Digital Art Zone

 
     
Petition to include version information in the file name.
Posted: 11 November 2012 05:53 PM   [ Ignore ]
Power Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  2322
Joined  2011-11-16

Version information is critical in knowing if what one has locally is up-to-date. Everyone should care about this. If you do, please post your wish here so perhaps DAZ might listen before the new naming convention is cast in stone.

 Signature 

Just because I may have a strong opinion doesn’t make it any more (or less) correct than any other, just that I feel passionately a particular way at that moment.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 11 November 2012 06:07 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 1 ]
Power Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  1708
Joined  2008-05-31

The new DAZ download manager is supposed to keep you informed about new versions, so it shouldn’t be such a big problem.

 Signature 
Tools for the DAZ store
Profile
 
 
Posted: 11 November 2012 06:10 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 2 ]
Power Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  2322
Joined  2011-11-16

I don’t know as yet how it works nor if it will work for me. I repackage all of my zip files so I don’t have to reorder things a second time if I have to reinstall. I know many people do this by watching the forums. How is the installer supposed to keep track of versions if we are repackaging things? There are too many ways this can break and including a version # in the file name is both simple and flexible. I really hope they reconsider.

 Signature 

Just because I may have a strong opinion doesn’t make it any more (or less) correct than any other, just that I feel passionately a particular way at that moment.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 11 November 2012 06:32 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 3 ]
Addict
Avatar
RankRankRankRank
Total Posts:  4545
Joined  2007-09-13

I’ve noticed lots (not all, by any means) of the newer stuff does have version info…something like ‘somenumber’_filename_1.x_’somecode’.exe/zip/etc, (code=dc/etc).

I assume all files start at version 1.0…

 Signature 

1432 old posts

My ShareCG gallery.

Just because something costs a lot, doesn’t mean it’s the best…

It just means it’s expensive.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 11 November 2012 06:43 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 4 ]
Active Member
RankRank
Total Posts:  544
Joined  2011-04-12
Taozen - 11 November 2012 06:07 PM

The new DAZ download manager is supposed to keep you informed about new versions, so it shouldn’t be such a big problem.

That will become an acceptable answer after the download manager is actually available.  It’s been “soon” for half a year now.

 Signature 

Not interested in the giant leap backwards that is “Genesis 2”.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 11 November 2012 06:59 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 5 ]
Power Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  1708
Joined  2008-05-31
Gedd - 11 November 2012 06:10 PM

I don’t know as yet how it works nor if it will work for me. I repackage all of my zip files so I don’t have to reorder things a second time if I have to reinstall. I know many people do this by watching the forums. How is the installer supposed to keep track of versions if we are repackaging things? There are too many ways this can break and including a version # in the file name is both simple and flexible. I really hope they reconsider.

The DAZ download manager should include a zip installer as well. I assume it will work with DS, not sure about Poser though.

Are you repackaging to get rid of the “content” folder?

In any case, is shouldn’t be a big deal to add version number to the zip file, e.g. like this:

IM00003835_010_the-heart-of-space.zip (version 1.0)
IM00003835_013_the-heart-of-space.zip (version 1.3)
IM00003835_115_the-heart-of-space.zip (version 11.5)

That format should be sufficient, easy to understand, and easy to parse programmatically.

So I’d vote for that.

 

 Signature 
Tools for the DAZ store
Profile
 
 
Posted: 11 November 2012 08:19 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 6 ]
Power Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  2322
Joined  2011-11-16

I’m repacking because I totally reorganize my files and don’t want to have to do it multiple times. Others do this as well as I have seen from forum posts. and they used to use vX.XX format which was fine.

My workflow when I get something is to install it to a separate folder, reorganize how I want it, then move to the main folder. I then zip the contents of the temp folder so if I have to reinstall that item again it’s as easy as double clicking on the zip folder and dropping the contents in the library. Actually, I also include the templates, a url to the item at DAZ, an image or images of item and any notes etc.. in the zip file and delete the now useless readmes (as they point to different locations then where I put things.) I happen to prefer having all of my cameras/lights in a subfolder of the site, textures as subfolders of the item they go to etc… My base sort is to have everything that came together, together. Then I can use categories and/or metadata to sort by other methods.

 Signature 

Just because I may have a strong opinion doesn’t make it any more (or less) correct than any other, just that I feel passionately a particular way at that moment.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 11 November 2012 08:28 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 7 ]
Power Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  1965
Joined  2005-04-15
Gedd - 11 November 2012 05:53 PM

Version information is critical in knowing if what one has locally is up-to-date. Everyone should care about this. If you do, please post your wish here so perhaps DAZ might listen before the new naming convention is cast in stone.

But that would be logical.  Logic is a little tweeting bird, chirping in a meadow.  Logic is a wreath of pretty flowers which smell baaaad.  - Norman 1, head of Store Programming, Mudd’s Magento Emporium, Ltd.

 Signature 

“And on the subject of bundles, exactly WHY does the M5 Pro Suite have a V5 DRESS and the Troll in it? Exactly what kind of “pro” IS M5?  Apparently one who likes to dress up in drag and go cruising down in the red light district of lower Middle Earth.”

Profile
 
 
Posted: 11 November 2012 08:32 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 8 ]
Power Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  2322
Joined  2011-11-16
Murgatroyd - 11 November 2012 06:43 PM
Taozen - 11 November 2012 06:07 PM

The new DAZ download manager is supposed to keep you informed about new versions, so it shouldn’t be such a big problem.

That will become an acceptable answer after the download manager is actually available.  It’s been “soon” for half a year now.

I would rather not have to rely on some piece of software when a simple vX.xxx in the filename would provide me the information I’m looking for personally.

 Signature 

Just because I may have a strong opinion doesn’t make it any more (or less) correct than any other, just that I feel passionately a particular way at that moment.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 11 November 2012 09:01 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 9 ]
Power Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  1708
Joined  2008-05-31
Gedd - 11 November 2012 08:19 PM

I’m repacking because I totally reorganize my files and don’t want to have to do it multiple times. Others do this as well as I have seen from forum posts. and they used to use vX.XX format which was fine.

My workflow when I get something is to install it to a separate folder, reorganize how I want it, then move to the main folder. I then zip the contents of the temp folder so if I have to reinstall that item again it’s as easy as double clicking on the zip folder and dropping the contents in the library. Actually, I also include the templates, a url to the item at DAZ, an image or images of item and any notes etc.. in the zip file and delete the now useless readmes (as they point to different locations then where I put things.) I happen to prefer having all of my cameras/lights in a subfolder of the site, textures as subfolders of the item they go to etc… My base sort is to have everything that came together, together. Then I can use categories and/or metadata to sort by other methods.

OK, that sounds like a good and (in the long run) time saving strategy. If only it could be automated, but that’s probably impossible.

 

 Signature 
Tools for the DAZ store
Profile
 
 
Posted: 11 November 2012 09:04 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 10 ]
Power Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  2322
Joined  2011-11-16

Actually it isn’t impossible at all if DAZ had a published standard they stuck to. A tool could be created to unpack, sort according to criteria and repack. The problem is, with the current state of disorganization in the way things are packed it is true, it cannot be automated in any reasonable fashion.

 Signature 

Just because I may have a strong opinion doesn’t make it any more (or less) correct than any other, just that I feel passionately a particular way at that moment.

Profile
 
 
Posted: 11 November 2012 09:52 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 11 ]
Power Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  1708
Joined  2008-05-31
Gedd - 11 November 2012 09:04 PM

Actually it isn’t impossible at all if DAZ had a published standard they stuck to. A tool could be created to unpack, sort according to criteria and repack. The problem is, with the current state of disorganization in the way things are packed it is true, it cannot be automated in any reasonable fashion.

I can only agree - but it’s not only a problem with DAZ, but with the whole 3D Content world (or a least the “discount” part of it).

 

 Signature 
Tools for the DAZ store
Profile
 
 
Posted: 11 November 2012 10:06 PM   [ Ignore ]   [ # 12 ]
Power Member
RankRankRank
Total Posts:  2322
Joined  2011-11-16

I have to say, DAZ has some great products at good prices. They do good QA on the products. They have great customer service and return policies. As many problems as they have with the site, it is better laid out then any of the others imo. Sometimes they don’t get enough credit for what they do right.

 Signature 

Just because I may have a strong opinion doesn’t make it any more (or less) correct than any other, just that I feel passionately a particular way at that moment.

Profile