Daz Studio 2026 Beta - version 6.25.2026.12107! (Updated May 04, 2026)

16768697173

Comments

  • fastbike1fastbike1 Posts: 4,082

     FWIW 2026 is Alpha not Beta.. You should expect it to be "buggier" than 2024.  I'm running 6.25.2025.35308 with a 5070 TI and find a viewport render to be faster than 4.24 was with a 3090 TI. 2025 also loads a character/scene much much faster the 4.24. Granted I don't use viewport enders for anything other than quick texture or lighting checks. Straight renders in 2025 at 4000x6000 and up are man times faster than 4.24 and GPU temperatures about half the value of the 3090 TI.

    yonashald said:

    I don't understand why the viewport in 2026 is so garbage (lagging much more even when using the same scenes) compared to the 4.24, I sadly have to use 2026 to render because I have a 50 graphic card, but God 2026 is so horrible, I know it's a BETA but damn.. 

  • LeanaLeana Posts: 13,099

    fastbike1 said:

     FWIW 2026 is Alpha not Beta..

    It moved to beta a few builds ago.

  • bluejauntebluejaunte Posts: 2,079

    yonashald said:

    I don't understand why the viewport in 2026 is so garbage (lagging much more even when using the same scenes) compared to the 4.24, I sadly have to use 2026 to render because I have a 50 graphic card, but God 2026 is so horrible, I know it's a BETA but damn.. 

    Odd, I'm having the opposite experience on a 4090. Is this a 5090 thing maybe? Don't see why that would be the case though.
  • V8 InfiniteV8 Infinite Posts: 43

    bluejaunte said:

    yonashald said:

    I don't understand why the viewport in 2026 is so garbage (lagging much more even when using the same scenes) compared to the 4.24, I sadly have to use 2026 to render because I have a 50 graphic card, but God 2026 is so horrible, I know it's a BETA but damn.. 

    Odd, I'm having the opposite experience on a 4090. Is this a 5090 thing maybe? Don't see why that would be the case though.

     

     I find that strange too, I have a 5090 Astral and I also experience significant slowdowns...

     
     

     

     

  • HamEinarHamEinar Posts: 136

    V8 Infinite said:

    bluejaunte said:

    yonashald said:

    I don't understand why the viewport in 2026 is so garbage (lagging much more even when using the same scenes) compared to the 4.24, I sadly have to use 2026 to render because I have a 50 graphic card, but God 2026 is so horrible, I know it's a BETA but damn.. 

    Odd, I'm having the opposite experience on a 4090. Is this a 5090 thing maybe? Don't see why that would be the case though.

     

     I find that strange too, I have a 5090 Astral and I also experience significant slowdowns...

    Same here - 5090 Astral on a Core 9 285k with 128 GB RAM; 4.24 - the viewport in any view is completely stutterless with HEAVY scenes loaded - 2026 latest with 2 characters jumps all over the place. I share the frustrations of every single 50-series owner - but why, why, why are people with 4090's even running the 2026 version?!!!!

  • jmucchiellojmucchiello Posts: 1,189

    I have a 4090 and it runs crisper on the beta than 4.24. If I had access to all my scripts and plugins, I'd only be running the beta.

  • bluejauntebluejaunte Posts: 2,079

    HamEinar said:

    V8 Infinite said:

    bluejaunte said:

    yonashald said:

    I don't understand why the viewport in 2026 is so garbage (lagging much more even when using the same scenes) compared to the 4.24, I sadly have to use 2026 to render because I have a 50 graphic card, but God 2026 is so horrible, I know it's a BETA but damn.. 

    Odd, I'm having the opposite experience on a 4090. Is this a 5090 thing maybe? Don't see why that would be the case though.

     

     I find that strange too, I have a 5090 Astral and I also experience significant slowdowns...

    Same here - 5090 Astral on a Core 9 285k with 128 GB RAM; 4.24 - the viewport in any view is completely stutterless with HEAVY scenes loaded - 2026 latest with 2 characters jumps all over the place. I share the frustrations of every single 50-series owner - but why, why, why are people with 4090's even running the 2026 version?!!!!

    Because it's snappier? On 4090 at least, apparently. But in my case mostly for testing while I developed the 3d mouse plugin and ported my other plugins.
  • HamEinarHamEinar Posts: 136

    bluejaunte said:

    HamEinar said:

    V8 Infinite said:

    bluejaunte said:

    yonashald said:

    I don't understand why the viewport in 2026 is so garbage (lagging much more even when using the same scenes) compared to the 4.24, I sadly have to use 2026 to render because I have a 50 graphic card, but God 2026 is so horrible, I know it's a BETA but damn.. 

    Odd, I'm having the opposite experience on a 4090. Is this a 5090 thing maybe? Don't see why that would be the case though.

     

     I find that strange too, I have a 5090 Astral and I also experience significant slowdowns...

    Same here - 5090 Astral on a Core 9 285k with 128 GB RAM; 4.24 - the viewport in any view is completely stutterless with HEAVY scenes loaded - 2026 latest with 2 characters jumps all over the place. I share the frustrations of every single 50-series owner - but why, why, why are people with 4090's even running the 2026 version?!!!!

    Because it's snappier? On 4090 at least, apparently. But in my case mostly for testing while I developed the 3d mouse plugin and ported my other plugins.

    So, the complete program overhaul works better on a 4090 than any of the 50-series it was actually made for? Interesting..  Worrying, but very interesting. Any other 30- or 40-series who can weigh in on this?

  • Richard HaseltineRichard Haseltine Posts: 109,935

    HamEinar said:

    bluejaunte said:

    HamEinar said:

    V8 Infinite said:

    bluejaunte said:

    yonashald said:

    I don't understand why the viewport in 2026 is so garbage (lagging much more even when using the same scenes) compared to the 4.24, I sadly have to use 2026 to render because I have a 50 graphic card, but God 2026 is so horrible, I know it's a BETA but damn.. 

    Odd, I'm having the opposite experience on a 4090. Is this a 5090 thing maybe? Don't see why that would be the case though.

     

     I find that strange too, I have a 5090 Astral and I also experience significant slowdowns...

    Same here - 5090 Astral on a Core 9 285k with 128 GB RAM; 4.24 - the viewport in any view is completely stutterless with HEAVY scenes loaded - 2026 latest with 2 characters jumps all over the place. I share the frustrations of every single 50-series owner - but why, why, why are people with 4090's even running the 2026 version?!!!!

    Because it's snappier? On 4090 at least, apparently. But in my case mostly for testing while I developed the 3d mouse plugin and ported my other plugins.

    So, the complete program overhaul works better on a 4090 than any of the 50-series it was actually made for? Interesting..  Worrying, but very interesting. Any other 30- or 40-series who can weigh in on this?

    DS 2026/6 is not "made for" the newer cards, and daz would in fact have supported the cards in DS 4 if they could (the chnage log shows they added a version of Iray that had support, but it proved to be buggy during the internal/private testing and had to be rolled back). nVidia made chnages to the way they build the Iray code, and those changes cannot be supported in DS 4 so the updated Iray is DS 2026/6 only; but DS 2026/6 was being worked on anyway, for general reasons not for an unexpected issue with Iray.

  • bluejauntebluejaunte Posts: 2,079

    Did some more testing. In a moderately complex scene with a G9 figure at subd 3 and a strand based hair, DS6 gives 40 fps while moving 3d mouse. Same thing in DS4 is like 18 fps (using the same 3d mouse plugin as well). However, once I remove the strand based hair, both of them are 40 fps. And I also notice that DS6 frametime graph is way more chaotic than DS4 so that means that fps from frame to frame must be way less consistent.

    I then set the figure to subd 4 and no strand based hair. DS4 did 20 fps and DS6 still 36 fps. Added the strand based hair on top and DS4 was 15 while DS6 did 35 fps.

    So only going from 20 to 15 fps in DS4 when adding strand based hair back in, which before resulted in going from 40 to 18 fps is a bit bewildering. But other than that I guess the new Qt6 OpenGL just handles lots of polys better, while having a weird ass seismograph for frametimes though.

  • bluejauntebluejaunte Posts: 2,079

    Never mind frametime graph, it only happens when Aux viewport is also rendering the same thing. Still a bit weird it doesn't happen in DS4. I guess something in DS6 may cause the rendering of both viewports to alternate between each other or something weird, resulting in a messy frametime graph.

  • jmucchiellojmucchiello Posts: 1,189

    Simulating under 2026 is so much faster. The 60 frame simulation zipped by, until the surface exploded. That still takes forever to cancel. No idea why canceling operations can take forever in Daz, any version.

  • mnemonicmnemonic Posts: 6

    Now that Daz 6 is in beta, is there beta SDK available somewhere?

  • TotteTotte Posts: 14,990

    mnemonic said:

    Now that Daz 6 is in beta, is there beta SDK available somewhere?

    Indeed ( Check your DIM ) 

  • mnemonicmnemonic Posts: 6

    Totte said:

    mnemonic said:

    Now that Daz 6 is in beta, is there beta SDK available somewhere?

    Indeed ( Check your DIM ) 

    I can only see 4.5 SDK in DIM.

  • DoctorJellybeanDoctorJellybean Posts: 9,863

    mnemonic said:

    Totte said:

    mnemonic said:

    Now that Daz 6 is in beta, is there beta SDK available somewhere?

    Indeed ( Check your DIM ) 

    I can only see 4.5 SDK in DIM.

    It's not available to the general public as yet. I suspect it will be once the features have been locked in. 

  • umblefuglyumblefugly Posts: 72

    Totte said:

    umblefugly said:

    Thank you again, I am working on a standalone tool and QA is asking if it will support DS 2026. If there are changes then I will have to constantly update it. I wonder if it would be best to note the changes for the future and just release the tool for 4.2x and update it once 2026 is no longer Beta. Thanks Doc!

    If it is a script, so far script engine in DS 6 hasn't really changed, so you could release a script for DS 6 ( I've done that, dual, DS 4 and DS 6 ), but for plugins, I'll wait until DS 6 SDK is frozen.

     

    It's a stand-alone windows application.

  • GranvilleGranville Posts: 701

    Does anyone know what the plan is for all those scripts? Will we need to repurchase them or will they be updated for exisiting owners?

  • jmucchiellojmucchiello Posts: 1,189

    Granville said:

    Does anyone know what the plan is for all those scripts? Will we need to repurchase them or will they be updated for exisiting owners?

    That will be decided individually by the PAs.

  • WendyLuvsCatzWendyLuvsCatz Posts: 40,764

    I tried reading through if this had been answered 

    what is Universal Drawstyle?

    a compromise between Textured and Filament or something new?

    I noticed Depth been added too

  • DoctorJellybeanDoctorJellybean Posts: 9,863
    edited April 27

    WendyLuvsCatz said:

    I tried reading through if this had been answered 

    what is Universal Drawstyle?

    a compromise between Textured and Filament or something new?

    I noticed Depth been added too

    https://docs.daz3d.com/public/software/dazstudio/6/change_log#6_25_2025_15923

    Post edited by DoctorJellybean on
  • WendyLuvsCatzWendyLuvsCatz Posts: 40,764
    edited April 27

    DoctorJellybean said:

    WendyLuvsCatz said:

    I tried reading through if this had been answered 

    what is Universal Drawstyle?

    a compromise between Textured and Filament or something new?

    I noticed Depth been added too

    https://docs.daz3d.com/public/software/dazstudio/6/change_log#6_25_2025_15923

    I see it's been added but it doesn't tell me what it is devil 

    looks the worst

    Universal.jpg
    1920 x 1080 - 1M
    iray_Depth.jpg
    1920 x 1080 - 113K
    filament.jpg
    1920 x 1080 - 1M
    iray.jpg
    1920 x 1080 - 943K
    Post edited by WendyLuvsCatz on
  • barbultbarbult Posts: 26,752

    DoctorJellybean said:

    WendyLuvsCatz said:

    I tried reading through if this had been answered 

    what is Universal Drawstyle?

    a compromise between Textured and Filament or something new?

    I noticed Depth been added too

    https://docs.daz3d.com/public/software/dazstudio/6/change_log#6_25_2025_15923

    But where is the explanation of what they do? A link to the change log is not very helpful. 

  • jmucchiellojmucchiello Posts: 1,189
    edited April 27

    I've looked at universe a few times and then given up. No clue what it's purpose is.

    Post edited by jmucchiello on
  • TotteTotte Posts: 14,990

    I could see a use for someone making a product much like the Old 3Delight LPR Render ( or what it is called ), where you render a bunch of layers and masks and generate a Photoshop file where you easily could merge those different layers using the masks to do some advanced render postprocessing...

     

  • WendyLuvsCatzWendyLuvsCatz Posts: 40,764
    edited April 27

    Totte said:

    I could see a use for someone making a product much like the Old 3Delight LPR Render ( or what it is called ), where you render a bunch of layers and masks and generate a Photoshop file where you easily could merge those different layers using the masks to do some advanced render postprocessing...

     

    first one would need to understand what it is surprise

    as a PA you also likely have a glimpse at the new SDK (not that it would be any use to me)

    and therefore understand a bit more about it's purpose and functions 

    I only actually looked at this build because a Facebook friend with a 5### card couldn't use Filament on her machine 

    she says she doesn't have it in he dropdown 

    I still cannot help her there other than to say she can still use Filament in 4.24 without her Nvidia GPU

     

    Post edited by WendyLuvsCatz on
  • DoctorJellybeanDoctorJellybean Posts: 9,863

    WendyLuvsCatz said:

    I only actually looked at this build because a Facebook friend with a 5### card couldn't use Filament on her machine 

    she says she doesn't have it in he dropdown 

    I still cannot help her there other than to say she can still use Filament in 4.24 without her Nvidia GPU

    I'm not sure why it isn't in her dropdown. 

    Filament.jpg
    177 x 344 - 13K
  • WendyLuvsCatzWendyLuvsCatz Posts: 40,764

    yes, I see it and can use it but I have a 2080Ti

    she was surprised when I showed a similar screenshot as she didn't have that

  • DoctorJellybeanDoctorJellybean Posts: 9,863

    WendyLuvsCatz said:

    yes, I see it and can use it but I have a 2080Ti

    she was surprised when I showed a similar screenshot as she didn't have that

    Are her drivers up to date? Filament requires at least OpenGL 4.1, which basically covers graphic cards released during the past 5 years. I have a 5090 myself.

  • WendyLuvsCatzWendyLuvsCatz Posts: 40,764

    DoctorJellybean said:

    WendyLuvsCatz said:

    yes, I see it and can use it but I have a 2080Ti

    she was surprised when I showed a similar screenshot as she didn't have that

    Are her drivers up to date? Filament requires at least OpenGL 4.1, which basically covers graphic cards released during the past 5 years. I have a 5090 myself.

    I suggested asking on the forum

    I cannot diagnose someone elses PC since she dioes have Filament in 4.24 AFAIK I don't really know what's going on

    I wasn't even using this beta hence just discovered the new drawstyles

    deptn is very useful except it sadly ignores cutout opacity 

Sign In or Register to comment.