails on it, so how is that "NUDE" like a real person? to Qoute its not Real nude cause its a 3D model, grow up!!

    This is going on Youtube.com "LIVE" NOW!!!

    For the purposes of the forum it's nude if it shows the groin, or front chest on a woman, with skin coloured textures - lack of detail doesn't help Acceptable Ways of Handling Nudity  If you repost your images in Smooth Shaded then people will still be able to see the issue, complying with the forum rules will not hamper your obtaining help.

  • SevrinSevrin Posts: 6,313

    Well, with a name like commando991, you can't expect underwear.

  • commando991_70eecfd4fccommando991_70eecfd4fc Posts: 98

    Sevrin said:

    Well, with a name like commando991, you can't expect underwear.

    LOL, I get it, but the name is Military base name for my old position in the service.

     

  • HoMartHoMart Posts: 488

    Just for INFO

    bought her in the 2.99 deal yesterday - the ERROR is still there - intalled via DIM

  • BejaymacBejaymac Posts: 1,964

    Starting to wonder if someone has reset something they really shouldn't have, as a result a lot of "fixed" products have been reset back to thier original upload.

    Sure would explain why a "broken" product gets "fixed", only to return to being "broken" some time later.

    Did a spot of digging through my notes and it turns out one of my lot bought this "Zilpha", and that I had to do a spot of fixing.

    A control dial with a value of 1 was only part of the issue, the control dial didn't have any ERC, so it wasn't linked to anything, and a control dial without ERC is a waste of drive space.

    The main issue was ERC links in both head and body DSF files, they were pushing a value into the control dial.

    Don't have the files to check, but I probably manually coded two ERC links into the control dial, set the value to zero, then removed the bad ERC links from the head and body morphs.

  • Umi no Senshi no IshiUmi no Senshi no Ishi Posts: 332

    I used the instructions in this conversation to fix the Zilpha issue:

    https://www.daz3d.com/forums/discussion/369811/zilpha-hd-for-jenni-8-is-loading-with-all-of-my-g8f-characters

    I used notepad to change the value form "1" to "0" and it fixed it.

  • NovicaNovica Posts: 23,925

    FIX THIS DAZ!  This is so unprofessional to let this issue persist since NOVEMBER 2019. This needs to be posted in The Commons so everyone knows about it.

  • chris-2599934chris-2599934 Posts: 1,915

    Novica, according to this post, halfway down the first page, the bug was fixed in December 2019. It seems to have become unfixed again recently.

    Either way, it need fixing.

  • NorthOf45NorthOf45 Posts: 5,732

    There was a fix in 2019-12-10 (the ReadMe actually documents this, when you can get to it), but the currently available zip is the previous version (released 2019-11-20, package date 2019-10-23). It seems to have crept back in sometime around 2020-10-30 (just before the store change) as an update, which wasn't really an update, but I guess it triggered the update status, since it was, in fact, different. I always compare updates with the previous version to see what has changed and noticed it had reverted somehow, but then Storepocalypse happened, and, well, bigger fish...

    DAZ needs to put back the previous (new) version. The only change was to the file mentioned above. Oddly, I have the 2019-12-10 version of the archive in place in my download folder, but DIM accepts it as up-to-date. Something is wonky with the perceived package dates.

    Timeline:

    • Purchased for the first time 2020-01-31, downloaded 2020-02-01, fix included, dated 2019-12-09.
    • Installed, no problems.
    • New file downloaded 2020-10-30, probably because it showed as an update. Fix is missing, old file dated 2019-10-23, as per initial release.
    • Put back previous version from 2020-02-01 (with the fix) and re-installed. Back to normal.
    • DIM still shows package version and date from 2019-10-23, which it clearly is not. Not sure where DIM gets those dates from, but they are what is in the manifest from the Manifest Archive (when it was installed). The last installed date is 2020-11-05, after I restored the archive with the fix.
       

     

Sign In or Register to comment.