Frame Width vs. Translating the Camera
LosingSignal
Posts: 409
in The Commons
After finally discovering the usefulness of the Focal Length setting on Cameras, I was wondering if there is an appreciable difference between moving the camera closer or further away vs changing the Frame Width setting to get an image properly framed. I'm running a few test renders right now, but those will take a while. Is there a technical difference between the two techniques?

Comments
@LosingSignal, Moving the camera forward and back is much like stepping forward or back with your camera in the real world. And when you can't step back any further because of a wall, you'll get more of the room in the shot if you use the lens to get the wide angle. Or when you can't step any closer to an animal in the zoo because of the railings, you use the lens to zoom in.
Using the Frame Width, (and Focal Length,) in the Camera's "Camera" settings are like using the camera lens to zoom in close, or zoom out for a wide angle shot.
I guess what I was getting at is that if the Focal Length helps "flatten" out the image, does altering the image with Frame Width undo that? Or is Frame Width more or less a zoom feature?
Yes. This is the difference between a close, wide camera, and a distant, narrow camera:
~~~~~
As far as the difference between frame width and focal length, my understanding is that the difference in the result from changing one rather than the other is most significant with renders with a very high aspect ratio. I can't remember how it works out, I don't tend to render very wide images.