Does Headshop work only if DAZ Studio install path is the default one ?

I have Daz Studio installed on drive E, and HeadShop works fine. So as long as you select the correct location during install, it should work.

I have checked and double checked my installation, all appears to be exactly as the video shows with the exception of my Daz install being on drive G: Headshop started in accordance with the video, a photo has been selected from drive F: but as it loads I get an error message, 'Daz model not found'

The following error log contains a lot of references to drive D: but I have nothing related to daz, headshop, or the source photo in drive D:

That's exactly the same problem I have... and the same error message ! My install is on drive C:, although not in the default path (ie. in program files folder) and all the files seems to be correct. The pic is loaded from drive E:   I didn't find the issue yet...

Does Headshop work only if DAZ Studio install path is the default one ?

The answer is yes: it looks for files in the default location, which is c:/Program Files/DAZ 3D

I have checked and double checked my installation, all appears to be exactly as the video shows with the exception of my Daz install being on drive G: Headshop started in accordance with the video, a photo has been selected from drive F: but as it loads I get an error message, 'Daz model not found'

The following error log contains a lot of references to drive D: but I have nothing related to daz, headshop, or the source photo in drive D:

That's exactly the same problem I have... and the same error message ! My install is on drive C:, although not in the default path (ie. in program files folder) and all the files seems to be correct. The pic is loaded from drive E:   I didn't find the issue yet...

Does Headshop work only if DAZ Studio install path is the default one ?

It is an installation issue. Please watch the installation movie.

Observe where the HeadShop folder should be (inside c:/Program Files/DAZ 3D folder), and where the three other items go (inside c:/Program Files/DAZ 3D/DAZStudio4).

Well, everything seems to be OK : all the files are at the right place... but it doesn't work ...   ;-(

I've found it will crash on some pictures and won't find a picture on other pictures so try different pictures at 1000x1000 pixels if you can.

Since the software depends on finding feature dots automatically, it does need decent resolution pictures.

It is an installation issue. Please watch the installation movie.

Observe where the HeadShop folder should be (inside c:/Program Files/DAZ 3D folder), and where the three other items go (inside c:/Program Files/DAZ 3D/DAZStudio4).

Well, everything seems to be OK : all the files are at the right place... but it doesn't work ...   ;-(

I've found it will crash on some pictures and won't find a picture on other pictures so try different pictures at 1000x1000 pixels if you can.

It is an installation issue. Please watch the installation movie.

Observe where the HeadShop folder should be (inside c:/Program Files/DAZ 3D folder), and where the three other items go (inside c:/Program Files/DAZ 3D/DAZStudio4).

Well, everything seems to be OK : all the files are at the right place... but it doesn't work ...   ;-(

I have checked and double checked my installation, all appears to be exactly as the video shows with the exception of my Daz install being on drive G: Headshop started in accordance with the video, a photo has been selected from drive F: but as it loads I get an error message, 'Daz model not found'

The following error log contains a lot of references to drive D: but I have nothing related to daz, headshop, or the source photo in drive D:

No, sono gratis eccome, quei pacchetti di robe non sono male!

Comunque, perchè dici che headshop è cattivo? Non sembra più essere come le vecchie versioni!

In se per se forse il programma non è male, ma partecipai al beta testing della prima versione del software, e mi bisticciai con chi gestivai beta tester, perchè non mi mandava gli agiornamenti.

OK, another comparison of Facegen Pro with OneClick. I still get the RH.OneClick error when I export the morph but if you have the right picture and it's focused picture then OneClick gives as almost good results as FaceGen Pro. You have to get good, unblurry pictures though and it's better to use one focused picture instead of a focused & a blurry picture(s).

Famous Person - Left to Right - FaceGen Pro & Genesis 3 Female | OneClick & Genesis 2 Female | OneClick & Genesis 3 Female

All use the same frontal picture and no profile pictures. I had to manually place to dots on FaceGen pro but OneClick autoselected the dots. I did not check the autoselected dots on OneClick or make other adjustments besides using DAZ Genesis 2 & Genesis 3 Female default textures.

All that said though, it's the FaceGen picture is the one I look at and go, 'That looks like her.' One thing I should add though, is how much of FaceGen's very good likeness of this famous person is copying her expression which seemed to be neutral but actually she does seem to habitually purse her lips. 

Does FaceGen give different results between Genesis 2 and 3? I didn't splurge on the FG Pro because the difference was quite steep. But if it works better on G3, I may think about making that plunge.

For everyone: It would be helpful to see the source pictures people are using, if that's ok. The reason why is because of how important the quality and pose of the source pic is for these products. Maybe we could even test each other's pics to see how each of us compare!

I really, really wish One Click/Headshop could blend the created face texture into the skin. It stands out a lot so much. These forehead seems are crazy.

One more thing...I read a response from one user that moving all of their Daz content to one location solved their install problem. But I cannot do that. I have Daz content spread over 2 hard drives because I cannot fit it all on one hard drive. My C drive is a 500GB SSD and it is crammed full. Does that mean One Click will not install for me?

I will generate FaceGen Pro morphs of the prior tests tomorrow using Genesis 2 & Genesis and then post but if memory serves right they looked pretty much identical to me.

From what I've read elsewhere you can use GenX2 to transfer morphs between V4/M4/Genesis/Genesis 2/Genesis 3 so whather you get FaceGen Pro to generate Genesis 3 morphs depends on if you think GenX2 transfers a FaceGen Pro Genesis or Genesis 2 morph exactly to Genesis 3. I think it would be the case that FaceGen Pro would do the better job but I don't own GenX2 to test that guess out.

I have GenX2, but I've had lots of trouble getting it to port my Genesis 2 characters. It works great for V4/M4/G1, though. I think its due to my file structure, but I haven't really looked into to much. Porting the skin from G2 is another thing, too, and I've only been successful with base G2. With that in mind, it might be a good thing if FG makes nearly identical results for G2/3 until I get that figured out.

If you happen to have a skin that is the same between G2/3, that might make the comparison between the One Click morphs a bit more fair. Taking a closer look at your pics, I think they might be a closer match to each other than they appear to be because of how the different skins.

OK, well I have a product to move V4 textures to Genesis 2 Female but none to move to Genesis 3 Female. I also own no products to move Genesis 2 textures to Genesis 3 textures because my collection of characters is not big enough. Maybe with future sales my collection will grow.

Anyway, I did redo the texture in my famous actress comparison to make them look alike as possible. The 1st & 3rd character are both Genesis 3, the 1st is FaceGen Pro & the 3rd OneClick so those should theorectically look nearly identical. The middle is Genesis 2 & OneClick with the same eyes but I had to use a Genesis 2 texture instead. They both use the same looking straight ahead expressionless professional picture that is over 1000x1000 pixels.

So compare and pick the one that you like best.

OK, another comparison of Facegen Pro with OneClick. I still get the RH.OneClick error when I export the morph but if you have the right picture and it's focused picture then OneClick gives as almost good results as FaceGen Pro. You have to get good, unblurry pictures though and it's better to use one focused picture instead of a focused & a blurry picture(s).

Famous Person - Left to Right - FaceGen Pro & Genesis 3 Female | OneClick & Genesis 2 Female | OneClick & Genesis 3 Female

All use the same frontal picture and no profile pictures. I had to manually place to dots on FaceGen pro but OneClick autoselected the dots. I did not check the autoselected dots on OneClick or make other adjustments besides using DAZ Genesis 2 & Genesis 3 Female default textures.

All that said though, it's the FaceGen picture is the one I look at and go, 'That looks like her.' One thing I should add though, is how much of FaceGen's very good likeness of this famous person is copying her expression which seemed to be neutral but actually she does seem to habitually purse her lips. 

Does FaceGen give different results between Genesis 2 and 3? I didn't splurge on the FG Pro because the difference was quite steep. But if it works better on G3, I may think about making that plunge.

For everyone: It would be helpful to see the source pictures people are using, if that's ok. The reason why is because of how important the quality and pose of the source pic is for these products. Maybe we could even test each other's pics to see how each of us compare!

I really, really wish One Click/Headshop could blend the created face texture into the skin. It stands out a lot so much. These forehead seems are crazy.

One more thing...I read a response from one user that moving all of their Daz content to one location solved their install problem. But I cannot do that. I have Daz content spread over 2 hard drives because I cannot fit it all on one hard drive. My C drive is a 500GB SSD and it is crammed full. Does that mean One Click will not install for me?

I will generate FaceGen Pro morphs of the prior tests tomorrow using Genesis 2 & Genesis and then post but if memory serves right they looked pretty much identical to me.

From what I've read elsewhere you can use GenX2 to transfer morphs between V4/M4/Genesis/Genesis 2/Genesis 3 so whather you get FaceGen Pro to generate Genesis 3 morphs depends on if you think GenX2 transfers a FaceGen Pro Genesis or Genesis 2 morph exactly to Genesis 3. I think it would be the case that FaceGen Pro would do the better job but I don't own GenX2 to test that guess out.

I have GenX2, but I've had lots of trouble getting it to port my Genesis 2 characters. It works great for V4/M4/G1, though. I think its due to my file structure, but I haven't really looked into to much. Porting the skin from G2 is another thing, too, and I've only been successful with base G2. With that in mind, it might be a good thing if FG makes nearly identical results for G2/3 until I get that figured out.

If you happen to have a skin that is the same between G2/3, that might make the comparison between the One Click morphs a bit more fair. Taking a closer look at your pics, I think they might be a closer match to each other than they appear to be because of how the different skins.

OK, for the male figures I tested with OneClick & FaceGen I did use the same Caleb for M4 / Genesis on the FaceGen Pro & OneClick results.

For the famous actress I didn't but I will try to get my products working that allow that as goodness knows I paid enough money for all that and I'll repost the actress comparison.

For your request to see the FaceGen Pro results with Genesis, Genesis 2, and Genesis 3 I did so for both a male figure and female figure. The male figure has the same skin texture in all three but not yet the female. I need to find the Genesis or V4 texture I think works best with her but even without the matching textures you can pretty easiliy see geometrically the face is the same. At least to my untrained non-artist eye.

To see those 2 tests (the last two images in my 'DAZ Driver's License Gallery') since it is not a review or bug report about OneClick I will not post it here, follow the link to my Gallery & the comparison is there.

OK, another comparison of Facegen Pro with OneClick. I still get the RH.OneClick error when I export the morph but if you have the right picture and it's focused picture then OneClick gives as almost good results as FaceGen Pro. You have to get good, unblurry pictures though and it's better to use one focused picture instead of a focused & a blurry picture(s).

Famous Person - Left to Right - FaceGen Pro & Genesis 3 Female | OneClick & Genesis 2 Female | OneClick & Genesis 3 Female

All use the same frontal picture and no profile pictures. I had to manually place to dots on FaceGen pro but OneClick autoselected the dots. I did not check the autoselected dots on OneClick or make other adjustments besides using DAZ Genesis 2 & Genesis 3 Female default textures.

All that said though, it's the FaceGen picture is the one I look at and go, 'That looks like her.' One thing I should add though, is how much of FaceGen's very good likeness of this famous person is copying her expression which seemed to be neutral but actually she does seem to habitually purse her lips. 

Does FaceGen give different results between Genesis 2 and 3? I didn't splurge on the FG Pro because the difference was quite steep. But if it works better on G3, I may think about making that plunge.

For everyone: It would be helpful to see the source pictures people are using, if that's ok. The reason why is because of how important the quality and pose of the source pic is for these products. Maybe we could even test each other's pics to see how each of us compare!

I really, really wish One Click/Headshop could blend the created face texture into the skin. It stands out a lot so much. These forehead seems are crazy.

One more thing...I read a response from one user that moving all of their Daz content to one location solved their install problem. But I cannot do that. I have Daz content spread over 2 hard drives because I cannot fit it all on one hard drive. My C drive is a 500GB SSD and it is crammed full. Does that mean One Click will not install for me?

I will generate FaceGen Pro morphs of the prior tests tomorrow using Genesis 2 & Genesis and then post but if memory serves right they looked pretty much identical to me.

From what I've read elsewhere you can use GenX2 to transfer morphs between V4/M4/Genesis/Genesis 2/Genesis 3 so whather you get FaceGen Pro to generate Genesis 3 morphs depends on if you think GenX2 transfers a FaceGen Pro Genesis or Genesis 2 morph exactly to Genesis 3. I think it would be the case that FaceGen Pro would do the better job but I don't own GenX2 to test that guess out.

I have GenX2, but I've had lots of trouble getting it to port my Genesis 2 characters. It works great for V4/M4/G1, though. I think its due to my file structure, but I haven't really looked into to much. Porting the skin from G2 is another thing, too, and I've only been successful with base G2. With that in mind, it might be a good thing if FG makes nearly identical results for G2/3 until I get that figured out.

If you happen to have a skin that is the same between G2/3, that might make the comparison between the One Click morphs a bit more fair. Taking a closer look at your pics, I think they might be a closer match to each other than they appear to be because of how the different skins.

OK, another comparison of Facegen Pro with OneClick. I still get the RH.OneClick error when I export the morph but if you have the right picture and it's focused picture then OneClick gives as almost good results as FaceGen Pro. You have to get good, unblurry pictures though and it's better to use one focused picture instead of a focused & a blurry picture(s).

Famous Person - Left to Right - FaceGen Pro & Genesis 3 Female | OneClick & Genesis 2 Female | OneClick & Genesis 3 Female

All use the same frontal picture and no profile pictures. I had to manually place to dots on FaceGen pro but OneClick autoselected the dots. I did not check the autoselected dots on OneClick or make other adjustments besides using DAZ Genesis 2 & Genesis 3 Female default textures.

All that said though, it's the FaceGen picture is the one I look at and go, 'That looks like her.' One thing I should add though, is how much of FaceGen's very good likeness of this famous person is copying her expression which seemed to be neutral but actually she does seem to habitually purse her lips. 

Does FaceGen give different results between Genesis 2 and 3? I didn't splurge on the FG Pro because the difference was quite steep. But if it works better on G3, I may think about making that plunge.

For everyone: It would be helpful to see the source pictures people are using, if that's ok. The reason why is because of how important the quality and pose of the source pic is for these products. Maybe we could even test each other's pics to see how each of us compare!

I really, really wish One Click/Headshop could blend the created face texture into the skin. It stands out a lot so much. These forehead seems are crazy.

One more thing...I read a response from one user that moving all of their Daz content to one location solved their install problem. But I cannot do that. I have Daz content spread over 2 hard drives because I cannot fit it all on one hard drive. My C drive is a 500GB SSD and it is crammed full. Does that mean One Click will not install for me?

I will generate FaceGen Pro morphs of the prior tests tomorrow using Genesis 2 & Genesis and then post but if memory serves right they looked pretty much identical to me.

From what I've read elsewhere you can use GenX2 to transfer morphs between V4/M4/Genesis/Genesis 2/Genesis 3 so whather you get FaceGen Pro to generate Genesis 3 morphs depends on if you think GenX2 transfers a FaceGen Pro Genesis or Genesis 2 morph exactly to Genesis 3. I think it would be the case that FaceGen Pro would do the better job but I don't own GenX2 to test that guess out.

OK, another comparison of Facegen Pro with OneClick. I still get the RH.OneClick error when I export the morph but if you have the right picture and it's focused picture then OneClick gives as almost good results as FaceGen Pro. You have to get good, unblurry pictures though and it's better to use one focused picture instead of a focused & a blurry picture(s).

Famous Person - Left to Right - FaceGen Pro & Genesis 3 Female | OneClick & Genesis 2 Female | OneClick & Genesis 3 Female

All use the same frontal picture and no profile pictures. I had to manually place to dots on FaceGen pro but OneClick autoselected the dots. I did not check the autoselected dots on OneClick or make other adjustments besides using DAZ Genesis 2 & Genesis 3 Female default textures.

All that said though, it's the FaceGen picture is the one I look at and go, 'That looks like her.' One thing I should add though, is how much of FaceGen's very good likeness of this famous person is copying her expression which seemed to be neutral but actually she does seem to habitually purse her lips. 

Does FaceGen give different results between Genesis 2 and 3? I didn't splurge on the FG Pro because the difference was quite steep. But if it works better on G3, I may think about making that plunge.

For everyone: It would be helpful to see the source pictures people are using, if that's ok. The reason why is because of how important the quality and pose of the source pic is for these products. Maybe we could even test each other's pics to see how each of us compare!

I really, really wish One Click/Headshop could blend the created face texture into the skin. It stands out a lot so much. These forehead seems are crazy.

One more thing...I read a response from one user that moving all of their Daz content to one location solved their install problem. But I cannot do that. I have Daz content spread over 2 hard drives because I cannot fit it all on one hard drive. My C drive is a 500GB SSD and it is crammed full. Does that mean One Click will not install for me?

I have purchased and am trying to install HeadShop OneClick.  The Install Program is asking for the License Key.  Where is that information located?  Any help will be greatly appreciated.  Thanks!

hello all i have got mine working now. i had an older version of faceshop and had to remove it to get headshop one click to work. once i removed faceshop 8 i then reinstall headshop one click and it work just fine now. thank you for your time and help Laslo.

I tried it all and it still wont work! Very frustraiting!

 

OK, well you need to contact the developer as I said all the things or other buyers noticed. You can get the developer's Skype name & email address from this thread:

http://www.daz3d.com/forums/discussion/122371/headshop-oneclick-submitted-to-daz-best-in-class-commercial/p4

Also, that developer contact information is probably in the OneClick Support documents.

Good luck.

It is an installation issue. Please watch the installation movie. Observe where the HeadShop folder should be (inside c:/Program Files/DAZ 3D folder), and where the three other items go (inside c:/Program Files/DAZ 3D/DAZStudio4).

Am I missing something here with my installation? 'Enter Licence Key' what licence key? All I have is a zip folder with a 32 and 64 bit installer, and a README2.PDF but no mention of a licence key. 

License is in your DAZ/My Account/Serials

It is an installation issue. Please watch the installation movie.

Observe where the HeadShop folder should be (inside c:/Program Files/DAZ 3D folder), and where the three other items go (inside c:/Program Files/DAZ 3D/DAZStudio4).

Hello

I tried Headshop OneClick (after never obtaining results with the previous version) but it always crashes with the error messages show below. I'm following the steps in the user guide :

1. Load G3F

2. Start Headshop

3. Select Face, Lips, Head

4. Select "Add front photo" => error message : Daz model not found (01.png)

5. Select "Apply" => error message : Microsoft .NET Framework error. (02.png)

6. Headshop error message (03.png) and nothing appear in the Headshop window.

Can you provide any help ?

Thanks

No, sono gratis eccome, quei pacchetti di robe non sono male!

Comunque, perchè dici che headshop è cattivo? Non sembra più essere come le vecchie versioni!