Digital Art Zone

 
   
2 of 5
2
Plugin update status for DS 4.5
Posted: 17 August 2012 01:41 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 16 ]
Addict
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  5444
Joined  2005-08-29
Kerya - 17 August 2012 01:36 AM

Now to find out which ones I bought and have to reset.

Wish there was a “filter by category” in the Itemized History wink

 Signature 

=============================================
My DAZ Gallery  | The adventures of Lomund
Free RPG adventures for DnD, O:FR and more: http://4eyes.code66.se
Community Volunteer

Proud member of the Bald Wizards Club
I always look on the bright side of life, ‘cause I never expected the Spanish inquisition!

Profile
 
 
Posted: 17 August 2012 02:21 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 17 ]
New Member
Avatar
Total Posts:  12
Joined  2011-10-03

A better wish for the Itemized History would be that there was an UPDATED indicator if an item has been updated since purchase.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 17 August 2012 02:29 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 18 ]
Active Member
Avatar
RankRank
Total Posts:  287
Joined  2005-08-25

is reality plugin updated or do we have to wait till jan 2013 after the poser release?

 Signature 

DAZSTUDIO FUTURE REQUESTS - CLICK ME TO JOIN
Feel free to join, sign and vote for dazstudio future improvements.
(620 users and still counting up to 1000) would like to see improvements, and you?

What features would you like to see appear in dazstudio 5?

Profile
 
 
Posted: 17 August 2012 07:43 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 19 ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  13934
Joined  2003-10-09

My understanding was that Paolo intends to update Reality 2.x to work in 4.5, and that it’s Reality 3 for DS that will follow the release of Reality 3 for Poser.

 Signature 

DAZ Studio Frequently Asked Questions

Index of free DAZ Studio scripts and plugins list

Profile
 
 
Posted: 17 August 2012 09:54 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 20 ]
Power Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  2322
Joined  2011-11-16
acanthis - 16 August 2012 04:35 PM

... insisting that ...) plugin developers have to recompile and link their code..

This is common in software and is almost ‘always’ the case, be it MS, Apple, etc etc etc… It is unfortunately just the nature of the beast for many reasons. It is also why many people put off upgrading until the items they need are supported.

The other side of this is that eventually the older stuff is no longer supported and people get upset about that (me included at times,) but it is also just part of the nature of growth and change.

 Signature 

Just because I may have a strong opinion doesn’t make it any more (or less) correct than any other, just that I feel passionately a particular way at that moment.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 17 August 2012 10:00 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 21 ]
New Member
Avatar
Total Posts:  4
Joined  2003-10-09
Totte - 17 August 2012 01:41 AM
Kerya - 17 August 2012 01:36 AM

Now to find out which ones I bought and have to reset.

Wish there was a “filter by category” in the Itemized History wink

++
Or a search. I have 1023 items in that list and even with the maximum 50 items per page I need to go through 21 pages :(

EDIT: OK. I wasn’t paying attention there… It is at least in alphabetical order. This makes it somewhat quicker, though still somewhat awkward…

Profile
 
 
Posted: 17 August 2012 10:02 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 22 ]
Power Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  2322
Joined  2011-11-16

I copy the list to Evernote. It makes it fast to search through for any item. But, that just lets me find a given item. Version information could be handled much better unfortunately. Specifically, it would be nice if the order history automatically had a way to show what items you have downloaded that there is an update available for. We can only hope smile

Just saw Panther’s post… well I cast my vote for this feature as high priority, along with an installer which saves my preferences so I don’t have to keep putting them in every time, and that lets me batch install, preferably from 7z/rar files I’ve reorganized to my taste ;p

 Signature 

Just because I may have a strong opinion doesn’t make it any more (or less) correct than any other, just that I feel passionately a particular way at that moment.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 17 August 2012 10:36 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 23 ]
Moderator
Avatar
RankRank
Total Posts:  996
Joined  2007-10-17
acanthis - 16 August 2012 04:35 PM
FroschGott - 16 August 2012 04:15 PM

Sounds very good and is already downloaded, but will not be installed until at least Reality is updated.
I loved to play around with the first Betas and the possibility to connect to C8.5 but had to switch back to use my PlugIns.
Will there be a thread where those updates will be announced (no discussion, simply posting the actual updates)?
I am waiting at least for GenX and Reality until I can update.

100% agreed.  That’s exactly what is needed ... BUT ... this situation shouldn’t have arisen in the first place!


At this point 4.5 is just not useable for anybody who has existing 4.x plugins and this is a problem that I blame 100% on inept software development practices at DAZ. By insisting that, for every version released (whether it be a major build or point release) plugin developers have to recompile and link their code, DAZ have basically created an unsupportable product.


Sorry to everyone who worked hard on this build, but it’s true.

The only way to not have an SDK change and not require a recompile is to not advance and improve the software.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 17 August 2012 11:21 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 24 ]
Power Member
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  1581
Joined  2008-11-10
DAZ_Spooky - 17 August 2012 10:36 AM

The only way to not have an SDK change and not require a recompile is to not advance and improve the software.

Incorrect. There’s many software companies, such as Adobe, which has advances in software but you can still drop in filters and plugins from previous versions so people don’t lose their investments and time waiting for new versions of plugins… and hope the developer does update their plugins.

The software really needs to be written so that plugins, especially when they are calling the same methods that have not been depreciated, still run without needing recompilation. Things such as this speed adoption of software and allow for people to quickly upgrade; constantly recompiling and changing formats slows it down. The nature of your software is modular; as a software developer, there’s really no excuse for the constant changing and recompiling that DS does. Those plug in modules really need to snap in place and run, if those calls are still available to it.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 17 August 2012 11:49 AM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 25 ]
New Member
Avatar
Total Posts:  13
Joined  2012-04-28
Richard Haseltine - 17 August 2012 07:43 AM

My understanding was that Paolo intends to update Reality 2.x to work in 4.5, and that it’s Reality 3 for DS that will follow the release of Reality 3 for Poser.

He stated on the Renderosity forums that he is currently compiling and testing Reality2.5.  He just got the SDK yesterday, since there was no advance release of it.  So he has to compile 4 versions (32/64bit for Mac & Windows) and test them all to make sure they still work with new features such as instancing/group node/etc.

Since there is no change in the Reality2 software itself, other than to compile it for the new SDK, it should be out fairly quickly.

 

Profile
 
 
Posted: 17 August 2012 12:00 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 26 ]
New Member
Avatar
Total Posts:  13
Joined  2012-04-28
Totte - 17 August 2012 01:11 AM
WayOfTheSword - 16 August 2012 05:30 PM

You can load old files from 4.0 into 4.5.  I never had a problem with any of mine in 4.5rc3.  But once you save as as a .duf file, those cannot be loaded into daz4.0.

That’s because .duf was not implemented in 4.0. I agree on the plugin part, but I guess most will show up in a few days, shaders too, but duf is such a leap ahead, I cant say this enough, .duf is vital to make your own home render farm for DS, as long as you dont render using 3Delight standalone renders.

Yeah, I’m trying to figure out how I can work a couple of AMD machines with Radeon 7970’s into my budget, to have a mini-farm.  According to Tom’s Hardware review, they blow away even the new high end NVIDIAs for luxrendering. Add Vue and a couple rendercows to them and I think I could have a much faster workflow.

Oh, and my new avatar is proof that FaceGen still works fine with Daz4.5.  smile

Profile
 
 
Posted: 17 August 2012 12:07 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 27 ]
Addict
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  4533
Joined  2004-08-11

SDK for 4.5 is released already?  COOL beans!

 Signature 

    —- Wolff On The Prowl—-

Pan Project

Profile
 
 
Posted: 17 August 2012 12:50 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 28 ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  13934
Joined  2003-10-09
Male-M3dia - 17 August 2012 11:21 AM
DAZ_Spooky - 17 August 2012 10:36 AM

The only way to not have an SDK change and not require a recompile is to not advance and improve the software.

Incorrect. There’s many software companies, such as Adobe, which has advances in software but you can still drop in filters and plugins from previous versions so people don’t lose their investments and time waiting for new versions of plugins… and hope the developer does update their plugins.

The software really needs to be written so that plugins, especially when they are calling the same methods that have not been depreciated, still run without needing recompilation. Things such as this speed adoption of software and allow for people to quickly upgrade; constantly recompiling and changing formats slows it down. The nature of your software is modular; as a software developer, there’s really no excuse for the constant changing and recompiling that DS does. Those plug in modules really need to snap in place and run, if those calls are still available to it.

That’s semi true, but remember that Photoshop plugins don’t have much access to the internal methods, data and structures of PS - they pretty much get the current layer, its mask, and some memory to work in as I understand it. Plugins that do do more have often had to wait for updates before they will work in a new version of PS for that reason. The same is true for many other applications - plugins that re tightly integrated, or plugin architectures that allow tight integration, tend to be version-specific.

 Signature 

DAZ Studio Frequently Asked Questions

Index of free DAZ Studio scripts and plugins list

Profile
 
 
Posted: 17 August 2012 01:51 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 29 ]
Power Member
Avatar
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  1581
Joined  2008-11-10
Richard Haseltine - 17 August 2012 12:50 PM
Male-M3dia - 17 August 2012 11:21 AM
DAZ_Spooky - 17 August 2012 10:36 AM

The only way to not have an SDK change and not require a recompile is to not advance and improve the software.

Incorrect. There’s many software companies, such as Adobe, which has advances in software but you can still drop in filters and plugins from previous versions so people don’t lose their investments and time waiting for new versions of plugins… and hope the developer does update their plugins.

The software really needs to be written so that plugins, especially when they are calling the same methods that have not been depreciated, still run without needing recompilation. Things such as this speed adoption of software and allow for people to quickly upgrade; constantly recompiling and changing formats slows it down. The nature of your software is modular; as a software developer, there’s really no excuse for the constant changing and recompiling that DS does. Those plug in modules really need to snap in place and run, if those calls are still available to it.

That’s semi true, but remember that Photoshop plugins don’t have much access to the internal methods, data and structures of PS - they pretty much get the current layer, its mask, and some memory to work in as I understand it. Plugins that do do more have often had to wait for updates before they will work in a new version of PS for that reason. The same is true for many other applications - plugins that re tightly integrated, or plugin architectures that allow tight integration, tend to be version-specific.

However, that still doesn’t take away from plugins that access the same non-depreciated methods shouldn’t require recompilation. The sdk is the interface to the internal code of the program; so if a plugin is making the same calls there really isn’t a reason to recomplile unless there’s some new feature the plugin wants to take advantage.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 17 August 2012 02:07 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 30 ]
New Member
Avatar
Total Posts:  24
Joined  2004-05-16

I will download DS 4.5 but not installing. I will wait when (and if) all my plugins and shaders will be updated. Due to the tiring download finding procedure (over 3000 items on my itemized order history - DAZ should look to Renderosity or even better RDNA, in former times also DAZ had a great update service) it will last hours until i find and download them.
I donĀ“t think that there is a big advantage between DS4Pro and DS4.5Pro to endure the procedure of deleting the old one and installing the new without knowing if it works as well as the old one. Besides this it is always irritating when in just so short intervals arrive always new updates without compatible plugins (DS3, DS4, DS4.5)
DS4 works great, i will wait for future developments.

Profile
 
 
   
2 of 5
2