No encrypted for me.
This discussion has been closed.
Adding to Cart…
Licensing Agreement | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | EULA
© 2025 Daz Productions Inc. All Rights Reserved.You currently have no notifications.
Licensing Agreement | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | EULA
© 2025 Daz Productions Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Comments
The fact that I wake up this morning to find over 160 more posts in this thread from 10:00 last night indicates to me that this topic has hit a hot button and is not going away anytime soon. I certainly hope some enterprising mod summarizes the arguments to the people who threw this wrench into the mechanism because they certainly wouldn't take the time to read all these posts.
maybe the page needs editing ....
Except that right now Exp content doesn't work correctly if all files are not installed in the same directory...
I'll point out that one doesn't have to presume malice to view a company as untrustworthy.
You mean the Product Library page on your site account page? You cana lways download the Offline Authoriastion packages, but they should be showing in Smart Content and in Content Library>Products if you log in from DS too. I don't know if the servers are still being hammered - general site peformance seems normal - so it may be worth opening a ticket if they haven't popped-up by now.
I don't really think they did bundle it together hoping no one would notice. It's sort of like saying that the ever changing prices during sales are intentionally out to get you. There's usually a much simpler answer.
Which is true, but not the reason it doesn't work with Daz Connect. (Though that may affect things after it is installed.)
I hope that perhaps some of the vendors who get their products assigned as encrypted-only may be able (and interested in) selling their content elsewhere. If it is relevant high-quality content, I would be willing to pay a few extra dollars compared to here.
So if I only want to use Daz Connect to install all my files how do I get V4, M4 etc to work?
One of the reasons mentioned for the encryption early on (assuming I remember correctly) is to attract new PAs. So it may be interesting to see if some new names show up selling encrypted only content. Maybe they are hoping to entice some of the high end vendors to sell encrypted versions of stuff here. Some of those giant sci-fi cityscapes on Turbosquid that sell for $500+ come to mind. I'm not going to hold my breath though. Though if I could pick up an ecrypyted version for $5 for a $500 item, I would consider it. But for $50, I might die of laughter. Edit: is content for Unity sold encrypted?
I dunno, I'd bite at $50 for a $500 type item. Some sort of massive influx of a new type of content that wouldn't otherwise be available would actually make the encryption make some sense to implement. That said, also not holding my breath or speculate that such a thing might ever occur.
I love displacement maps. But...
On the other hand...
Thanks!!
This discussion was created from comments split from: Changing Products To Encrypted Without Announcing It?.
For anyone still following this, I have a bit of a (hopefully positive ) heads up.
All of the PC+ new releases for today were released in unencrypted format. Also they were made available for DIM, Connect, and Manual Download.
I decided to show my apppreciation for this choice with my wallet. Hopefully others do as well and the sales dept takes note.
+1
Instead, there is a forum post with 36 FAQs in 2 pages specifically for Daz Connect:
http://www.daz3d.com/forums/discussion/comment/941598/
TL;DR?
Who thinks DAZ_Vince should be required to make a video highlighting every bullet point?
; )
Just submitted a help desk ticket suggestion letting them know that they lost sales from me on several of their recently released DRM Encryption only items.
I will not be buying any DRM encryption only products. I note that an alternative marketplace is promoting the fact that their products do not use DMR only. Also, I would prefer anything that is Carrara compatible, which the Daz store is moving away from on a number of fronts.
+1
For me the question would be whether they stay that way, but I don't want to speculate.
I actually stayed up a little later last night to see if the PC+ freebie was going to be available as a non-connect only product. I was happy when it was, but I also "purchased" and downloaded it immediately before someone could flip the connect/encrypted switch, incase it was supposed to be encrypted or connect only.
Everything I've bought in the past few days has been downloaded so fast, since I don't want to speculate on any possible changes to them.
So I have decided to load 4.9 on my computer at work (and yes, my boss knows and doesn't care) as an experiment to see what the difference is and if my content categories will work the same. Also to see what the improvements to the render engines really are. I also want to actually see what the smart content looks like. This hasn't changed my mind about encrypted content but I had no way to tell if my personal concerns about other parts of the upgrade were valid or not without actually compromising my home pc and laptop. I will try things out on my work computer because if something goes wrong it doesn't matter. I have no stake in the content loaded on my work computer because I don't generally use it for this (and yes, my boss is an awesome guy who totally understands my obsession and has no issues with what I do as long as his work gets done first.) I still am completely against something that may, if in the future something goes terribly wrong, lock me out of content I have paid for. And even though I have only been here 4 1/2 months I have spent well over a $1000 (I'm afraid to look its probably at least twice that) I have issues with if something goes wrong and I need to get online to re verify or whatever and I am somewhere without internet I am just SOL. (We camp a lot in the summer and some places have wifi, most don't.) I get a LOT of work done offline around the campfire so it would really stink if I was unable to do that.
So far they have stayed with the multi-install format.
The only items to have been changed were intended, and advertised, to be encrypted from the outset.
I agree. It's like my gramps used to say: "Condescension is the best way to move forward a discussion. And certainly the best to calm people down."
There is no reason he said that to me of all people, of course
Also I made that up.
I remember the initial release of 4.9 beta encrpted all content. That was changed within a few days or so iirc.
Not quite the same, though - and not in the direction of encryption. I thought that was so people had the encrypted stuff to make sure the system worked.
That was my undedrstanding as well. I think DAZ_Rawb even stated that. It makes sense since that's the point of betas.
I don't know if that was the reason, but it did make sense to release it, otherwise no way of knowing if it would work. It isn't how I remember the threads, but I could be mistaken.