Daz Studio Iray - Rendering Hardware Benchmarking

12346»

Comments

  • Matt_CastleMatt_Castle Posts: 949
    edited December 2019

    Well, I did grab a new card over the Black Friday/Cyber Monday weekend, so I can now pretend I'm sort of contributing to the thread, as even if this is the baby card of the 1600 series, I believe it's a card that has not yet been benchmarked for Iray.

    System Configuration
    System/Motherboard: Hewlett Packard IPM87-MP
    CPU: Intel Core i7 4790 @ stock MHz (100mV undervolt)
    GPU: Gigabyte GTX 1650 LP OC @ 1695 MHz boost (Factory overclock, Reference 1665 Mhz)
    System Memory: 2x Micron PC3-12800U-11-11-B1 8GB DDR3 @ 1600 MHz
    OS Drive: Samsung 850 EVO 250GB mSATA
    Asset Drive: Seagate Barracuda Green ST2000DL003 2 TB
    Operating System: Windows 8.1 Home 64-bit, Version 6.3, Build 9600
    Nvidia Drivers Version: 441.41
    Daz Studio Version: Daz Studio 4.12.0.086
    Optix Prime Acceleration: On

    Benchmark Results:
    2019-12-05 13:52:48.268 Total Rendering Time: 19 minutes 33.25 seconds
    2019-12-05 13:52:51.192 Iray [INFO] - IRAY:RENDER ::   1.0   IRAY   rend info : CUDA device 0 (GeForce GTX 1650):      1800 iterations, 8.574s init, 1161.116s render

    Iteration Rate: 1.550 iterations per second
    Loading Time: 12.134 seconds

    I have to say, I'm pretty happy. Based on the gaming benchmarks vs. my old 1050 Ti, I was expecting the 1650 to be a 30% speed improvement and hoping for 40%, so a 50% increase is very welcome. It's a shame that the 1650 Super turned out to be a 100 Watt card that won't end up in a low profile version, as that could have been particularly awesome.
    (Okay, a 50% performance increase probably wouldn't be worth chasing with more expensive cards, but with the relatively low cost of cards at this level and the fact that good low profile cards retain their value pretty well, the exercise of upgrading will have only set me back about £20-30 once I sell on the 1050 Ti, and this does again put me on the top low profile card, so I'd say reasonably worthwhile all in all).

    Other than a driver update, the only other difference to note versus the system I ran before is that I have now undervolted the CPU by 100 mV in order to get the system a bit cooler and quieter, but as both were GPU-only renders and the system wasn't throttling before, this won't really have had much impact.

    Post edited by Matt_Castle on
  • System Configuration
    System/Motherboard: Custom Build/Asus Crosshair V Formula Z
    CPU: AMD FX-8370 @ Stock
    GPU:  nVidia Geforce RTX 2060 @ Stock, :  nVidia Geforce RTX 2060 @ Stock
    System Memory: Corsair DDR3-2400 16GB
    OS Drive: Samsung SSD 850 EVO 250GB
    Asset Drive: WDC 100GB
    Operating System: Windows 10 Pro 64bit Build 18362.476
    Nvidia Drivers Version: 441.41
    Daz Studio Version: Daz Studio 4.12.0.086
    Optix Prime Acceleration: On and Off
     

    2 GPU Optix On
    2019-12-04 23:07:40.306 Total Rendering Time: 4 minutes 13.3 seconds
    2019-12-04 23:07:48.896 Iray [INFO] - IRAY:RENDER ::   1.0   IRAY   rend info : CUDA device 0 (GeForce RTX 2060):      896 iterations, 6.504s init, 241.227s render
    2019-12-04 23:07:48.896 Iray [INFO] - IRAY:RENDER ::   1.0   IRAY   rend info : CUDA device 1 (GeForce RTX 2060):      904 iterations, 6.693s init, 240.680s render
    Iteration Rate: (1800 / 241.227) = 7.462  iterations per second
    Loading Time: ((0 + 240 + 13.3) - 241.227) = (253.3 - 241.227) =  12.073 seconds

    1 GPU Optix On-drives monitor
    2019-12-04 23:18:58.485 Total Rendering Time: 8 minutes 2.15 seconds
    2019-12-04 23:19:04.776 Iray [INFO] - IRAY:RENDER ::   1.0   IRAY   rend info : CUDA device 0 (GeForce RTX 2060):      1800 iterations, 4.935s init, 473.345s render
    Iteration Rate: (1800 / 473.345) = 3.803 iterations per second
    Loading Time: ((0 + 480 + 2.15) - 473.345) = (482.15 - 473.345) =  8.805 seconds

    1 GPU second card Optix On
    2019-12-04 23:28:09.079 Total Rendering Time: 7 minutes 58.81 seconds
    2019-12-04 23:28:13.070 Iray [INFO] - IRAY:RENDER ::   1.0   IRAY   rend info : CUDA device 1 (GeForce RTX 2060):      1800 iterations, 5.011s init, 469.870s render
    Iteration Rate: (1800 /469.870 ) =  3.831 iterations per second
    Loading Time: ((0 +  420 +58.81 ) - 469.870) = (478.81 - 469.870) =   8.94 seconds

    1 GPU second card Optix Off
    2019-12-04 23:38:58.433 Total Rendering Time: 7 minutes 58.65 seconds
    2019-12-04 23:39:03.312 Iray [INFO] - IRAY:RENDER ::   1.0   IRAY   rend info : CUDA device 1 (GeForce RTX 2060):      1800 iterations, 4.995s init, 469.746s render
    Iteration Rate: (1800 /469.746 ) =   3.832 iterations per second
    Loading Time: ((0 + 420  + 58.65) - 469.746) =    8.904 seconds

    CPU + 2 GPU Optix On
    2019-12-04 23:45:34.584 Total Rendering Time: 4 minutes 28.38 seconds
    2019-12-04 23:45:39.905 Iray [INFO] - IRAY:RENDER ::   1.0   IRAY   rend info : CUDA device 0 (GeForce RTX 2060):      885 iterations, 6.019s init, 256.602s render
    2019-12-04 23:45:39.905 Iray [INFO] - IRAY:RENDER ::   1.0   IRAY   rend info : CUDA device 1 (GeForce RTX 2060):      883 iterations, 6.412s init, 256.266s render
    2019-12-04 23:45:39.905 Iray [INFO] - IRAY:RENDER ::   1.0   IRAY   rend info : CPU:      32 iterations, 5.840s init, 258.582s render
    Iteration Rate: (1800 /258.582 ) =   6.961 iterations per second
    Loading Time: (0 + 240  +28.38 ) -258.582 ) =    9.798 seconds
     

  • RayDAntRayDAnt Posts: 584
    LenioTG said:

    I'm deciding if I should buy a RTX 2060 Super or a RTX 2070 Super, and since here there are some results for both of them, I'd like to see how my 2060 behaves in this test.
    I've installed this Public Build just to test this out, to compare the two Daz Studio versions.

    Congratulations on this thread RayDAnt, it looks very professional :)
    Thanks for allowing us to gather this data.

    Thanks @LenioTG! Honestly it’s bugged me for years how little consistent info there was on this stuff. And since I recently came into posession of a formal education in data gathering/analysis of this very sort, I figured why not put my idle moments to good use?

    Been very happy with the results so far. The level of consistency between people’s results has been especially impressive considering we’ve got people from likely all over the world reporting in in all sorts of different testing environments. There are lots of reasons to hate on Nvidia, but hardware quality clearly isn’t (currently) one of them.

     

    LenioTG said:

    IRAY_STATS
    Sorry, can't find that, but I've found this:

    The secret to finding IRAY_STATS in the log file is to first completely close down Daz Studio and then open/refresh the log file. Device Statistics are only reported at the close of an Iray instance. And since Iray Instances persist in active memory even after initial completion conditions have been met (to facilitate render resumption), the only surefire way to see those stats is by closing DS and potentially waiting an extra bit for the process itself to fully shutdown in the background. And then check the log file.

     

    LenioTG said:

    So, compared to the existing test, my 2060 was 7% faster (3,750 vs 3,505 iterations per second) in the stable build.

    Yet, a 2060 Super achieved 4,444, +18,5% compared to my RTX 2060.
    And the 2070 Super achieved 6,202, +65% compared to my RTX 2060, and +40% compared to the 2060 Super.
    The RTX 2080 and 2080 Super didn't go much faster.

    I’d caution against making any direct comparison between the numbers in this thread and the results you got without those Iray statistics. The “1800 iterations after XXX.XXXs” line you did find confounds max device Init time with max device Render time as found in the elusive Iray Device Statistics. Meaning that it is always going to undereport true device rendering performance (in putting together this thread I ended up having to study the relationships between pretty much every time based statistic given in the log file to determine which ones were most reliable/relevant to performance metering. This stat turned out to be one of the ones to avoid.)

  • shaneseymourstudioshaneseymourstudio Posts: 383
    edited December 2019

    System Configuration
    System/Motherboard: Gigabyte x470 Aorus Gaming 5 Wifi (Bios F50a latest)
    CPU: Ryzen 7 2700X/stock
    GPU: Asus RTX 2080ti Turbo
    System Memory: Ripjaws V DDR4-3600 4x16GB (64GB) Manually Clocked to 3200 for stability
    OS Drive: Samsung SSD 950 PRO 512GB
    Asset Drive: WD My Passport 0827 USB Device 3TB
    Operating System: Windows 10 Pro Version 1809 OS build 17763.529
    Nvidia Drivers Version: 26.21.14.4120(NVIDIA 441.20)
    Daz Studio Version: 4.12.1.40

    GPU Only
    DAZ_STATS
    2019-12-07 14:35:12.481 Finished Rendering
    2019-12-07 14:35:12.532 Total Rendering Time: 4 minutes 7.37 seconds
    IRAY_STATS
    2019-12-07 14:36:06.593 Iray [INFO] - IRAY:RENDER ::   1.0   IRAY   rend info : Device statistics:
    2019-12-07 14:36:06.593 Iray [INFO] - IRAY:RENDER ::   1.0   IRAY   rend info : CUDA device 0 (GeForce RTX 2080 Ti):      1800 iterations, 2.420s init, 240.813s render
    Iteration Rate: (1800 / 240.813) 7.474679523115446
    Loading Time: ((0 + 4 * 60 + 7.37) - 240.813) 6.557

     

    CPU Only
    DAZ_STATS
    2019-12-07 17:21:17.653 Finished Rendering
    2019-12-07 17:21:17.713 Total Rendering Time: 49 minutes 3.10 seconds
    IRAY_STATS
    2019-12-07 17:21:28.671 Iray [INFO] - IRAY:RENDER ::   1.0   IRAY   rend info : Device statistics:
    2019-12-07 17:21:28.671 Iray [INFO] - IRAY:RENDER ::   1.0   IRAY   rend info : CPU:      1800 iterations, 2.092s init, 2937.642s render
    Iteration Rate: (1800 / 2937.642) 0.6127363375115143
    Loading Time: ((0 + 49 * 60 + 3.1) - 2937.642) 5.458

    Post edited by shaneseymourstudio on
  • LenioTGLenioTG Posts: 1,362

    System Configuration
    System/Motherboard: Gigabyte B450M AORUS M
    CPU: Ryzen 5 3600 @ Stock speed
    GPU: RTX 2070 SUPER MSI Ventus @ Stock speed
    System Memory: 32Gb (4x8) HyperX Fury @ 3000Mhz
    OS Drive: Samsung 970 Evo 250Gb
    Asset Drive: Samsung 860 1TB
    Operating System: Windows 10 build 18362
    Nvidia Drivers Version: 441.66
    Daz Studio Version: 4.12.0.86 Pro Edition (64-bit)
    Optix Prime Acceleration: OFF (Daz Studio 4.12.1.086 or earlier only)

    Benchmark Results
    DAZ_STATS
    2019-12-17 19:56:14.964 Finished Rendering
    2019-12-17 19:56:14.993 Total Rendering Time: 5 minutes 15.19 seconds
    IRAY_STATS
    I still can't find this, sorry. I've closed Daz right away this time and then I've searched for the log.

    2019-12-17 19:56:14.359 Iray [INFO] - IRAY:RENDER ::   1.0   IRAY   rend info : Received update to 01800 iterations after 312.266s.
    2019-12-17 19:56:14.359 Iray [INFO] - IRAY:RENDER ::   1.0   IRAY   rend info : Maximum number of samples reached.

    Iteration Rate: 1800 iterations/309,224s=5,82
    Loading Time: 2019-12-17 19:51:05.148 Iray [INFO] - IRAY:RENDER ::   1.0   IRAY   rend info : Received update to 00001 iterations after 3.042s.

  • RayDAntRayDAnt Posts: 584
    edited December 2019
    LenioTG said:

    System Configuration
    System/Motherboard: Gigabyte B450M AORUS M
    CPU: Ryzen 5 3600 @ Stock speed
    GPU: RTX 2070 SUPER MSI Ventus @ Stock speed
    System Memory: 32Gb (4x8) HyperX Fury @ 3000Mhz
    OS Drive: Samsung 970 Evo 250Gb
    Asset Drive: Samsung 860 1TB
    Operating System: Windows 10 build 18362
    Nvidia Drivers Version: 441.66
    Daz Studio Version: 4.12.0.86 Pro Edition (64-bit)
    Optix Prime Acceleration: OFF (Daz Studio 4.12.1.086 or earlier only)

    Benchmark Results
    DAZ_STATS
    2019-12-17 19:56:14.964 Finished Rendering
    2019-12-17 19:56:14.993 Total Rendering Time: 5 minutes 15.19 seconds
    IRAY_STATS
    I still can't find this, sorry. I've closed Daz right away this time and then I've searched for the log.

    2019-12-17 19:56:14.359 Iray [INFO] - IRAY:RENDER ::   1.0   IRAY   rend info : Received update to 01800 iterations after 312.266s.
    2019-12-17 19:56:14.359 Iray [INFO] - IRAY:RENDER ::   1.0   IRAY   rend info : Maximum number of samples reached.

    Iteration Rate: 1800 iterations/309,224s=5,82
    Loading Time: 2019-12-17 19:51:05.148 Iray [INFO] - IRAY:RENDER ::   1.0   IRAY   rend info : Received update to 00001 iterations after 3.042s.

    Close and reopen Notepad. Then use it to navigate to "c:\Users\[your username here]\AppData\Roaming\DAZ 3D\Studio4\log.txt" You should now find the missing Iray statistics.

    Post edited by RayDAnt on
  • System Configuration
    System/Motherboard: ASUS ROG Maximus IX CODE
    CPU: Intel I7-7700K BRAND MODEL @ 4.2 GHz
    GPU: EVGA RTX 2080 + EVGA GTX 1080 (neither overclocked)
    System Memory: Corsair Dominator Platinum CMD32GX4M2B3000C15 Total 64GB Dual Channel DRAM Frequency 1071 MHz, NB Frequency 4119 MHz
    OS Drive: Samsung 850 Pro 512GB
    Asset Drive: Samsung 860 EVO 1TB
    Operating System: Windows 10 64-bit Version 1909 Build 18363.535
    Nvidia Drivers Version: 441.28 Driver type Standard
    Daz Studio Version: 4.12.1.40 Public Build (BETA) 64-bit
    Optix Prime Acceleration: OFF

    Benchmark Results
    2020-01-05 08:33:22.319 Finished Rendering
    2020-01-05 08:33:22.350 Total Rendering Time: 3 minutes 43.88 seconds

    2020-01-05 08:34:43.624 Iray [INFO] - IRAY:RENDER ::   1.0   IRAY   rend info : Device statistics:
    2020-01-05 08:34:43.639 Iray [INFO] - IRAY:RENDER ::   1.0   IRAY   rend info : CUDA device 0 (GeForce RTX 2080):   1266 iterations, 3.945s init, 217.087s render
    2020-01-05 08:34:43.639 Iray [INFO] - IRAY:RENDER ::   1.0   IRAY   rend info : CUDA device 1 (GeForce GTX 1080):   534 iterations, 6.455s init, 214.569s render

    Iteration Rate - RTX 2080:  5.65 iterations/second
    Iteration Rate - GTX 1080 :  2.38 iterations/second


    Loading Time - RTX 2080 -  6.8 sec
    Loading Time - GTX 1080 -  9.31 sec

  • RayDAntRayDAnt Posts: 584
    edited January 11

    FYI updated all tables to reflect latest results.

    Post edited by RayDAnt on
  • 3dOutlaw3dOutlaw Posts: 2,046

    Hey, thanks for this thread!  Not sure why it's not stickied in the Daz Studio area or something.  There is enough questions about this all over the forums that it seems it should be consolidated.

    Heard some comments about GTX cards recently, so went searching.  I am looking at a 1660ti versus a RTX 2060 in a new laptop.  I am running a GTX960M in my laptop now (probably not worth benchmarking since it is 6 years old, and there is already results on a 960)  I had seen this note on a post:  "The RTX card will render anywhere from 20% to 50% faster than the 1660ti", which leans me towards the RTX, of course.  Then I found this thread, and it looks like about a +/-30% increase for the RTX, and it will be a 75% or so increase in speed versus my 960, woohoo!  cheeky  

    The gaming speed seems to be about 14% increase on average, so that solidifies it for me. (https://youtu.be/X59_-ol8H88)   I'll post a benchmark when I get it. 

    Again, awesome thread!

  • outrider42outrider42 Posts: 2,194
    3dOutlaw said:

    Hey, thanks for this thread!  Not sure why it's not stickied in the Daz Studio area or something.  There is enough questions about this all over the forums that it seems it should be consolidated.

    Heard some comments about GTX cards recently, so went searching.  I am looking at a 1660ti versus a RTX 2060 in a new laptop.  I am running a GTX960M in my laptop now (probably not worth benchmarking since it is 6 years old, and there is already results on a 960)  I had seen this note on a post:  "The RTX card will render anywhere from 20% to 50% faster than the 1660ti", which leans me towards the RTX, of course.  Then I found this thread, and it looks like about a +/-30% increase for the RTX, and it will be a 75% or so increase in speed versus my 960, woohoo!  cheeky  

    The gaming speed seems to be about 14% increase on average, so that solidifies it for me. (https://youtu.be/X59_-ol8H88)   I'll post a benchmark when I get it. 

    Again, awesome thread!

    @3dOutlaw  A few notes first:

    RTX is a little different than past generations in the performance does not scale exactly the same. With pure CUDA the performance generally scales exactly the same across all of the different scenes you may make. And the 2060 has a major CUDA advantage over 960M, it has more and they are faster on top of that. But then you have the RT cores, and these are a bit different. The performance boost you get from RT cores will vary depending on the content of your scene. So you might not always get the exact same speed boost, it might be a bit less or a bit more than what this test does. But it is basically like this: The more geometrically complex your scenes are, the more of a benefit the RT cores become over pure CUDA rendering. So the more stuff you have in your scene, the better the investment in RTX becomes! That is also why I generally recommend RTX to anyone, those RT cores are the big game changers for Iray rendering.

    Next up, your calculated performance gains are off, you are actually underestimating them, and by a lot. That is because the laptop versions of GPUs are a little different from the desktop. How much of a difference has changed since the 960M. The 960M is a TOTALLY different GPU than a full GTX 960. They have different CUDA counts, clocks, and are built on different dies, and you can guess the 960M's specs are vastly lower in each. The 960M is a pale imitation of the full 960. The desktop 960 can range from 30% to a whopping 80% faster than the 960M depending on the task. They really are not in the same league at all. 

    The script changes a bit with newer laptops, but still depends on which you buy. Today Nvidia actually uses the same chips in laptops that they do for desktops, so that is an obvious plus as you now get the same CUDA counts that desktops do. However they are still downclocked compared to the desktop (in the 2060's case, it is clocked about 30% less than desktop). The result is that while they perform slower than the desktop version, they are not as horribly handicapped like the 960M Vs the 960. At least I think. Looking at Notebookcheck gives me pause because those numbers are way less than a desktop 2060. https://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-GeForce-RTX-2060-Laptop-Graphics-Card.384946.0.html

    According to that link, the desktop 1660ti actually beats the laptop 2060. So this again points out the differences in desktop and laptop. BUT that is not Iray, and the 1660ti has no RT cores like the 2060 does. So I am sure that once you factor RT cores in, the laptop 2060 would win. Still...laptops...

    There was going to be what they call a "Max Q" version of the 2060, but this was cancelled. That's good! LOL. The Max-Q versions cut the clockspeeds drastically to save on power for like super thin notebooks. But this obviously reduces the performance a lot as well. That is not good for Iray. 

    Even though the Max-Q 2060 is cancelled, I still wanted to make a note of this here in case anybody happens to be reading this thread and is looking at the other Max-Q models of the 2070 or 2080. Of course I personally would recommend not buying a laptop at all, but if one absolutely must buy a laptop for rendering, I would steer clear of Max-Q versions of anything. The website I linked is a great source for comparing them, too bad they don't bench Iray.

    Now, since we do not actually have a 960M benchmark, I would like to ask you if you are willing to try it. It would be nice to have that data point, plus it would give you a better idea of what performance to expect. Though these are desktop versions, and again the laptop version will be a little slower. There is one 2070 laptop benched, but that's a 2070. I will warn you, this bench might take a while for your 960M to complete. It took a regular 960 nearly 30 minutes, so it could take yours 40 to 45 or maybe even more. So I can understand if you don't want to run it.

    Meanwhile, desktop 2060's can run this test in about 8 minutes. A laptop version may be 15-30% slower than that mark. But that would still be a massive gain over a 960M.

  • JD_MortalJD_Mortal Posts: 691
    edited January 16

    Just updating for the latest nVidia/IRAY/Daz software updates. Nothing major changed. Slightly slower times, by a fraction of a few seconds. Major instability with Daz/IRAY, trying to render anything substantial. (Beta version of Daz.)

    No sense doing TCC, Added CPU... (CPU was a bit faster, due to Embree. Shaved 5 min off a 30 min render.)

    System Configuration
    System/Motherboard: ASRock x299 OC Formula (PCIe 8x/8x/8x/8x speeds)
    CPU: Intel i9-7980XE 3.80Ghz, 18 core (36 threads), 44 PCIe lanes @ Stock (Water cooled)
    GPU: Nvidia Titan V @ stock (5120 cuda cores)
    GPU: Nvidia Titan V @ stock (5120 cuda cores)
    GPU: Nvidia Titan Xp Collectors Edition @ stock (3840 cuda cores)
    GPU: Nvidia Titan Xp Collectors Edition @ stock (3840 cuda cores)
    System Memory: Corsair Dominator Platinum 64GB DDR4 @ 2133Mhz
    OS Drive: Samsung 960 PRO 2TB NVMe SSD M.2
    Asset Drive: Samsung 850 EVO 4TB V-NAND SSD
    Operating System: Windows 10 Home (64-bit) version 1903 build 18362.535
    Nvidia Drivers Version: 441.66 STUDIO DRIVERS

    Single card tests

    Benchmark Results - Titan-V #1 (WDDM Mode)
    Daz Studio Version: 4.12.1.40 Beta x64
    Optix: OptiX Prime version 5.0.1
    Total Rendering Time: 3 minutes 56.63 seconds
    CUDA device 1 (TITAN V): 1800 iterations, 2.673s init, 230.437s render
    Iteration Rate: (1800 / 230.437) = 7.811 iterations per second
    Loading Time: (236.63 - 230.437) = 6.193 seconds

    Benchmark Results - Titan-Xp Collectors Edition #1 (WDDM Mode)
    Daz Studio Version: 4.12.1.40 Beta x64
    Optix: OptiX Prime version 5.0.1
    Total Rendering Time: 6 minutes 57.28 seconds
    CUDA device 2 (TITAN Xp Collectors Edition): 1800 iterations, 2.521s init, 412.073s render
    Iteration Rate: (1800 / 412.073) = 4.368 iterations per second
    Loading Time: (417.28 - 412.073) = 5.207 seconds

    Benchmark Results - Titan-V #2 (WDDM Mode)
    Daz Studio Version: 4.12.1.40 Beta x64
    Optix: OptiX Prime version 5.0.1
    Total Rendering Time: 3 minutes 55.74 seconds
    CUDA device 0 (TITAN V): 1800 iterations, 2.141s init, 230.851s render
    Iteration Rate: (1800 / 230.851) = 7.797 iterations per second
    Loading Time: (235.74 - 230.851) = 4.889 seconds

    Benchmark Results - Titan-Xp Collectors Edition #2 (WDDM Mode)
    Daz Studio Version: 4.12.1.40 Beta x64
    Optix: OptiX Prime version 5.0.1
    Total Rendering Time: 6 minutes 55.46 seconds
    CUDA device 3 (TITAN Xp Collectors Edition): 1800 iterations, 2.169s init, 410.585s render
    Iteration Rate: (1800 / 410.585) = 4.384 iterations per second
    Loading Time: (415.46 - 410.585) = 4.875 seconds

    MULTI-CARD

    Benchmark Results - 2x Titan-V & 2x Titan-Xp Collectors Edition (WDDM Mode)
    Daz Studio Version: 4.12.1.40 Beta x64
    Optix: OptiX Prime version 5.0.1
    Total Rendering Time: 1 minutes 24.84 seconds
    CUDA device 1 (TITAN V): 579 iterations, 3.343s init, 78.731s render
    CUDA device 2 (TITAN Xp Collectors Edition): 316 iterations, 2.547s init, 79.174s render
    CUDA device 0 (TITAN V): 591 iterations, 2.406s init, 79.333s render
    CUDA device 3 (TITAN Xp Collectors Edition): 314 iterations, 3.068s init, 78.709s render
    Iteration Rate: (1800 / 78.986) = 22.779 iterations per second
    Loading Time: (88.8478.986) = 9.854 seconds

    CPU

    Benchmark Results - CPU (i9-7980XE 3.80Ghz, 18 core (36 threads))
    Daz Studio Version: 4.12.1.40 Beta x64
    Renderer: Using Embree 2.8.0
    Total Rendering Time: 25 minutes 43.52 seconds
    CPU: 1800 iterations, 2.038s init, 1538.749s render
    Iteration Rate: (1800 / 1538.749) = 1.170 iterations per second
    Loading Time: (1543.521538.749) = 4.771 seconds

     

    Post edited by JD_Mortal on
  • BeeMKayBeeMKay Posts: 6,693
    edited January 16
    System Configuration
    System/Motherboard: ASUSTeK H87M-PLUS Rev X.0x
    CPU: Intel Core i7-4770 CPU @ 3.40GHz/stock
    GPU: Gainward GeForce GTX 980 Ti/stock
    System Memory: 32 GB DDR3 1600 MHZ DIMM (Don't know brand)
    OS Drive: Samsung SSD 850 EVO 500GB
    Asset Drive: ST2000DX001-1NS164
    Operating System: Windows 10, Build 9200, No Service Pack Installed
    Nvidia Drivers Version: 441.66 (26.21.14.4166)
    Daz Studio Version: 4.12.1.40 (BETA)
    Optix Prime Acceleration:

    Benchmark Results
    2020-01-16 01:49:31.150 Finished Rendering
    2020-01-16 01:49:31.181 Total Rendering Time: 10 minutes 33.8 seconds
    2020-01-16 01:56:37.742 Iray [INFO] - IRAY:RENDER ::   1.0   IRAY   rend info : Device statistics:
    2020-01-16 01:56:37.742 Iray [INFO] - IRAY:RENDER ::   1.0   IRAY   rend info : CUDA device 0 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti):      1800 iterations, 4.715s init, 624.731s render
    Iteration Rate: (1800 / 624.731) = 2.8812
    Loading Time: (633.8 - 624.731) = 9.069

     

    Post edited by BeeMKay on
Sign In or Register to comment.