So my wife is 7 months pregnant with our 4th child. This far along means that sleep is quite difficult for her and by extension me. Because of the sleep deprivation and impending deadline of not being able to work on projects at my leisure, I foolheartedly claimed that I could do a demonstration of 3D animation for the local filmmaker group that I am a member of – Nebraska Independent Film Projects (NIFP).

In my sleepless haze, I thought to myself wouldn’t it be fun to live stream this crazy idea as if it were a cooking show and have the audience choose the character the actor would morph into as the “secret ingredient”?  Why not!!? After all, I have 90 minutes of meeting time to fill!

I have managed to convince a few other deranged individuals to go along with this crazy plan and now we are going to live stream this on our NIFP Facebook page on Aug 15th 2019 starting at 6:30pm Central Time.

Please join us through our Facebook page https://www.facebook.com/nifp.org/ to see if it ends in triumph or tears! I for one am hoping for both!

• Use FaceGen Artist Pro to create a 3D digital stunt double
• Capture motions using a Kinect 2 and Brekel Pro Body v2
• Convert .BVH file from Brekel Pro Body 2 to aniblock for Genesis 3 figure
• Capture a sentence or two of dialogue
• Apply lip sync to the animation using AniLip 2
• Apply the chosen secret ingredient morph the character
• Add an appropriate background to the scene
• Decide what if any “extra” details (proper Iray lights, blinking and eye movement, and emotional expressions) can be added in the final minutes
• Begin the render in Daz Studio to have a completed animation within 24 hours

.

They should, but they won't.  Uncertainly is central to the customer psychology of the marketing playbook they follow.  Keep us guessing, make us panic that we might miss the discount, so we don't stop and think long enough to decide to pass.

I use reverse phsychology; there is always another sale, and any item will get cheaper.

Or unavailable...

Either way, I save cash. None of it I actually need.

No, I think almost everyone who have been at this for a few years already have a lot more than they need (what they want is a different story).

.

They should, but they won't.  Uncertainly is central to the customer psychology of the marketing playbook they follow.  Keep us guessing, make us panic that we might miss the discount, so we don't stop and think long enough to decide to pass.

I use reverse phsychology; there is always another sale, and any item will get cheaper.

Or unavailable...

Either way, I save cash. None of it I actually need.

.

They should, but they won't.  Uncertainly is central to the customer psychology of the marketing playbook they follow.  Keep us guessing, make us panic that we might miss the discount, so we don't stop and think long enough to decide to pass.

I use reverse phsychology; there is always another sale, and any item will get cheaper.

Or unavailable...

They should, but they won't.  Uncertainly is central to the customer psychology of the marketing playbook they follow.  Keep us guessing, make us panic that we might miss the discount, so we don't stop and think long enough to decide to pass.

I use reverse phsychology; there is always another sale, and any item will get cheaper.

Decluttering today.  No, not decluttering.  Procrastinating about decluttering, that's what I'm really doing right now.  But I am going to make either some iced tea or iced coffee and get out there now.  In 5 10 20 25 minutes.  Okay, maybe a half hour.

Oh wait, I could turn this on its head.  I will go out now and declutter.  I'll still procrastinate, because it's what I do.  But I'll procrastinate LATER.  Which means I'm procrastinating right now about procrastinating later.

I like that.  But it only works if I go off to declutter right now, which is what I'm doing...

I spend a great deal of time planning to declutter. With luck I'll be able to move from the planning stage to the pre-implementation stage. And from there to benefit analysis stage...

Oh wow you're good.  I bow to your expertise!

I'm glaring at my latest render... scowling even.

Why couldn't you be exactly like I intended? You're such a disappointment...

Now wait a minute!  Just hold your horses!  Jiminy Crickets!  Keep your shirt on!

Okay, now that I got all my mom's favorite sayings out of the way...

That render is really good!  The only thing I'd do is flip the image upside down.  And that's only because gravity should pull hair, and um, "boingy" body parts downward, not upward.  Re-examine the upper girl and you'll see what I mean.

But yeah, really good.

Complaint:  Last week I related a story about being trapped in the wilds of central NY State with an unremovable gas cap, requiring a truck mechanic with big muscles and an array of sequentially bigger tools that eventually succeeded in completely destroying the gas cap but effectively removing it from my filling spout.  Yay?  After the fortuitous purchasing of a proper gas cap from a miraculously open auto supply store on a Sunday, I was on my way home and no longer fretting about having to have my car towed 100 miles because I couldn't remove the $###$%# gas cap!

It's been a week and I've been on a couple mini-adventures and my gas tank needed filling again today (can you see what's coming?)  I drove east to the Indian reservation to get my cheap (no tax) gasoline and at the pump a young guy came out (they don't let customers pump their own gas) and I relayed the story of the gas cap to him and warned him to be careful about making sure it was being inserted correctly and to not cross-thread it or miss the alignment key slots.  So, after paying my bill inside the little store I returned to my car and drove off to have a most excellent lunch at Burger King 10 miles up the road.  As I got out of the car at BK I said to myself, "Self, you better check that gas cap!"  Sure enough, I could not for the life of me get that cap to unscrew.  Now purple with rage I fumed all during my Whopper meal and planned my speech to the kid who had screwed me (pun intended) again.  All sorts of mean things to say went through my mind but I finally decided on just driving in and asking him politely to remove my gas cap.  And when he would fail I would have said "Remember me asking you to not force my gas cap?  Did you think I was just some old fogey talking at you just to hear himself speak?"  But, perhaps fortunately, the same kid was not there and an older guy was attending the pumps now but I politely relayed the story, using twenty-seven 8x10 color, glossy, photographs with circles and arrows on them and singing in three part harmony to him about the gas cap saga.  This encouraged him so that with some effort he was able to finally get the cap off again and this time I watched him put it back on without having to force it.  If it comes off easily the next time then I can be assured that it is the way that people jam it on that buggers it up, not the cap itself.  Life is too short to be worrying about gas caps.

You seem technically/mechanically inclined, so I hesitate to mention this because some folks get annoyed when you suggest something they already know, but I also know you are kind and patient too... (okay, maybe... sort of... I think) but anyway... on some autolocomobiles, particularly ones made in the late 90s to early 00s, the gas caps have a stupid habit of failing. The gizmo inside that prevents you from over tightening the cap just falls apart... you probably noticed that the cap clicks and stops tightening after only a short twist, but will grab and start turning open in the other direction... Fords seem prone to having the (ratchet?) mechanism disintegrate making it spin in both directions resulting in a cap that is impossible to remove without 50 tools... Dodge/Chrysler seemed to have a flaw where the mechanism would freeze up resulting in a cap that could easily get stuck (not click, lock up)... and of course once you applied too much force, that would break resulting in an infernally spinning cap...

I think you said you have an early 00s Buick, and I’ve never helped anyone with a problem GM cap (other makes I’ve fixed though), but you might have some variation of that problem on your car... technically the cap on any late 80s to present vehicles should never be able to be over tightened because they all should have that feature where once it is sufficiently tight, the cap clicks and rotates without tightening. If it can be over tightened, it’s essentially broken and should be replaced...

You are right about this.  There's NO WAY to overtighten a gas cap.  Something else is messed up.  It's one of these:

• The car's vapor recirculation function isn't working correctly and now it's just sucking so hard the cap is just being held in place by vacuum.  I vote for this one.  If I'm right, expect it to cost a pretty penny.  Twice.  Once to fix it, and the second time to fix what the tech broke.
• The cap is wrong for the car.  (It should click when you tighten it enough)
• The car is wrong for the cap.  (Take this to mean whatever you want)

 I'd probably just sell the car and keep the gas cap.  You're probably better off. 

It was gas caps or me writing about that kangaroo again... so... I chose gas caps because I’m pretty sure everyone is sick of that story by now.

Please, not the kangaroo again!  Can't you have any nice friends who don't hop around carrying rolled up quarters in a sock? 

The kangaroo was not my friend, he is the one that robbed a liquor store... you are thinking of the surly drunken Penguin with the quarters.

In his defense he was going to the arcade when that incident occurred, so it’s just the grand theft auto thing that is really an issue with him... and in all honesty, can you blame him for taking a car that someone left running? In Penguinia, it’s a socialistic society where penguins share vehicles freely and leaving an unoccupied vehicle running is an open invitation to share. 

Decluttering today.  No, not decluttering.  Procrastinating about decluttering, that's what I'm really doing right now.  But I am going to make either some iced tea or iced coffee and get out there now.  In 5 10 20 25 minutes.  Okay, maybe a half hour.

Oh wait, I could turn this on its head.  I will go out now and declutter.  I'll still procrastinate, because it's what I do.  But I'll procrastinate LATER.  Which means I'm procrastinating right now about procrastinating later.

I like that.  But it only works if I go off to declutter right now, which is what I'm doing...

I spend a great deal of time planning to declutter. With luck I'll be able to move from the planning stage to the pre-implementation stage. And from there to benefit analysis stage...

Oh wow you're good.  I bow to your expertise!

I'm glaring at my latest render... scowling even.

Why couldn't you be exactly like I intended? You're such a disappointment...

Now wait a minute!  Just hold your horses!  Jiminy Crickets!  Keep your shirt on!

Okay, now that I got all my mom's favorite sayings out of the way...

That render is really good!  The only thing I'd do is flip the image upside down.  And that's only because gravity should pull hair, and um, "boingy" body parts downward, not upward.  Re-examine the upper girl and you'll see what I mean.

But yeah, really good.

Complaint:  Last week I related a story about being trapped in the wilds of central NY State with an unremovable gas cap, requiring a truck mechanic with big muscles and an array of sequentially bigger tools that eventually succeeded in completely destroying the gas cap but effectively removing it from my filling spout.  Yay?  After the fortuitous purchasing of a proper gas cap from a miraculously open auto supply store on a Sunday, I was on my way home and no longer fretting about having to have my car towed 100 miles because I couldn't remove the $###$%# gas cap!

It's been a week and I've been on a couple mini-adventures and my gas tank needed filling again today (can you see what's coming?)  I drove east to the Indian reservation to get my cheap (no tax) gasoline and at the pump a young guy came out (they don't let customers pump their own gas) and I relayed the story of the gas cap to him and warned him to be careful about making sure it was being inserted correctly and to not cross-thread it or miss the alignment key slots.  So, after paying my bill inside the little store I returned to my car and drove off to have a most excellent lunch at Burger King 10 miles up the road.  As I got out of the car at BK I said to myself, "Self, you better check that gas cap!"  Sure enough, I could not for the life of me get that cap to unscrew.  Now purple with rage I fumed all during my Whopper meal and planned my speech to the kid who had screwed me (pun intended) again.  All sorts of mean things to say went through my mind but I finally decided on just driving in and asking him politely to remove my gas cap.  And when he would fail I would have said "Remember me asking you to not force my gas cap?  Did you think I was just some old fogey talking at you just to hear himself speak?"  But, perhaps fortunately, the same kid was not there and an older guy was attending the pumps now but I politely relayed the story, using twenty-seven 8x10 color, glossy, photographs with circles and arrows on them and singing in three part harmony to him about the gas cap saga.  This encouraged him so that with some effort he was able to finally get the cap off again and this time I watched him put it back on without having to force it.  If it comes off easily the next time then I can be assured that it is the way that people jam it on that buggers it up, not the cap itself.  Life is too short to be worrying about gas caps.

You seem technically/mechanically inclined, so I hesitate to mention this because some folks get annoyed when you suggest something they already know, but I also know you are kind and patient too... (okay, maybe... sort of... I think) but anyway... on some autolocomobiles, particularly ones made in the late 90s to early 00s, the gas caps have a stupid habit of failing. The gizmo inside that prevents you from over tightening the cap just falls apart... you probably noticed that the cap clicks and stops tightening after only a short twist, but will grab and start turning open in the other direction... Fords seem prone to having the (ratchet?) mechanism disintegrate making it spin in both directions resulting in a cap that is impossible to remove without 50 tools... Dodge/Chrysler seemed to have a flaw where the mechanism would freeze up resulting in a cap that could easily get stuck (not click, lock up)... and of course once you applied too much force, that would break resulting in an infernally spinning cap...

I think you said you have an early 00s Buick, and I’ve never helped anyone with a problem GM cap (other makes I’ve fixed though), but you might have some variation of that problem on your car... technically the cap on any late 80s to present vehicles should never be able to be over tightened because they all should have that feature where once it is sufficiently tight, the cap clicks and rotates without tightening. If it can be over tightened, it’s essentially broken and should be replaced...

You are right about this.  There's NO WAY to overtighten a gas cap.  Something else is messed up.  It's one of these:

• The car's vapor recirculation function isn't working correctly and now it's just sucking so hard the cap is just being held in place by vacuum.  I vote for this one.  If I'm right, expect it to cost a pretty penny.  Twice.  Once to fix it, and the second time to fix what the tech broke.
• The cap is wrong for the car.  (It should click when you tighten it enough)
• The car is wrong for the cap.  (Take this to mean whatever you want)

 I'd probably just sell the car and keep the gas cap.  You're probably better off. 

It was gas caps or me writing about that kangaroo again... so... I chose gas caps because I’m pretty sure everyone is sick of that story by now.

Please, not the kangaroo again!  Can't you have any nice friends who don't hop around carrying rolled up quarters in a sock? 

Hello All,

I am in a situation in which I am doing two separate rendering locations on an island.  I have a set up scene on one end and initially I moved the entire island over the central spot where items spawn when selected.  The thing is now I cannot move the entire island for I didn't parent any of the new items I added to the island.  So naturally if I move it, some items well get left behind.  I am wondering if there is a way to move the grid over to a new location that I want to work on the island and thus create a new spawn point for items I want to put in that area. I do want to keep the first location intact in the event if it shows up in the background.

Thank you.

It might be easiest to put everything except the island into a group with Parent in place enabled, then parent the group to the island. You can select everything you want to put into the group, then create a new group. Depending on factors I haven't figured out, doing it this way may change the parent of items already parented to objects you are adding to the group. Another way is to create the group first, and then parent the other items to the group.

Theoretically, with everything now parented to the island via the Group, just move the island where you need it to be and everything in the group will follow. I admit to having issues with older items that didn't want to play nice with groups, though, so it's possible there will be one or two that need to be replaced.

Or you could save the scene and close it, and work on the next section in a new scene. Once you're happy with the second section, you can merge the two scenes. Or you can render the scene that will be in the background, and use it on a plane, or as a backdrop in the Environment tab.

You have many options to reach your end result.

Hello All,

I am in a situation in which I am doing two separate rendering locations on an island.  I have a set up scene on one end and initially I moved the entire island over the central spot where items spawn when selected.  The thing is now I cannot move the entire island for I didn't parent any of the new items I added to the island.  So naturally if I move it, some items well get left behind.  I am wondering if there is a way to move the grid over to a new location that I want to work on the island and thus create a new spawn point for items I want to put in that area. I do want to keep the first location intact in the event if it shows up in the background.

Thank you.

They should, but they won't.  Uncertainly is central to the customer psychology of the marketing playbook they follow.  Keep us guessing, make us panic that we might miss the discount, so we don't stop and think long enough to decide to pass.

Uncertainty makes me just buy less, not more, as I need time to think about if I can manage to get the funds for something I want to buy - and most often if I really want to buy anything at all. For me it's "if the sale ends before I can decide what I want and if I can pay for it, then DAZ showed me they don't want my money... and I didn't needed anything anyway at all..."

With a proper timer DAZ would probably make more money from me.

Yep. Thats how I deal with this nonsense.

They should, but they won't.  Uncertainly is central to the customer psychology of the marketing playbook they follow.  Keep us guessing, make us panic that we might miss the discount, so we don't stop and think long enough to decide to pass.

Uncertainty makes me just buy less, not more, as I need time to think about if I can manage to get the funds for something I want to buy - and most often if I really want to buy anything at all. For me it's "if the sale ends before I can decide what I want and if I can pay for it, then DAZ showed me they don't want my money... and I didn't needed anything anyway at all..."

With a proper timer DAZ would probably make more money from me.

Complaint:  Last week I related a story about being trapped in the wilds of central NY State with an unremovable gas cap, requiring a truck mechanic with big muscles and an array of sequentially bigger tools that eventually succeeded in completely destroying the gas cap but effectively removing it from my filling spout.  Yay?  After the fortuitous purchasing of a proper gas cap from a miraculously open auto supply store on a Sunday, I was on my way home and no longer fretting about having to have my car towed 100 miles because I couldn't remove the $###$%# gas cap!

It's been a week and I've been on a couple mini-adventures and my gas tank needed filling again today (can you see what's coming?)  I drove east to the Indian reservation to get my cheap (no tax) gasoline and at the pump a young guy came out (they don't let customers pump their own gas) and I relayed the story of the gas cap to him and warned him to be careful about making sure it was being inserted correctly and to not cross-thread it or miss the alignment key slots.  So, after paying my bill inside the little store I returned to my car and drove off to have a most excellent lunch at Burger King 10 miles up the road.  As I got out of the car at BK I said to myself, "Self, you better check that gas cap!"  Sure enough, I could not for the life of me get that cap to unscrew.  Now purple with rage I fumed all during my Whopper meal and planned my speech to the kid who had screwed me (pun intended) again.  All sorts of mean things to say went through my mind but I finally decided on just driving in and asking him politely to remove my gas cap.  And when he would fail I would have said "Remember me asking you to not force my gas cap?  Did you think I was just some old fogey talking at you just to hear himself speak?"  But, perhaps fortunately, the same kid was not there and an older guy was attending the pumps now but I politely relayed the story, using twenty-seven 8x10 color, glossy, photographs with circles and arrows on them and singing in three part harmony to him about the gas cap saga.  This encouraged him so that with some effort he was able to finally get the cap off again and this time I watched him put it back on without having to force it.  If it comes off easily the next time then I can be assured that it is the way that people jam it on that buggers it up, not the cap itself.  Life is too short to be worrying about gas caps.

You seem technically/mechanically inclined, so I hesitate to mention this because some folks get annoyed when you suggest something they already know, but I also know you are kind and patient too... (okay, maybe... sort of... I think) but anyway... on some autolocomobiles, particularly ones made in the late 90s to early 00s, the gas caps have a stupid habit of failing. The gizmo inside that prevents you from over tightening the cap just falls apart... you probably noticed that the cap clicks and stops tightening after only a short twist, but will grab and start turning open in the other direction... Fords seem prone to having the (ratchet?) mechanism disintegrate making it spin in both directions resulting in a cap that is impossible to remove without 50 tools... Dodge/Chrysler seemed to have a flaw where the mechanism would freeze up resulting in a cap that could easily get stuck (not click, lock up)... and of course once you applied too much force, that would break resulting in an infernally spinning cap...

I think you said you have an early 00s Buick, and I’ve never helped anyone with a problem GM cap (other makes I’ve fixed though), but you might have some variation of that problem on your car... technically the cap on any late 80s to present vehicles should never be able to be over tightened because they all should have that feature where once it is sufficiently tight, the cap clicks and rotates without tightening. If it can be over tightened, it’s essentially broken and should be replaced...

I don’t remember what exact model you have, but a good online price for a 2004 Buick LeSabre ranges from $25 - $55... Amazon has one for $11, but the hell I’d trust that to work with the tank’s sensors... I’m not 100% sure, but gas caps might be universal... a few years back my friend’s old Ford F-150’s cap broke and I gave him a crappy old Toyota cap that worked for two weeks with no problems until a replacement arrived (well the filler door didn’t close perfectly). Don’t get a “universal” cap... I’m sure as an engineer you are familiar with “universal” fit... it universally fits nothing.  The real problem with cheap caps or wrong caps is bad caps can trigger tank sensors on some cars that result in a “Check Engine” light going on that usually requires a trip to the mechanic to be reset (although some vehicles “fix” the problem on their own if the cap is replaced with a proper or new unit).

Pep Boys, Advance Auto Parts or Auto Zone should either carry the replacement cap or order it for you (or you can order it online)... the only difficulty in replacing a cap is the plastic rivet that holds the cap leash... Some of the auto parts places over here will do something like that for free or a minimum charge because it’s so easy... but it’s generally easy to break off the old rivet and pop in the new one.

I figure you know all this stuff, but just in case you are unaware, forgot or didn’t care to think about it until now, I figured I’d mention it... also I was bored and sitting in front of the air conditioner (which is a highly underrated machine in modern society), so I figured why not write a 10,000 word essay on gas caps... 

It was gas caps or me writing about that kangaroo again... so... I chose gas caps because I’m pretty sure everyone is sick of that story by now.

Complaint:  Last week I related a story about being trapped in the wilds of central NY State with an unremovable gas cap, requiring a truck mechanic with big muscles and an array of sequentially bigger tools that eventually succeeded in completely destroying the gas cap but effectively removing it from my filling spout.  Yay?  After the fortuitous purchasing of a proper gas cap from a miraculously open auto supply store on a Sunday, I was on my way home and no longer fretting about having to have my car towed 100 miles because I couldn't remove the $###$%# gas cap!

It's been a week and I've been on a couple mini-adventures and my gas tank needed filling again today (can you see what's coming?)  I drove east to the Indian reservation to get my cheap (no tax) gasoline and at the pump a young guy came out (they don't let customers pump their own gas) and I relayed the story of the gas cap to him and warned him to be careful about making sure it was being inserted correctly and to not cross-thread it or miss the alignment key slots.  So, I watched him easily remove the gas cap that I had last installed a week ago then after paying my bill inside the little store I returned to my car and drove off to have a most excellent lunch at Burger King 10 miles up the road.  As I got out of the car at BK I said to myself, "Self, you better check that gas cap!"  Sure enough, I could not for the life of me get that cap to unscrew.  Now purple with rage I fumed all during my Whopper meal and planned my speech to the kid who had screwed me (pun intended) again.  All sorts of mean things to say went through my mind but I finally decided on just driving in and asking him politely to remove my gas cap.  And when he would fail I would have said "Remember me asking you to not force my gas cap?  Did you think I was just some old fogey talking at you just to hear himself speak?"  But, perhaps fortunately, the same kid was not there and an older guy was attending the pumps now but I politely relayed the story, using twenty-seven 8x10 color, glossy, photographs with circles and arrows on them and singing in three part harmony to him about the gas cap saga.  This encouraged him so that with some effort he was able to finally get the cap off again and this time I watched him put it back on without having to force it.  If it comes off easily the next time then I can be assured that it is the way that people jam it on that buggers it up, not the cap itself.  Life is too short to be worrying about gas caps.

They should, but they won't.  Uncertainly is central to the customer psychology of the marketing playbook they follow.  Keep us guessing, make us panic that we might miss the discount, so we don't stop and think long enough to decide to pass.

I disagree.  If there is a sale going on at "that other content site" (where they helpfully post a countdown timer for sale items), I can budget "real life" expenses around the sale date. (Like, "I can skip Starbuck's tomorrow and get that lights set instead.") And it's not like we don't know that "flash" sales go fast (make up your mind fast or you miss it) and that pretty much all other sales tick past at midnight DAZ time according to the order of the sale banners on the store website.  I can say with absolute certainty that DAZ has lost money from me as a result of their unposted end-of-sale times. If an item falls off the sale while in my cart, I'm going to remember how much I could have saved, if only I'd known I should postpone answering my phone or having a 3-minute conversation until AFTER I clicked through the payment method screen and I won't be buying it again until it hits that price point.

They should, but they won't.  Uncertainly is central to the customer psychology of the marketing playbook they follow.  Keep us guessing, make us panic that we might miss the discount, so we don't stop and think long enough to decide to pass.

Hey all, 

I've been working with Daz for sometime now with no issues. My desktop is a newer rig (specs below). After purchasing, downloading, and installing quite a bit of content today, I noticed that loading Ryker for Genesis 8 was taking an unusual amount of time; probably 30 or 40 seconds. Applying materials was taking equally as long. At times, the app would be become unresponsive and crash. Additionally, when I decided to work on a different character I've developed, I noticed when I attempted to load content, I'm getting messages that the content needed is not installed (human mat for Katarya elf). 

I decided to uninstall and reinstall studio; no changes. I checked my windows updates, drivers, and they are all up-to-date. I checked my internet connection, which is stable. 

Any thoughts or ideas on what the seemingly sudden glitch might be? 

Any help is greatly appreciated. 

(Specs below.) 

Best, 

Jason 

OS Name Microsoft Windows 10 Home

Version 10.0.17763 Build 17763

Other OS Description Not Available

OS Manufacturer Microsoft Corporation

System Name DESKTOP-FSS75I7

System Manufacturer To Be Filled By O.E.M.

System Model To Be Filled By O.E.M.

System Type x64-based PC

System SKU To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Processor Intel(R) Core(TM) i9-9900K CPU @ 3.60GHz, 3600 Mhz, 8 Core(s), 16 Logical Processor(s)

BIOS Version/Date American Megatrends Inc. P1.40, 10/12/2018

SMBIOS Version 3.1

Embedded Controller Version 255.255

BIOS Mode UEFI

BaseBoard Manufacturer ASRock

BaseBoard Product Z390 Pro4

BaseBoard Version

Platform Role Desktop

Secure Boot State Off

PCR7 Configuration Binding Not Possible

Windows Directory C:\windows

System Directory C:\windows\system32

Boot Device \Device\HarddiskVolume2

Locale United States

Hardware Abstraction Layer Version = "10.0.17763.529"

User Name DESKTOP-FSS75I7\Jason

Time Zone Central Daylight Time

Installed Physical Memory (RAM) 8.00 GB

Total Physical Memory 7.92 GB

Available Physical Memory 5.33 GB

Total Virtual Memory 14.4 GB

Available Virtual Memory 9.13 GB

Page File Space 6.50 GB

Page File C:\pagefile.sys

Kernel DMA Protection Off

Virtualization-based security Not enabled

Device Encryption Support Reasons for failed automatic device encryption: TPM is not usable, PCR7 binding is not supported, Hardware Security Test Interface failed and device is not InstantGo, Un-allowed DMA capable bus/device(s) detected, TPM is not usable

Hyper-V - VM Monitor Mode Extensions Yes

Hyper-V - Second Level Address Translation Extensions Yes

Hyper-V - Virtualization Enabled in Firmware Yes

Hyper-V - Data Execution Protection Ye

don't forget Carrara.  

currently my book covers were done with poser,
updating with carrara renders.

creating bookcovers with DS was confusing to me, there is no where to set dpi for printing.
the printer requires 300 dpi graphics. cover is 5.25 x8, the binding side is odd pixels, bleed area.  woes.

I realize bumping this after 2.5 years is a bit...inane...but I realized as I was perusing this thread that no one had ever mentioned a response to you.  I've rendered in DAZ for print by simply making my resolution match whatever the 300 dpi equivalent would be, then resizing the image in Photoshop to actually BE print resolution.
As an example, your cover is 5.25x8...at 300 dpi, that'd be 1575 pixels x 2400 pixels.  If you render at those dimensions in DAZ, you'd get a render that is that size in pixels, but at 96 dpi.  That could then be resized in Photoshop (or an equivalent), by changing the Image Size in PS to 300 dpi, then telling the software to keep the width and height at 1575x2400.  Play around with the different sampling options in the resize window to get the best results for your desired output.

If you need to add bleed, it'd be an additional 1/8", or 75 pixels added to both height and width of your document.  That would give you 1/8" of extra render at each edge, just make sure that you keep your image focal point somewhat central, so you don't cut off anything important.  ;-)

This could also be done in GIMP, though I don't know that software well enough to explain the process, or which menu options you'd use.

Hope this (very) delayed response was helpful...or at least, not condescending and irrelevant. 

Have a great day!

 

It is useful, but I don't actually use environment maps outside of test scenes. DAZ own' Environment Shader Builder macro relied on Nn/Nf vector manipulation for the lookup. When I was looking at Pixar's docs, they actually allow passing a matrix as 'envspace', but it seems 3delight devs didn't allow that with 3delight's trace ().

For the shadow catcher, you can get away with using environment (), but for a surface shader I don't think it will do. Environment () don't have parameters like brdf () and trace (), plus it doesn't do MIS, just plain importance sampling. To do proper MIS with it, you'll need to write your own importance sampling code, like PDFs and G masking/shadowing term, do the proper weighting necessary. I think Matt Ebb tried that once, though I think he was using gather (). He found 3delight's inbuilt trace () is just faster and easier to work with.

You miss the point. IS or MIS is not really important. I'm just saying that message passing as well as co-shader access and other RSL 2.0 avanced functionnallity are usefull. I'm the very lazy type that hates to do things twice when there is a way do prevent that.

You don't need to pass map right now because you use a solid sphere I got it. And that gives me the perfect example (or that's what I hope because I will not dig some archive) : If I remember correctely, Maya Sun and Sky use a combination of shaders that work together and I think they query informations that should be outside of the shader (the usual day/time/HH:MM:SS tranformed or not to suit the shaders). I don't have other Maya examples in head (and that's old story for me) but there are certainly other examples in the 3DL shader samples if you dig

Note : I dont think Matt Ebb used trace because it was faster. He just used the standard maya light that has trace but also PBGI, Occlusion, and photon mapping for the first version. The second version used advanced RSL 2.0 with coshader access to retrieve light infos and I don't remember there was any trace() used. I think there was rather a dumb shader to collect datas

Honestly, if DS have the same coordinate system as 3delight, then we won't have this problem.

What would be the ideal solution is for DS to have a functional viewport OpenGL environment sphere or sun/sky environment that it can pass to whatever renderer plugin is selected. But looking at 4.11, that doesn't exist (even with iray). That's a setup that's been available in Maya/Max/Houdini/C4D/Blender/Modo or even game engines like Unity and UE for ages.

Yes and no. Iray is a GPU renderer and the philosophy is to run a preview render so that you can have a better idea of the final output

3DL has the IPR. Having an OpenGL preview was good in the old times where CPU/GPU power was not like todays. That's just an old legacy

Even Pixar made a GPU real time preview tools for lightning purpose before rendering final frames

And really, there is an easy solution for the coordinate system. Since you speak of RIB export, you can simply export the RIB and call the 3DL renderer. It won't be done by DS but will be correct

You have to eventually pass the IBL sphere rotations to the light shader (after hiding the sphere at rendertime)

There is also the user friendliness factor where you could have a central panel with overview of many Quality/Tonemapping/Environment/User choices (ex AOV output) which centralize a bunch of common variables a bit like the Iray render panel. Instead of having to setup everything manually, for each shader, each shader instance will get the info from the central collecting point

Ex : you have three different specular models available in your shaders. Instead of going through each shader to set the specular model, you set it once in the central panel and every shader in the scene are updated

I actually agree. It would be best to have those all in one place, which is why I went and place some on a 'dumb' ambient light shader.

Since I wanted to allow viewport response when you shift the horizontal offset of the HDRI, message passing that offset was not doable. Well, technically you can setup a DS custom script on the light shader to fetch the offset parameter off the sphere, but I think that's prone to problems.

I don't really see the problem but well I don't have my head into it

You also need to keep in mind there are certain limitations in place (when doing it via pure RSL/RiSpec). For example, shutter time is controlled via Motion Blur settings in the renderer's option tab. Since it's a RiOption, light/surface shaders can only read this value, but can't change/write it. The only feasible solution is to 'split' the setting - one inside the light shader which can only affect scene exposure but have no effect on motion blur and vice versa, the one in the renderer's option which only affect motion blur but not scene exposure.

I don't understand where this subject comes from but OK. I don't understand where the problem is here either. Shaders mustn't write any renderer parameter. You do it via the renderer panel setting. The shaders only read datas at rendertime and these values won't change during render so I don't see why there would be a need for writing render settings from the shaders while rendering. I guess you want to implement a scene exposure somewhat and I still don't see the problem. Either you correct output values in linear space or you implement an imager shader (and I don't know if that workflow is correct) but that should work because you already read required datas at rendertime before the beginning of the rendering

AOV output is nice, but I think those should always be in the renderer's options. However, within the RSL framework, AOV output is at least two parts working together. Shaders need to be explicitly written to output AOV and identifier attributes. The second part is the RIB export and that means doing things via the render script. Currently, it doesn't have the code to export AOV (yet). Mustakettu's the one working on that, so you should ask her.

Not really, it's not a request. AOV is just one classical example that came to my mind and is not really difficult to implement. The only thing I will say is that if you plan to do AOV outputs, and think of making shadermixer blocks, think the strategy carefully

(BTW this discussion made me think of an old shader I wrote and could be usefull for Iray. So I'll certainly dig a bit of some old RSL)

As for BRDF choices, well, I think all other renderers put those in materials/shaders. There are overrides, but I think those mainly uses AOV and does not actually change the BRDF used by specular/reflection lobes.

This was just an example. It was because there are tons of shading models and I implemented them in the same one shader and I could easily switch between the models

Ultimately, what I'm saying is there's limitation in RSL/RiSpec and DS that makes certain things impossible or just downright hard.

Wildly thinking here, but the best thing would be a USD export for DS. It will literally open up a lot of possibilities. Renderer options for one. There's also easier lookdev/scene management, not to mention you can just have more memory to the USD standalone/renderer.

Expanding the render setting panel to add whatever options is doable. You may have more hard time with the shadermixer brick at the beginning

I was wildly thinking too. MDL is an other option but 3DL with RSL version (new version seems to only have OSL) is not supported and I don't know what would be needed for it

Made some minor updates to the cover. Added more blood to the hands and removed it off his pants.

I really love how your work developed. It definitely has a much darker and emotional grab. It's great to see how the connection to the character and the story improved with the incremental tweaks. The title is although im curious, if the genre is to be portrayed along the lines of horror or thriller type. 

How did you get the stalactites at toward the backside ceiling to sketch out like that, impressive work. 

Ah, the title logo! That has no relationship to the content of my comic book story. Nite Flyte is the title of my contribution to a small APA, which is an Amateur Press Association. Four times a year we each create a small fanzine/newsletter, print out the appropriate copies (right now it's just 14) and then send them into a Central Mailer. The CM collects everyone's contributions and then combines them between two covers, adds a TOC and some other bookkeeping stuff, and then mails them back to us. This way, four times a year, we get to read about 50-70 pages of work by people who, like us, enjoy comics, fantasy, sci-fi and stuff like that. The name of this APA is Snicker Snack, and if you're ever interested in seeing a sample copy, let me know. 

In this case, Nite Flyte is simply my contribution for the group. And in this case, with it being stark red against the strong black-and-white image, I can definitely see that the whole thing takes on a horror feel. But that's not my focus inside my 10-12 page contribution. The APA has been around for ages: next issue is #43. As you can see from my cover, this is just my third contribution.

I'm glad you like the effect on the stalactites. To create them, I took a texture from Clip Studio Paint that has a lot of sketchy lines in it (I think it's called MT Volcano). I placed it on a layer and then, using the lasso tool, just drew out the shapes I wanted and then created a layer mask so that only the areas I wanted to see were visible. I then moved the pattern around inside the layer mask until I found something I liked. I also did some touch-up work on the layer mask to keep the edges from being too crisp. Specifically, I go to the layer mask and edit it to extend a stroke here and there beyond the super-straight line created by the selection tool. I even add little twists and curls here and there to line ends to give a more hand-drawn look.

It's not a difficult process, but it does take a little time and attention to detail.

Thanks again for the feedback!

It's in the DS SDK. It's called curvebrick. You'll need Visual Studio 2010 compiler

I remember having also tried to directely create a brick inside DS and I think I got somewhat limited successfull results but don't really remember the details of what works and what doesn't. For the moment, let's just say that for complex shader bricks the DS SDK is the way.

It's a start in the right direction.

Message passing is usefull if you target performance at some point. Without environment lookup you don't have MIS for example.I know I made some complicated thing few years ago and in order to get some performance gain I remember I did not just pass environment maps. You may need to pass values and vectors

It is useful, but I don't actually use environment maps outside of test scenes. DAZ own' Environment Shader Builder macro relied on Nn/Nf vector manipulation for the lookup. When I was looking at Pixar's docs, they actually allow passing a matrix as 'envspace', but it seems 3delight devs didn't allow that with 3delight's trace ().

For the shadow catcher, you can get away with using environment (), but for a surface shader I don't think it will do. Environment () don't have parameters like brdf () and trace (), plus it doesn't do MIS, just plain importance sampling. To do proper MIS with it, you'll need to write your own importance sampling code, like PDFs and G masking/shadowing term, do the proper weighting necessary. I think Matt Ebb tried that once, though I think he was using gather (). He found 3delight's inbuilt trace () is just faster and easier to work with.

Honestly, if DS have the same coordinate system as 3delight, then we won't have this problem.

What would be the ideal solution is for DS to have a functional viewport OpenGL environment sphere or sun/sky environment that it can pass to whatever renderer plugin is selected. But looking at 4.11, that doesn't exist (even with iray). That's a setup that's been available in Maya/Max/Houdini/C4D/Blender/Modo or even game engines like Unity and UE for ages.

There is also the user friendliness factor where you could have a central panel with overview of many Quality/Tonemapping/Environment/User choices (ex AOV output) which centralize a bunch of common variables a bit like the Iray render panel. Instead of having to setup everything manually, for each shader, each shader instance will get the info from the central collecting point

Ex : you have three different specular models available in your shaders. Instead of going through each shader to set the specular model, you set it once in the central panel and every shader in the scene are updated

I actually agree. It would be best to have those all in one place, which is why I went and place some on a 'dumb' ambient light shader.

Since I wanted to allow viewport response when you shift the horizontal offset of the HDRI, message passing that offset was not doable. Well, technically you can setup a DS custom script on the light shader to fetch the offset parameter off the sphere, but I think that's prone to problems.

You also need to keep in mind there are certain limitations in place (when doing it via pure RSL/RiSpec). For example, shutter time is controlled via Motion Blur settings in the renderer's option tab. Since it's a RiOption, light/surface shaders can only read this value, but can't change/write it. The only feasible solution is to 'split' the setting - one inside the light shader which can only affect scene exposure but have no effect on motion blur and vice versa, the one in the renderer's option which only affect motion blur but not scene exposure.

AOV output is nice, but I think those should always be in the renderer's options. However, within the RSL framework, AOV output is at least two parts working together. Shaders need to be explicitly written to output AOV and identifier attributes. The second part is the RIB export and that means doing things via the render script. Currently, it doesn't have the code to export AOV (yet). Mustakettu's the one working on that, so you should ask her.

As for BRDF choices, well, I think all other renderers put those in materials/shaders. There are overrides, but I think those mainly uses AOV and does not actually change the BRDF used by specular/reflection lobes.

Ultimately, what I'm saying is there's limitation in RSL/RiSpec and DS that makes certain things impossible or just downright hard.

Wildly thinking here, but the best thing would be a USD export for DS. It will literally open up a lot of possibilities. Renderer options for one. There's also easier lookdev/scene management, not to mention you can just have more memory to the USD standalone/renderer.