Render times G8/8.1

Why does the render time on a female (HD or not with no extra makeup) take up to 2/3 times longer than males? I find this consistently...even when there is nothing other than lighting (same light set). Not complaining, (well maybe a little lol) but I am curious.

Comments

  • Richard HaseltineRichard Haseltine Posts: 108,975

    Hair or clothing? Broadly the same number of maps used?

  • arks0ngarks0ng Posts: 275

    Not sure without knowing what exactly you are rendering, but I've found what amps up times most is hair. Is it possible you're using more resource-heavy hairs on the females than the males? 

  • RJGirlRJGirl Posts: 93

    Just a basic figure, top, bottoms, shoes, hair...I would say pretty much same amount of maps used...

    just wondered if anyone else has noticed this also

  • LeanaLeana Posts: 12,894

    Different hairs can lead to very different render time. Same for clothes or other add-ons.

  • TheKDTheKD Posts: 2,711

    Chances are it's mostly the hair. It's all the transmaps that need more calculations than just plain old geometry.

  • Serene NightSerene Night Posts: 17,704

    I recently rendered a female, and her short bob hair took 3 times longer than anything I used for the males. 

  • KrzysztofaKrzysztofa Posts: 226

    Another thing to consider with hairs: some hairs are very resource heavy, like OutOfTouch or ChevyBabe hairs. Those can contribute to overloading your GPUs vram unless you have a high-end card and make the render dump to CPU, which is orders of magnitude slower.

    I only learned this recently (thank you Richard!), but in the Task Manager > Performance tab in windows, you can change the charts for GPU to show CUDA (or compute_0 if no CUDA appears). That chart will tell you if Daz is actually using your GPU or not.

  • RJGirlRJGirl Posts: 93

    Thanks all! I kinda figured it was probably hair...and I am a sucker for OOTs lol

  • FSMCDesignsFSMCDesigns Posts: 12,847

    RJGirl said:

    Thanks all! I kinda figured it was probably hair...and I am a sucker for OOTs lol

    ..and those are very resource intensive in my experience

  • HavosHavos Posts: 5,610

    dforce hairs are the worst for eating resources. Whilst the VRAM usage is not that different from other high quality hairs, the RAM growth when rendering can be quite eye watering. I have seen some hairs add 20GB or more to the memory needed.

  • j cadej cade Posts: 2,310

    Havos said:

    dforce hairs are the worst for eating resources. Whilst the VRAM usage is not that different from other high quality hairs, the RAM growth when rendering can be quite eye watering. I have seen some hairs add 20GB or more to the memory needed.

    my wild mass guessing for this is that, while the maps can e copied over to the vram one at a time, the geometry has to be copied to it as one whole chunk - so the whole thing has to sit in the RAM at once

     

    whatever it is there's definitely some sort of bottleneck.

     

    on the other hand I find once it starts up strand hair tends to need fewer iterations to clear up (my guess here would be because it isn't doing calculations for 20 layers of transparency maps)

     

    the most recent version of Iray has added a more optimized strand primitive, which I don't think has been added to DS yet. I just hope that will help

     

    to the original topic I too love oot hairs... and I also love shrinking their textures

  • Ghosty12Ghosty12 Posts: 2,080
    edited June 2021

    Havos said:

    dforce hairs are the worst for eating resources. Whilst the VRAM usage is not that different from other high quality hairs, the RAM growth when rendering can be quite eye watering. I have seen some hairs add 20GB or more to the memory needed.

    Tell me about it, I have a few of Chevybabes dforce hair products buying them because they looked so good.. But I don't even attempt to use them because after trying to render with them, they really do bring my computer to a screeching halt..

    I did find a setting that allowed me to speed up rendering but it made the hair look terrible..

    j cade said:

    Havos said:

    dforce hairs are the worst for eating resources. Whilst the VRAM usage is not that different from other high quality hairs, the RAM growth when rendering can be quite eye watering. I have seen some hairs add 20GB or more to the memory needed.

    my wild mass guessing for this is that, while the maps can e copied over to the vram one at a time, the geometry has to be copied to it as one whole chunk - so the whole thing has to sit in the RAM at once

     

    whatever it is there's definitely some sort of bottleneck.

     

    on the other hand I find once it starts up strand hair tends to need fewer iterations to clear up (my guess here would be because it isn't doing calculations for 20 layers of transparency maps)

     

    the most recent version of Iray has added a more optimized strand primitive, which I don't think has been added to DS yet. I just hope that will help

     

    to the original topic I too love oot hairs... and I also love shrinking their textures..

    With the iRay update I hope so, because as it is now I avoid using those dforce hair products because they are so resource intensive.. I have a lot of oot's hair products and shrinking the textures a lot..

    Post edited by Ghosty12 on
  • RJGirlRJGirl Posts: 93

    j cade said:

     

    to the original topic I too love oot hairs... and I also love shrinking their textures

     

    Intersting...by how much if I may inquire lol?

  • KrzysztofaKrzysztofa Posts: 226

    Ghosty12 said:

    Havos said:

    dforce hairs are the worst for eating resources. Whilst the VRAM usage is not that different from other high quality hairs, the RAM growth when rendering can be quite eye watering. I have seen some hairs add 20GB or more to the memory needed.

    Tell me about it, I have a few of Chevybabes dforce hair products buying them because they looked so good.. But I don't even attempt to use them because after trying to render with them, they really do bring my computer to a screeching halt..

    Thats the irony of Chevybabe hairs. They're basically unusable for me, so I've stopped buying them. Maybe after I find a 3090 card I'll start getting them again.

Sign In or Register to comment.