Digital Art Zone

 
     
Free Genesis Morph
Posted: 16 September 2012 12:25 PM   [ Ignore ]
Power Member
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  1163
Joined  2006-04-16

Seems someBODY (don’t know who) decided to stamp down on Edson/Edmoso for creating THE BEST Megan Fox morph ANYWHERE. Thanks for that. Do you enjoy sucking the fun out of freebies?

 Signature 

Genesis is head & shoulders above “Genesis 2” (or better known as BF2/BM2) and is the FAR superior figure. Why? It doesn’t suffer from the UN-necessary gender split

My DeviantArt Page.

ULTIMATE SUPER-HERO FREEBIES!

The Supersuit product comes with a Basic Supersuit. DAZ has finally fixed it’s UV’s. Re-Download now to receive the update. Thanks DAZ! smile

Profile
 
 
Posted: 16 September 2012 01:16 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]
Addict
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  6487
Joined  2005-08-15



Stunning, thanks for posting this.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 16 September 2012 02:11 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]
Power Member
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  1163
Joined  2006-04-16

Anytime, Jimmy. smile

 Signature 

Genesis is head & shoulders above “Genesis 2” (or better known as BF2/BM2) and is the FAR superior figure. Why? It doesn’t suffer from the UN-necessary gender split

My DeviantArt Page.

ULTIMATE SUPER-HERO FREEBIES!

The Supersuit product comes with a Basic Supersuit. DAZ has finally fixed it’s UV’s. Re-Download now to receive the update. Thanks DAZ! smile

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 September 2012 05:37 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]
Active Member
Avatar
RankRank
Total Posts:  514
Joined  2009-01-14

seems to be gone from sharecg :(

 Signature 

my art: http://mototsume.deviantart.com/
or http://mototsume.webege.com/
freebies:  http://mototsume.webege.com/downloads.htm

Old Post Count: 1773

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 September 2012 07:47 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 4 ]
Power Member
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  1163
Joined  2006-04-16

Seems so. Edson, for some reason, decided to delete his entire gallery. :(

 Signature 

Genesis is head & shoulders above “Genesis 2” (or better known as BF2/BM2) and is the FAR superior figure. Why? It doesn’t suffer from the UN-necessary gender split

My DeviantArt Page.

ULTIMATE SUPER-HERO FREEBIES!

The Supersuit product comes with a Basic Supersuit. DAZ has finally fixed it’s UV’s. Re-Download now to receive the update. Thanks DAZ! smile

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 September 2012 11:27 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 5 ]
Active Member
Avatar
RankRank
Total Posts:  608
Joined  2012-02-07

All things considered, I wonder if it was Ms Fox herself/her lawyers.  I wonder where exactly the threshold is for celebrity morphs before they are considered problematic.

 Signature 

Black is Beautiful II - a repository of links and rendering tips for darker skinned characters

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 September 2012 11:32 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 6 ]
Member
Rank
Total Posts:  84
Joined  2007-08-24

Technically, they should be okay on fair use basis, and not for libel or slander against the person depicted.  It scares me that we’re not allowed that much anymore… =/;

Profile
 
 
Posted: 23 September 2012 11:40 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 7 ]
Addict
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  4545
Joined  2007-09-13

The problem is, once lawyers get involved, it doesn’t matter if there is a real case, most folks don’t have the resources to be able to fight it.

 Signature 

1432 old posts

My ShareCG gallery.

Just because something costs a lot, doesn’t mean it’s the best…

It just means it’s expensive.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 24 September 2012 12:01 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 8 ]
Active Member
Avatar
RankRank
Total Posts:  608
Joined  2012-02-07

A lot could be potentially assumed but no one would know unless it was explicitly noted.  When you think about it, a freebie maker would probably have more of a leg to stand on for a fair use argument than the vendors selling celebrity morphs.  It could also be as nitpicky as terminology.  If the morph was named after her character in the Transformers movies, it could have been Transformers/Hasbro sending a cease and desist since it might be considered copyright infringement at that point.

 Signature 

Black is Beautiful II - a repository of links and rendering tips for darker skinned characters

Profile
 
 
Posted: 24 September 2012 12:10 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 9 ]
Power Member
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  1390
Joined  2011-11-16
ZamuelNow - 24 September 2012 12:01 AM

A lot could be potentially assumed but no one would know unless it was explicitly noted.  When you think about it, a freebie maker would probably have more of a leg to stand on for a fair use argument than the vendors selling celebrity morphs.  It could also be as nitpicky as terminology.  If the morph was named after her character in the Transformers movies, it could have been Transformers/Hasbro sending a cease and desist since it might be considered copyright infringement at that point.

The character morph was indeed named for the movie character she portrayed, “Mikela”. Granted, given that Mikela is a typical female first name, it’s not subject to trademark (though “Mikela Banes” potentially could be). The combination of the face with the name, could have put up some red flags.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 24 September 2012 02:45 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 10 ]
Power Member
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  1176
Joined  2009-01-09
Ariaso - 23 September 2012 11:32 PM

Technically, they should be okay on fair use basis, and not for libel or slander against the person depicted.

Actually, not really. People—you, me, celebrities, whoever—have the right to control the use and distribution of their likeness for both commercial and noncommercial uses. Celebrities tend to have fewer grounds to object to the distribution of their image, since most are doing publicity for various and sundry things now and again, but there are some limits on what you can do.

There are a few exceptions to that general rule—if someone is taking a photograph of a large group of people at an event of some sort, and your face happens to be close enough to be distinguishable, you can’t stop them from releasing it. And when it has to do with actual newsworthy events, your rights of control are fairly limited; you can’t stop news photographers/videographers/artists from capturing and distributing your image if you’re arrested, since that’s a matter of public record, for example. But otherwise, something like a morph/image that’s deliberately aimed at capturing the likeness of a particular person, and then distributed—either for profit or otherwise—is the sort of thing they can go after you for doing. That’s why there are general and specific releases for photographer’s models and other such uses.

Not that I have any idea of the inner workings of the DAZ legal counsel’s office, but, for example, I suspect the amount of legal paper dealing with Reby Sky is truly staggering, since she’s based on a real person who participated in the creation process. Model releases would be the least of it.

The “Mikaela” morph could actually have gotten it from two different directions. Megan Fox and/or her representatives could have objected to the distribution of her likeness without consent—especially since it could possibly have been used for commercial purposes without her consent. (I assume the terms of the morph said that such uses weren’t allowed, but that wouldn’t stop anyone from actually doing that.) And, as noted, since it was using the likeness of Megan Fox and the name of her character from a specific film, the owners of that particular intellectual property could also have objected.

In general, for distributing a freebie, unless they’re feeling particularly vindictive—or unless the RIAA or MPAA are somehow involved, in which case you are terribly terribly screwed—unless they can demonstrate some particular sort of damage linked to that thing, they’ll probably just do a cease-and-desist. If you’re selling the likeness, all bets are off.

Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer, just someone who has had to do a horrifying amount of research into copyright law. Not legal advice. Your mileage may vary. Etc.

 Signature 

VWrangler at deviantArt (NSFW for some images; login required to view those)

Profile
 
 
Posted: 24 September 2012 05:32 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 11 ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  14030
Joined  2003-10-09

Locked. We don’t know why the freebie was removed, and shouldn’t speculate.

 Signature 

DAZ Studio Frequently Asked Questions

Index of free DAZ Studio scripts and plugins list

Profile