No encrypted for me.

13536384041

Comments

  • StrixowlStrixowl Posts: 301
    DAZ_Steve said:

    I would like to chime in with a question:

    Many people have expressed their hatred of encryption.  In the case of something like an MP3 I understand this.  If I buy a song from apple, I may not always want to play it in iTunes.  So, I want something portable to be used in other apps.

    In the case of DUF files, other than perhaps Poser, which all of our polls show a very few people use, the DUF files are likely only going to be used in Daz Studio.  And, if you do need to use the content in a non-DUF format in an applicatiopn other than Studio, you can still export it from studio in a non-excrypted, non-duf format.

    Based on that, it seems very different than the concerns that I, and most people had with the DRM that appe rolled out around music.

    But, there are two concerns people appear to express:

    1- Effect on content usability ond portability (which, again, I'd love opinions on what I wrote above).

    2- The perception that Daz does not trust its customers and is treating them like criminals.

    So, let me address the second issue.  Nearly every Daz customer is trustworthy.  But for anyone to say that there is not a small segment of people who buy content, then illegally share it is simply not realistic.  When people do this, it takes money from Daz and it's ability to support the store and offerings, and it also takes money away from the artists.  This means that, either there is less money to for Daz to roll out new features and figures, and less money for the artists to live, or that prices go up and the honest people pay more.

    I'm not in this thread to "tow the company line", nore to try to pull the wool over anyone's eyes.  I would honestly, objectively like to hear opinions on those two points.

     

     

    Doesn't a large number of customers opting out of DS 4.9 & Daz Direct content also mean there is less money for Daz to roll out new features and figures, and less money for the artists to live, or that prices go up and the honest people pay more. I think so. Allot of us have been with DAZ since the beginning. feels like a slap in the face.

  • I've written more tech support tickets for 4.9 than all prior versions combined. The most vexing boil down to 'getting stuck needing to login' for things that used to be doable offline. All because Daz wanted a DRM system and therefore needed to mandate login for certain tasks and push for constant connection whenever possible.

    Heh, just got an email from GOG, talking about new games in development that are DRM free. Not just ancient stuff pulled from the days of floppy disks but actual currently being worked on by developers games that have opted to go without DRM in a market where DRM is much more entrenched.

    One of the big reasons for this is simply DRM is unpopular. One reason DRM is unpopular because sooner or later it hurts honest customers. Maybe not all of them, maybe not all the time, but it does.

    As for stopping piracy? Not much of a success rate there. Sometimes it seems the presence of DRM actually spurs it on as people try to pirate the DRMed software as a challenge for bragging rights.

    I hope the idea is that the market for this content is so small that nobody with the knowledge and tools to attempt breaking the encryption would notice or bother. I really hope that is the thinking. It may be hopelessly naive but at least it's not as bad as drm being imposed knowing it's worthless for it's stated purpose.

    Because if this is about what DAZ_Steve said about keeping honest people honest, then it is a slap in the face to every one of us. Honest people don't need someone holding their hand to keep them honest.

    And for those using the lock on a door analogy: This isn't about me having a lock on my front door. This is about letting someone else put a lock on my front door, and handing me a key that they can take away any time if I don't take specific precautions against it. They may say they won't but they hold all the power in that arrangement.

    DAZ is a business, and even if I trust the people working there today, who can guarantee that I can trust the people working there tomorrow? With my current stuff I've got backups and can refer to the EULA they came with to provide at least a tiny crumb of protection against potential negative action. The new encrypted content could easily forbid me to reinstall until I accept a different EULA, something that happens rather frequently in other sectors. No matter that my offline computer has a key from it's rare time online, sooner or later I'd be in the position of accept the terms or be locked out. The DRM takes away my control and my protections, giving the company that holds nearly all the power in the arrangement even more power.

  • kyoto kidkyoto kid Posts: 41,846
    edited January 2016

    ...response removed as off topic to discussion.

    Apologies.

    Post edited by kyoto kid on
  • Strixowl said:
    DAZ_Steve said:

    I would like to chime in with a question:

    Many people have expressed their hatred of encryption.  In the case of something like an MP3 I understand this.  If I buy a song from apple, I may not always want to play it in iTunes.  So, I want something portable to be used in other apps.

    In the case of DUF files, other than perhaps Poser, which all of our polls show a very few people use, the DUF files are likely only going to be used in Daz Studio.  And, if you do need to use the content in a non-DUF format in an applicatiopn other than Studio, you can still export it from studio in a non-excrypted, non-duf format.

    Based on that, it seems very different than the concerns that I, and most people had with the DRM that appe rolled out around music.

    But, there are two concerns people appear to express:

    1- Effect on content usability ond portability (which, again, I'd love opinions on what I wrote above).

    2- The perception that Daz does not trust its customers and is treating them like criminals.

    So, let me address the second issue.  Nearly every Daz customer is trustworthy.  But for anyone to say that there is not a small segment of people who buy content, then illegally share it is simply not realistic.  When people do this, it takes money from Daz and it's ability to support the store and offerings, and it also takes money away from the artists.  This means that, either there is less money to for Daz to roll out new features and figures, and less money for the artists to live, or that prices go up and the honest people pay more.

    I'm not in this thread to "tow the company line", nore to try to pull the wool over anyone's eyes.  I would honestly, objectively like to hear opinions on those two points.

     

     

    Doesn't a large number of customers opting out of DS 4.9 & Daz Direct content also mean there is less money for Daz to roll out new features and figures, and less money for the artists to live, or that prices go up and the honest people pay more. I think so. Allot of us have been with DAZ since the beginning. feels like a slap in the face.

    How many times does it need to be said before folks get the message; DAZ CONNECT IS OPTIONAL. I've updated to 4.9, told the software I don't want to use DAZ Connect and not to ask me again, and I'm using DIM just like I did before to download and install content. I have no interest in buying encrypted or otherwise "protected" content, and until DAZ makes Connect madatory for all users, I will not use it. If it ever bcomes mandatory, I won't upgrade to the version of the software that requires it.

  • StrixowlStrixowl Posts: 301

    Why can't daz release the Iray upgrade as a patch/upgrade to 4.8 without all the "smart content" & DAZ Connect stuff so us who stay with 4.8 aren't blocked out of the upgrade unless we install DS 4.9?

  • HavosHavos Posts: 5,574
    Strixowl said:

    Why can't daz release the Iray upgrade as a patch/upgrade to 4.8 without all the "smart content" & DAZ Connect stuff so us who stay with 4.8 aren't blocked out of the upgrade unless we install DS 4.9?

    As explained by the previous post you do not need to use DAZ connect, and so what is the point of having a separate version without it? If you do not trust 4.9, and think it will still try to do something "bad", then why would you trust a version of 4.9 that was created without it, since both versions would be written by the same people, ie DAZ.

  • lx_2807502lx_2807502 Posts: 2,996
    kyoto kid said:
    jpb06t said:

    One day I read a life inspiring quote: "Don't get mad, get even".

    In the spirit of that quote I advise anybody "uneasy" <MUHAHAHA> with DAZ "encryption" not to "speculate" any further but to have a look at Manuel Bastioni ManuelLab, a mindboggling (and free as speech...) plugin/resource kit for Blender.

    No speculations, just the facts, Ma'am.

    ...well, not an option for myself as I find Blender's learning curve (just for the application itself) to be akin to free climbing El Capitan in a blinding snowstorm.

    I feel like I'm some sort fo alien species because this is the common thing I hear and yet I find Blender to be so incredibly natural and logical (and also customisable.) That said while the figures thing is really interesting, there are definite advantages to Daz figures (lots of textures would be the most obvious one, but also clothing etc if you're into that. 

  • kyoto kid said:
    kyoto kid said:
    lx said:
     Sure your DRM scheme is less restrictive than it could be, but that is another thing I have I seen that before from companies too.  Start small and it only gets worse as time goes on.  DRM ONLY gets worse not better.

     

    +1, as the youngsters type.

    At the moment it's presented as all about combating piracy. I'll bet money that within a couple of years some aspect of DAZ output will be subscription based, which is what this process enables. The most obvious candidate is a variation on the Platinum Club, where content is "free" so long as you continue to pay the annual subsciption.

    Sadly, rent seeking is a natural human behaviour.

    This has been mentioned several times, and every time it has been pointed out how little sense a subscription model would make for Daz, how PC+ is basically one anyway (if you buy products here at least once a month, you should probably be in it) and how insanely logistically difficult that would be to organise for a company that mainly operates via hundreds of vendors.

    ...Autodesk is heading that route with 3DS Max

     

    Autodesk has actual incentive to do this since 3DS Max is THE most pirated 3D software program in the world.  Though the idea still disgusts me.

    ...so I wonder if they'll do the same to Modo since they acquired The Foundry.

    Are you sure about that?

  • StrixowlStrixowl Posts: 301
    Strixowl said:
    DAZ_Steve said:

    I would like to chime in with a question:

    Many people have expressed their hatred of encryption.  In the case of something like an MP3 I understand this.  If I buy a song from apple, I may not always want to play it in iTunes.  So, I want something portable to be used in other apps.

    In the case of DUF files, other than perhaps Poser, which all of our polls show a very few people use, the DUF files are likely only going to be used in Daz Studio.  And, if you do need to use the content in a non-DUF format in an applicatiopn other than Studio, you can still export it from studio in a non-excrypted, non-duf format.

    Based on that, it seems very different than the concerns that I, and most people had with the DRM that appe rolled out around music.

    But, there are two concerns people appear to express:

    1- Effect on content usability ond portability (which, again, I'd love opinions on what I wrote above).

    2- The perception that Daz does not trust its customers and is treating them like criminals.

    So, let me address the second issue.  Nearly every Daz customer is trustworthy.  But for anyone to say that there is not a small segment of people who buy content, then illegally share it is simply not realistic.  When people do this, it takes money from Daz and it's ability to support the store and offerings, and it also takes money away from the artists.  This means that, either there is less money to for Daz to roll out new features and figures, and less money for the artists to live, or that prices go up and the honest people pay more.

    I'm not in this thread to "tow the company line", nore to try to pull the wool over anyone's eyes.  I would honestly, objectively like to hear opinions on those two points.

     

     

    Doesn't a large number of customers opting out of DS 4.9 & Daz Direct content also mean there is less money for Daz to roll out new features and figures, and less money for the artists to live, or that prices go up and the honest people pay more. I think so. Allot of us have been with DAZ since the beginning. feels like a slap in the face.

    How many times does it need to be said before folks get the message; DAZ CONNECT IS OPTIONAL. I've updated to 4.9, told the software I don't want to use DAZ Connect and not to ask me again, and I'm using DIM just like I did before to download and install content. I have no interest in buying encrypted or otherwise "protected" content, and until DAZ makes Connect madatory for all users, I will not use it. If it ever bcomes mandatory, I won't upgrade to the version of the software that requires it.

    I don't use Smart Content. I only use the Content tab and arrage all my own stuff manually where I want it. If I install DS 4.9 wil it screw up my Content layout? It seems others are having real problems with this on install. Seperate problem than DAZ Connect.

  • There's a lot of mention of "pirate sites" and downloads, etc; of how encryption won't stop that; and of how these aren't lost sales anyway. All largely true, I expect.

    However, I suspect that there may be quite a bit of "casual" file sharing amongst some of the user base, in the sense of multiple installations (of content) on computers of family and friends. No great criminal malice intended (just some pretty models for the kids and uncle Bob to play with, etc), but breaking the EULA and probably hitting sales. Encryption/DRM could largely stop that.

    However, I still think the "piracy" angle is a distraction. I believe the main purpose of encryption/DRM long-term is simply to enable DAZ to retain control of the content. Software as a subscription service is where commercial software is headed now, with the assent of the majority it seems. If DAZ heads in the same direction it should be no surprise. They may not do so, but getting the customer base acclimatised to encryption/DRM certainly facilitates it.

    Software subscription is not wrong or evil. But it's not where I want to go.

  • Well the new login required for things that don't need it is throwing a real monkey wrench in my studio usage. Right now at least nearly everything I've tried in hopes of somehow actually fixing my issue keeps hitting login screens with no 'do this offline, i know the files are there' option.

    I'd love to hear from anyone with encrypted content if that can handle my specific situation (product already installed, offline, database reset, metadata restored but not seen as 'installed') any better or if it's less usable than the unencrypted stuff. I just wouldn't ask anyone to reset their database to check. Even if I had a connection on the laptop it'd be a tedious process to fix.

    From what I have read and understood if you have intermittent connectivity your best bet might be to install everything via DIM, use Batch Convert to make sure that all of the files are compressed, and then go online and install using Connect (remember that you can multi-seelct items to install). That should alrgely copy the files from the local isntallation, only needing to use the connection to validate them and download any files that have been changed in the time since your last DIM download. I'd try that wih a small batch of items first - especially as you want to keep disc usage down.

    Everything is already neatly in place, installed by Connect before the database reset. However the reset of the content DB has caused it to no longer see the installed content in Smart Content. I can see it if I add the cloud folder as a base and want to look up things just by their product number but that is a terrible way to use it. When I reconnected, I got the metadata for my product library back, but it says they aren't installed, leaving me with the same no smart content/difficult navigation issue. The only solution for me at the moment is to go product by product and 'install' them. Which makes Connect go looking for updates. Which requires login. Install offline content doesn't work as the content is already in installed form instead of ready to go installers. Scan known directories and scan hard drive don't do the job. Nor do Search for Content or reimport metadata. Throw in what looks like a memory leak when 'installing' too many things in one session and you might get why I'm ready to drive to Utah and hand deliver a notarized request that I be permitted to relinquish all licenses to any of their products, along with the powdered remains of my dvd backups of said products. I am that close to being done with DAZ. While the encryption isn't the immediate issue, the adoption of the DRM is what led to making a system that needs this level of connection.
  • StrixowlStrixowl Posts: 301
    Havos said:
    Strixowl said:

    Why can't daz release the Iray upgrade as a patch/upgrade to 4.8 without all the "smart content" & DAZ Connect stuff so us who stay with 4.8 aren't blocked out of the upgrade unless we install DS 4.9?

    As explained by the previous post you do not need to use DAZ connect, and so what is the point of having a separate version without it? If you do not trust 4.9, and think it will still try to do something "bad", then why would you trust a version of 4.9 that was created without it, since both versions would be written by the same people, ie DAZ.

    I don't use Smart Content. I only use the Content tab and arrage all my own stuff manually where I want it. If I install DS 4.9 wil it screw up my Content layout? It seems others are having real problems with this on install. Seperate problem than DAZ Connect.

  • LeanaLeana Posts: 12,738
    Strixowl said:

    Why can't daz release the Iray upgrade as a patch/upgrade to 4.8 without all the "smart content" & DAZ Connect stuff so us who stay with 4.8 aren't blocked out of the upgrade unless we install DS 4.9?

    And then what? They maintain and support 2 official versions of DS forever, one without Connect and one with it? Because next time a new feature gets added, you can bet that the people who don't want Connect will ask why they can't have that added to "their" version too...

  • Well the new login required for things that don't need it is throwing a real monkey wrench in my studio usage. Right now at least nearly everything I've tried in hopes of somehow actually fixing my issue keeps hitting login screens with no 'do this offline, i know the files are there' option.

    I'd love to hear from anyone with encrypted content if that can handle my specific situation (product already installed, offline, database reset, metadata restored but not seen as 'installed') any better or if it's less usable than the unencrypted stuff. I just wouldn't ask anyone to reset their database to check. Even if I had a connection on the laptop it'd be a tedious process to fix.

    From what I have read and understood if you have intermittent connectivity your best bet might be to install everything via DIM, use Batch Convert to make sure that all of the files are compressed, and then go online and install using Connect (remember that you can multi-seelct items to install). That should alrgely copy the files from the local isntallation, only needing to use the connection to validate them and download any files that have been changed in the time since your last DIM download. I'd try that wih a small batch of items first - especially as you want to keep disc usage down.

     

    Everything is already neatly in place, installed by Connect before the database reset. However the reset of the content DB has caused it to no longer see the installed content in Smart Content. I can see it if I add the cloud folder as a base and want to look up things just by their product number but that is a terrible way to use it. When I reconnected, I got the metadata for my product library back, but it says they aren't installed, leaving me with the same no smart content/difficult navigation issue. The only solution for me at the moment is to go product by product and 'install' them. Which makes Connect go looking for updates. Which requires login. Install offline content doesn't work as the content is already in installed form instead of ready to go installers. Scan known directories and scan hard drive don't do the job. Nor do Search for Content or reimport metadata. Throw in what looks like a memory leak when 'installing' too many things in one session and you might get why I'm ready to drive to Utah and hand deliver a notarized request that I be permitted to relinquish all licenses to any of their products, along with the powdered remains of my dvd backups of said products. I am that close to being done with DAZ. While the encryption isn't the immediate issue, the adoption of the DRM is what led to making a system that needs this level of connection.

    Well, you can stil do them in batches by multi-seelction, you don't have to go one-by-one.

  • LeanaLeana Posts: 12,738

    I'm upset about Daz altering my install and work flow.  

    You can still organize your content how you want by dragging and dropping shortcuts from the Smart Content panel to the Content Library panel. I am reinstalling my content now using this method to get used to it and try and get a little more organized. It's not exactly the same as the manual folder method we're used to, but it's quite similar.

    And if smart content or connect goes down we're dead in the water with links until they start working again. Not so with files. So there's that.

    You still have the files on your hard drive, they're just stored in a different place.

  • LeanaLeana Posts: 12,738
    lx said:
    Havos said:

    I am always amazed at how many Carrara users posts in the forums, given we have been led to believe they are a small and decreasing band

    I once mentioned on the forums that all signs on the forums and store pointed to Carrara no longer being of interest to Daz. I was immediately warned that such speculation would be unwise. Based on being told that development was still in progress for Carrara (after asking many times) I bought it. The manual was for a completely different version, but still workable. Months later, not a single official word about it or any sort of update.

    I mean you can call them conspiracy theories, speculations, whatever buzz word you want to stop paying customers from posting things you don't want on your forums, but the fact is there has been no word of anything happening for the other programs, only Studio. 

    Corporate silence continues with Hexagon and Bryce too.  In fact, whenever any particular thing you want or need is met with corporate silence, then you should assume that it's not being done.  And I'd even go so far as to say that if the corporate silence has formed a "Cone of Silence" around the entire product (Bryce, Hex), then you must assume that the product is approaching the end of its life span.

    Silence does not necessarily imply that no work is being done. As I recall the DS change-log went quiet before the public betas of 4.8 and 4.9, because of Iray and Daz Connect, but that certainly didn't indicate that development had stopped, as witness Iray and Daz Connect (whatever your view of their usefulness). I'm pretty sure soemone, Rob I think, did make some comments in one of the DS Beta threads on developments towards Genesis 3 support in Carrara - I can't recall if he also mentioned Connect support though.

    He certainly didn't at the time he talked about Genesis 3 support since we had never heard about Connect then ;)

  • HavosHavos Posts: 5,574

    There's a lot of mention of "pirate sites" and downloads, etc; of how encryption won't stop that; and of how these aren't lost sales anyway. All largely true, I expect.

    However, I suspect that there may be quite a bit of "casual" file sharing amongst some of the user base, in the sense of multiple installations (of content) on computers of family and friends. No great criminal malice intended (just some pretty models for the kids and uncle Bob to play with, etc), but breaking the EULA and probably hitting sales. Encryption/DRM could largely stop that.

    However, I still think the "piracy" angle is a distraction. I believe the main purpose of encryption/DRM long-term is simply to enable DAZ to retain control of the content. Software as a subscription service is where commercial software is headed now, with the assent of the majority it seems. If DAZ heads in the same direction it should be no surprise. They may not do so, but getting the customer base acclimatised to encryption/DRM certainly facilitates it.

    Software subscription is not wrong or evil. But it's not where I want to go.

    Remember that subscription works best where what you are paying for is mostly the software itself. That is the case with Windows and Office, and also the case with Photoshop and Adobe's other apps. The problem a lot of these companies are grappling with is that once their software had reached the point that it already does what most users want, how do you get people to upgrade, and without upgrades, how can you ensure a continous revenue stream? The answer was to rent the software rather than sell it. However the business model of DAZ is very different, they give the software away and sell the content, so since they already have a continous revenue stream, what possible reason would they have of switching to a subscription based model?

  • TesseractSpaceTesseractSpace Posts: 1,582
    edited January 2016

    Well the new login required for things that don't need it is throwing a real monkey wrench in my studio usage. Right now at least nearly everything I've tried in hopes of somehow actually fixing my issue keeps hitting login screens with no 'do this offline, i know the files are there' option.

    I'd love to hear from anyone with encrypted content if that can handle my specific situation (product already installed, offline, database reset, metadata restored but not seen as 'installed') any better or if it's less usable than the unencrypted stuff. I just wouldn't ask anyone to reset their database to check. Even if I had a connection on the laptop it'd be a tedious process to fix.

    From what I have read and understood if you have intermittent connectivity your best bet might be to install everything via DIM, use Batch Convert to make sure that all of the files are compressed, and then go online and install using Connect (remember that you can multi-seelct items to install). That should alrgely copy the files from the local isntallation, only needing to use the connection to validate them and download any files that have been changed in the time since your last DIM download. I'd try that wih a small batch of items first - especially as you want to keep disc usage down.

     

    Everything is already neatly in place, installed by Connect before the database reset. However the reset of the content DB has caused it to no longer see the installed content in Smart Content. I can see it if I add the cloud folder as a base and want to look up things just by their product number but that is a terrible way to use it. When I reconnected, I got the metadata for my product library back, but it says they aren't installed, leaving me with the same no smart content/difficult navigation issue. The only solution for me at the moment is to go product by product and 'install' them. Which makes Connect go looking for updates. Which requires login. Install offline content doesn't work as the content is already in installed form instead of ready to go installers. Scan known directories and scan hard drive don't do the job. Nor do Search for Content or reimport metadata. Throw in what looks like a memory leak when 'installing' too many things in one session and you might get why I'm ready to drive to Utah and hand deliver a notarized request that I be permitted to relinquish all licenses to any of their products, along with the powdered remains of my dvd backups of said products. I am that close to being done with DAZ. While the encryption isn't the immediate issue, the adoption of the DRM is what led to making a system that needs this level of connection.

    Well, you can stil do them in batches by multi-seelction, you don't have to go one-by-one.

    Wait, where is that? I hold down shift and click the highlight moves to what I clicked on. Ctrl click is the same. Is there some special method?

    Oh, and could you kill my doubled post please? Been doing this all from my phone including manually adding paragraph tags and such because it can't handle most of the forum features.

    Post edited by TesseractSpace on
  • LeanaLeana Posts: 12,738
    Strixowl said:
    Strixowl said:
    DAZ_Steve said:

    I would like to chime in with a question:

    Many people have expressed their hatred of encryption.  In the case of something like an MP3 I understand this.  If I buy a song from apple, I may not always want to play it in iTunes.  So, I want something portable to be used in other apps.

    In the case of DUF files, other than perhaps Poser, which all of our polls show a very few people use, the DUF files are likely only going to be used in Daz Studio.  And, if you do need to use the content in a non-DUF format in an applicatiopn other than Studio, you can still export it from studio in a non-excrypted, non-duf format.

    Based on that, it seems very different than the concerns that I, and most people had with the DRM that appe rolled out around music.

    But, there are two concerns people appear to express:

    1- Effect on content usability ond portability (which, again, I'd love opinions on what I wrote above).

    2- The perception that Daz does not trust its customers and is treating them like criminals.

    So, let me address the second issue.  Nearly every Daz customer is trustworthy.  But for anyone to say that there is not a small segment of people who buy content, then illegally share it is simply not realistic.  When people do this, it takes money from Daz and it's ability to support the store and offerings, and it also takes money away from the artists.  This means that, either there is less money to for Daz to roll out new features and figures, and less money for the artists to live, or that prices go up and the honest people pay more.

    I'm not in this thread to "tow the company line", nore to try to pull the wool over anyone's eyes.  I would honestly, objectively like to hear opinions on those two points.

     

     

    Doesn't a large number of customers opting out of DS 4.9 & Daz Direct content also mean there is less money for Daz to roll out new features and figures, and less money for the artists to live, or that prices go up and the honest people pay more. I think so. Allot of us have been with DAZ since the beginning. feels like a slap in the face.

    How many times does it need to be said before folks get the message; DAZ CONNECT IS OPTIONAL. I've updated to 4.9, told the software I don't want to use DAZ Connect and not to ask me again, and I'm using DIM just like I did before to download and install content. I have no interest in buying encrypted or otherwise "protected" content, and until DAZ makes Connect madatory for all users, I will not use it. If it ever bcomes mandatory, I won't upgrade to the version of the software that requires it.

    I don't use Smart Content. I only use the Content tab and arrage all my own stuff manually where I want it. If I install DS 4.9 wil it screw up my Content layout? It seems others are having real problems with this on install. Seperate problem than DAZ Connect.

    Some people have had problems with the update not keeping their custome categories or metadata. If you don't use smart content or categories it shouldn't have any impact on your library.

  • kyoto kidkyoto kid Posts: 41,846
    lx said:
    Havos said:

    I am always amazed at how many Carrara users posts in the forums, given we have been led to believe they are a small and decreasing band

    I once mentioned on the forums that all signs on the forums and store pointed to Carrara no longer being of interest to Daz. I was immediately warned that such speculation would be unwise. Based on being told that development was still in progress for Carrara (after asking many times) I bought it. The manual was for a completely different version, but still workable. Months later, not a single official word about it or any sort of update.

    I mean you can call them conspiracy theories, speculations, whatever buzz word you want to stop paying customers from posting things you don't want on your forums, but the fact is there has been no word of anything happening for the other programs, only Studio. 

    Corporate silence continues with Hexagon and Bryce too.  In fact, whenever any particular thing you want or need is met with corporate silence, then you should assume that it's not being done.  And I'd even go so far as to say that if the corporate silence has formed a "Cone of Silence" around the entire product (Bryce, Hex), then you must assume that the product is approaching the end of its life span.

    ...and this frustrates me to no end. 

    Bryce uses fractal generation, which makes for very realistic formations. Sad that it is still stuck in the 32 bit world, which for 3D CG work has pretty much been left in the dust.

    Hexagon has such a nice clean and elegant UI as well as very comprehensive toolset and best of all, is a standalone modeller rather than being just another tab in some "Swiss Army Knife" application.  It is an excellent programme that is sorely hamstrung by instabilities and bugs, as well as being only 32 bit. Hex has been left to languish in this form (with only one very minor update) since I came aboard eight years ago (and paid a fairly substantial price for it). 

  • kyoto kid said:
    lx said:
    Havos said:

    I am always amazed at how many Carrara users posts in the forums, given we have been led to believe they are a small and decreasing band

    I once mentioned on the forums that all signs on the forums and store pointed to Carrara no longer being of interest to Daz. I was immediately warned that such speculation would be unwise. Based on being told that development was still in progress for Carrara (after asking many times) I bought it. The manual was for a completely different version, but still workable. Months later, not a single official word about it or any sort of update.

    I mean you can call them conspiracy theories, speculations, whatever buzz word you want to stop paying customers from posting things you don't want on your forums, but the fact is there has been no word of anything happening for the other programs, only Studio. 

    Corporate silence continues with Hexagon and Bryce too.  In fact, whenever any particular thing you want or need is met with corporate silence, then you should assume that it's not being done.  And I'd even go so far as to say that if the corporate silence has formed a "Cone of Silence" around the entire product (Bryce, Hex), then you must assume that the product is approaching the end of its life span.

    ...and this frustrates me to no end. 

    Bryce uses fractal generation, which makes for very realistic formations. Sad that it is still stuck in the 32 bit world, which for 3D CG work has pretty much been left in the dust.

    Hexagon has such a nice clean and elegant UI as well as very comprehensive toolset and best of all, is a standalone modeller rather than being just another tab in some "Swiss Army Knife" application.  It is an excellent programme that is sorely hamstrung by instabilities and bugs, as well as being only 32 bit. Hex has been left to languish in this form (with only one very minor update) since I came aboard eight years ago (and paid a fairly substantial price for it). 

    When a free modeller like Wings3d has a 64 bit version and a pay one like Hexagon doesn't, you know there's a problem...
  • LeanaLeana Posts: 12,738
    Havos said:

    There's a lot of mention of "pirate sites" and downloads, etc; of how encryption won't stop that; and of how these aren't lost sales anyway. All largely true, I expect.

    However, I suspect that there may be quite a bit of "casual" file sharing amongst some of the user base, in the sense of multiple installations (of content) on computers of family and friends. No great criminal malice intended (just some pretty models for the kids and uncle Bob to play with, etc), but breaking the EULA and probably hitting sales. Encryption/DRM could largely stop that.

    However, I still think the "piracy" angle is a distraction. I believe the main purpose of encryption/DRM long-term is simply to enable DAZ to retain control of the content. Software as a subscription service is where commercial software is headed now, with the assent of the majority it seems. If DAZ heads in the same direction it should be no surprise. They may not do so, but getting the customer base acclimatised to encryption/DRM certainly facilitates it.

    Software subscription is not wrong or evil. But it's not where I want to go.

    Remember that subscription works best where what you are paying for is mostly the software itself. That is the case with Windows and Office, and also the case with Photoshop and Adobe's other apps. The problem a lot of these companies are grappling with is that once their software had reached the point that it already does what most users want, how do you get people to upgrade, and without upgrades, how can you ensure a continous revenue stream? The answer was to rent the software rather than sell it. However the business model of DAZ is very different, they give the software away and sell the content, so since they already have a continous revenue stream, what possible reason would they have of switching to a subscription based model?

    I agree. A subscription system for content would be a nightmare to setup, since most of the content in the store belongs to individual PAs: how would you share the revenue between them? You could imagine that if all items were DAZ Originals I suppose, but I doubt DAZ could afford to buy all the content from the store upfront. And having a subscription for only part of the content doesn't make sense.

  • Leana said:
    lx said:
    Havos said:

    I am always amazed at how many Carrara users posts in the forums, given we have been led to believe they are a small and decreasing band

    I once mentioned on the forums that all signs on the forums and store pointed to Carrara no longer being of interest to Daz. I was immediately warned that such speculation would be unwise. Based on being told that development was still in progress for Carrara (after asking many times) I bought it. The manual was for a completely different version, but still workable. Months later, not a single official word about it or any sort of update.

    I mean you can call them conspiracy theories, speculations, whatever buzz word you want to stop paying customers from posting things you don't want on your forums, but the fact is there has been no word of anything happening for the other programs, only Studio. 

    Corporate silence continues with Hexagon and Bryce too.  In fact, whenever any particular thing you want or need is met with corporate silence, then you should assume that it's not being done.  And I'd even go so far as to say that if the corporate silence has formed a "Cone of Silence" around the entire product (Bryce, Hex), then you must assume that the product is approaching the end of its life span.

    Silence does not necessarily imply that no work is being done. As I recall the DS change-log went quiet before the public betas of 4.8 and 4.9, because of Iray and Daz Connect, but that certainly didn't indicate that development had stopped, as witness Iray and Daz Connect (whatever your view of their usefulness). I'm pretty sure soemone, Rob I think, did make some comments in one of the DS Beta threads on developments towards Genesis 3 support in Carrara - I can't recall if he also mentioned Connect support though.

    He certainly didn't at the time he talked about Genesis 3 support since we had never heard about Connect then ;)

    Ah, I'd thought it was one of the 4.9 beta threads. Thanks.

  • Havos said:

    There's a lot of mention of "pirate sites" and downloads, etc; of how encryption won't stop that; and of how these aren't lost sales anyway. All largely true, I expect.

    However, I suspect that there may be quite a bit of "casual" file sharing amongst some of the user base, in the sense of multiple installations (of content) on computers of family and friends. No great criminal malice intended (just some pretty models for the kids and uncle Bob to play with, etc), but breaking the EULA and probably hitting sales. Encryption/DRM could largely stop that.

    However, I still think the "piracy" angle is a distraction. I believe the main purpose of encryption/DRM long-term is simply to enable DAZ to retain control of the content. Software as a subscription service is where commercial software is headed now, with the assent of the majority it seems. If DAZ heads in the same direction it should be no surprise. They may not do so, but getting the customer base acclimatised to encryption/DRM certainly facilitates it.

    Software subscription is not wrong or evil. But it's not where I want to go.

    Remember that subscription works best where what you are paying for is mostly the software itself. That is the case with Windows and Office, and also the case with Photoshop and Adobe's other apps. The problem a lot of these companies are grappling with is that once their software had reached the point that it already does what most users want, how do you get people to upgrade, and without upgrades, how can you ensure a continous revenue stream? The answer was to rent the software rather than sell it. However the business model of DAZ is very different, they give the software away and sell the content, so since they already have a continous revenue stream, what possible reason would they have of switching to a subscription based model?


    Perhaps the 3D human figure market is also reaching the point that it already does what most users want.

  • Well the new login required for things that don't need it is throwing a real monkey wrench in my studio usage. Right now at least nearly everything I've tried in hopes of somehow actually fixing my issue keeps hitting login screens with no 'do this offline, i know the files are there' option.

    I'd love to hear from anyone with encrypted content if that can handle my specific situation (product already installed, offline, database reset, metadata restored but not seen as 'installed') any better or if it's less usable than the unencrypted stuff. I just wouldn't ask anyone to reset their database to check. Even if I had a connection on the laptop it'd be a tedious process to fix.

    From what I have read and understood if you have intermittent connectivity your best bet might be to install everything via DIM, use Batch Convert to make sure that all of the files are compressed, and then go online and install using Connect (remember that you can multi-seelct items to install). That should alrgely copy the files from the local isntallation, only needing to use the connection to validate them and download any files that have been changed in the time since your last DIM download. I'd try that wih a small batch of items first - especially as you want to keep disc usage down.

     

    Everything is already neatly in place, installed by Connect before the database reset. However the reset of the content DB has caused it to no longer see the installed content in Smart Content. I can see it if I add the cloud folder as a base and want to look up things just by their product number but that is a terrible way to use it. When I reconnected, I got the metadata for my product library back, but it says they aren't installed, leaving me with the same no smart content/difficult navigation issue. The only solution for me at the moment is to go product by product and 'install' them. Which makes Connect go looking for updates. Which requires login. Install offline content doesn't work as the content is already in installed form instead of ready to go installers. Scan known directories and scan hard drive don't do the job. Nor do Search for Content or reimport metadata. Throw in what looks like a memory leak when 'installing' too many things in one session and you might get why I'm ready to drive to Utah and hand deliver a notarized request that I be permitted to relinquish all licenses to any of their products, along with the powdered remains of my dvd backups of said products. I am that close to being done with DAZ. While the encryption isn't the immediate issue, the adoption of the DRM is what led to making a system that needs this level of connection.

    Well, you can stil do them in batches by multi-seelction, you don't have to go one-by-one.

     

    Wait, where is that? I hold down shift and click the highlight moves to what I clicked on. Ctrl click is the same. Is there some special method?

    Oh, and could you kill my doubled post please? Been doing this all from my phone including manually adding paragraph tags and such because it can't handle most of the forum features.

    Where are you selecting them? Since you have the metadata back I assumed you were in the products list in Smart Content, which will show and allow selection of multiple items.

  • kyoto kidkyoto kid Posts: 41,846
    Havos said:
    lx said:
    Havos said:

    I am always amazed at how many Carrara users posts in the forums, given we have been led to believe they are a small and decreasing band

    I once mentioned on the forums that all signs on the forums and store pointed to Carrara no longer being of interest to Daz. I was immediately warned that such speculation would be unwise. Based on being told that development was still in progress for Carrara (after asking many times) I bought it. The manual was for a completely different version, but still workable. Months later, not a single official word about it or any sort of update.

    I mean you can call them conspiracy theories, speculations, whatever buzz word you want to stop paying customers from posting things you don't want on your forums, but the fact is there has been no word of anything happening for the other programs, only Studio. 

    Corporate silence continues with Hexagon and Bryce too.  In fact, whenever any particular thing you want or need is met with corporate silence, then you should assume that it's not being done.  And I'd even go so far as to say that if the corporate silence has formed a "Cone of Silence" around the entire product (Bryce, Hex), then you must assume that the product is approaching the end of its life span.

    I would be surprised if any of the Hexagon and Bryce developers still worked for DAZ. If not, then short of dragging back the old guys on a contract basis, it would be very hard for someone who had never worked on them to come in and do the necessary enhancements.

    I agree.  But why does DAZ have to be silent about that?  Just make 'em free and tell us, "these products are at end-of-development and are being offered on an 'as is' basis, without any warrantee or guarantee of any kind."  [sarc]Good communication is just too hard, I know... [/sarc]

    ...they may as well just sell them off to someone who would actually do something with them.  After all Daz acquired Bryce from Corel in 2004, and Hexagon (along with Carrara) when they acquired Eovia in 2006. As their Flagship Studio application began to grow (particularly after the release of 4.0), interest in development of the other programmes seriously waned. Even Carrara seems to have taken its seat in the "rear of the bus".

  • LeanaLeana Posts: 12,738
    edited January 2016
    Leana said:
    lx said:
    Havos said:

    I am always amazed at how many Carrara users posts in the forums, given we have been led to believe they are a small and decreasing band

    I once mentioned on the forums that all signs on the forums and store pointed to Carrara no longer being of interest to Daz. I was immediately warned that such speculation would be unwise. Based on being told that development was still in progress for Carrara (after asking many times) I bought it. The manual was for a completely different version, but still workable. Months later, not a single official word about it or any sort of update.

    I mean you can call them conspiracy theories, speculations, whatever buzz word you want to stop paying customers from posting things you don't want on your forums, but the fact is there has been no word of anything happening for the other programs, only Studio. 

    Corporate silence continues with Hexagon and Bryce too.  In fact, whenever any particular thing you want or need is met with corporate silence, then you should assume that it's not being done.  And I'd even go so far as to say that if the corporate silence has formed a "Cone of Silence" around the entire product (Bryce, Hex), then you must assume that the product is approaching the end of its life span.

    Silence does not necessarily imply that no work is being done. As I recall the DS change-log went quiet before the public betas of 4.8 and 4.9, because of Iray and Daz Connect, but that certainly didn't indicate that development had stopped, as witness Iray and Daz Connect (whatever your view of their usefulness). I'm pretty sure soemone, Rob I think, did make some comments in one of the DS Beta threads on developments towards Genesis 3 support in Carrara - I can't recall if he also mentioned Connect support though.

    He certainly didn't at the time he talked about Genesis 3 support since we had never heard about Connect then ;)

    Ah, I'd thought it was one of the 4.9 beta threads. Thanks.

    I think it was before that, but I might not remember it correctly.

    Post edited by Leana on
  • lx_2807502lx_2807502 Posts: 2,996
    kyoto kid said:
    Havos said:
    lx said:
    Havos said:

    I am always amazed at how many Carrara users posts in the forums, given we have been led to believe they are a small and decreasing band

    I once mentioned on the forums that all signs on the forums and store pointed to Carrara no longer being of interest to Daz. I was immediately warned that such speculation would be unwise. Based on being told that development was still in progress for Carrara (after asking many times) I bought it. The manual was for a completely different version, but still workable. Months later, not a single official word about it or any sort of update.

    I mean you can call them conspiracy theories, speculations, whatever buzz word you want to stop paying customers from posting things you don't want on your forums, but the fact is there has been no word of anything happening for the other programs, only Studio. 

    Corporate silence continues with Hexagon and Bryce too.  In fact, whenever any particular thing you want or need is met with corporate silence, then you should assume that it's not being done.  And I'd even go so far as to say that if the corporate silence has formed a "Cone of Silence" around the entire product (Bryce, Hex), then you must assume that the product is approaching the end of its life span.

    I would be surprised if any of the Hexagon and Bryce developers still worked for DAZ. If not, then short of dragging back the old guys on a contract basis, it would be very hard for someone who had never worked on them to come in and do the necessary enhancements.

    I agree.  But why does DAZ have to be silent about that?  Just make 'em free and tell us, "these products are at end-of-development and are being offered on an 'as is' basis, without any warrantee or guarantee of any kind."  [sarc]Good communication is just too hard, I know... [/sarc]

    ...they may as well just sell them off to someone who would actually do something with them.  After all Daz acquired Bryce from Corel in 2004, and Hexagon (along with Carrara) when they acquired Eovia in 2006. As their Flagship Studio application began to grow (particularly after the release of 4.0), interest in development of the other programmes seriously waned. Even Carrara seems to have taken its seat in the "rear of the bus".'

    I distinctly remember reading that they were purchased to make sure that no one else did anything with them (this isn't unique to Daz, lots of companies and people do this "drag everyone else down" type thing.)

  • DustRiderDustRider Posts: 2,879
    Leana said:
    Leana said:
    lx said:
    Havos said:

    I am always amazed at how many Carrara users posts in the forums, given we have been led to believe they are a small and decreasing band

    I once mentioned on the forums that all signs on the forums and store pointed to Carrara no longer being of interest to Daz. I was immediately warned that such speculation would be unwise. Based on being told that development was still in progress for Carrara (after asking many times) I bought it. The manual was for a completely different version, but still workable. Months later, not a single official word about it or any sort of update.

    I mean you can call them conspiracy theories, speculations, whatever buzz word you want to stop paying customers from posting things you don't want on your forums, but the fact is there has been no word of anything happening for the other programs, only Studio. 

    Corporate silence continues with Hexagon and Bryce too.  In fact, whenever any particular thing you want or need is met with corporate silence, then you should assume that it's not being done.  And I'd even go so far as to say that if the corporate silence has formed a "Cone of Silence" around the entire product (Bryce, Hex), then you must assume that the product is approaching the end of its life span.

    Silence does not necessarily imply that no work is being done. As I recall the DS change-log went quiet before the public betas of 4.8 and 4.9, because of Iray and Daz Connect, but that certainly didn't indicate that development had stopped, as witness Iray and Daz Connect (whatever your view of their usefulness). I'm pretty sure soemone, Rob I think, did make some comments in one of the DS Beta threads on developments towards Genesis 3 support in Carrara - I can't recall if he also mentioned Connect support though.

    He certainly didn't at the time he talked about Genesis 3 support since we had never heard about Connect then ;)

    Ah, I'd thought it was one of the 4.9 beta threads. Thanks.

    I think it was before that, but I might not remember it correctly.

    For anyone interested, the post from rbtwhiz concerning both Genesis 3 in Carrara and DAZ Connect support in Carrara can be found here http://www.daz3d.com/forums/discussion/comment/944221#Comment_944221 

  • kyoto kidkyoto kid Posts: 41,846
    atticanne said:
     
    DAZ_Steve said:
    Cool scripts:

    Understood.  We will look at how to work with Published Artists to give them the ability to write tools that will still do cool stuff with new content.  Expect to see advancements here as well.

    Why just Published Artists?

    DAZ_Steve said:
    DAZ_Steve said:
    Cool scripts:

    Understood.  We will look at how to work with Published Artists to give them the ability to write tools that will still do cool stuff with new content.  Expect to see advancements here as well.


     

    Update on this (Sorry, my mistake for not realizing the answer before): Although content cannot be modified on disk by scripts when encrypted, it can be modified throguh the API once loaded (and if needed could then be saved out).  Key Published Artists who have historically provided script based products have been informed the "new" way to do most of what they used to do.  So most of that stuff can still be done to the encrypted content.

    Once again, why only Key Published Artists?  What about those of us who would like to learn scripting for DAZ products?

    Anyone will be able to write scripts, but I would expect Daz to work with the PA script creators so they can modify any existing scripts that get broken by the new system. Rob has, as he can, been working on the scripting docs.

    ...since the 4.7 update, AoA's effects Cameras and Advanced Lights have been crippled (as I understand by changes to some bricks in the Shader Mixer).  This remained an issue through two updates to the Studio programme (4.7 & 4.8) before a third party (other than the PA) provided scripts to get two of the effects Cameras (Graphic Art and Colour Cameras) to work again.  As I understand, the issue with the Advanced Lights and flagging SSS surfaces is admittedly much more complicated and thus most likely looks as if it will not be dealt with. This is a sad situation for it makes 3DL less attractive since the other option, UE, can involve extremely long rendering times, even longer than CPU mode rendering in Iray.

This discussion has been closed.