DAZ could even ask the people at ShareCG where they got theirs… the one that works via no obvious rhyme or reason to randomly select the number of stars it believes you probably intended to choose based on barometric pressure or regional field mouse population tallies, divided by the average rainfall in the Gobi dessert in June 1867… But they could also choose to leave out a comments box where you can write “Sorry I really meant to give you 9 stars not 2”, so PAs will think their products suck and become clinically depressed and highly despondent.
By the way… what does despondent mean? I this word I say I do no thin I know what it means…
I don’t think your idea is bad… I just don’t think a good chunk of the people out there would use it fairly or maturely…. that… and I’d like to at least see a few horrible bugs fixed before ANYONE touches anymore code.
Basically I’m not suggesting that it is like giving Antimatter pistols to chimpanzees…. it’s more like Rhesus monkeys with grenades… or dolphins with… ah… I don’t know, I’ve got a bad hangover….