No areola on G9 skin
DawnStar
Posts: 73
Why are some G9 figures created with no areolas? I don't understand the point of it. I suppose the only way around it is to buy the G9 breast utility in the store?
Daz 3D is part of 
Connect
DAZ Productions, Inc.
7533 S Center View Ct #4664
West Jordan, UT 84084
Licensing Agreement | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | EULA
© 2026 Daz Productions Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Comments
Not sure which figures you're referring to, but that's often the case for characters marketed as underage.
Which in itself is ridiculous seeing as areolas are present from birth.
May as well go the whole hog and ban anyone from creating characters under 21 years of age
Or you can do what many of us are doing when we're creating a scene with children and teenagers: dressing them in age appropriate clothes.
You don't understand sarcasm?
Not really when it come to the topic of complaining about the inability to do topless renders of underage characters.
Who said anything about doing topless renders? I didn't. You assume an awful lot.
When I put non translucent clothes over any area of a character's body, I don't care about how these areas look on the texture maps: they are not visible in the final render.
Following that logic, it's safe to assume that the only case where areolas being removed from the textures is a problem is for render showing them (in short topless renders, or renders with translucent clothes but they are the same for that matter).
Fair enough. I guess I just trust that the majority of people in this hobby aren't that way inclined.
My point is purely based on accuracy. Some of the "child" textures just don't look as realistic as the adult versions when rendered, almost like they've been dumbed down.
well, you could actually use adult textures on a child
not for those reasons, but maybe for those horrible beauty pageants or as dolls, dressed of course