Adding to Cart…
Licensing Agreement | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | EULA
© 2025 Daz Productions Inc. All Rights Reserved.You currently have no notifications.
Licensing Agreement | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | EULA
© 2025 Daz Productions Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Comments
Adding the Victoria 9 shape does move in that direction, and i would think it worth a bug report, but the only way I can make it look about as bad as yours is by zeroing the figure before applying the pose and shape.
@Richard Haseltine
Could you try loading a base G9 and just bend the thigh to -80 or so? For my this resulted in this strange fold.
Are you loading base figure or dev load base figure?
dev load has joint control off.
Base. And I even checked that the Joint Control was at 100%
I hope you can solve this problem, Kervala. And not charge an arm and leg for the solution!!
Laurita,
You are using V9, rather than G9F and your bends look good. Does V9 have some JCM fixes?
G9 has no JCMs anymore, it has a new name for that, if thats the question. It has some CBSs, I did test the -80 tigh bend, it looks wrong indeed. and the CTRL changes nothing for me. to be fair. maybe I am doing something wrong or the CTRL is not working, or I have no clue about that topic : )
Edit: I just find the controllers for the CBS but not the CBS itself.
It has no bearing on anything.....but JCM's are now called CBS on all G9 characters moving forth ;)
And I suppose for the eventual Genesis 10, they'll switch from CBSs to Paramounts, or Desilus... while we go where no Daz has gone before...
I know, but it looked from the G9/G9 from G8/G8 comparison images as if poses converted from G8 seemed to be slightly worse than the G9 directly applied pose.
Regards,
Richard
Is the thigh/pelvis crease noticeable with clothes on?
Unfortunately yes, especially for tight clothes :(
evolving backwards.
@kervala Thank you for letting me know. It's refreshing that we can candidly discuss these issues without fear of censorship.