No encrypted for me.

13537394041

Comments

  • KickAir 8PKickAir 8P Posts: 1,865

    The definition of theft is a side issue and potentially confusing the main topic. The posst have been removed, as will any further posts on the subject.

    To this topic?  I won't buy 3D content that's been impaired by encryption and/or DRM because I won't pay to be punished for other's offenses -- the claimed justification for doing this to us has to be more than just a side issue.

  • On the topic at hand...

    My husband pays more attention to the ups and downs of DRM than I do.  When the beta threads started and they announced that there was going to be DRM'ed content, I asked him if I should worry.  He said that as long as DAZ did the DRM "right" I shouldn't have any problem.

    As of yet, I haven't bought any Encrypted Only content.  Primarily because everything I've wanted has been more than what's available in my Mad Money.

    Now it's my turn to speculate - and I think it sounds like DAZ is doing DRM "right."  Which means I'm not going to worry about it.  I have other reasons to be annoyed with there being stuff I can only download through Daz Connect, but the DRM isn't one of them.

    Try resetting the content DB with a Connect based library... Have fun with that if you're offline.  Technically anything not encrypted is still usable... but it sure isn't easy. I can't say about the encrypted, I don't have any. Perhaps someone who does could check if the encrypted products need 'installed' metadata to function or if you can still get the same limited functionality by going to their folder?

    The fact that there are insufficient provisions for users that can't be online at all times is a problem for me. (At least the old library system had the ability to re-import metadata while offline and when reimported it didn't treat the product as needing to be installed on top of that.), I'm still looking for a way to automate restoring my library to 'installed' status during the brief periods I do have a connection on my laptop. Currently I'm click click clicking my way through products one by one. And while the encryption isn't at fault for this as I have no encrypted products, the underlying structure of the DRM is making this far more difficult than it should have to be.  The biggest annoyance is I can't even say it's a bug. This seems to be 'working as intended' to use a phrase for this kind of issue.

  • nicsttnicstt Posts: 11,715

    And once again, this discussion becomes ridiculous. I'd be willing to bet that most of the people saying they will never buy encrypted content would also not be inconvienced by it if they did. 

     

    Also, bear in mind that Daz isn't encrypting their content because we're all worried it might get stolen from us by thieves - they're encrypting it because they believe that any one of us could be a potential thief

    Just a few posts ago, you said that pirates usually do purchase items and then redistribute them. We ARE the potential thieves - perhaps not you and I personally, but some customers are.

     

    Like DesignAnvil said, some protection is better than none at all. Would you rather risk DAZ feeling the need to put truly draconian limitations on content (like encrypted textures and no export options) or eliminating their 30-day return policy to fight potential piracy or loss of sales? You can talk about speculation all you want, but we do not work here and we do not have the available information that DAZ does. Thinking that we know better than DAZ is like saying you know more about my personal finances than I do.

    Agree some protection is better that none at all; Daz will decide if what they have done was worthwhile, or has actually even been any protection at all.

    However, Daz needs us, not the other way round - there are other sources of products, and other software - I use Blender for instance. Utlimately, I can chose to buy some or all of my wants (not needs) from Daz, or I can chose to go elsewhere.

    Daz has added many features for its software, this one I have trouble seeing as an advantage for me. I can't concern myself with what other people make of it, only me.

    If Daz Connect only items are half the full price of current ones, would I think differently? I don't know for sure, but I doubt it, as DRM in these circumstances, effectively turns an item from a bought one to a rented one - and I don't know how long the duration of the rental is.

    If I'm renting, I want to know up front the duration, and what the renewal options are.

  • atticanneatticanne Posts: 3,009
    DAZ_Jon said:
    DAZ_Steve said:
     

    So, let me address the second issue.  Nearly every Daz customer is trustworthy.  But for anyone to say that there is not a small segment of people who buy content, then illegally share it is simply not realistic.  When people do this, it takes money from Daz and it's ability to support the store and offerings, and it also takes money away from the artists.  This means that, either there is less money to for Daz to roll out new features and figures, and less money for the artists to live, or that prices go up and the honest people pay more.

    I'm not in this thread to "tow the company line", nore to try to pull the wool over anyone's eyes.  I would honestly, objectively like to hear opinions on those two points.

     

    I truly get this and I am all in favor of this. heck, I have even reported pirated content to DAZ, but I am still unsure of how this will solve the issue without causing undue stress to legit users. I am a modeler and constantly import/export mesh thru various different modeling apps when working on personal projects, including DAZ content. As a moral, ethical person, I don't share or upload any DAZ assets, but how would this new encryption keep extracted mesh from being uploaded to a pirate site, or is it handled at the export process somehow. I am NOT looking for a way around the encryption, just wanting to understand how/if this will affect my workflow.

    Our content is a lot more than just the mesh. If a pirate exported out an FBX or OBJ and shared it calling it Victoria 7, it would be less useful than the actual full product, and the work it would take to bring back into Daz and make it work like the original product with just the data in an OBJ or FBX or other format is a lot of work and requires a level of knowledge most don't have. There is so much stuff which is Daz Studio specific functionality that you lose on export that sharing the export would be similar to pirating a movie by recording it with your phone camera in a dark theatre. Some people will still attempt to download and watch it, but it will be way worse of an experience than actually watching it in the theatre or on Blu-ray or DVD. I'm not saying it is "okay" to share exported content as it is still against the EULA, but it also means those that want to use it pirated in that way aren't getting near the full value of the product through legitimate means.

    That being said, these changes shouldn't have an impact on exporting and importing content if that is how you work with it. 

    Then why have the import/export feature at all?

    DAZ_Steve said:

    There are two valid points I have seeen in this thread, so I'd like to address both (and a third issue as well):

    1- What if Daz goes away?

    2- I have cool scripts now.  Would be cool if they could work on new content as well.

    3- I'm not a criminal, why treat me like one.

    What if Daz Goes away:

    Point taken.  We already have plans to look a methods to "unlock" content in the event of our demise.  Expect to see advancements here.

     

    Cool scripts:

    Understood.  We will look at how to work with Published Artists to give them the ability to write tools that will still do cool stuff with new content.  Expect to see advancements here as well.

     

    I'm not a crook.  Why treat me like one:

    Sadly, crooked people don't wear signs.  Even when they are dientifiable, there would be a lot of effort and cost into chasing them down individually to do anything about it.  In the event that they are out of the country this is much harder and costlier to do.  Even the ones that seem easier, we run the risk of being further perceived as "Big Bad Daz" if we go after someone.  As such, encryption, though not fool-proof, is much like locks on doors and windows in your homes... They help keep honest people honest and hopefully avoid the problem instead of trying to deal with it after the fact.

    Why just Published Artists?

    DAZ_Steve said:
    DAZ_Steve said:
    Cool scripts:

    Understood.  We will look at how to work with Published Artists to give them the ability to write tools that will still do cool stuff with new content.  Expect to see advancements here as well.


     

    Update on this (Sorry, my mistake for not realizing the answer before): Although content cannot be modified on disk by scripts when encrypted, it can be modified throguh the API once loaded (and if needed could then be saved out).  Key Published Artists who have historically provided script based products have been informed the "new" way to do most of what they used to do.  So most of that stuff can still be done to the encrypted content.

    Once again, why only Key Published Artists?  What about those of us who would like to learn scripting for DAZ products?

    DAZ_Steve said:
    Daikatana said:
    Sorel said:
     

     

    DAZ_Steve said:

    There are two valid points I have seeen in this thread, so I'd like to address both (and a third issue as well):

    1- What if Daz goes away?

    2- I have cool scripts now.  Would be cool if they could work on new content as well.

    3- I'm not a criminal, why treat me like one.

    What if Daz Goes away:

    Point taken.  We already have plans to look a methods to "unlock" content in the event of our demise.  Expect to see advancements here.

     

    Cool scripts:

    Understood.  We will look at how to work with Published Artists to give them the ability to write tools that will still do cool stuff with new content.  Expect to see advancements here as well.

     

    I'm not a crook.  Why treat me like one:

    Sadly, crooked people don't wear signs.  Even when they are dientifiable, there would be a lot of effort and cost into chasing them down individually do do anything about it.  In the even that they are out of the country this is much harder and costlier to do.  Even the ones that seem easier, we run the risk of being further perceived as "Big Bad Daz" if we go after someone.  As such, encryption, though not fool-proof, is much like locks on doors and windows in your homes... They help keep honest people honest and hopefully avoid the problem instead of trying to deal with it after the fact.

    OK. which is it?  You have plans to look at ways to unlock the content?  Or do you HAVE a " poison pill" option already as was definitevely stated by another member of the company back when all this started?    A correct, current and true answer would be much appreciated here.  There have been so many flip-flops on this subject of late - coming from DAZ3D no less- that I have no idea what to believe or what level of discomfort/comfort is apropriate here.

     

    It is written, but not compiled or tested (we've been focused on getting the release out for now).  So the answer is "yes and no".  Yes, we have written it, no I can't say it's done until it is verified.

    In other words, DAZ doesn't know diddly squat about how they will handle this.  You appear to have been sent out in front of the firing squad with the assurance that none of the guns are loaded, but since the unloading procedure is merely on paper, untested, you could be dead in a few minutes.  Very brave man?

    DAZ_Steve said:

     

    nicstt said:

    We don't know what wilOnly weeks ago, there were no plans to introduce encrypted only content; the day that Daz release 4.9, they release encrypted only content.l happen, that is the problem... and those of you offering assurances also don't know what others have planned.

    I gotta say, this is one of the times where I will don the tin foil hat with you. There were no plans. They kept saying that. And then, on day one, there is Connect Only content. That really, really bothered me.

    Up until a few days ago there was no plan for encrypted only content.  Just prior to the launch was thought, "Hey, let's put out a few free items that require 4.9 so we can get people to try it and see that 4.9 is pretty cool."  This was based on the number of people in the forums who had expressed concerns about 4.9.

    Based on the number of downloads of 4.9 today, and the number of people connecting with Daz Connect, it appears that the enticement was un-needed.  We do however, have a few more encrypted only free items planned over the weekend.

    This was not intended to mislead or bait and switch anyone.

    Also, as I am personally the individual who determines what products to launch when, what to price them, and what formats they will be in, I can tell you this:

    I have no intention of releasing major figure launches encrypted only in the near future.

    I will launch some products encrypted only in the coming weeks and see how they do.

    I will also use free items to entice people to adopt encryption.

     

    Are you The Boss?  What if you are fired or drop dead tomorrow?  What then?

    UHF said:

    Ice Dragon Art said:

    UHF said:

    According to the FAQ I'm screwed.

    http://www.daz3d.com/forums/discussion/comment/941600/#Comment_941600

    "You cannot move files around for products installed through Daz Connect. You can change the drive and/or path to which products are installed using Daz Connect, but you cannot manually re-organize the files within the product."

    So... if a vendor decides I need to look on the fricken moon for files.. that's where I have to do it forever.  That truly sucks and is a real step backwards.

     

    Can you imagine what 1000 product library would look like?  Each vender sticks there garbage in whatever directory they thought up today?  To my eyes.. this is truly nuts.  Think about smart props.. some have poses with the props, some have them with the character some do both.  (I merge the poses to the same directories as the props so I can find them without scrolling though everything on the planet trying to find them.)

    WHAT!!!!  I was almost sold when I found out that the content library I created for myself would still be there but you are saying that I can't add the new content to my own version of the content library in the future?!  That's a deal breaker for me.  I spent hours upon hours on that content library so that it would suit the way I think and work.  I don't use smart content, ever.  If I can't add them to my own beautifully organized content library I will be unable to work with this.

    Its solveable I think, but I don't think they care.  To my eyes theres a few ways to get the protection they want without excluding the normal use of Daz Studio or Daz's content.

    One method would be to encode encryption codes in the content that excluded directory locations.  Everything would work the same as before.

    The other solution would be to stick stuff wherever, but create a series of files in the usual locations as normal.  I could rearrange those files to my heart's content, but I'd have issues with updates.  (If you think about it, this is what we are doing now.. I never touch texture directories or geometries.)

    I also have no idea if I can access things like the original texture files, but I regularly solve problems that way.  For instance, materials optimized for Daz or poser rarely work well with Reality or Octane.  No amount of adjusting will clear it up, but tweaking say specularity contrast does wonders. Like so;

    http://www.deviantart.com/art/Bethany-s-Eyes-584678187

     

    I really have zero trust in database management. In this case its being added on top of another database called a 'File System'..

     

     

     

    I double checked on this a bit and while the actual files themselves can't be moved around you can still organize content inside of Daz like before (except for the encrypted only content).  So most of the content for now will still be manageable from the content library side of things.  This probably isn't helpful for you if you are moving the files themselves though.

    As more and more content becomes encrypted only, the actual files will become more and more immoveable.

     

    Kaleb242 said:

    Would everyone be happy if plugins were developed that enabled you to load encrypted products (including Genesis 3+ content) into Carrara and Poser?

    NO, I wouldn't be happy.  No encryption and no G3 content.  I use Carrara and Poser, in addition to other programs.  I stopped purchasing characters with G2F&M.  With a 32-bit laptop, using IRay is not an option.  DS4.8 will be the highest I go for Studio.  I gave up on Hex, Bryce, and Carrara being advanced a long time ago.  I'll just sit in in my little corner of the world and work with what I have or get from another site.  I have recently bought some M3, V3, and D3 items though.

  • atticanneatticanne Posts: 3,009
    tl155180 said:

    So the solution is to do nothing and continue to let pirates give away (or even charge in some site membership cases) products that some people DO download rather than buying? This argument is getting old.

    Sorry SnowSultan but I really dislike this argument. Lets say my car was stolen one day by thieves... I buy a new one and as a precaution I shoot everyone dead who comes within 20 metres of the new car, regardless of how innocent they might be. Now, would you say that my solution was a good idea because its better than doing nothing?

     

    No, what I would do is insure the car, lock the doors and install a security system. None of these are 100% guaranteed all the time. They do mitigate the risk though. Even if I need to remember to unlock it, Carry around my key, pay my insurance and make sure the alarm doesn't consistantly wake my neighbours at all hours.

    The one thing I wouldn't do is, leave the keys in the ignition and the doors open while I went to the movies.

     

    My relatives who live just outside a prison that does have walkoffs always leave their vehicles unlocked with the keys in the ignition.  This makes it far less likely that escapees will try to enter the house and harm people.

     

  • tl155180tl155180 Posts: 994
    edited January 2016
    DAZ_Steve said:
    I'm not a crook.  Why treat me like one:

    Sadly, crooked people don't wear signs.  Even when they are dientifiable, there would be a lot of effort and cost into chasing them down individually to do anything about it.

    I had the same thought. Right now, out walking the streets or going about their business, there are criminals amongst us. We don't know who most of them are though and they don't wear signs. So the easiest thing to do is lock everyone up, guilty and innocent alike, just to be on the safe side. If we simply treat everyone as potential criminals, then we could completely eradicate crime altogether! And it saves us the hassle of having to identify and track down the real criminals.

    There. I solved crime laugh.

    Post edited by tl155180 on
  • nicsttnicstt Posts: 11,715
    atticanne said:
    tl155180 said:

    So the solution is to do nothing and continue to let pirates give away (or even charge in some site membership cases) products that some people DO download rather than buying? This argument is getting old.

    Sorry SnowSultan but I really dislike this argument. Lets say my car was stolen one day by thieves... I buy a new one and as a precaution I shoot everyone dead who comes within 20 metres of the new car, regardless of how innocent they might be. Now, would you say that my solution was a good idea because its better than doing nothing?

     

    No, what I would do is insure the car, lock the doors and install a security system. None of these are 100% guaranteed all the time. They do mitigate the risk though. Even if I need to remember to unlock it, Carry around my key, pay my insurance and make sure the alarm doesn't consistantly wake my neighbours at all hours.

    The one thing I wouldn't do is, leave the keys in the ignition and the doors open while I went to the movies.

     

    My relatives who live just outside a prison that does have walkoffs always leave their vehicles unlocked with the keys in the ignition.  This makes it far less likely that escapees will try to enter the house and harm people.

     

    Oh my.

     

    tl155180 said:
    DAZ_Steve said:
    I'm not a crook.  Why treat me like one:

    Sadly, crooked people don't wear signs.  Even when they are dientifiable, there would be a lot of effort and cost into chasing them down individually to do anything about it.

    I had the same thought. Right now, out walking the streets or going about their business, there are criminals amongst us. We don't know who most of them are though and they don't wear signs. So the easiest thing to do is lock everyone up, guilty and innocent alike, just to be on the safe side. If we simply treat everyone as potential criminals, then we could completely eradicate crime altogether! And it saves us the hassle of having to identify and track down the real criminals.

    There. I solved crime laugh.

    Extreme, and it would just relocate the crime. :)

  • ALLIEKATBLUEALLIEKATBLUE Posts: 2,983

    I've only invested in the G3 characters because, well I'm a packrat collector with a bit of disposable income and just wanted to see what it was all about.  Not really impressed, characters mostly white pretty bland but I support the artists and some look ok.  Not upgrading to 4.9, seems like too many issues. I have so much BEAUTIFUL V4 textures and have been on a mission converting the textures and characters to G2, and since other content stores still support V4 even for iray I'm up to my eyeballs in V4.  Just waiting for the point that DAZ sell connect only content because that's where DAZ and I will have to part and besides, there's other fish in the sea.

  • lx said:
    Havos said:

    I am always amazed at how many Carrara users posts in the forums, given we have been led to believe they are a small and decreasing band

    I once mentioned on the forums that all signs on the forums and store pointed to Carrara no longer being of interest to Daz. I was immediately warned that such speculation would be unwise. Based on being told that development was still in progress for Carrara (after asking many times) I bought it. The manual was for a completely different version, but still workable. Months later, not a single official word about it or any sort of update.

    I mean you can call them conspiracy theories, speculations, whatever buzz word you want to stop paying customers from posting things you don't want on your forums, but the fact is there has been no word of anything happening for the other programs, only Studio. 

    Corporate silence continues with Hexagon and Bryce too.  In fact, whenever any particular thing you want or need is met with corporate silence, then you should assume that it's not being done.  And I'd even go so far as to say that if the corporate silence has formed a "Cone of Silence" around the entire product (Bryce, Hex), then you must assume that the product is approaching the end of its life span.

  • TesseractSpaceTesseractSpace Posts: 1,582
    edited January 2016

    And on to Day 3 of the new login required system restricting my content usage...

    I know I can use it by navigating through the cloud folders but I get no smart content functionality that way. And some expansions seem to be unable to find the files from the product they expand, likely because Studio doesn't think they're installed.

    My options thus far seem to be:

    1. Reinstall my content in the brief times I have connection to the internet. A tedious process even for a small library.

    2. Reinstall everything from backups. An even more tedious process as I then have to remove copies from the cloud directory to keep duplicates from eating all my free space.

    3. Give up and just not use Daz content on this system till I can finish 1 or 2.

    I don't have enough space on this machine to tie up a large section of it holding backup installers for my whole library, and given that the products are still fully downloaded and in place I should be able to tell it to forgo looking for an update and just work with what's already there. However since Connect wants that check-in so it can make sure I still am allowed to use that product, I'm stuck. And again this looks like how it should be in the new system. There's a lot inconvenience to me, but nothing showing any instability or unpredictable behaviour in Studio. I've put in a ticket for how it seems to slow down after several 'installs' and I explained the rest of the issue, but I hold little hope of a simple solution.

    Post edited by TesseractSpace on
  • HavosHavos Posts: 5,575
    lx said:
    Havos said:

    I am always amazed at how many Carrara users posts in the forums, given we have been led to believe they are a small and decreasing band

    I once mentioned on the forums that all signs on the forums and store pointed to Carrara no longer being of interest to Daz. I was immediately warned that such speculation would be unwise. Based on being told that development was still in progress for Carrara (after asking many times) I bought it. The manual was for a completely different version, but still workable. Months later, not a single official word about it or any sort of update.

    I mean you can call them conspiracy theories, speculations, whatever buzz word you want to stop paying customers from posting things you don't want on your forums, but the fact is there has been no word of anything happening for the other programs, only Studio. 

    Corporate silence continues with Hexagon and Bryce too.  In fact, whenever any particular thing you want or need is met with corporate silence, then you should assume that it's not being done.  And I'd even go so far as to say that if the corporate silence has formed a "Cone of Silence" around the entire product (Bryce, Hex), then you must assume that the product is approaching the end of its life span.

    I would be surprised if any of the Hexagon and Bryce developers still worked for DAZ. If not, then short of dragging back the old guys on a contract basis, it would be very hard for someone who had never worked on them to come in and do the necessary enhancements.

  • UHFUHF Posts: 518

    Design Anvil - Razor42 said:

    Again I ask if what you're saying has been proven beyond all doubt, why do the leading industries continue to use it if the only outcome is financial ruin.

    It doesn't really add up to me.  

    I didn't say it led to financial ruin, nor do I know exactly why each company makes the choices it does.

    These are the facts you can actually measure:

    Fact: Many companies employ DRM to attempt to protect their product from piracy. (This does not mean I approve of this.)
    Fact: Almost all of these products are freely available in an illegal format. (This does not mean I approve of this.)
    Fact: DRM does inconvenience customers. We know this because we can read customer feedback.
    Fact: If one pirate cracks a DRM system, that system can now be compromised by everyone via sharing. This means that mitigation isn't happening via this way.

    If you implement something, you have to show that it was worth implementing, not make everyone else prove that it wasn't. I have yet to see any measurable data on this being a success.
     

    "Fact: If one pirate cracks a DRM system, that system can now be compromised by everyone via sharing. This means that mitigation isn't happening via this way."

    This isn't what mitigation means, mitgation doesn't deal in absolutes. Mitigation is attempting to influence percentages to affect an outcome. Putting a lock on your door doesn't guarantee that you can never be broken into, if it is broken from then on it wont keep anyone out until it is repaired or patched. Do you use locks? The lock helps to mitigate the risk.

    Using the applied theory your drawing as a conclusion here. You could ask, why use money if it can be stolen, why build banks if the can be robbed, why build prisons if they can be escaped from, why live if you can be killed. In none of these situation has anyone ever said well, it can be broken so it's useless.  In every instance mitigation is applied to reduce the likelihood of the worst case happening. That fact that you can die doesn't mean you give up living, everyday you mitigate the associated risks of dieing even though there is no guarantee you will be successful on each and every day. And it is a fact that one day you won't be. 

    None of this discusses the impact of DRM on a customer which is gauged by how put out through procedure or the level that usage is impacted by the protection.  it's just attempting to explain why DRM, and why it is employed regularly by most successful businesses. Nor will it effect you if you decide that locking and unlocking your door every time you leave your house is to much trouble. If you don't like locks you don't need to have them. You just accept that you won't be using that mitigating factor to protect your house and assets. I'm not sure if the lock company will mind.

    This is correct.  Oh.. and most physical locks don't work.  Last I read, some 70% of locks are still bumpable.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lock_bumping

    Deterant's generally block stupid stuff and prevent little kids from gettin gup to no good.

     

    I have serious doubts that DRM will change anything, or result in more profits or sales in any fashion.

  • Subtropic PixelSubtropic Pixel Posts: 2,388
    edited January 2016
    atticanne said:
    tl155180 said:

    So the solution is to do nothing and continue to let pirates give away (or even charge in some site membership cases) products that some people DO download rather than buying? This argument is getting old.

    Sorry SnowSultan but I really dislike this argument. Lets say my car was stolen one day by thieves... I buy a new one and as a precaution I shoot everyone dead who comes within 20 metres of the new car, regardless of how innocent they might be. Now, would you say that my solution was a good idea because its better than doing nothing?

     

    No, what I would do is insure the car, lock the doors and install a security system. None of these are 100% guaranteed all the time. They do mitigate the risk though. Even if I need to remember to unlock it, Carry around my key, pay my insurance and make sure the alarm doesn't consistantly wake my neighbours at all hours.

    The one thing I wouldn't do is, leave the keys in the ignition and the doors open while I went to the movies.

     

    My relatives who live just outside a prison that does have walkoffs always leave their vehicles unlocked with the keys in the ignition.  This makes it far less likely that escapees will try to enter the house and harm people.

     

    Whoa.

    Anybody breaking out of prison will not just need transportation; they will also need a change of clothing and money, therefore a certain percentage of escapees will consider breaking into the nearest houses anyway, even if there's an unlocked car in the driveway. 

    So if you live near a prison, you should probably home carry.

    Yeah, OT, I know.  So I'll add this:

    It's not so much the fear of encrypted content or DRM (but it IS, yes it is DRM).  It's because you have to install "one-at-a-time" and as somebody else has outlined, if the Connect database gets wacky-whoo-whoo for any reason, you end up having to install everything all over again.  One. At. A. Time.

    User inconveniences are not my cup of tea, so I'm suddenly getting into the habit of looking at anything in my cart and removing those things that don't let me install via DIM.

    I'm also resisting the temptation of buying something because it's a 75% off Connect item, or because it's a free Connect item when you buy another item.  I have my dignity.

    Post edited by Subtropic Pixel on
  • SnowSultanSnowSultan Posts: 3,773
    edited January 2016

    I'm not abandoning Daz, nor advocating for anyone else to do so. Neither have I seen anyone else telling others to also leave.

    No, but this thread is filled with people bragging about how much they've spent here and how they're going to cut back on spending or shop elsewhere over something that nearly none of them have actually experienced any problems with yet. It's been six days since this began, we simply need to give it more time and address any actual issues before people talk about "taking their toys and going home".

     

    I also have no interest in telling people posting in the thread what they're allowed to discuss on the topic

    :sigh:

    I said that because I thought it would be better for all parties to cool down a bit and get back to actually having legitimate questions asked and answers given. Things like "do I have to sign in to DAZ using Connect every time I want to use my encrypted content?" rather than "can we take legal action against DAZ and/or get a refund if they go bankrupt and I can no longer access the detective coat I bought four years ago?"

    Post edited by Richard Haseltine on
  • Havos said:
    lx said:
    Havos said:

    I am always amazed at how many Carrara users posts in the forums, given we have been led to believe they are a small and decreasing band

    I once mentioned on the forums that all signs on the forums and store pointed to Carrara no longer being of interest to Daz. I was immediately warned that such speculation would be unwise. Based on being told that development was still in progress for Carrara (after asking many times) I bought it. The manual was for a completely different version, but still workable. Months later, not a single official word about it or any sort of update.

    I mean you can call them conspiracy theories, speculations, whatever buzz word you want to stop paying customers from posting things you don't want on your forums, but the fact is there has been no word of anything happening for the other programs, only Studio. 

    Corporate silence continues with Hexagon and Bryce too.  In fact, whenever any particular thing you want or need is met with corporate silence, then you should assume that it's not being done.  And I'd even go so far as to say that if the corporate silence has formed a "Cone of Silence" around the entire product (Bryce, Hex), then you must assume that the product is approaching the end of its life span.

    I would be surprised if any of the Hexagon and Bryce developers still worked for DAZ. If not, then short of dragging back the old guys on a contract basis, it would be very hard for someone who had never worked on them to come in and do the necessary enhancements.

    I agree.  But why does DAZ have to be silent about that?  Just make 'em free and tell us, "these products are at end-of-development and are being offered on an 'as is' basis, without any warrantee or guarantee of any kind."  [sarc]Good communication is just too hard, I know... [/sarc]

  • Well the new login required for things that don't need it is throwing a real monkey wrench in my studio usage. Right now at least nearly everything I've tried in hopes of somehow actually fixing my issue keeps hitting login screens with no 'do this offline, i know the files are there' option.

    I'd love to hear from anyone with encrypted content if that can handle my specific situation (product already installed, offline, database reset, metadata restored but not seen as 'installed') any better or if it's less usable than the unencrypted stuff. I just wouldn't ask anyone to reset their database to check. Even if I had a connection on the laptop it'd be a tedious process to fix.

  • UHFUHF Posts: 518

    SnowSultan said:

     

    I'm not abandoning Daz, nor advocating for anyone else to do so. Neither have I seen anyone else telling others to also leave.

    No, but this thread is filled with people bragging about how much they've spent here and how they're going to cut back on spending or shop elsewhere over something that nearly none of them have actually experienced any problems with yet. It's been six days since this began, we simply need to give it more time and address any actual issues before people talk about "taking their toys and going home".

    Actually, the last time Daz really broke their store, I rage quit the place. I went from spending thousands $$$ here to spending a trickle.  Most of my money since then has gone to Renderosity, and RuntimeDNA.  I might add that content I buy over in those places is often better than what I can find here, and generally comes with better texture work.   Daz would now be a healthy $5k up if they hadn't botched it all up.  (I can't even remember why what ticked me so much either.)

    So apart from core products, and some of the better vendors, I try to avoid Daz's store.

     

    In this case, I'm not upset about encryption. I'm upset about Daz altering my install and work flow.  (The time tell people not to use directores for installs was years ago.  Now is too f*cking.)

  • SnowSultanSnowSultan Posts: 3,773

    I'm upset about Daz altering my install and work flow.  

    You can still organize your content how you want by dragging and dropping shortcuts from the Smart Content panel to the Content Library panel. I am reinstalling my content now using this method to get used to it and try and get a little more organized. It's not exactly the same as the manual folder method we're used to, but it's quite similar.

     

      (I can't even remember why what ticked me so much either.)

    So you're still not shopping here even though you can't remember why you left in the first place? uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

     LOL, truly internet forums are where common sense goes to die. 

  • I'm upset about Daz altering my install and work flow.  

    You can still organize your content how you want by dragging and dropping shortcuts from the Smart Content panel to the Content Library panel. I am reinstalling my content now using this method to get used to it and try and get a little more organized. It's not exactly the same as the manual folder method we're used to, but it's quite similar.

     

    And if smart content or connect goes down we're dead in the water with links until they start working again. Not so with files. So there's that.

  • acanthisacanthis Posts: 604
    edited January 2016

    btw I have other reasons for refusing to upgrade to 4.9 that are nothing to do with DRM, but that would be off topic (and probably speculative).

    Post edited by acanthis on
  • The definition of theft is a side issue and potentially confusing the main topic. The posst have been removed, as will any further posts on the subject.

    To this topic?  I won't buy 3D content that's been impaired by encryption and/or DRM because I won't pay to be punished for other's offenses -- the claimed justification for doing this to us has to be more than just a side issue.

    Arguing over which word should be used to describe the offences is not relevant, and was in fact sidetracking the discussion of the topic.

  • atticanne said:
     
    DAZ_Steve said:
    Cool scripts:

    Understood.  We will look at how to work with Published Artists to give them the ability to write tools that will still do cool stuff with new content.  Expect to see advancements here as well.

    Why just Published Artists?

    DAZ_Steve said:
    DAZ_Steve said:
    Cool scripts:

    Understood.  We will look at how to work with Published Artists to give them the ability to write tools that will still do cool stuff with new content.  Expect to see advancements here as well.


     

    Update on this (Sorry, my mistake for not realizing the answer before): Although content cannot be modified on disk by scripts when encrypted, it can be modified throguh the API once loaded (and if needed could then be saved out).  Key Published Artists who have historically provided script based products have been informed the "new" way to do most of what they used to do.  So most of that stuff can still be done to the encrypted content.

    Once again, why only Key Published Artists?  What about those of us who would like to learn scripting for DAZ products?

    Anyone will be able to write scripts, but I would expect Daz to work with the PA script creators so they can modify any existing scripts that get broken by the new system. Rob has, as he can, been working on the scripting docs.

  • lx said:
    Havos said:

    I am always amazed at how many Carrara users posts in the forums, given we have been led to believe they are a small and decreasing band

    I once mentioned on the forums that all signs on the forums and store pointed to Carrara no longer being of interest to Daz. I was immediately warned that such speculation would be unwise. Based on being told that development was still in progress for Carrara (after asking many times) I bought it. The manual was for a completely different version, but still workable. Months later, not a single official word about it or any sort of update.

    I mean you can call them conspiracy theories, speculations, whatever buzz word you want to stop paying customers from posting things you don't want on your forums, but the fact is there has been no word of anything happening for the other programs, only Studio. 

    Corporate silence continues with Hexagon and Bryce too.  In fact, whenever any particular thing you want or need is met with corporate silence, then you should assume that it's not being done.  And I'd even go so far as to say that if the corporate silence has formed a "Cone of Silence" around the entire product (Bryce, Hex), then you must assume that the product is approaching the end of its life span.

    Silence does not necessarily imply that no work is being done. As I recall the DS change-log went quiet before the public betas of 4.8 and 4.9, because of Iray and Daz Connect, but that certainly didn't indicate that development had stopped, as witness Iray and Daz Connect (whatever your view of their usefulness). I'm pretty sure soemone, Rob I think, did make some comments in one of the DS Beta threads on developments towards Genesis 3 support in Carrara - I can't recall if he also mentioned Connect support though.

  • Well the new login required for things that don't need it is throwing a real monkey wrench in my studio usage. Right now at least nearly everything I've tried in hopes of somehow actually fixing my issue keeps hitting login screens with no 'do this offline, i know the files are there' option.

    I'd love to hear from anyone with encrypted content if that can handle my specific situation (product already installed, offline, database reset, metadata restored but not seen as 'installed') any better or if it's less usable than the unencrypted stuff. I just wouldn't ask anyone to reset their database to check. Even if I had a connection on the laptop it'd be a tedious process to fix.

    From what I have read and understood if you have intermittent connectivity your best bet might be to install everything via DIM, use Batch Convert to make sure that all of the files are compressed, and then go online and install using Connect (remember that you can multi-seelct items to install). That should alrgely copy the files from the local isntallation, only needing to use the connection to validate them and download any files that have been changed in the time since your last DIM download. I'd try that wih a small batch of items first - especially as you want to keep disc usage down.

  • Corporate silence continues with Hexagon and Bryce too.  In fact, whenever any particular thing you want or need is met with corporate silence, then you should assume that it's not being done.  And I'd even go so far as to say that if the corporate silence has formed a "Cone of Silence" around the entire product (Bryce, Hex), then you must assume that the product is approaching the end of its life span.

     

    That's pretty reasonable. There was silence long after Bryce6 and it was pretty obvious that Bryce was done and dusted. I said so with conviction.

    And then all of a sudden Bryce7 was coming out. So no, you must not assume.

    Having said that, Bryce is now done and dusted. wink

  • kyoto kidkyoto kid Posts: 41,847
    edited January 2016

    The pirates who make the content available are not going to buy it, but the problem really is when people come across 3D content and *might* have bought it if they didn't just find it for free. Many here are quick to assume that no one who downloads pirated software or content would ever have considered buying it lawfully. How many people who refuse to buy an encrypted product here would download the thing if they came across it online unencrypted with the justification of sticking it to DAZ for encrypting it in the first place? 

    ...I (and most likely others here would) find that supposition just a little offensive and just as much a "if, this..." statement.

    I am on a very tight fixed income.  I have to weigh out whether I can justify even a 10$ purchase based on how much  use would it get. Even so, when I've seen instances where Daz content was pirated, I reported it.

    To a PA, downloading a pirated file would be akin to someone stealing say, 20$, from you or I. Thus, "Sticking it to Daz" really means "sticking it" to people who are not much different than you or I. PAs don't make a whole lot of money at this, especially in light of the time and effort along with the cost of the tools it takes to create, test, and package said content.

    Petercat's comment:

    Daz, take a popular, high demand product like the trenchcoat... sell it as encrypted through the normal new product high sales period, say a month.

    Then offer it as unencrypted, for the same price, and see how many regular customers snap it up.

    ...would be an excellent test to compare which version received more sales. Maybe Daz should try this. I wouldn't be surprised if some customers who purchased the encrypted version wouldn't ask for a refund, then turn around and purchase the unencrypted one.

     

    Post edited by kyoto kid on
  • lx said:
    Havos said:

    I am always amazed at how many Carrara users posts in the forums, given we have been led to believe they are a small and decreasing band

    I once mentioned on the forums that all signs on the forums and store pointed to Carrara no longer being of interest to Daz. I was immediately warned that such speculation would be unwise. Based on being told that development was still in progress for Carrara (after asking many times) I bought it. The manual was for a completely different version, but still workable. Months later, not a single official word about it or any sort of update.

    I mean you can call them conspiracy theories, speculations, whatever buzz word you want to stop paying customers from posting things you don't want on your forums, but the fact is there has been no word of anything happening for the other programs, only Studio. 

    Corporate silence continues with Hexagon and Bryce too.  In fact, whenever any particular thing you want or need is met with corporate silence, then you should assume that it's not being done.  And I'd even go so far as to say that if the corporate silence has formed a "Cone of Silence" around the entire product (Bryce, Hex), then you must assume that the product is approaching the end of its life span.

    Silence does not necessarily imply that no work is being done. As I recall the DS change-log went quiet before the public betas of 4.8 and 4.9, because of Iray and Daz Connect, but that certainly didn't indicate that development had stopped, as witness Iray and Daz Connect (whatever your view of their usefulness). I'm pretty sure soemone, Rob I think, did make some comments in one of the DS Beta threads on developments towards Genesis 3 support in Carrara - I can't recall if he also mentioned Connect support though.

    My comment about "corporate silence" was directed at Hexagon, Bryce, and to a somewhat lesser extent, Carrara.  But now that you raise the issue, I guess it could apply to "features" such as Connect.  Yeah, I'll go along with that.

    But to my direct point in that post, the silence on Hexagon and Bryce have gone on for more years than I have thumbs.  In fact, I would need to use multiple thumbs and multiple fingers to count the years of silence for either of these two products.  That should not be acceptable to any reasonable person.  Especially in the absence of a statement made to inform the user community that these products are "as-is" with no warranty promised or implied, and an appropriate caution that they could stop working in part or in whole with a future update of the operating system or other software.

    The silence on Carrara, while not quite so long, has been longer than the last DS lifecycle (DAZ Studio 4.8).  This too is an unreasonable length of silence.

    With no other information available and no official corporate statements to guide paying customers (whether paying for the software or the content, we are paying), what are we to believe?  Does DAZ expect us to hold out hope indefinitely; to stay on software that is no longer cutting edge?  Is that a reasonable expectation when other companies in this industry provide semi-annual, annual, or "dotted annual (1)" updates for their other software?

    Corporate silence of any extreme length of time bothers me as an ethical issue.  It should bother everybody, including employees, executive management, and officers of the company being silent.

     

    (1)  My term as a musician.  A "dotted" note should be played for the length value of the note plus half of that value.  So a dotted eighth note would be equivalent to three sixteenth notes tied together.  Likewise, a dotted half-note would be held for the length of three beats. 

    Hence, "Dotted Annual" = 18 month.

  • kyoto kidkyoto kid Posts: 41,847
    tl155180 said:
    lx said:
    As a customer speaking only for yourself, is the current Daz product worth buying if it is encrypted?
     

    I don't know if you meant that as a personal question to me, but I'll answer it anyway to be polite. wink

    Personally, I'm not upgrading to 4.9 for a variety of reasons (don't want a DS version that has online access for any reason, don't want my content folders dictated to me, don't want encrypted content that might potentially become inaccessible in future... etc). I, therefore, won't be buying any Connect-only content. I may or may not continue to purchase DIM-downloadable content depending on how good the sales are, but I won't be renewing my PC+ membership as I'm concerned that all future content will eventually become Connect-only (whether Daz admit it or not), so the amount I spend is likely to fall dramatically.

    If Daz can make up in sales to former pirates what they lose in sales to me, then good luck to em as far as I'm concerned. Ain't my problem. Its only gonna save me money laugh

    [Bold Emphasis mine]

    ...that is my concern as well since the encrypted products are Daz Originals which the PC+ gives members a price break on.

  • kyoto kidkyoto kid Posts: 41,847
    kyoto kid said:
    lx said:
     Sure your DRM scheme is less restrictive than it could be, but that is another thing I have I seen that before from companies too.  Start small and it only gets worse as time goes on.  DRM ONLY gets worse not better.

     

    +1, as the youngsters type.

    At the moment it's presented as all about combating piracy. I'll bet money that within a couple of years some aspect of DAZ output will be subscription based, which is what this process enables. The most obvious candidate is a variation on the Platinum Club, where content is "free" so long as you continue to pay the annual subsciption.

    Sadly, rent seeking is a natural human behaviour.

    This has been mentioned several times, and every time it has been pointed out how little sense a subscription model would make for Daz, how PC+ is basically one anyway (if you buy products here at least once a month, you should probably be in it) and how insanely logistically difficult that would be to organise for a company that mainly operates via hundreds of vendors.

    ...Autodesk is heading that route with 3DS Max

     

    Autodesk has actual incentive to do this since 3DS Max is THE most pirated 3D software program in the world.  Though the idea still disgusts me.

    ...so I wonder if they'll do the same to Modo since they acquired The Foundry.

  • kyoto kidkyoto kid Posts: 41,847
    jpb06t said:

    One day I read a life inspiring quote: "Don't get mad, get even".

    In the spirit of that quote I advise anybody "uneasy" <MUHAHAHA> with DAZ "encryption" not to "speculate" any further but to have a look at Manuel Bastioni ManuelLab, a mindboggling (and free as speech...) plugin/resource kit for Blender.

    No speculations, just the facts, Ma'am.

    ...well, not an option for myself as I find Blender's learning curve (just for the application itself) to be akin to free climbing El Capitan in a blinding snowstorm.

This discussion has been closed.