Digital Art Zone

chohole - 01 December 2012 01:17 PM

Norse Graphics

You forgot to post a link to this article

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2236054/Online-porn-linked-half-child-sex-abuse-cases.html

I’m not sure that’s a meaningful statistic.  It’s hard to find real numbers, but I’m pretty sure the percentage of males with internet connections who look at porn on those connections approaches 300% (slightly fewer for women, who often prefer textual erotica).  That’s going to automatically include sex criminals.

Are we seriously using Daily Fail (insert your own favorite permutation of its name) as a source?

chohole - 01 December 2012 01:17 PM

Norse Graphics

You forgot to post a link to this article

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2236054/Online-porn-linked-half-child-sex-abuse-cases.html

Totally Irreliviant if you ask me, what exactly is the point they are making? are they suggesting that less children were suffering abuse prior to the existance of the internet? I sincerely hope not because that would be a laughable suggestion.
We do however, have alot more child protection laws in place now, and also thanks to the internet….we are catching these bastards alot more often. So thats a big fat double edged sword right there.
Yes, It might be a good informative artical, on the other hand it also might be fear mongering sensationalist garbage. (well…. it is the dailyfail)

When you here about something in the NEWS, that doesnt automatically mean it is something genuinely ’ NEW’, it could have been going on for centuries, but it either went undetected, nobody cared or it was too controversial for the public ...or a combination of all three.

Good flipping grief!  Sex Offenders have a pre-disposition to LOOK AT PORN?  Really?  No kidding.  Porn does not cause sexual abuse, and there is no evidence other than the idiot opinions of people who speak Psychobabble that says it does.

You should all be ashamed of yourselves.
Mom

tjohn - 01 December 2012 01:42 PM

You should all be ashamed of yourselves.
Mom

i think this thread needs an LOL Cat!

How we ended up with a ten page thread on the internet’s biggest industry is anyone’s guess. I’ve nothing real to add to the discussion except the old idiom ‘sex sells’. That said, I tend to keep my renders on the clean side simply because the minute you add naked images to your portfolio that’s precisely what most of your visitors will remember you for. Sad, but true.

HeraldOfFire - 01 December 2012 02:22 PM

How we ended up with a ten page thread on the internet’s biggest industry is anyone’s guess. I’ve nothing real to add to the discussion except the old idiom ‘sex sells’. That said, I tend to keep my renders on the clean side simply because the minute you add naked images to your portfolio that’s precisely what most of your visitors will remember you for. Sad, but true.

True.^

What bothers me the most is why on earth would DAZ make every joint on V4 work properly but then completely neglect her butt? It doesn’t make any logical sense. The texture stretching alone is extremely annoying.  Then they don’t even add extra geometry in case someone wants to fix their mistakes.

DAZ are you reading this? What the F man? Sorry, I’m just frustrated. My workload gets tripled because of this problem and I need to vent. Why here on this forum? Because DAZ made v4.2..

An almost 10 y o render of mine basically still on topic. And yes my gallery works that contain nudity get at least 3 times as many views as the rest.
I don’t make porn.
I’m not here to condemn those who do.

laksdfj - 01 December 2012 02:48 PM

DAZ are you reading this?

Not likely.  Your first mistake was promoting the Porn industry in your topic header.  If you were aiming to get DAZ to ignore what you want, you went about it in the right way.

I was Pm’ed regarding this thread I guess somebody noticed my fantasy size related porn LOL!  Some ppl do make it with live actors & actresses but the quality is inferior to what can be rendered.  Made some decent side coin selling commissions. Its not all porn I also make 500 render episodes. Been using the Luxrender since lat feb. Deviant Art is anal about porn even though they have strict adult content fighters. Makes me wounder what they are for? Hiding naked Manga drawings?  Flickr is ok as long as you apply the proper filters. I tweak most defects with PS.  I have the “all ages” edited versions on youtube and its doing not too bad…

tjohn - 01 December 2012 03:02 PM

An almost 10 y o render of mine basically still on topic..

@tjohn, LMAO at Renderboy! I remember trying to decide between Vicki 1/2 and Posette myself, pulling either of them up now makes me realize just how far we’ve actually come. I’m surprised you got them looking even that good back then.
NVIATWAS (Or NV anywhere with anything) still has to be the most popular type of render. Not as bad as back then though- although I blame all the NV’s then on people just not knowing how to make clothing yet, and decided naked was good enough for it instead

Damn.  I wanted to follow this thread to see where it went. 

And it’s going nowhere!

Gutted!