Windows 7 and future Pascal GPUs ?

NaviNavi Posts: 454
edited January 2016 in The Commons

Hello,

I'm building a new PC, and I'm hesitating about the OS at the moment, I would like to take another Windows 7, but I wonder if it will work with the new GPUs that should be released later this year (Pascal), does anyone know anything about it ? Is it more "safe" to get Windows 10 for that purpose ?

Thanks for any help,

Navi

Post edited by Navi on

Comments

  • nDelphinDelphi Posts: 1,920

    If you get Windows 10, it is better to do a clean install of it. Even though I have had my headaches with Windows 10, I recommend Windows 10.

  • NaviNavi Posts: 454

    Thanks nDelphi, if I get 10 it will be a clean install anyway, and actually 10 is cheaper to buy than 7 pro, but I still would prefer to have 7 installed, if possible :)

  • nDelphinDelphi Posts: 1,920
    Navi said:

    Thanks nDelphi, if I get 10 it will be a clean install anyway, and actually 10 is cheaper to buy than 7 pro, but I still would prefer to have 7 installed, if possible :)

    The problem with that is that Microsoft will actually be adding stuff to Windows 10 that they will not to past OSses. You just don't want to be left behind. May as well take the bad tasting pill now. Something sooner or later is going to force your hand and you will end up paying twice.

  • HavosHavos Posts: 5,581
    nDelphi said:
    Navi said:

    Thanks nDelphi, if I get 10 it will be a clean install anyway, and actually 10 is cheaper to buy than 7 pro, but I still would prefer to have 7 installed, if possible :)

    The problem with that is that Microsoft will actually be adding stuff to Windows 10 that they will not to past OSses. You just don't want to be left behind. May as well take the bad tasting pill now. Something sooner or later is going to force your hand and you will end up paying twice.

    At least for the next year, Windows 10 is free, so you can always upgrade later at no cost. However I agree with the initial point that Windows 7 will start getting out of date, in particular with drivers for modern chipsets like Pascal.

  • StratDragonStratDragon Posts: 3,273
    edited January 2016

    as of the most recent 900 series card the drivers dated 12/21/15 support windows 7 and Vista so while MS has put Win 7 in it's rearview mirror it does not mean companies will abandon Win 7 because MS would like them to push Win 10 (train wreck IMHO btw) for them.

    Windows 7 is still hands down the largest WIndows OS deployed across the world at almost 50% and Windows 10 barely squeeks by OS X at this time at just over 10%

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_operating_systems

    Post edited by StratDragon on
  • Havos said:
    nDelphi said:
    Navi said:

    Thanks nDelphi, if I get 10 it will be a clean install anyway, and actually 10 is cheaper to buy than 7 pro, but I still would prefer to have 7 installed, if possible :)

    The problem with that is that Microsoft will actually be adding stuff to Windows 10 that they will not to past OSses. You just don't want to be left behind. May as well take the bad tasting pill now. Something sooner or later is going to force your hand and you will end up paying twice.

    At least for the next year, Windows 10 is free, so you can always upgrade later at no cost. However I agree with the initial point that Windows 7 will start getting out of date, in particular with drivers for modern chipsets like Pascal.

    It's the next nearly seven months rather than the next year - the offer will supposedly end on July 29th 2016.

  • Win 7 is way more 50% of the whole actual PC base.

    It is hightly improbable that a manufacturer skips such a big base of potential clients.

    It is one the the (many) reason that I don't switch to Win 10 atm and stay to my satisfying win 7 (2 professionals pc + 1 personal).

    And don't forget the basic rule: "if it ain't broken, don't fix it"

  • StratDragonStratDragon Posts: 3,273

    Win 7 is way more 50% of the whole actual PC base.

    It is hightly improbable that a manufacturer skips such a big base of potential clients.

    It is one the the (many) reason that I don't switch to Win 10 atm and stay to my satisfying win 7 (2 professionals pc + 1 personal).

    And don't forget the basic rule: "if it ain't broken, don't fix it"

    it's 47% of all OS's worldwide: Windows, Mac OS, Unix, Linux, Ubuntu, OS 2 Warp, Amiga Workbench, Celico Adam, Commodore PET, etc.

    Having been forced into getting a new laptop with Windows 10 I detest it. Windows 7 was the most unobtrusive and stable OS's I have ever used, still do and I prefer to any version of OS X I have had to support. 

  • nicsttnicstt Posts: 11,715

    Pascal cards, and some of their benefits may only work with DirectX 12; this is only available for Windows 10.

    At this stage, it is speculative, but likely.

    For instance, the ability to share memory between graphics cards.

  • nDelphinDelphi Posts: 1,920
    nicstt said:

    Pascal cards, and some of their benefits may only work with DirectX 12; this is only available for Windows 10.

    If this is the case, why would Microsoft worry about bring it to Windows 7 when they are desparate to move everyone into Windows 10.

  • alexhcowleyalexhcowley Posts: 2,403
    edited January 2016

    Win 7 is way more 50% of the whole actual PC base.

    It is hightly improbable that a manufacturer skips such a big base of potential clients.

    It is one the the (many) reason that I don't switch to Win 10 atm and stay to my satisfying win 7 (2 professionals pc + 1 personal).

    And don't forget the basic rule: "if it ain't broken, don't fix it"

    it's 47% of all OS's worldwide: Windows, Mac OS, Unix, Linux, Ubuntu, OS 2 Warp, Amiga Workbench, Celico Adam, Commodore PET, etc.

    Having been forced into getting a new laptop with Windows 10 I detest it. Windows 7 was the most unobtrusive and stable OS's I have ever used, still do and I prefer to any version of OS X I have had to support. 

    I still have very fond memories of Windows 2000.  Since then, Microsoft has made just two improvements to Windows:

    1) spliting the directory tree and file name lists into two seperate panes on the file save, save as and open windows

    2) the jpeg viewer in Windows Explorer has been improved significantly although it still needs a lot more work.

    Everything else since W2000 has been a step backwards IMHO.

    Cheers,

    Alex.

    Post edited by alexhcowley on
  • nicsttnicstt Posts: 11,715
    nDelphi said:
    nicstt said:

    Pascal cards, and some of their benefits may only work with DirectX 12; this is only available for Windows 10.

    If this is the case, why would Microsoft worry about bring it to Windows 7 when they are desparate to move everyone into Windows 10.

    They wont bring it to Windows 7; some of the features of DirectX12 have been rolled out to DirectX 11.(something, I forget), available for Windows 8.

     

    Win 7 is way more 50% of the whole actual PC base.

    It is hightly improbable that a manufacturer skips such a big base of potential clients.

    It is one the the (many) reason that I don't switch to Win 10 atm and stay to my satisfying win 7 (2 professionals pc + 1 personal).

    And don't forget the basic rule: "if it ain't broken, don't fix it"

    it's 47% of all OS's worldwide: Windows, Mac OS, Unix, Linux, Ubuntu, OS 2 Warp, Amiga Workbench, Celico Adam, Commodore PET, etc.

    Having been forced into getting a new laptop with Windows 10 I detest it. Windows 7 was the most unobtrusive and stable OS's I have ever used, still do and I prefer to any version of OS X I have had to support. 

    I still have very fond memories of Windows 2000.  Since then, Microsoft has made just two improvements to Windows:

    1) spliting the directory tree and file name lists into two seperate panes on the file save, save as and open windows

    2) the jpeg viewer in Windows Explorer has been improved significantly although it still needs a lot more work.

    Everything else since W2000 has been a step backwards IMHO.

    Cheers,

    Alex.

    Ha, I loved 2000; I was forced to upgrade eventually - I had to get Vista (shudder); OK at first, but a resource hog. Not surprising though, as it has the largest number of lines of any of MS's OSs.

  • nDelphinDelphi Posts: 1,920
    edited January 2016

    I still have very fond memories of Windows 2000.  Since then, Microsoft has made just two improvements to Windows:

    1) spliting the directory tree and file name lists into two seperate panes on the file save, save as and open windows

    They forgot about tabbing. Something Linux has had for ages. Open Source to the rescue with QTTabBar.

    2) the jpeg viewer in Windows Explorer has been improved significantly although it still needs a lot more work.

    Everything else since W2000 has been a step backwards IMHO.

    There are open source image viewers around. Some are better, others not so much.

    Post edited by nDelphi on
  • NaviNavi Posts: 454
    nicstt said:

    Pascal cards, and some of their benefits may only work with DirectX 12; this is only available for Windows 10.

    Thank you everyone for the feedback, and this issue about DirectX 12 is one of the thing that makes me worried, so I guess I have no choice but to get Windows 10 if I want to stay "safe" in the near future :/ .

    Hopefully, one can disable all the "connected" junk that ships with 10, I hope it's at least as stable as 7, which has never crashed for me so far (the only few times I've had to force reboots were related to Iray with Swap file, on scenes that were apparently too large for my ram).

  • NaviNavi Posts: 454

    Win 7 is way more 50% of the whole actual PC base.

    It is hightly improbable that a manufacturer skips such a big base of potential clients.

    It is one the the (many) reason that I don't switch to Win 10 atm and stay to my satisfying win 7 (2 professionals pc + 1 personal).

    And don't forget the basic rule: "if it ain't broken, don't fix it"

    it's 47% of all OS's worldwide: Windows, Mac OS, Unix, Linux, Ubuntu, OS 2 Warp, Amiga Workbench, Celico Adam, Commodore PET, etc.

    Having been forced into getting a new laptop with Windows 10 I detest it. Windows 7 was the most unobtrusive and stable OS's I have ever used, still do and I prefer to any version of OS X I have had to support. 

    I still have very fond memories of Windows 2000.  Since then, Microsoft has made just two improvements to Windows:

    1) spliting the directory tree and file name lists into two seperate panes on the file save, save as and open windows

    2) the jpeg viewer in Windows Explorer has been improved significantly although it still needs a lot more work.

    Everything else since W2000 has been a step backwards IMHO.

    Cheers,

    Alex.

    I was a happy camper with XP, until 64 bits became mandatory, with 3D programs... But there is ONE thing I can't figure out, it's how they've changed the Windows thumb database Oo , in XP you had a small file inside each folder, so thumbs were generated once for all; in all later Windows, they made it temporary, so you have to rebuild all thumbs every now and then, in large picture folders... Really a shame.

  • I think I will let the "Ooooh new & shiney" crowd test and find all the bugs in Win10 before I take the lunge into shark infested waters.

  • mjc1016mjc1016 Posts: 15,001
    edited January 2016

    I think I will let the "Ooooh new & shiney" crowd test and find all the bugs in Win10 before I take the lunge into shark infested waters.

    Not going to ever happen...MS will have the next version of Windows released long before they run out of bugs to fix in Win10.

    Post edited by mjc1016 on
  • nDelphinDelphi Posts: 1,920
    mjc1016 said:

    I think I will let the "Ooooh new & shiney" crowd test and find all the bugs in Win10 before I take the lunge into shark infested waters.

    Not going to ever happen...MS will have the next version of Windows released long before they run out of bugs to fix in Win10.

    More like fixing Windows 10 bugs forever as, according to them, this is the last version of Windows.

  • kyoto kidkyoto kid Posts: 41,859
    nicstt said:

    Pascal cards, and some of their benefits may only work with DirectX 12; this is only available for Windows 10.

    At this stage, it is speculative, but likely.

    For instance, the ability to share memory between graphics cards.

    ...however this will only benefit games that support DX12 not the type of 3D rendering we do. We will still be stuck with the memory limit of a single GPU.

     

    As to Win10, MS will have to drag me kicking, clawing, and screaming as I am so against their iron fisted mandatory update policy.  Their track record hasn't been all that stellar since the "free" release, especially where Nvidia driver updates and multi display setups are concerned.

    Also dislike rubbish like Cortana being forced on me. The last thing I need is some bloody nag of an "assistant" designed to pester me, which even when turned off, keeps running in background and hogging processor resources that could be better used for other functions.

    I love WIn 7, it's the last elegant and truly functional OS MS ever released.

  • kyoto kidkyoto kid Posts: 41,859
    mjc1016 said:

    I think I will let the "Ooooh new & shiney" crowd test and find all the bugs in Win10 before I take the lunge into shark infested waters.

    Not going to ever happen...MS will have the next version of Windows released long before they run out of bugs to fix in Win10.

    ...exactly.  Earlier today read an article in a tech journal that security support for "The Last OS You Will Ever Need" will expire in March of 2025.

    Not sure what will happen after that.  Maybe we all go DNI or something.

  • nicsttnicstt Posts: 11,715
    kyoto kid said:
    nicstt said:

    Pascal cards, and some of their benefits may only work with DirectX 12; this is only available for Windows 10.

    At this stage, it is speculative, but likely.

    For instance, the ability to share memory between graphics cards.

    ...however this will only benefit games that support DX12 not the type of 3D rendering we do. We will still be stuck with the memory limit of a single GPU.

     

    As to Win10, MS will have to drag me kicking, clawing, and screaming as I am so against their iron fisted mandatory update policy.  Their track record hasn't been all that stellar since the "free" release, especially where Nvidia driver updates and multi display setups are concerned.

    Also dislike rubbish like Cortana being forced on me. The last thing I need is some bloody nag of an "assistant" designed to pester me, which even when turned off, keeps running in background and hogging processor resources that could be better used for other functions.

    I love WIn 7, it's the last elegant and truly functional OS MS ever released.

    Will have to wait and see; plus NVidia is looking at shared memory on graphics cards (if looking at is the right way of wording it); I forgot where I saw it, and if it was only game related, or other uses too.

    I wouldn't write off shareing memory for rendering with DirectX12; I mean the derth of DirectX12 games means that the functionality is still in its infancy.

  • nicsttnicstt Posts: 11,715
    kyoto kid said:
    mjc1016 said:

    I think I will let the "Ooooh new & shiney" crowd test and find all the bugs in Win10 before I take the lunge into shark infested waters.

    Not going to ever happen...MS will have the next version of Windows released long before they run out of bugs to fix in Win10.

    ...exactly.  Earlier today read an article in a tech journal that security support for "The Last OS You Will Ever Need" will expire in March of 2025.

    Not sure what will happen after that.  Maybe we all go DNI or something.

    Probably windows update 10.9089457093710976 by then.

Sign In or Register to comment.