larsmidnatt - 29 November 2012 02:28 PM
Dogz - 29 November 2012 02:20 PM
probably because in reality that “SOOOOOO much” is actualy just “A bit”
Logistically speaking - I’d imagine you can hire real actors for much less than a bunch of Maya Licences, a team of 3d artists ,a render farm and big fat electricity bill. There would be no point.
The only reason I can see that someone would opt to make 3d porn (which i’d imagine is fairly low demand compared to the real thing) is that its very low cost to produce - thanks to the likes of Poser.
Yes to the just a bit piece.
Yes to the fairly low demand part. More demand for drawn porn than 3d porn for good reasons.
Yes to the part of the reason 3D porn exists is that 3D porn is cheaper to produce than getting good makeup artist to make the girl next door actually look like an elf, or the guy involved with her looking like a dragon/imp/troll.
Both drawn and 3d porn do a better job with the fantasy elements than using real folks.
I admit, my foray onto a site with a name similar to Renderosity’s was brief, but I would guess 3d adult entertainment is stalled by a few issues. The most important is not that most people don’t want 3d porn, but that most 3d porn is TERRIBLE. Terribly lit, terribly rendered, and terribly animated. (I’m not a fan of all the monster rape scenarios, either, but that’s a different kind of terrible.)
The problem is not a lack of morphs to expose V4’s bits. It’s that attention has been paid to that rather than to the things that make a good 3d render or film.
