Adding to Cart…
Licensing Agreement | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | EULA
© 2025 Daz Productions Inc. All Rights Reserved.You currently have no notifications.
Licensing Agreement | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | EULA
© 2025 Daz Productions Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Comments
I missed Woodstock because I was working for the Army Corps of Engineers and didn't think I should ask for time off to go.
I missed Woodstock because I was not born until about thirteen or fourteen years after the event and I have yet to find a time traveling doctor to befriend
I’m facing a time traveler moral dilemma in video game form. Playing Civilization III and Japan launches a surprise nuclear attack on my nation. Partway through the attack my computer crashes and I have to go back to the last save point and play again, essentially going back in time.
Now I know that in at least one alternate timeline I’ve experienced, Japan launches a surprise nuclear attack on me and so far in the restored timeline I’m playing Japan hasn’t launched the attack, but everything else is playing out the same as it did before.
Am I morally justified launching a preemptive nuclear strike on Japan based on what I experienced in an alternate timeline or would it be wrong for me to attack Japan in my current timeline based on what they did in an alternate one?
So far no British people in a blue box have showed up to offer their assistance.
nice story
I'd nuke em, Ghastly, but then I'm not a British person in a blue box, just a Commonwealth citizen that Britain doesn't want anymore. Oh wait, it's not Britain you want to nuke?!
You could nuke Britain and Japan. That way if Britain nuked you in a timeline alternative to the one where Japan nuked you, you're nuking two birds with one stone. I don't know though, that sort of thing can start wars if you're not careful.
Ironically I ended up playing England this time (I always set my empire to random).