George for (original DAZ terminology censored) Bald No Eyebrows
Wait... They normally have eyebrows? None of the ones I've seen have had eyebrows, just the one squinty eye. ;)
Post edited by DigitalSteam on
This discussion has been closed.

Comments
that technicaly is not genitalia
the reproductive bits in front are
it's an orifice for waste and can be quite hairy
I don't understand whether my humor has been lost on you, or yours has been lost on me :)
it makes sense because george has never seen his own toes let alone his...
Eyebrows are an anatomical element. Logically they could put all the head hair, body hair, face hair, eye lashes in there too. Although at 1st I always would look in the hair section for the eye brows.
i normally use super natural brows with my characters and brow remover script when needed - two great resources that were well worth the price since i use them endlessly and george looks great with super natural brows
I, uh... I think an admin edited my title, which is from their own website... I find that genuinely funny, if more than a little difficult to believe, even for a Utah company. :) And I was born and raised in Utah, along with all that typically entails. lol
Of course eyebrows are an anatomical element (after a fashion - they're hair) but that's not what the thread was called, and that's not what the feature on the product description says - it says "
THAT is what I thought was funny enough to create a thread for. Bald Genitalia without Eyebrows. Sure, you may say, They're pretty much all bald and have no eyebrows... But it's a material option. Which means it's default state is either bald with eyebrows, or non-bald without eyebrows, or perhaps non-bald with eyebrows! XD
So I did a quick cartoon of a friendly little guy with hair and eyebrows. And a funny little cleft grin.. And suspiciously placed ears... And a kind of long neck.... But who is definitely just a cartoon person, and nothing bad.
There. Since my original thread title offended, I've changed the title from the censored "George for Anatomical Elements Bald No Eyebrows" to "George for (original DAZ terminology censored) Bald No Eyebrows" to be less misleading :)
(Seriously -I just found the option title confusing and hilarious - I didn't mean to offend anyone.)
trying not to laugh... trying not to laugh... trying not to laugh... F A I L !
Well, you are not used to naming process.Obviously now it's not "George for original daz terminology bald" but structure of several steps
[George][for original daz terminology][bald]
which is
[product name][supplied material][option for that]
So after looking at situation like this, it becomes pretty logical. As "George" and "for original daz terminology" aren't part of one phrase, but subdivisions in structure. So "for original daz terminology" is pretty much understandable name for texture. Bald and otherwise options included.
Toast has eyebrows? Well that's different....
I have no idea what any of this has to do with genitals having eyebrows. ;)
They censored the cartoon... I'm shocked :) So it doesn't have to be an "anatomical feature" to be censored, it only has to be a cartoon of a man who... well... looks rather like an "anatomical feature". :)
LOL!
Welcome to the days of the puritans.
No wonder we europeans were glad most of them went to America. Had they stayed, musical classics like Monty Python's "Isn't it awfully nice to have an anatomical element" (no link to a youtube video due to the lyrics using bad words) could never have seen the light of day...
This does seem to be drifting into forbidden waters, to put it baldly, so it is being locked.