Dazwear in reality - ROTFL
This discussion has been closed.
Adding to Cart…
Licensing Agreement | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | EULA
© 2025 Daz Productions Inc. All Rights Reserved.You currently have no notifications.
Licensing Agreement | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | EULA
© 2025 Daz Productions Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Comments
I don't think you can call those malfunctions, they are clearly wanting to show it off when you wear something that revealing without any panties
Greetings,
Heh; no, I meant other examples of DAZish clothing out-and-about. Although that last article is...kinda unpleasantly...judgemental. :( It's like...show a few 'racy' pictures, and then insist that they were mortified by their clothing...show a few more pictures, and imply that they were humiliated at the event...rinse and repeat.
Interestingly, they are both wearing a covering that probably runs from the mid-torso 'belt' around to the other side, that acts as underwear, but it's just not visible in most of the pictures, as it JUST covers the very minimum (a 'hammock' essentially). The guy they were with showed a bit of skin also.
I'm not sure if I know of a DAZ male shirt that does that offhand...
Anyway, I really always disliked the DAZ style of clothing with a between-the-leg flap; it seems massively overdone, and usually it's rigged like a board. Those ones obviously weren't...
-- Morgan
I didn't read the text, just looked at pictures ... LOL
A male shirt that opens: http://www.daz3d.com/m304
Well, i did post and outfit on the previous page :)
I would show you pictures of the outfits I see people in at the mall but it is probably either rude or illegal to photograph them without their permission.
I'm fine with nudity in public with the exception of rear ends.
Because I don't want to be sitting where someone's bare bum has been.
Other than THAT, I say anything goes.
I believe the standard etiquette is to carry a towel and place it on the surface before sitting.
The euphemism 'bumping uglies' does not exist for nothing. I can't imagine how bordering on displaying the least attractive bits of your anatomy is ever going to get you talked about for all the right reasons. Audrey Hepburn didn't have to walk round with half her undercarriage on show to be labelled 'stylish'. 'Exhibitionist' is probably the tag people in the Daz dresses are going for, which is all very well, but what happens once everyone gets as bored with 'exhibitionist' as they seem to have done with 'stylish'? Pretty soon there will be no where else left to go.
At the local mall, I once saw a lady with no shirt instead she had a sports bra on. Sports bras are not shirts. It is a type of bra aka underwear.
Yes, this is the standard etiquette at all of the nudist resorts I've been to. It is considered rather rude to not have a towel handy for sitting purposes. :)
But if you are carrying around towels for sitting, it just seems silly not to strap them to your waist or what not and hey, guess what, you've reinvented a tucked loincloth.
Nah! Then, you have to worry about them falling off. It's just easier to have the towel around your neck or in your carryall! Some of the women do wear sarong type things around the waist when they feel like it. I have a few really pretty ones of those and they are nice to have if you are getting too much sun on your lap and take care of the problem of what to sit on.
LOL. Now that's funny!
0.o
Those girls have panties on FYI. Narrow, like loincloths, but they are not going commando. The article is wrong about them not wearing undies, probably on purpose. The girls are not embarrassed, not looking for attention, they are models and they are doing what models do. Much ado about nothing really.
That's odd because every picture that was on a UK news website had that area pixeled out like they were nude, and there was no colouring in the pixels to suggest they had been wearing anything, especially the pink underwear in the link just a couple posts up.
Very odd. Now it just looks like an attempt to create some sort of sensationalized news story to fill a slow day.
- - -
The new "Fantasy Wrap" advertisment campaign is up and running to celebrate this topic...


- - -
I actually kind of like the outfits except maybe the sleeves on the pink one. I love the bright colors next to their tanned skin and the important parts are all covered, it's just the illusion of nudity, nothing is actually showing. If I looked like those models, I would not have a problem wearing those dresses. Especially in Italy!
Greetings,
Nah, there must be some mistake. The news would never do that, especially as staid and upstanding a paper as The Sun.
I will respectfully disagree, and leave it at that. :-)
I love the Fantasy Wrap ad right next to the picture; that's a flawless ad victory!
-- Morgan
That ad is just targeted to you since the bots know you use Daz, it doesn't go out to the general public... Targeted ads, big data... The Internet is watching...
Form vs Function. I always assumed the functional purpose of clothing was to shelter and shield the body from the extremity of the elements. To my mind these dresses are complete fails. Further; if something doesn't serve it's primary function, then the form no matter how beautiful is completely irrelevant. I find myself asking my sister all the time; "Aren't you going to be cold in that outfit?" Which is code for; "No!!!!!!!!!" Needless to say...hated it. Got a good laugh though. But I think part of the ideal with these outfits is to REBEL against the standards of society, to purposefully do things not becuase they should be done, but because no one else has done them yet.
I see this every day in so many artistic disciplines in the modern day search for "originality." Living in NYC where performance art is everywhere I often ask people with the greatest respect; "Why did you decide to do that?" And often the answer is something like; "because no one else has ever done it." Which then leads me to ask them; "Did you ever ask yourself why?" It's at that moment that they realize they haven't really thought this thing through. After shoulder shrugging off the question I then I kindly as possible try to explain that It isnt enough to have artistic inspiration, it also helps to have the good taste to know which ideas are worthy of further development and which are not. Not every idea that pops into one's head is going to be awesome. People these days are submitting "masterpieces" that seem fully original to them, not realizing that these same bad ideas have already occurred to many artists perhaps centuries before them but all those artists had the good taste and presence of mind to recognize that these were indeed a bad ideas so they focused on better ones. I then encourage the "rebellious" artist to dig a little deeper, don't be in such a hurry to publish and be seen; and to cultivate the better ideas they likely already have... and indeed most times they do have better ideas, that they just scrapped for not being original enough. Unfortunate. There's always room for originality, if it comes from the right place. Ask Lady Gaga.
Anyhow, it must be stated; if ever there were two ladies with the shapes required to wear these outfits these girls are it. Considering the diet and exercise routines these ladies must maintain, maybe too much clothing in the midsection overheats them?
I personally think people should be careful with the "statements" they make with their clothing. I see guys who could buy shirts that fit them but are instead forcing themselves into these skin tight t-shirts, wondering why people assume them to be meat heads and prone to aggression. But it is clear these guys work out more than they read books, because reading books takes time...the same time they are spending at the gym. The ladies in this image could well be very intelligent, but if I met one of them while at this particular event I'd have to question whether my interest in them at that time was soley out of interest in their minds. Even if they used smart words like stalwart, reticent, or dihydrogen monoxide, my mind would still be stuck on something else.
And I do believe, that these girls could be wearing paper bags with torn handles and they'd still look incredible.
If only more guys thought like you! Unfortunately, here in LA, people are way more superficial! I used to have a thing for screenwriters thinking they had more depth than other Hollywood guys, and I briefly dated two Oscar nominated screenwriters and both were NOT interested in talking, getting to know me at all, just wanted to move things to the bedroom. When I said "Can't we just talk, get to know each other?" The response was "If I just wanted to talk, I have guy friends for that." And most guys here think that way. Especially in the entertainment industry, which is most of the people I know.
And maybe the reason girls dress the way they do is because otherwise guys won't even look their way. It's all about being noticed here and being noticed for being hot. But also, because everyone dresses that way, you feel you have to too or you feel frumpy and out of place. You almost have to dress at least somewhat sexy or you won't fit in... There's actually peer pressure to dress sexy. And then you don't have to wait in line, you get into the VIP section and invited to the after party... There are distinct advantages to dressing that way. As I write this, I realize how crazy superficial this all sounds, but it's the world I know...
I've seen girls do incredibly exhibitionistic acts, usually while drunk or on drugs at a party, but they need that attention. And on further research, I discovered that many of these (drop dead gorgeous) girls were sexually abused as children and now think the only way to get attention is through sexual exhibitionism. And, mostly they are right. It's hard to find the rare guy who wants to get to know your mind. This is the land of boob jobs, spray tans and hair extensions. I guess I just got used to it. I'm originally from NYC BTW.
But, the other part of the equation is--it's just fashion. Many of the fashion designers are gay males so I'm not sure why they create such revealing clothes for women and then the female designers are doing the same thing. It's not like the girls/models are designing their own clothes. But I guess it's like Daz, if skimpy clothes sell well, designers will keep creating it. And when stars wear their clothes on the red carpet, or models on the runway, others want to dress similarly... It's hard to stop the "being noticed for being hot" cycle, it has too much power... And I know a 61 year old woman (with a boob job and a 25 year old looking body) who STILL dresses that way! I don't think it's anything new to our current timeline, I'm sure it dates back to the Egyptians and the Greeks. I personally have no problem with girls dressing that way, but I do hate the peer pressure to dress like that myself.
You mean like a meat dress?
Strikes me as a total recipie for loneliness and attracting the wrong kind of attention. Where I live there's beautiful women everywhere... it actually gets boring after a while and you really start to notice how they all try too hard.
For me, nothing can beat a girl in a simple pony tail, sweatshirt and jeans who has a real personality, a sparkle in her eyes, and a heart-achingingly sweet laugh. But then again, I never really was a city boy.
Interesting turn. Don't want to turn this into some Gaga session. But this is a fair question.
Meat dress? Exactly. I'm sure lots of people considered it before her, but decided against it as a bad...really terrible,....really really really terrible idea. But Gaga got away with it. Not because she did something just to be weird, but because she did something weird to make a point about discrimination in the military, and to poke fun at the ideal of fame itself as being ridiculous which fit perfectly with the theme of the album she was promoting "Fame Monster." And I'll bet that the meat dress was far from the craziest idea she's been presented with by her colony of supporters who actually submit these designs to her for consideration. She has vetoed many a terrible idea. But we'll never see those, will we? So in the context of her as an artist, the meat dress fits.
Celine Dion in the same outfit would be an outrage. We wouldn't accept as truthful an explanation from Celine for wearing such a dress because Celine has not based her entire public personae on the notion of her activism. Gaga has.
That's one of the reasons Gaga's become so big of a star. Not only does she wear a meat dress, but she can actually sing; the woman has legitimate pipes. Her music is conscientious, she knows that if she's managed to grab my attention the least she can do is make her statement and make it good, before I move on to the next thing in my busy life. She presented herself from the beginning as someone who didnt take herself so seriously, and this has allowed her to go places most artists couldnt touch. Lady Gaga is smart, she uses controversy the correct way. No one can say even after a meat dress that this woman means harm to anyone, even animals. It's not what you do, but how you do it and WHY. Just being different is a shallow exercise. When you analyze her actions, though quite visual and engaging, she's quite thoughful and is in full control of her art. She knows when to turn the crazy on and when to shut it off.
And I'd even say that Madonna and Gaga are a good area of comparison. When Madonna was making her way in the 80's, MTV really helped launch her by giving her and other artists visual frameworks to express their music. As a female in the "Naturally Selective" world we live in, everyone speaks the universal language of sex. So Madonna who has al the sex appeal anyone needs, capitalized on that. Madonna was the sexy girl with a touch of crazy, but sexy was the first bullet point. Madonna, who is now a mature woman, still dresses like a 20 something making club musin when no one her age has been to a club in 15 years, because Madonna's personae has always been tied to her sexuality.
Gaga being a generation later, has benefitted greatly from the pathways carved by artists like Madonna. Gaga realized smartly and early in her carrere that one cannot convincing play sexy at any age....but they can indeed play crazy at any age. That's why even later in life, when Gaga is in her 80's, she can still wear a meat dress, even if she doesn't look sexy in it.
But she'll do it with a great Poker Face!
How did Gaga get away with it? It isn't illegal to wear a meat dress, just offensive and wasteful and not even worth searching the net for the pictures of, although just now hearing this is enough to continue not to buy her music or products. Those that care about such things all know she did it and the overwhelming majority still don't own her albums, even those that claim wearing a meat dress is sensitive, artistic, and intelligent.
Greetings,
The last few posts, I...wow, I can't even... smh We travel in very different circles of thought.
Don't you see those criticisms are precisely the same as those who claim that 3D images 'can't be art'? You don't get to choose what things are considered artistic endeavors. You just..don't.
While we are hopefully all creators here, the middle part, about tastes only narrowing and excluding people, is also very on-point.
-- Morgan