Three More Wishes G8F

Comments

• richardandtracy Posts: 7,076

  December 2

  Apparently the UK is not an approved region to see images 2&3.. Image 1 looks interesting, though. Regards, Richard
• Squishy Posts: 705

  December 2 edited December 3

  Couldn't get PostImages to show it correctly, and I don't know of another image host that the UK allows through, although you can see the promo images in either of the download links before actually downloading.

  e: figured out what the problem with Postimages was, let me know if UK readers can see the promo images please.

  Post edited by Squishy on December 3
• Squishy Posts: 705

  December 3

  
• Jan_Scrapper Posts: 538

  December 3

  Gorgeous!!  Thank you so very much!!!
• Squishy Posts: 705

  December 3

  People seem to really like this set, I'm glad it came out so well 
• richardandtracy Posts: 7,076

  December 3

  Can see them now. Regards, Richard.
• Squishy Posts: 705

  December 3

  
• emanuela1 Posts: 928

  December 3

  Very nice! thank you!:)
• grantzero Posts: 5

  December 3

  I think this is my fave of your sets so far. The skirt, especially, has a lovely ethereal quality. Thank-you for sharing!

  Is it intentional that the license on this set on RenderHub is set to “Extended Use License (IP Restricted)”? I’m not sure what intellectual property the set is using.
• Squishy Posts: 705

  December 3

  The general rule for anything I publish is no redistribution of contents, renders and other use are OK.
• SapphireBlue Posts: 1,362

  2:48AM

  Dreamy set, especially that floaty skirt. Thanks for sharing! 

  (grantzero: Renderhub seems to list everything as IP restricted for a day or two until they've had the chance to check the item. If you look now, you'll probably find the IP restriction has already been removed.)
• Squishy Posts: 705

  5:57AM

  I am thinking about doing some material options and it looks like the way to do it is to apply the material settings (mostly color at this point) to all six pieces and save it as a hierarchical material set, with the parent character figure excluded. That way the pieces can be mixed and matched and you only need one material file to apply to whatever pieces you have loaded.
• richardandtracy Posts: 7,076

  7:09AM

  That could work provided the surfaces have the same names. Never tried it myself, and my concern would be that the preset looks for a particular garment name to apply the material to. It the name causes a problem you could get it to work if you create the hierarchical preset on a figure wearing all the clothes you want to materials to apply to. Regards, Richard.
• Squishy Posts: 705

  7:17AM edited 7:18AM

  It works! The main reason I use generic surface names is so materials are interchangeable. It's a little messy in this case because I wanted to mix and match garment pieces and have different surface settings per garment, it turns out this works just the way I want it to except it probably applies UV maps, no easy way to prevent that with hierarchical material files. It won't affect anything I'm doing but it may bother people that customize their local versions, hopefully if anyone is doing that they know how to deal with it.

  So the way this works is you can just load whichever wearable garment pieces you want (all four combinations shown here) and then with any of them selected, you can load the hierarchical material. It's OK if the parent figure name is different from the default (all four of these characters have unique figure names).

  

  Post edited by Squishy at 7:18AM
• Squishy Posts: 705

  7:21AM

  very pleased that you can just throw these onto four characters posed and just run the simulation and it just works 

  I did exclude extremities (just the fingers) but otherwise I just loaded all these in one scene and ran it in one pass, pretty painless