Ahhhhh........

I've been learning Daz for about three years on my gaming laptop.  8G RAM and a Geforce 750M.  Needless to say, I learned to be very efficient with my IRay scenes.

Today I built my monster system.  32G RAM, i7-6700k 4Ghz, dual GTX 980 Ti.  I just rendered a scene I built on my laptop.  It took my laptop two hours to get the scene to around 80% convergence.  My new machine finished the render to 95% convergence in just under 6 minutes.

Ahhhh........

Comments

  • barbultbarbult Posts: 26,392

    Great!

  • tring01tring01 Posts: 305
    barbult said:

    Great!

    Thanks.  I'd been waiting and waiting for the drivers for the 1070 to come out - then saw a post with some tests and the 980 Ti was as fast or faster.  I scored a pair of them brand new on eBay for $850.  Great card for $425 each!

  • barbultbarbult Posts: 26,392
    tring01 said:
    barbult said:

    Great!

    Thanks.  I'd been waiting and waiting for the drivers for the 1070 to come out - then saw a post with some tests and the 980 Ti was as fast or faster.  I scored a pair of them brand new on eBay for $850.  Great card for $425 each!

    I've had one 980Ti for over a year, and it works well. You got a good price and will enjoy them.

  • kyoto kidkyoto kid Posts: 42,001
    edited November 2016

    ...indeed good price on those 980s. I've seen single ones going for as much as 900$.

    Looking at the 1070 myself,  Yeah not as many cores but more importantly for me, an extra 2 GB of memory.  The only 8 GB Maxwell card is the 2,500$ Quadro M5000.  If I had that much to throw at a GPU I'd get a 16 GB P5000 instead.(interestingly, the same price).

    Post edited by kyoto kid on
  • AllenArtAllenArt Posts: 7,175
    edited November 2016

    Just remember that computer hardware has the same effect as money....the more you have, the more you spend. Sooner or later you'll be building scenes so big and full that even that nice card ya just got won't hold them. LOL. I should know...I have the same card (and here I am, waiting for a render...lol) ;).

    Laurie

    Post edited by AllenArt on
  • kyoto kidkyoto kid Posts: 42,001

    ...I already do that yet my GPU has only 1 GB.and my sytem only 12 GB (well actually 10.7 after Widnows and system utilities). One scene I created is 8.9 GB in size when loaded. That one goes into swap mode when rendering. To contain my scenes in VRAM would require at least a Pascal Titan-X if not a Quadro P5000.  If I had an extra 5,300$ burning a hole in my pockat I'd just say bugger it and get a Quadro P6000 with 24 GB.

  • tring01tring01 Posts: 305
    AllenArt said:

    Just remember that computer hardware has the same effect as money....the more you have, the more you spend. Sooner or later you'll be building scenes so big and full that even that nice card ya just got won't hold them. LOL. I should know...I have the same card (and here I am, waiting for a render...lol) ;).

    Laurie

    Too true!!  8-)

     

  • tring01tring01 Posts: 305
    kyoto kid said:

    ...I already do that yet my GPU has only 1 GB.and my sytem only 12 GB (well actually 10.7 after Widnows and system utilities). One scene I created is 8.9 GB in size when loaded. That one goes into swap mode when rendering. To contain my scenes in VRAM would require at least a Pascal Titan-X if not a Quadro P5000.  If I had an extra 5,300$ burning a hole in my pockat I'd just say bugger it and get a Quadro P6000 with 24 GB.

    Wow!  Now that sounds like a monster!

  • Congrats on your new rig Tring, and way to score a killer deal on the graphics cards!

  • kyoto kidkyoto kid Posts: 42,001
    tring01 said:
    kyoto kid said:

    ...I already do that yet my GPU has only 1 GB.and my sytem only 12 GB (well actually 10.7 after Widnows and system utilities). One scene I created is 8.9 GB in size when loaded. That one goes into swap mode when rendering. To contain my scenes in VRAM would require at least a Pascal Titan-X if not a Quadro P5000.  If I had an extra 5,300$ burning a hole in my pockat I'd just say bugger it and get a Quadro P6000 with 24 GB.

    Wow!  Now that sounds like a monster!

    ...if you are speaking of the scene (see attachment below), indeed.  8 Genesis/G2 figures, large set, a number of emissive lights, "voulumetic" cube to simulate a fine misty rain, and wet surfaces. 

    If you are referring to the Quadro P6000 yes that card is a total beast as it has as just as much VRAM as the physical memory that my MB supports.

     

     

    railway station beta.png
    1600 x 1200 - 3M
  • pwiecekpwiecek Posts: 1,598
    AllenArt said:

    Just remember that computer hardware has the same effect as money....the more you have, the more you spend. Sooner or later you'll be building scenes so big and full that even that nice card ya just got won't hold them. LOL. I should know...I have the same card (and here I am, waiting for a render...lol) ;).

    Laurie

    I used to have a problem with the RDL7 scene (Preview, not render) then upgraded my computer and it worked great. Now I've fallen behind the curve again.

  • BobvanBobvan Posts: 2,653

    I should of went for the ti when I got the 980 oh well 1080's are cheaper then 980ti's were back then. I will prolly just build a new rig with one next spring summer see how it goes..

  • PetercatPetercat Posts: 2,321
    kyoto kid said:

    ...I already do that yet my GPU has only 1 GB.and my sytem only 12 GB (well actually 10.7 after Widnows and system utilities). One scene I created is 8.9 GB in size when loaded. That one goes into swap mode when rendering. To contain my scenes in VRAM would require at least a Pascal Titan-X if not a Quadro P5000.  If I had an extra 5,300$ burning a hole in my pockat I'd just say bugger it and get a Quadro P6000 with 24 GB.

    Are you using the latest Nvidia drivers? They appear to use GPU memory more efficiently (I don't know about RAM, I have 64Gigs). I had one scene that rendered in RAM until I updated my driver, now it fits on the card.

  • kyoto kidkyoto kid Posts: 42,001

    ...1 GB would barely be enough for a single clothed figure with hair lights, a simple backdrop and maybe a prop like a chair or table.  The average size of the scenes I create (when the're not "epic level" ones) is in the 5 - 6 GB range.

  • tring01tring01 Posts: 305
    Bobvan said:

    I should of went for the ti when I got the 980 oh well 1080's are cheaper then 980ti's were back then. I will prolly just build a new rig with one next spring summer see how it goes..

    I think the 980 ti is a very good IRay render card for the price right now.  You can get one for around $400 on eBay.  That's a pretty good price for 2816 CUDA cores and 6G of VRAM.  I was looking at them back when they were $650 to $750 and up.  I just didn't feel like spending that much.  Now look at me.  $425 is so cheap I bought two.  LOL!

Sign In or Register to comment.