Digital Art Zone

 
   
1 of 2
1
What’s different between Poser and Daz Studio?
Posted: 17 November 2012 12:14 PM   [ Ignore ]
Addict
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2925
Joined  2010-11-30

I used to know the answer to the question in the subject line, but the state-of-the-art has changed, so…

What works in Daz Studio but doesn’t work in Poser?

What works in Poser but doesn’t work in Daz Studio?

What works differently in the two programs?

 Signature 

Rob Kelk (a.k.a. “the guy with all those freebie lists”)

Poser and Daz Studio Free Resources Wiki - rather small at the moment, but with big dreams to be the one-stop list for all D|S and Poser freebies

Come take part in the Freebie Challenge!

Profile
 
 
Posted: 17 November 2012 01:16 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]
Addict
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  4545
Joined  2007-09-13

The UI…

Under the hood, they are very closely matched feature-wise. Except for dynamics, Poser still holds that edge.

I’m sure there will be a lot of ‘but Poser can do this…nonny-nonny-boo-boo’ stuff, but really most of it falls flat, because things that are the usual items to pick on were available in DS, long ago, they just weren’t advertised and as such weren’t very well supported at the base level.

 Signature 

1432 old posts

My ShareCG gallery.

Just because something costs a lot, doesn’t mean it’s the best…

It just means it’s expensive.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 17 November 2012 02:54 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]
Addict
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2983
Joined  2004-04-14

DAZ Studio was designed to make use of Poser file types so even if certain products or freebies state they are not tested in DS, chances are they will still work.  Buyer beware and make sure you read everything carefully before purchasing (cause most of us haven’t!)

The Glossiness values between the two programs are always opposite of one another.  So a 0% in DS is the same as 1.0 in Poser and 100% in DS is 0.0 in Poser.
Spec map settings from one program is not read by the other. 
Bump maps are read but bump values are not.
All image maps in DS are tiled together.  Poser image maps can be tiled independant of each other.
The advanced features in the Poser Material Room do not translate to DS.  Shaders made from the Shader Mixer or Builder in DS do not translate into Poser.
If you are making something for use in both, make seperate material files, you will not be able to have an all-in-one for both.

Lighting from Poser does not translate into DS properly.

Dynamic Cloth does not translate between the two programs though you can use the dynamic cloth in the program its intended for and export it as an OBJ for use in the other program.

Poser Hair room hair cannot be used in DS.  The up comming “Look At My Hair” & “Garabaldi Hair” for DS will not translate into Poser as they rely on a RSL compliant render engine.  However, LAMH will export the hair model. (according to the author)

DAZ Studio will automatically render all normals forward so you do not see any gaps or holes in the model.  Poser does not by default but you can change that in the material room one surface at a time.

 Signature 

My DAZ3D Store
My Free Stuff
My Art @ DeviantART
Ships of the Line - MEGA THREAD
How to use the Poser Format Exporter - **Updated 2013-02-09**

Profile
 
 
Posted: 17 November 2012 04:21 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]
Addict
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  5232
Joined  2008-03-06

If you can get a trial version of Poser and some freebies for each and try them both, that’s probably the best way to see which you prefer.


My very subjective opinion is that Poser’s handling of cameras and lights is much more deft, but its renderer is more sluggish (I hate trying to do anything with Depth of Field in PP2012).  PP2012 and DS4.5 crash about the same frequency on my system, but it’s harder to tell when Poser has because its progress bar is less reliable about showing when it’s frozen.  It is easier to get a soft, real-feeling light setup with Poser Pro’s indirect lighting than with DS Uberenvironment.


Poser’s Material Room is much easier to get good shaders out of than DAZ Shader Mixer, if you’re talking about doing advanced shaders.  Shader Mixer is a bear to use.  Most people find the Mat Room easier to navigate initially, but with experience, equally good results for basic shaders can be achieved with the Surfaces tab.


DAZ cannot do dynamic strand hair at all (a plugin for strand hair seems to be in development).  Poser’s dynamic strand hair is migraine-inducing to work with, but it does exist.  Both have dynamics available in some form, but Poser’s cloth room is easier to use.


Both DAZ Studio 4.5 and Poser 9/PP2012 can use weight-mapped figures, which deform more realistically than the old .cr2 falloff zone figures.  DAZ Studio has the smoothing and collision mechanic, which can eliminate clipping without fixit morphs on most items.  Poser has no equivalent.  This right here is a pretty significant ding for me and also makes it harder for an artist to support Poser through the DSON system, because they’ll have to add more morphs to achieve the same functionality. 


Important weight-mapped figures include Genesis (DAZ), Alyson 2 (with Blackhearted’s Anastasia add-on, Smith Micro), Ryan 2 (with Blackhearted’s Tyler add-on, Smith Micro) and My Michelle (third party from RuntimeDNA, but with add-ons by Blackhearted as well).  Weight Mapped V4 and Antonia have their fans, but never took off with any real support.

 Signature 

My store at DAZ.

My Deviantart gallery.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 17 November 2012 04:55 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 4 ]
Active Member
Avatar
RankRank
Total Posts:  904
Joined  2005-11-06
SickleYield - 17 November 2012 04:21 PM

Poser’s Material Room is much easier to get good shaders out of than DAZ Shader Mixer, if you’re talking about doing advanced shaders.  Shader Mixer is a bear to use.  Most people find the Mat Room easier to navigate initially, but with experience, equally good results for basic shaders can be achieved with the Surfaces tab..

It has been my experience and also from what i have read on the forums that the material room in poser is a complete nightmare when it comes to advanced shaders. I haven’t tried any advanced ones in DS yet since I only use reality which deals with shaders thru it’s own interface.

SickleYield - 17 November 2012 04:21 PM

  DAZ Studio has the smoothing and collision mechanic, which can eliminate clipping without fixit morphs on most items.  Poser has no equivalent.  This right here is a pretty significant ding for me and also makes it harder for an artist to support Poser through the DSON system, because they’ll have to add more morphs to achieve the same functionality.  .

I have to agree with this. i have poser 2012 and DS 4.5 installed and DS just makes my work flow so much faster and the smoothing modifier is awesome!

To the OP, just try both apps and figure out what works best for you. if you ask others, you will get way to many different replies. The user interface of each has always been the biggest issue, with myself also, but once i took the time to figure out DS, it’s second nature now.

 Signature 

Regards, Michael

“Documentation? Who needs documentation, just open it and learn!”

My DeviantArt Gallery

My DAZ Gallery

Profile
 
 
Posted: 17 November 2012 05:29 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 5 ]
Administrator
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  16780
Joined  2003-10-09

Yes, as I keep saying it is very much a question of horses for courses.  Some of us prefer Poser and some of us prefer DS.

However that is not what Rob is asking, he wants to know what the differences are between the apps, what works in one and won’t work in the other, and so forth.

 Signature 

Chohole’s Space        NeilV’s Freebies and stuff        Winter Bryce Rendering Challenge        November Freebie Challenge
My DAZ 3D Gallery    11915

Profile
 
 
Posted: 17 November 2012 05:57 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 6 ]
Addict
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2925
Joined  2010-11-30
Mattymanx - 17 November 2012 02:54 PM

...
The advanced features in the Poser Material Room do not translate to DS.  Shaders made from the Shader Mixer or Builder in DS do not translate into Poser.
...

So shaders aren’t cross-compatible at all, or am I over-generalizing what you’re saying?

Can I use a pre-packaged D|S shader in Poser or a pre-packaged Poser shader in D|S?

SickleYield - 17 November 2012 04:21 PM

...
Both DAZ Studio 4.5 and Poser 9/PP2012 can use weight-mapped figures, which deform more realistically than the old .cr2 falloff zone figures.  DAZ Studio has the smoothing and collision mechanic, which can eliminate clipping without fixit morphs on most items.  Poser has no equivalent.  This right here is a pretty significant ding for me and also makes it harder for an artist to support Poser through the DSON system, because they’ll have to add more morphs to achieve the same functionality. 


Important weight-mapped figures include Genesis (DAZ), Alyson 2 (with Blackhearted’s Anastasia add-on, Smith Micro), Ryan 2 (with Blackhearted’s Tyler add-on, Smith Micro) and My Michelle (third party from RuntimeDNA, but with add-ons by Blackhearted as well).  Weight Mapped V4 and Antonia have their fans, but never took off with any real support.

Can both programs use the same weight-mapped figures, or is there still an incompatibility “under the hood”?

chohole - 17 November 2012 05:29 PM

Yes, as I keep saying it is very much a question of horses for courses.  Some of us prefer Poser and some of us prefer DS.

However that is not what Rob is asking, he wants to know what the differences are between the apps, what works in one and won’t work in the other, and so forth.

True - I’m happy with the Daz Studio interface and workflow and so far see no reason to change. But if there is something Poser can do that D|S can’t (other than dynamic hair - I don’t use dynamic anything), I might give it a try…

 Signature 

Rob Kelk (a.k.a. “the guy with all those freebie lists”)

Poser and Daz Studio Free Resources Wiki - rather small at the moment, but with big dreams to be the one-stop list for all D|S and Poser freebies

Come take part in the Freebie Challenge!

Profile
 
 
Posted: 17 November 2012 08:06 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 7 ]
Active Member
Avatar
RankRank
Total Posts:  904
Joined  2005-11-06

Rob, advanced shaders are usually not viable in both programs as each does things differently. As for weight mapped figures, there are some inconsistencies when using each one in both programs, so no, they don’t all work perfectly in both. Each app deals with weight mapping a bit differently.

Since you use DS, the main advantages of poser are the dynamics, the advanced shaders with some products and in general it’s easier to get better renders with firefly (out of the box), but with knowledge i have seen great things done with 3delight also. One plus for me, poser can import .3ds and LWO files which DS can’t which helps with importing many outside, non poserized objects and such

 Signature 

Regards, Michael

“Documentation? Who needs documentation, just open it and learn!”

My DeviantArt Gallery

My DAZ Gallery

Profile
 
 
Posted: 17 November 2012 08:25 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 8 ]
Addict
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  4545
Joined  2007-09-13
FSMCDesigns - 17 November 2012 08:06 PM

One plus for me, poser can import .3ds and LWO files which DS can’t which helps with importing many outside, non poserized objects and such

Yes, but with Hexagon (since it’s free, too) and the Bridge, 3ds are well within easy reach for DS (along with a couple others).

The two ‘main’ formats that one most commonly encounters are obj and 3ds, with lwo coming in at #3 (yeah, there are lots of .max files that won’t open in anything other Max, but many times they have at least one other format available…).

 

 Signature 

1432 old posts

My ShareCG gallery.

Just because something costs a lot, doesn’t mean it’s the best…

It just means it’s expensive.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 17 November 2012 09:25 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 9 ]
Active Member
Avatar
RankRank
Total Posts:  904
Joined  2005-11-06

Well aware of that mjc1016 since i use 3DSMax and have many other modelers installed, it is not a problem for me, but I always see posts with users trying to open a file format that DS does not import natively and some people don’t want to installed extra apps, especially for a file conversion. There is always a way, just pointing out the basics.

 Signature 

Regards, Michael

“Documentation? Who needs documentation, just open it and learn!”

My DeviantArt Gallery

My DAZ Gallery

Profile
 
 
Posted: 17 November 2012 09:30 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 10 ]
Addict
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  4545
Joined  2007-09-13

But I thought I’d point out Hex, since Daz, at least to start, was pushing the idea that DS, Hexagon and Bryce were a bundle…

 Signature 

1432 old posts

My ShareCG gallery.

Just because something costs a lot, doesn’t mean it’s the best…

It just means it’s expensive.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 18 November 2012 04:00 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 11 ]
Member
Rank
Total Posts:  89
Joined  2005-01-31

I am kinda new to this world, but for my experience the main problems I had is that content creators are kinda elitist with poser. You wont have problems if u buy from daz but if u buy from renderosity for example, most of files are always optimized for poser, the promotional images always look better the poser renders and its like SSS shaders are he best thing of the world and are just for poser, but michael 5 has SSS shaders and for what i see they work the same in my daz. It’s just like creators dont mind optimize the files for daz. Also u just have to look the lack of content for genesis till DSON importer appeared.

Said this once time u learn to tweak the files, mainly tweak the surfaces and build your own lights I find daz more versatale and i love the content manager and how i can organize things wich saves me lot of time.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 18 November 2012 04:47 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 12 ]
Addict
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  12167
Joined  2007-11-06

...If you are going to do a lot of clothing content design, this is where Poser tends to have the advantage because of it’s cloth and materials rooms. It also works better with third party design tools like Marvelous Designer which is a dedicated clothing modeller that also involves cloth dynamics.

If you are just set on using existing clothing content, Studio 4.5Pro has the Morph Transfer Utility which is a big step above Autofit since it will also handle footwear.  I’ve successfully translated a fair amount of Gen4 clothing to Genesis (even “cross-figure” in some cases), often with better results than the original conforming fits would do on the character the clothing was rigged for.  I agree that both Collision Detection and smoothing are very useful tools in this department.

If you already have a lot of Gen4 or (even Gen3) content, I’d also consider the GenerationX plugin (which lets one transfer basic and add on morphs from older supported figures to Genesis) as well as the various legacy “body shapes” for Genesis (the latter which are on sale through tomorrow as they are Daz Originals).

As I also discovered (somewhat by accident) 4.5 will also let you save a fully weight mapped version of an older figure as either Tri-Ax (which is the format Genesis uses) or “General” (which can be exported to Poser 9/Pro 2012).  The one downside of this however is the new figure becomes somewhat “exclusive” as the change in geometry will not accept most morph/character injections or texture maps after conversion save for the default ones.

 Signature 

...it’s five minutes to midnight…

I’d rather have a blue sky above me than a blue screen in front of me.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 18 November 2012 04:57 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 13 ]
Addict
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  5232
Joined  2008-03-06
Kyoto Kid - 18 November 2012 04:47 PM

...If you are going to do a lot of clothing content design, this is where Poser tends to have the advantage because of it’s cloth and materials rooms. It also works better with third party design tools like Marvelous Designer which is a dedicated clothing modeller that also involves cloth dynamics.


This is certainly true for dynamics.  Many of us are still unhappy that DAZ never released the method for making dynamics work with the program, effectively preventing users from creating their own.


With conforming clothes, on the other hand, the Transfer Utility is practically a Make Clothes for Genesis button and is a huge improvement over the old Figure Setup Tools, whereas rigging conformers in PP2012/P9 is hardly different from the clunky and inefficient methods of previous versions.

 Signature 

My store at DAZ.

My Deviantart gallery.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 18 November 2012 05:29 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 14 ]
Addict
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  12167
Joined  2007-11-06

...I actually transferred some K4 wear to my LeelaTeen.character (of course she does have a bit of “Basic Child” in her). 

What I am still impressed with though is that overall, clotyhing fits are so much better.  One of my favourite, yet frustrating clothing meshes to use for my Leela is the Teen Ashley top.  Never looked quite right as it would always distort in the chest area due to Leela’s more petite physique.  With the Transfer Utility and just a little tweaking, it fits like a charm and looks great.

 Signature 

...it’s five minutes to midnight…

I’d rather have a blue sky above me than a blue screen in front of me.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 18 November 2012 05:53 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 15 ]
Addict
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  2983
Joined  2004-04-14
robkelk - 17 November 2012 05:57 PM
Mattymanx - 17 November 2012 02:54 PM

...
The advanced features in the Poser Material Room do not translate to DS.  Shaders made from the Shader Mixer or Builder in DS do not translate into Poser.
...

So shaders aren’t cross-compatible at all, or am I over-generalizing what you’re saying?

Can I use a pre-packaged D|S shader in Poser or a pre-packaged Poser shader in D|S?

SickleYield - 17 November 2012 04:21 PM

...
Both DAZ Studio 4.5 and Poser 9/PP2012 can use weight-mapped figures, which deform more realistically than the old .cr2 falloff zone figures.  DAZ Studio has the smoothing and collision mechanic, which can eliminate clipping without fixit morphs on most items.  Poser has no equivalent.  This right here is a pretty significant ding for me and also makes it harder for an artist to support Poser through the DSON system, because they’ll have to add more morphs to achieve the same functionality. 


Important weight-mapped figures include Genesis (DAZ), Alyson 2 (with Blackhearted’s Anastasia add-on, Smith Micro), Ryan 2 (with Blackhearted’s Tyler add-on, Smith Micro) and My Michelle (third party from RuntimeDNA, but with add-ons by Blackhearted as well).  Weight Mapped V4 and Antonia have their fans, but never took off with any real support.

Can both programs use the same weight-mapped figures, or is there still an incompatibility “under the hood”?


DS will read the basics of Poser mat files so some of the info is applied to the model.  Poser cannot read a DS shader/mat file at all.

The two weight mapping systems are different.  I have not seen how weight maps are created in PP2012 so I cannot compare them to DS.  But they are different systems.

 Signature 

My DAZ3D Store
My Free Stuff
My Art @ DeviantART
Ships of the Line - MEGA THREAD
How to use the Poser Format Exporter - **Updated 2013-02-09**

Profile
 
 
   
1 of 2
1