Loading...
> >

How many CUDA cores you have in your system?

Super cheese sandwichSuper cheese sandwich Posts: 633
in The Commons

I'm just curious laugh

 

Thanks!

«13

Comments

  • Stryder87Stryder87 Posts: 899

    This is what I'm using:

    NVIDIA GTX 660
    960 CUDA Cores
    1072 MHz Base Clock
    1137 MHz Boost Clock
    85.7GT/s Texture Fill Rate
    Memory
    2048 MB, 192 bit GDDR5
    6008 MHz (effective)
    144.19 GB/s Memory Bandwidth
    Interface
    PCI-E 3.0 16x

    Old, I know... but I have a dream!!!  A 1080 when they get Iray so I can get a GTX980Ti 6Gb for cheap!  haha

     

  • MattymanxMattymanx Posts: 6,996

    Zotac 980TI AMP Extreme x2

    2816 CUDA Cores (5632)

    6GB 384-Bit GDDR5

    Core Clock 1253 MHz

    Boost Clock 1355 MHz (mine run @ 1400MHz)

     

  • ermullensermullens Posts: 93
    edited September 2016

    24,576  8, M6000 quadro 24GB,384 bit GDDR5 3072 cores per card, GPU 988 MHz Boost 1114 MHz Memory 1653MHz,6612 MHz effective 

    second twin ASUS GTX1080 Turbo 8GB Cores:,2560, per card, Base Clock:1607 MHz, Boost Clock: 1733 MHz 

    House looks like an electronics store lots of gadgets very few clothes, unless you look on the wife's side begins more of a clothing/shoe store look then

    Post edited by ermullens on
  • Richard HaseltineRichard Haseltine Posts: 108,000

    640 CUDA Cores, GTX 750 Ti.

  • hacsarthacsart Posts: 2,034

    None, zip, zilch...

  • Pack58Pack58 Posts: 750

    No laughing (or at least do it quietly) 192

  • AJ2112AJ2112 Posts: 1,417

    EVGA 670 FTW - 1344 

  • DustRiderDustRider Posts: 2,880
    edited September 2016

    GTX 970M - 1280 cores

    Post edited by DustRider on
  • exstarsisexstarsis Posts: 2,128

    GTX 745 (OEM)  CUDA Cores 384

  • AJ2112AJ2112 Posts: 1,417
    edited September 2016
    Pack58 said:

    No laughing (or at least do it quietly) 192

    I feel your pain friend, till Nov 2015 my previous card was 96

    Post edited by AJ2112 on
  • davesodaveso Posts: 7,774

    zero

  • fixmypcmikefixmypcmike Posts: 19,685

    too little too late

  • ChoholeChohole Posts: 33,604

    What's a cuda core?

  • boisselazonboisselazon Posts: 458
    edited September 2016

    number of cuda cores is not comparable between generations (maxwell, pascal, kepler etc...)

    Post edited by boisselazon on
  • mjc1016mjc1016 Posts: 15,001

    96...and that is most definitely NOT ENOUGH!

  • IceDragonArtIceDragonArt Posts: 12,751

    Where do I find this info?

     

  • AllenArtAllenArt Posts: 7,175
    edited September 2016

    On this laptop: Nvidia GeForce GTX 970M 6gb 1280 CUDA - not enough

    I have a 6gb GTX 980Ti on my desktop with 2816 CUDA - better, but still not enough ;)

     

    Post edited by AllenArt on
  • AllenArtAllenArt Posts: 7,175
    Ice Dragon Art said:

    Where do I find this info?

     

    There's a small free program called GPU-Z that will give you all the info on your graphics.

  • Silver DolphinSilver Dolphin Posts: 1,638

    Nvidia 780 6gb = 2304 cuda cores each. I have 3 so 6912 cuda cores. It makes for zippy Iray renders.

  • mjc1016mjc1016 Posts: 15,001
    Ice Dragon Art said:

    Where do I find this info?

     

    The Nvidia Control Panel applet (or whatever they are calling it these days)...no need to download anything else.

  • Silent WinterSilent Winter Posts: 3,872

    GTX 780 (3Gb) - just over 2000 cuda cores

  • TottallouTottallou Posts: 555

    GTX 1080 - 2560 Cuda Cores which equals 0 for rendering right now as it's not yet supported in Iray  :)

  • AllegraAllegra Posts: 405

    I've no idea about cores either but I've a GTX670 and it zips through Iray.

  • mjc1016mjc1016 Posts: 15,001
    Allegra said:

    I've no idea about cores either but I've a GTX670 and it zips through Iray.

    1344 according the Nvidia spec page...

  • AllenArtAllenArt Posts: 7,175
    mjc1016 said:
    Ice Dragon Art said:

    Where do I find this info?

     

    The Nvidia Control Panel applet (or whatever they are calling it these days)...no need to download anything else.

    GPU-Z has a portable version...no need to install.

    Laurie

  • PetercatPetercat Posts: 2,321

    So... let me ask here...
    What's more important for iray, CUDA or card memory? Or system memory? I rarely get tossed into CPU rendering, but when it happens, it's bad.

    Nvidia 980ti, 32G 3200 system RAM, I7 quad 3.4. Should I get another 980ti? Wait for 1080 support? Or double my system RAM in the meantime? Maybe an SSD.

    I remember, back in the stone age, when you could add RAM to your video card. They had empty sockets.

    I wish iray would use system RAM when needed, instead of the CPU. I'd be golden.

  • Nyghtfall3DNyghtfall3D Posts: 813
    edited September 2016
    Petercat said:

    So... let me ask here...
    What's more important for iray, CUDA or card memory? Or system memory?

    Iray doesn't use or look at system memory.  Card memory is needed for Iray to load scene data onto your card.  CUDA is needed for Iray to render that data.

    As for the thread, I've got 5120 cores between a 6 GB Geforce GTX 980 Ti and a 6 GB Geforce GTX 780.  I'm going to replace the 780 with another 980 Ti in a few months.

    Post edited by Nyghtfall3D on
  • L'AdairL'Adair Posts: 9,479
    Tottallou said:

    GTX 1080 - 2560 Cuda Cores which equals 0 for rendering right now as it's not yet supported in Iray  :)

    +1, sort of. On order with new computer, supposedly ships 10/4...

  • PetercatPetercat Posts: 2,321
    Nyghtfall said:
    Petercat said:

    So... let me ask here...
    What's more important for iray, CUDA or card memory? Or system memory?

    Iray doesn't use or look at system memory.  Card memory is needed for Iray to load scene data onto your card.  CUDA is needed for Iray to render that data.

    As for the thread, I've got 5120 cores between a 6 GB Geforce GTX 980 Ti and a 6 GB Geforce GTX 780.  I'm going to replace the 780 with another 980 Ti in a few months.

    So if I'm limited to 6Gig anyway, renders won't start any faster but adding another card will mean they finish faster?

  • mjc1016mjc1016 Posts: 15,001
    Petercat said:

    So if I'm limited to 6Gig anyway, renders won't start any faster but adding another card will mean they finish faster?

    Yes...but doubling the cores (2x of the same card) doesn't cut the time in half...it does shave off a bit, but not that much.

Sign In or Register to comment.